A comparison of 6-month outcomes between periacetabular osteotomy with concomitant hip arthroscopy to isolated hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement.

PURPOSE: To compare early outcomes of periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) with concomitant hip arthroscopy to isolated hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) and chondrolabral pathology using patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients scheduled for PAO with concomitant hip arthroscopy (PAO + HA) or isolated hip arthroscopy (HA) between the ages of 15 and 30 years old were prospectively included in the study. Based on power analysis, subjects were recruited until there were 22 subjects in the PAO + HA group. These subjects were then gender matched to the HA group. The PROMIS, with six subscales and two global health measures, were completed during preoperative and 6-month follow-up visits. One-way ANOVA was performed to compare intake information of age, symptom duration, body mass index, and Beighton scores as well as preoperative and 6-month postoperative PROMIS scores between the PAO + HA and HA. RESULTS: 22 consecutive subjects undergoing PAO + HA were all females (average age 20.0 years) and matched to 22 consecutive females (average age 22.6) in the HA group. ANOVA did not find a significant difference between the two groups when comparing intact information, with exception of age (p = 0.04). A significant difference was also not identified (p ≥ 0.05) between the two groups on preoperative or 6-month postoperative PROMIS scores. The largest difference in 6-month postoperative scores between the two groups was 4.4 points on physical function subscale. CONCLUSION: Outcomes at 6 months were not significantly different when comparing PAO + HA to HA for FAI and chondrolabral pathology in females under 30 years of age. The more extensive surgery with a prolonged protective period associated with PAO do not seem to negatively impact outcomes at 6 months when compared to HA. These finding support the use of PAO + HA, particularly if the patient and/or surgeon were concerned about prolonged disability, metal health issues, and/or higher pain levels that might be associated with the PAO procedure.

Substantial Loss to Follow-Up and Missing Data in National Arthroscopy Registries: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To report follow-up methodologies, compliance, and existing strategies for handling missing data in national arthroscopy registries collecting patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). METHODS: Annual reports, EMBASE, and MEDLINE were queried following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines to identify national arthroscopy registries reporting follow-up with a validated PROM and sample size greater than 500. Extracted data included weighted compliance in peer-reviewed publications, cumulative compliance throughout the time span of data collection, and missing-data methodologies. RESULTS: Nine national arthroscopy registries currently collect PROMs, with cumulative rates of follow-up ranging from less than 10% to more than 70%. We identified 36 publications from 5 national registries reporting hip and knee arthroscopies. The weighted mean compliance with PROMs in national registry publications was 56% at 0.5 years, 44% to 59% at 1 year, 40% to 61% at 2 years, 35% to 54% at 5 years, and 40% at 10 years. A missing-data analysis was reported or referenced in 58% of publications. CONCLUSIONS: In national arthroscopy registries, compliance with 2-year PROMs does not meet traditional follow-up thresholds of 60% or 80% and reporting of missing-data methodologies is inconsistent. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level II through IV studies.

