Increased toxicity of high-dose furosemide versus low-dose dopamine in the treatment of refractory congestive heart failure.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of low-dose dopamine, high-dose furosemide, and their combination in the treatment of refractory congestive heart failure. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients with refractory congestive heart failure were randomized to receive intravenous low-dose (4 micrograms/kg/min) dopamine combined with low-dose (80 mg/day) oral furosemide (group A; n = 7), intravenous low-dose dopamine with medium-dose furosemide (5 mg/kg/day through continuous intravenous administration; group B; n = 7), or high-dose furosemide (10 mg/kg/day through continuous intravenous administration; group C; n = 6). RESULTS: The three groups showed similar improvement in signs and symptoms of congestive heart failure, urinary output (2506 +/- 671 ml/24 hr, mean +/- SD) and weight loss (3.3 +/- 2.3 kg) after 72 hours of therapy. Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) decreased by 14% +/- 8% and 15% +/- 6% in groups B and C, respectively, but increased by 4% +/- 15% in group A (p = 0.017). Renal function deteriorated significantly in groups B and C: creatinine clearance decreased by 41% +/- 23% and 42% +/- 23%, respectively, but increased by 14% +/- 35% in group A (p = 0.0074). MAP decrease was positively correlated with the decrease in creatinine clearance (r = 0.7; p = 0.0007). Patients in group B and C had more hypokalemia than group A. Two patients in group C sustained acute oliguric renal failure and one patient in group B died suddenly while sustaining severe hypokalemia. CONCLUSION: Combined low-dose intravenous dopamine and oral furosemide have similar efficacy but induce less renal impairment and hypokalemia than higher doses of intravenous furosemide taken either alone or with low-dose dopamine. The renal impairment induced by intravenous furosemide is probably related to its hypotensive effect in patients with refractory congestive heart failure.

High-dose nitrates in the immediate management of unstable angina: optimal dosage, route of administration, and therapeutic goals.

Nitrates are commonly used for rapid relief of ischemia in the initial management of unstable angina. However, their optimal dosage, route of administration, and therapeutic goals have not been fully established. This study was conducted to determine the optimal dosage and mode of administration (intravenous bolus versus sublingual spray) of nitrates and the therapeutic goals of their use in the immediate management of unstable angina. In a single-center prospective trial, 72 consecutive patients with unstable angina accompanied by typical ST-segment depression on electrocardiogram were randomly assigned to receive isosorbide dinitrate either as repeated intravenous boluses or as sublingual sprays while being delivered to the hospital by a mobile intensive care unit. Optimal nitrate dosage was tailored to pain relief while monitoring mean blood pressure reduction to an optimal range (5% to 20%) without dosage restriction. The mean nitrate dosage needed for ischemia control during the first hour of treatment was 7.8 +/- 3.8 mg. Optimal blood pressure reduction was achieved by significantly more intravenously treated patients than sublingually treated patients (68% v 41%, P = .037). Intravenously treated patients also experienced a more pronounced therapeutic effect, as assessed by reduction in chest pain score (67% v 39%, P = .0004) and decrease in ST-segment depressions (57% v 27%, P = .004). These results show that higher doses of nitrates than previously recommended are required for ischemia control during the initial management of unstable angina. The use of repeated intravenous boluses is safe and more easily controlled and, therefore, more efficacious than sublingual sprays in inducing the maximal anti-ischemic effect while avoiding significant hypotension.

Randomised trial of high-dose isosorbide dinitrate plus low-dose furosemide versus high-dose furosemide plus low-dose isosorbide dinitrate in severe pulmonary oedema.

BACKGROUND: Nitrates and furosemide, commonly administered in the treatment of pulmonary oedema, have not been compared in a prospective clinical trial. We compared the efficacy and safety of these drugs in a randomised trial of patients with severe pulmonary oedema and oxygen saturation below 90%. METHODS: Patients presenting to mobile emergency units with signs of congestive heart failure were treated with oxygen 10 L/min, intravenous furosemide 40 mg, and morphine 3 mg bolus. 110 patients were randomly assigned either to group A, who received isosorbide dinitrate (3 mg bolus administered intravenously every 5 min; n=56) or to group B, who received furosemide (80 mg bolus administered intravenously every 15 min, as well as isosorbide dinitrate 1 mg/h, increased every 10 min by 1 mg/h; n=54). Six patients were withdrawn on the basis of chest radiography results. Treatment was continued until oxygen saturation was above 96% or mean arterial blood pressure had decreased by 30% or to below 90 mm Hg. The main endpoints were death, need for mechanical ventilation, and myocardial infarction. The analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Mechanical ventilation was required in seven (13%) of 52 group-A patients and 21 (40%) of 52 group-B patients (p=0.0041). Myocardial infarction occurred in nine (17%) and 19 (37%) patients, respectively (p=0.047). One patient in group A and three in group B died (p=0.61). One or more of these endpoints occurred in 13 (25%) and 24 (46%) patients, respectively (p=0.041). INTERPRETATION: High-dose isosorbide dinitrate, given as repeated intravenous boluses after low-dose intravenous furosemide, is safe and effective in controlling severe pulmonary oedema. This treatment regimen is more effective than high-dose furosemide with low-dose isosorbide nitrate in terms of need for mechanical ventilation and frequency of myocardial infarction.