Resection of an oropharyngeal venous malformation.

BACKGROUND: Venous malformations (VMs) are congenital vascular lesions caused by enlarged and ectatic venous channels. Current methods of treatment for VMs involve a combination of sclerotherapy, laser therapy, and surgical resection. While sclerotherapy remains the most commonly used treatment for small VMs, surgery remains an important tool for isolated VMs or larger VMs with higher flow due to potential local and systemic side effects associated with the use of certain sclerosing agents. METHODS/RESULTS: Here we present a case of a patient with a naso- and oropharyngeal venous malformation which was successfully resected with endoscopic-assisted transoral surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This is a low-fingerprint technique to tumors of the oropharynx with excellent visualization and maneuverability in cases where TORS is not an option. This technique does not require palate splitting or excessive retraction, allows multiple surgeons to work simultaneously, and is associated with significantly lower morbidity than transcervical techniques. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A.

Mixed gangliocytoma-pituitary adenoma in MEN1 syndrome: A case report and literature review.

Pituitary adenoma is one of the three most common neoplasms described in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1), and patients with pituitary adenoma occupies 30-50% of those with MEN1-related tumor. Mixed gangliocytoma-pituitary adenoma (MGPA) is a rare clinical entity in which gangliomatous cells are intermixed with adenomatous cells. This tumor has been estimated to account for 0.52-1.26% of all pituitary tumors. We report a rare case of MGPA in a patient with MEN1. A retrospective chart review was conducted on a patient with MEN1 diagnosed with MGPA in 2019 at a single tertiary academic medical center. A review of the literature was performed on MGPA and pituitary adenoma in MEN1. MGPA is rare, with only 174 cases previously reported in the literature and only three prior case reported in a patient with MEN1. There are multiple hypotheses regarding their pathogenesis, and it is unclear whether the MEN1 gene (menin) plays a role in the pathogenesis of MGPA. This tumor in MEN1 is a rare clinical entity of unknown etiology. Further studies are required with difficulty due to its low incidence.

Impact of Treatment Delay in Head and Neck Mucosal Melanoma on Overall Patient Survival.

Objectives Head and neck mucosal melanoma (HNMM) is a rare malignancy with high mortality. This study evaluates the impact of treatment delays on overall survival in HNMM. Design/Setting/Participants A retrospective review of patients with surgically managed HNMM treated with adjuvant radiation was performed from the 2004-2016 National Cancer Database. Main Outcome Measures Durations of diagnosis-to-treatment initiation (DTI), surgery-to-radiotherapy initiation (SRT), duration of radiotherapy (RTD), surgery-to-immunotherapy initiation (SIT), diagnosis-to-treatment end (DTE), and total treatment package (TTP) were calculated. Results A total of 1,011 patients (50.7% female, 90.5% Caucasian) met inclusion criteria. Median DTI, SRT, RTD, SIT, DTE, and TTP were 30, 49, 41, 102, 119, and 87 days, respectively. Only longer DTE was associated with decreased mortality (hazard ratio, 0.720; 95% confidence interval, 0.536-0.965; p = 0.028). Conclusion DTI, SRT, RTD, SIT, and TTP do not significantly affect overall survival in patients with HNMM who undergo surgery and adjuvant radiation. Longer DTE is associated with improved survival in this population. Level of Evidence 4.

Treatment of Stapedial Myoclonus as a Migraine-Related Phenomenon.

OBJECTIVE: To describe a case series of patients with stapedial myoclonus (SM) whose conditions improved after prophylactic migraine treatment. PATIENTS: We present seven cases of SM reported from a tertiary care neurotology clinic. All seven patients reported SM triggers similar to those of migraine headaches and suffered from concomitant headaches and/or vertigo, and were thus treated with a standard migraine protocol used at this neurotology clinic. INTERVENTION: Prophylactic migraine treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Reduction or resolution of SM. RESULTS: In this series, seven patients with SM were included. Six of seven subjects were male (86%), with a mean age at presentation of 44 years. Four patients noted significant improvement in their symptoms, with a reduced frequency, duration, and intensity of their symptoms with the migraine regimen. Three patients experienced complete resolution of SM with their migraine treatment. CONCLUSION: We report that treatment with prophylactic migraine treatment can provide long-term relief for patients with SM, which may suggest an etiological association between migraine and SM as well as a possible treatment for SM.