Tenotomy for Iliopsoas Pathology is Infrequently Performed and Associated with Poorer Outcomes in Hips Undergoing Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article was to report prevalence of iliopsoas pathology in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), incidence of rendered tenotomy, and outcomes of hips with iliopsoas involvement compared with those with primary FAI. METHODS: A cohort study from a hip arthroscopy study group using a prospectively-collected multicenter database was performed. Patients who underwent isolated hip arthroscopy for FAI from January 2016 to March 2017 were assigned to the Iliopsoas group (defined as preoperative diagnosis of coxa saltans internus, intraoperative anteroinferior labral bruising or tear, and preoperative positive psoas injection) or control group. The prevalence of iliopsoas pathology, radiographic and intraoperative findings, and rendered procedures between groups were compared. Mean 2-year (minimum 1.8 year) outcomes of iliopsoas groups with and without rendered tenotomy and a control group were compared. RESULTS: There were 1393 subjects, of which 92 (7%) comprised the iliopsoas study group with 1301 subjects control subjects. Sixteen subjects in the iliopsoas group received tenotomy (17% of iliopsoas group, 1% of all subjects), whereas 76 subjects (83% of iliopsoas group) with iliopsoas involvement did not. There was significant effect on postoperative International Hip Outcome Tool-12 (iHOT-12) scores based on iliopsoas involvement and treatment, F(2,1390) = 3.74, P = .02. Compared with the control group (M = 73, standard deviation [SD] = 24), the non-tenotomized iliopsoas group (M = 69, SD = 32) had similar postoperative scores (P = .46), whereas the tenotomized iliopsoas group (M = 57, SD = 28) averaged lower postoperative scores (P = .03). In the tenotomy group, 25% achieved the iHOT-12 substantial clinical benefit and patient acceptable symptomatic state value for normal function and 100% satisfaction, compared to 49% and 41% for the without tenotomy and control groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tenotomy in patients with iliopsoas pathology undergoing arthroscopic surgery for FAI is infrequently performed and is associated with poorer outcomes. Co-afflicted patients treated without tenotomy have similar successful outcomes to patients with primary FAI. Indiscriminate tenotomy for iliopsoas pathology in this setting should be cautiously considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, cohort study.

Editorial Commentary: A-version to a Pain in the Butt-Structural and Dynamic Determinants of Posterior Hip Pain.

Ischiofemoral impingement is becoming a more recognized source of buttock pain that occurs as the lesser trochanter of the femur approximates the lateral margin of the ischium. Abnormal bony structure and alignment of the hip joint and/or faulty dynamic movement patterns may decrease the ischiofemoral space and compress the structures that are found within the space, including the quadratus femoris, proximal hamstring tendons, and sciatic nerve. The ischiofemoral space is reduced by structural factors including an increase in femoral anteversion and femoral neck angle. Dynamic assessment of the hip region may include the Craig test and total rotational range of motion of the hip joint, as well as the ischiofemoral impingement test and the long-stride walking test. The combination of structural and dynamic assessment of the hip region may help determine the presence of ischiofemoral impingement and direct appropriate management of the condition.

Unique Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool Based on Preoperative Level of Function.

PURPOSE: To define unique substantial clinical benefit (SCB) values for improvement on the 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) based on a preoperative self-rating of function in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for intra-articular pathology. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of prospective collected data on patients having hip arthroscopy for labral and chondral pathology and femoroacetabular impingement. On preoperative assessment and 1-year (+/-1 month) follow-up, subjects completed the iHOT-12 and a self-categorical rating of function ("severely abnormal," "abnormal," "nearly normal," or "normal"). Separate receiver operator characteristic analyses were performed for each preoperative categorical self-rating of function to determine unique SCB values for improvement-based changes in self-rating of function. RESULTS: Of 1034 eligible patients, 733 (71%) subjects met the inclusion criteria. Subjects consisted of 537 (73%) female and 196 (27%) male subjects with a mean age of 35.3 years (standard deviation 13). At a mean of 352 (standard deviation 21) days postsurgery, changes in iHOT-12 scores of 22, 28, and 27 points were associated with acceptable accuracy in identifying those who had an improved function rating when reporting a "severely abnormal," abnormal," and "nearly normal" rating on preoperative assessment, respectively. The accuracy of these SCB values in predicting improvement was different depending on the patient's preoperative rating of function. The accuracy of the SCB values in predicting improvement in those who had a "nearly normal" rating of function was not as accurate (area under the curve = 0.73) compared with those who had a "severely abnormal" or "abnormal" rating of function on preoperative assessment (area under the curve = 0.89; 0.89). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides surgeons with unique SCB values for the iHOT-12 based on a preoperative rating function and may allow for a more precise interpretation of score changes. SCB values of 22, 28, and 27 points on the iHOT-12 at 1-year (+/-1 month) follow-up identified those who had an improved function rating, when reporting a "severely abnormal," abnormal," and "nearly normal" rating on preoperative assessment, respectively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative study.

The Patient Acceptable Symptomatic State of the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool at 1-Year Follow-Up of Hip-Preservation Surgery.

PURPOSE: To determine the patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) cutoff score for the 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) for patients after hip-preservation surgery. METHODS: A multicenter hip arthroscopy registry containing deidentified patient data was analyzed to discriminate patients who achieved satisfactory results from patients who did not. Patients eligible for inclusion in the study were between 18 and 75 years of age, consented to undergo elective hip arthroscopy, and completed preoperative patient-reported outcome questionnaires. A receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine the PASS cutoff score for the iHOT-12 at 1 year after surgery based on the sensitivity and specificity of achieving satisfaction with surgery. A visual analog scale rating patient satisfaction 1 year after surgery was documented and compared between subjects who achieved the PASS score for the iHOT-12 and those who did not achieve it through an independent t test with an a priori α set at .05. RESULTS: A total of 647 subjects (66% women) aged between 18 and 73 years (mean, 36.5 years; standard deviation [SD], 12.0 years) were included in the study. A cutoff score of 75.2 for the iHOT-12 yielded a sensitivity of 0.91 and specificity of 0.81. Satisfaction averaged 89.5% (SD, 18.0%) for the patients with iHOT-12 scores greater than the PASS cutoff score versus 60.9% (SD, 30.61%) for those who did not achieve the PASS iHOT-12 score. CONCLUSIONS: The PASS cutoff score of 75.2 for the iHOT-12 establishes a "minimal" target score at which the patient is highly likely to be satisfied with the physical state of his or her hip joint at 1 year after hip arthroscopy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, case-control study.

Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for a Pain Visual Analog Scale After Hip Arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: To define minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) values for a pain visual analog scale (VAS) in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement or chondrolabral pathology. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of prospective collected data on patients having hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement and/or chondrolabral pathology. On initial assessment and follow-up between 335 and 395 days postsurgery, subjects completed a pain VAS and categorical self-rating of function. MCID was calculated using one-half the standard deviation (SD) of the change in 1-year pain VAS values. Receiver operator characteristic analysis was performed to determine SCB values. A change in SCB value was determined based on change in categorical self-rating of function to create "improved" and "not improved" groups. Absolute postoperative SCB scores were calculated to determine scores that would be associated with "normal" or "abnormal" function ratings. RESULTS: Of 1,034 eligible patients, 733 (71%) met the inclusion criteria, with 537 (73%) women and 196 (27%) men having a mean age of 35.3 years (SD 13). At a mean of 352 (SD 21) days postsurgery, 536 (73%) were in the improved group and 197 (27%) in the not improved group. MCID was -15.0 mm. A change of -22.7 mm on the pain VAS was able to identify those that improved with high sensitivity (0.74) and specificity (0.63). Values of ≤10.4 mm and ≥29.0 mm were cutoffs identifying subjects that rated their function as normal or abnormal, respectively, with high sensitivity (0.79 and 0.76) and specificity (0.88 and 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides surgeons with information to help interpret pain VAS values at a follow-up period ranging from 335 to 395 days with MCID and SCB values of -15.0 mm and -22.7 mm, respectively. Additionally, a patient who assesses a pain level at ≤10.4 mm is likely to have a normal rating of function, whereas a patient who assesses a pain level at ≥29.0 mm is likely to have an abnormal rating of function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, retrospective comparative study.

Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit Values for the 12-Item International Hip Outcome Tool.