Triamcinolone Injection for Cochlear Implant Magnet Adherence Issues.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of triamcinolone injections in treating external magnet displacement in cochlear implant (CI) patients with adhesions problems of their processor. PATIENTS: We present seven CI patients with magnet adhesion issues who presented to our tertiary care neurotology clinic. None of the patients had a history of head trauma, postimplant MRI, or surgery in the head and neck other than the cochlear implantation. INTERVENTION: Triamcinolone 40 mg/mL injected subcutaneously at the CI magnet site. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Reduction of scalp thickness and successful magnet retention. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of seven patients (eight implant sites) of which five were overweight or obese. The temporoparietal scalp thickness measured on preoperative CT scans varied between 8.4 and 15.9 mm. Initial conservative measures such as hair shaving at the magnet site, using a headband, and increasing magnet strength failed in all patients. After receiving triamcinolone injections at the CI receiver site, six out of seven patients (seven out of eight CI sites) were able to use their processor again without the need for a headband for an average of 9.55 hours/day. The average number of injections required for each patient was 2.57 (SD = 2.18), median (range) = 1 (1-7). One patient required a flap thinning surgery but showed no improvement even after flap thinning. None of the patients showed skin irritation, breakdown, ulceration, necrosis, or magnet exposure during follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: The significant improvement in CI retention shows that triamcinolone injections are effective in making the subcutaneous tissue thinner and allowing magnet retention.

Diagnosis, Prognosticators, and Management of Acute Invasive Fungal Rhinosinusitis: Multidisciplinary Consensus Statement and Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations.

BACKGROUND: Acute invasive fungal sinusitis (AIFS) is an aggressive disease that requires prompt diagnosis and multidisciplinary treatment given its rapid progression. However, there is currently no consensus on diagnosis, prognosis, and management strategies for AIFS, with multiple modalities routinely employed. The purpose of this multi-institutional and multidisciplinary evidence-based review with recommendations (EBRR) is to thoroughly review the literature on AIFS, summarize the existing evidence, and provide recommendations on the management of AIFS. METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically reviewed from inception through January 2022. Studies evaluating management for orbital, non-sinonasal head and neck, and intracranial manifestations of AIFS were included. An iterative review process was utilized in accordance with EBRR guidelines. Levels of evidence and recommendations on management principles for AIFS were generated. RESULTS: A review and evaluation of published literature was performed on 12 topics surrounding AIFS (signs and symptoms, laboratory and microbiology diagnostics, endoscopy, imaging, pathology, surgery, medical therapy, management of extrasinus extension, reversing immunosuppression, and outcomes and survival). The aggregate quality of evidence was varied across reviewed domains. CONCLUSION: Based on the currently available evidence, judicious utilization of a combination of history and physical examination, laboratory and histopathologic techniques, and endoscopy provide the cornerstone for accurate diagnosis of AIFS. In addition, AIFS is optimally managed by a multidisciplinary team via a combination of surgery (including resection whenever possible), antifungal therapy, and correcting sources of immunosuppression. Higher quality (i.e., prospective) studies are needed to better define the roles of each modality and determine diagnosis and treatment algorithms.

Migraine Features in Patients With Isolated Aural Fullness and Proposal for a New Diagnosis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the presence of migraine features between patients with isolated aural fullness (AF) who meet the diagnostic criteria for migraine headache and those who do not, and to propose diagnostic criteria for migraine-related AF based on our results. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of patients presenting to a tertiary-care neurotology clinic between 2014 and 2020 with migraine-related AF. This was defined as isolated, prolonged aural fullness concurrent with migraine features once other etiologies were ruled out via examination, audiometry, and imaging. Migraine features were compared between patients meeting the diagnostic criteria for migraine headache and those not meeting the criteria. RESULTS: Seventy-seven patients with migraine-related AF were included. The mean age was 56 ±â€Š15 years and 55 (71%) patients were female. Eleven (14%) patients fulfilled the criteria for migraine headache (migraine group). Of the 66 patients who did not meet the criteria (nonmigraine group), 17 (26%) met 4/5 criteria, and 32 (48%) met 3/5 criteria, for a total of 49 (74%) patients. The migraine and nonmigraine groups were only different in 5 of 20 features, including family history of migraine (p = 0.007), sound sensitivity (p < 0.001), mental fogginess (p = 0.008), visual motion sensitivity (p = 0.008), and light sensitivity (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There are minimal differences in the overall prevalence of migraine features between patients with migraine-related AF who meet and do not meet the diagnostic criteria for migraine. Our findings suggest that the criteria may be too stringent and exclude many patients from potentially benefitting from treatment with migraine prophylaxis.