PURPOSE: To define minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) values for the 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-12) in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for intra-articular pathology. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data on patients who underwent hip arthroscopy. On initial assessment and follow-up between 335 and 395 days after surgery, subjects completed the iHOT-12 and a categorical self-rating of function (severely abnormal, abnormal, nearly normal, or normal). One-half the standard deviation (SD) of the change in 1-year iHOT-12 scores was used to calculate the MCID. Receiver operator characteristic analysis was performed to determine SCB values. A change in SCB value was determined based on an improvement in the categorical rating of function. Absolute postoperative SCB scores were calculated to determine scores that would be associated with normal function ratings or with abnormal or severely abnormal function ratings. RESULTS: Of 1,034 eligible patients, 733 (71%) met the inclusion criteria. The subjects consisted of 537 female patients (73%) and 196 male patients (27%), with a mean age of 35.3 years (SD, 13 years). At a mean of 352 days (SD, 21 days) after surgery, 536 patients (73%) were in the "improved" group and 197 (27%) were in the "not improved" group. The MCID was 13 points. An SCB change score of 28 points was able to identify patients who improved with high sensitivity (0.79) and specificity (0.72). Scores of 86 points or greater and 56 points or less were the cutoff values found to identify subjects who rated their function as normal and abnormal, respectively, with high sensitivity (0.74 and 0.90, respectively) and specificity (0.82 and 0.86, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides information to help interpret iHOT-12 scores for a follow-up period ranging between 335 and 395 days with MCID and SCB values of 13 and 28 points, respectively. In addition, a vpatient who scored 86 points or better was likely to have a normal rating of function, whereas a patient with a score of 56 points or less was likely to have an abnormal rating of function. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Accuracy of 3 Clinical Tests to Diagnose Proximal Hamstrings Tears With and Without Sciatic Nerve Involvement in Patients With Posterior Hip Pain.

PURPOSE: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the active hamstring test at 30° (A-30) and 90° (A-90) of knee flexion, the long stride heel strike (LSHS) test, and combination of the 3 tests for individuals with hamstring tendon tears, with and without sciatic nerve involvement. METHODS: A retrospective review of 564 consecutive clinical records identified 42 subjects with a mean age of 50.31 ± 15 years who underwent a standard physical examination prior to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluation and diagnostic injection for posterior hip. The physical examination included the A-30, A-90, and LSHS tests. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio were calculated to determine the diagnostic accuracy of these 3 tests. RESULTS: Forty-two subjects (female = 32 and male = 10) with a mean age of 50.31 years (range 15-77, ± SD 14.52) met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. Based on MRI and/or injection, 64.28% (27/42) of subjects were diagnosed with hamstring tear. Fourteen (51.85%) presented with sciatic nerve involvement. The sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio for each test were as follows: A-30 knee flexion: 0.73, 0.97, 23.43, 0.28, and 84.73; A-90 knee flexion: 0.62, 0.97, 20.00, 0.39, and 51.67; LSHS: 0.55, 0.73, 2.08, 0.61, and 3.44. The most accurate findings were obtained when the results of the A-30 and A-90 were combined, with sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio of 0.84, 0.97, 26.86, 0.17, and 161.89, respectively. CONCLUSION: The combination of the active hamstring A-30 and A-90 tests proved to be a highly accurate and valuable tool to diagnose proximal hamstring tendons tears with or without sciatic nerve involvement in subjects presenting with posterior hip pain. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

Ischiofemoral impingement: defining the lesser trochanter-ischial space.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to define changes in the ischial-lesser trochanteric space associated with medial and lateral hip rotation in neutral and 10° of extension and adduction. METHODS: Twenty-five hip joints from 14 embalmed cadavers (7 males and 7 females) were used for this study. The pelvic region of each cadaver was skeletonized, and the hip capsule released distally. With the hip joint in 0° flexion-extension/abduction-adduction, the distance between the lesser trochanter and ischium was measured in: neutral rotation, 40° medial rotation, and 60° lateral rotation. A one-way ANOVA with post hoc analysis determined the difference in the ischiofemoral space in these three positions. An additional position was then tested by laterally rotating the femur with the hip joint positioned in 10° extension and adduction. RESULTS: The average distance between the lesser trochanter and ischium was different (p < .0005) in neutral rotation, 40° medial rotation, and 60° lateral rotation at 2.8 cm (SD 1.1), 4.3 cm (SD 1.2), and 1.4 cm (SD 0.7), respectively. With the hip joint laterally rotated from a starting position of 10° extension and adduction, 21 of 25 (84 %) hips made contact between the lesser trochanter and ischium at an average position of 29° (SD 20) of lateral rotation. CONCLUSIONS: The lesser trochanter is closest to the ischium in lateral rotation and is furthest away in medial rotation when the hip is in neutral flexion-extension/abduction-adduction. The lesser trochanter approximates the ischium when the hip is laterally rotated in 10° extension and adduction. The information gained through this investigation helps to define the pathomechanics associated with ischiofemoral impingement and validate clinical tests to diagnose ischiofemoral impingement.

Accuracy of 2 Clinical Tests for Ischiofemoral Impingement in Patients With Posterior Hip Pain and Endoscopically Confirmed Diagnosis.

PURPOSE: To establish the accuracy of the long-stride walking (LSW) and ischiofemoral impingement (IFI) tests for diagnosing IFI in patients whose primary symptom is posterior hip pain. METHODS: Confirmed IFI cases and cases in which IFI had been ruled out were identified considering imaging, injections, and endoscopic assessment, combined with pain relief and negative IFI-specific tests after treatment. Demographic data, duration of symptoms, pain location, ischiofemoral space, quadratus femoris space, quadratus femoris edema, surgical findings, and visual analog scale score for pain before and after treatment were computed for all patients included in this study. Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, likelihood ratios, and diagnostic odds ratios were computed individually for the LSW test and IFI test. RESULTS: Cases from 1,166 consecutive hip operations and charts from 564 consecutive outpatients were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent injection and/or endoscopic surgery because of posterior hip pain. Thirty individuals (21 women and 9 men) with a mean age of 49.8 years (range, 20 to 76 years; standard deviation, 13.0 years) were included for analysis. Of the 30 patients, 17 (56.6%) were confirmed as positive for IFI and 13 (43.4%) were confirmed as negative for IFI. The IFI test had a sensitivity of 0.82, specificity of 0.85, positive predictive value of 0.88, negative predictive value of 0.79, positive likelihood ratio of 5.35, negative likelihood ratio of 0.21, and diagnostic odds ratio of 25.6. The LSW test had a sensitivity of 0.94, specificity of 0.85, positive predictive value of 0.89, negative predictive value of 0.92, positive likelihood ratio of 6.12, negative likelihood ratio of 0.07, and diagnostic odds ratio of 88.8. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with complaints of posterior hip pain and negative evaluation findings for lumbosacral spine involvement or static/dynamic mechanical axis malalignment, the IFI and LSW tests are highly accurate to help identify those with or without IFI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, diagnostic study.

The effect of Astym® Therapy on muscle strength: a blinded, randomized, clinically controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Astym(®) therapy is a manual therapy intervention used to stimulate tissue healing, decrease pain, improve mobility, and improve muscle performance associated with musculoskeletal pathology. The purpose of this study was to determine if Astym therapy administered to the lower extremity would result in an immediate change of maximal force output during a unilateral isometric squat test among individuals with a lower extremity injury. METHODS: Forty-five subjects (14 males; 31 females) between 18 and 65 years of age were randomized into 3 treatment groups: 1) Control group - received no treatment 2) Placebo group - received a sham Astym treatment 3) Astym therapy group- received Astym therapy to the lower extremity. A baseline measure of maximal force output (pre-test) during a unilateral isometric squat was performed. The subjects then received the designated treatment intervention. Immediately following the treatment intervention, maximal force output (post-test) was retested using identical testing procedures by an investigator who was blinded to the treatment intervention received by the subjects. The percent change of maximal force output from pre-test to post-test measures was compared using a one-way analysis of variance. A Tukey's post-hoc analysis determined the statistical differences between the groups. RESULTS: The treatment intervention had a significant effect on the percent change of maximal force output [F(2,42) = 7.91, p = 0.001]. Tukey's post hoc analysis demonstrated that the percent change of maximal force output was significantly greater in the Astym group (15 ± 18 % change of Newtons) compared to the placebo (-6 ± 11 % change of Newtons; p = 0.0001) and control (-1 ± 17 % change of Newtons; p = 0.0014) groups. No significant difference (p = 0.68) was noted between the control and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Astym therapy to the involved lower extremity increased maximum force output during an isometric squat test immediately following treatment. The results of this study suggest that Astym therapy can immediately improve muscle performance (maximal force output) for patients presenting with muscular weakness caused by a lower extremity musculoskeletal injury. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02349230. Registered 23 January 2015.

Transcultural adaptation of the Korean version of the Hip Outcome Score.

PURPOSE: The Hip Outcome Score (HOS) is a questionnaire commonly used to assess the clinical outcome of patients after hip arthroscopy. However, a Korean version of the HOS is not available. The aim of this study was to translate and adapt the HOS questionnaire into the Korean language and then assess the psychometric properties of this instrument. METHODS: Translation and transcultural adaptation of the HOS into Korean (HOS-K) was performed in accordance with the international recommendations. Sixty patients (mean age 38.4 years) planning hip arthroscopy participated in evaluating the psychometric properties of the HOS-K. Psychometric analyses consisted of assessing for the following: (1) floor/ceiling effects, (2) internal consistency using Cronbach's alpha, (3) test-retest reliability over 2-3 weeks with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), (4) convergent validity by correlation with the SF-36 and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), (5) construct validity by assessing for a difference in HOS-K scores based on a rating of hip function, and (6) responsiveness with a change in score over a 6-month period. RESULTS: The English version of the HOS was translated and adapted to Korean without notable discrepancies. The HOS-K scores were reliable with ICC of 0.946 for the activities of daily living (ADL) subscale and 0.929 for the sports subscale. Internal consistency was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha >0.90 for both subscales. Both subscales had a strong correlation to the five subscales of SF-36, except the general health subscale. The ADL subscale showed strong correlations with all the subscales of the HOOS, and sports subscale showed strong correlations with all subscales of the HOOS, except the symptom subscales of HOOS. The HOS-K also demonstrated evidence for responsiveness without floor and ceiling effects. CONCLUSION: The HOS-K can be recommended as an outcome instrument in hip arthroscopy for Korean-speaking individuals. Surgeons can use the HOS-K to evaluate the outcome of hip arthroscopy in Korea. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic case series with no comparison group, Level IV.

Function of the ligamentum teres in limiting hip rotation: a cadaveric study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this cadaveric study was to evaluate the function of the ligamentum teres (LT) in limiting hip rotation in 18 distinct hip positions while preserving the capsular ligaments. METHODS: Twelve hips in 6 fresh-frozen pelvis-to-toes cadaveric specimens were skeletonized from the lumbar spine to the distal femur, preserving only the hip ligaments. Hip joints were arthroscopically accessed through a portal located between the pubofemoral and iliofemoral ligaments to confirm the integrity of the LT. Three independent measurements of hip internal and external rotation range of motion (ROM) were performed in 18 defined hip positions of combined extension-flexion and abduction-adduction. The LT was then arthroscopically sectioned and rotation ROM reassessed in the same positions. A paired sample t test was used to compare the average internal and external hip rotation ROM values in the intact LT versus resected conditions in each of the 18 positions. P < .0014 was considered significant. RESULTS: A statistically significant influence of the LT on internal or external rotation was found in 8 of the 18 hip positions tested (P < .0014). The major increases in internal and external rotation ROM occurred when the hip was in 90° or 120° of flexion. CONCLUSIONS: The major function of the LT is controlling hip rotation. The LT functions as an end-range stabilizer to hip rotation dominantly at 90° or greater of hip flexion, confirming its contribution to hip stability. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Ruptures of the LT contribute to hip instability dominantly in flexed hip positions.

Diagnostic accuracy of clinical tests for sciatic nerve entrapment in the gluteal region.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the straight leg raise (SLR), active piriformis, and seated piriformis stretch tests in identifying individuals with sciatic nerve entrapment. METHODS: Thirty-three individuals (female = 25 and male = 8) with a mean age of 43 years (range 15-64; SD ± 11 years) were included in the study. Twenty-three subjects had endoscopic findings of sciatic nerve entrapment. Ten subjects without entrapment during endoscopic assessment were used as a control group. The results of the SLR, active piriformis, and seated piriformis stretch tests were retrospectively reviewed for each subject and compared between both groups. The accuracy of these tests for the endoscopic finding of sciatic nerve entrapment was determined by calculating the sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio. RESULTS: The SLR had sensitivity of 0.15, specificity of 0.95, positive likelihood ratio of 3.20, negative likelihood ratio of 0.90, and diagnostic odds ratio of 3.59. The active piriformis test had sensitivity of 0.78, specificity of 0.80, positive likelihood ratio of 3.90, negative likelihood ratio of 0.27, and diagnostic odds ratio of 14.40. The seated piriformis stretch test had sensitivity of 0.52, specificity of 0.90, positive likelihood ratio of 5.22, negative likelihood ratio of 0.53, and diagnostic odds ratio of 9.82. The most accurate findings were obtained when the results of the active piriformis test and seated piriformis stretch test were combined, with sensitivity of 0.91, specificity of 0.80, positive likelihood ratio of 4.57, negative likelihood ratio of 0.11, and diagnostic odds ratio of 42.00. CONCLUSIONS: The active piriformis and seated piriformis stretch tests can be used to help identify patients with and without sciatic nerve entrapment in the deep gluteal region.

Clinically most relevant psychometric properties of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To systematically review and summarize the literature on minimal detectable change (MDC) and minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values for the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS). METHODS: The databases that were searched included PubMed, Embase, Medline, and CINAHL, from database inception to August 2023. The inclusion criteria were studies that examined the MDC or MCID of the LEFS in various patient populations and languages. The data extracted included information regarding test-retest reliability, MDC, MCID, and the intervals between assessments. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies defined MDC and five studies MCID values for the LEFS. They review reported a wide range of MDC values, spanning 11 language versions and a variety of diagnoses, with testing intervals ranging from 1 day to 12 months. MCID values were defined with corresponding area under curve, specificity, and sensitivity metrics for three language versions and a variety of diagnoses across timeframes from 4 weeks to 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: The review defined MDC and MCID values that can be applied in clinical practice for the LEFS across a variety of timeframes, diagnoses, and languages. The findings of this study allow clinicians use the identified MDC and MCID values of the LEFS when interpreting clinical outcome data.

The systematic review identified 24 studies on the minimal detectable change (MDC) and five on the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) across different timeframes, diagnoses, and language versions that can be applied in clinical practice.Clinicians can use the MDC and MCID values of the LEFS to make decisions regarding changes in patient scores over time.Clinicians should be cautious about interpreting the MDC and MCID values contextually, considering factors such as language, timeframe, and specific diagnoses.

Distal Radius Fracture Rehabilitation.

Distal radius fracture (DRF) is arguably the most common upper extremity fracture resulting from a fall accident. These clinical practice guidelines (CPG) were developed to guide all aspects of the management of DRF by physical therapists and other rehabilitation practitioners, such as certified hand therapists. This CPG employed a systematic review methodology to locate, appraise, and synthesize contemporary evidence while developing practice recommendations for determining the prognosis of outcomes, examination, and interventions while managing individuals with DRF. The quality of the primary studies found in the literature search was appraised using standardized tools. The strength of the available evidence for a particular practice domain (e.g., prognosis or intervention) was graded as strong, moderate, weak, or conflicting, where such gradings guided the level of obligation for each practice recommendation. Lastly, the CPG also provided the gaps in the evidence pool for the rehabilitation of DRF that future research efforts can address. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2024;54(9):CPG1-CPG78. doi:10.2519/jospt.2024.0301.

A cadaveric model for ligamentum teres function: a pilot study.

PURPOSE: Despite the prevalence and clinical consequences of ligamentum teres pathology, its function is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to help define the role the ligamentum teres may have in hip joint stabilization and determine whether a ball and string model could be used to describe the function of the ligamentum teres. METHODS: Eight embalmed cadavers were dissected to remove all soft tissue from around the hip, leaving only the ligamentum teres intact. Available hip abduction, adduction, medial rotation, and lateral rotation range of motion were measured for three repeated trials. The position of the ligamentum teres in relation to the femoral head was recorded at the endpoint position of these movements. RESULTS: An endpoint position as limited by the ligamentum teres for abduction, medial rotation, and lateral rotation was identified at a mean of 73°(SD 11°), 64°(SD 11°), and 58°(SD 10°), respectively. Hip adduction was limited by bony contact and therefore was not measured. The ligamentum teres wrapped around the femoral head to prevent inferior, posterior, and anterior subluxation with abduction, medial rotation, and lateral rotation, respectively. Repeated measures ANOVA indicated no significant difference in endpoint position based on trial number for the three movements (n.s.). CONCLUSION: The ligamentum teres consistently tightened to limit hip abduction, medial rotation, and lateral rotation. These results support a ball and string model for the femoral head and ligamentum teres. This information could be important for those with hip instability and ligamentum teres pathology.

Function of the ligamentum teres during multi-planar movement of the hip joint.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe the orientation of the ligamentum teres and quantify the limb position when the ligamentum teres reached its endpoint during a simulated squat position in human cadavers. METHODS: Dissection of eight (4 male; 4 female) cadavers resulted in the complete removal of all soft tissue attachment of the femur to the acetabulum, leaving only the ligamentum teres intact. The limb was then moved into combined flexion and abduction of the hip joint to simulate a deep squat position until a ligamentous endpoint of the ligamentum teres was achieved. The orientation of the ligamentum teres in relation to the femoral head was described and the position of the limb relative to the sagittal plane (flexion) and frontal plane (abduction) was quantified. The mean, standard deviation, 95 % confidence intervals, and standard error of the measurement were calculated for the observed angles. RESULTS: Multi-planar movement of flexion and abduction moved the ligamentum teres into an anterior/inferior position relative to the femoral head and prevented the femoral head from anterior/inferior subluxation. The ligamentum teres endpoint was obtained at a combined average position of 100.6° (range 94°-112°; SD 5.5º; 95 % CI 96º-105º) and 20.0° (range 12°-32°; SD 7.0º; 95 % CI 14º-26º) flexion and abduction angle. CONCLUSIONS: The ligamentum teres formed a "sling-like" structure to support the femoral head inferiorly as the hip joint was moved into a combined position of flexion and abduction that resembled a squat position. The results help to define a possible role of the ligamentum teres in hip joint stability and possible mechanisms of injury.

Isometric strength ratios of the hip musculature in females with patellofemoral pain: a comparison to pain-free controls.

The purpose of the study was to compare hip agonist-antagonist isometric strength ratios between females with patellofemoral pain (PFP) syndrome and pain-free control group. One hundred and twenty females between 15 and 40 years of age (control group: n = 60; PFP group: n = 60) participated in the study. Hip adductor, abductor, medial rotator, lateral rotator, flexor, and extensor isometric strength were measured using a hand-held dynamometer. Comparisons in the hip adductor/abductor and medial/lateral rotator and flexor/extensor strength ratios were made between groups using independent t-tests. Group comparisons also were made between the anteromedial hip complex (adductor, medial rotator, and flexor musculature) and posterolateral hip complex (abductor, lateral rotator, and extensor musculature). On average, the hip adductor/abductor isometric strength ratio in the PFP group was 23% higher when compared with the control group (p = 0.01). The anteromedial/posterolateral complex ratio also was significantly higher in the PFP group (average 8%; p = 0.04). No significant group differences were found for the medial/lateral rotator ratio and flexor/extensor strength ratios. The results of this study demonstrate that females with PFP have altered hip strength ratios when compared with asymptomatic controls. These strength imbalances may explain the tendency of females with PFP to demonstrate kinematic tendencies that increase loading on the patellofemoral joint (i.e., dynamic knee valgus).