Outcomes and Cost of Donor Nephrectomy Across Surgical Specialties and Operative Approaches.

INTRODUCTION: Live donor nephrectomy (LDN) is performed by various specialty surgeons, including urologists, general surgeons, and transplant surgeons. However, national practice patterns and outcomes associated with surgeon specialty have not been previously explored. Here, we investigate surgeon specialty trends, perioperative complications, hospital length of stay, cost, and charge for LDN according to surgeon specialty. METHODS: Patients who underwent LDN from 2000 to quarter 1 of 2020 were identified in the Premier Healthcare Database. Associations between physician specialty and 3-month complications, hospital length of stay, institutional cost, and patient charge for LDN procedures were examined using multivariable regression. RESULTS: We identified 11,418 patients who underwent LDN. Of these cases, 3387 (29.7%) were performed by urologists, 3127 (27.4%) by transplant surgeons, 3928 (34.4%) by general surgeons, and 976 (8.5%) by other specialties. In 2000, urologists performed 35.92% of LDNs, decreasing to 18.91% by 2019 (P < .001 for trend). In the last 5 years, we found no significant difference in complications or length of stay according to surgeon specialty. LDNs performed by a urologist ($57,289, 95% CI $49,292-$66,582) were associated with lower patient charges than those performed by a general surgeon ($68,501, 95% CI $59,090-$79,412) or transplant surgeon ($62,639, 95% CI $53,993-$72,670). CONCLUSIONS: From 2000 to 2019, the proportion of LDNs performed by urologists significantly decreased, while the proportion for transplant surgeons significantly increased, with no significant differences in complications or length of stay across specialties. However, surgeries performed by urologists cost hospitals less and had lower charges for patients.

Major Complications and Adverse Events Related to Use of SpaceOAR Hydrogel for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and severity of SpaceOAR-related adverse events using the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database. METHODS: We analyzed SpaceOAR-related adverse event reports in the Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database from January 2015 to May 2023. For each report, the event type, associated device and patient problems, event description, event timing, and event severity stratified by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0 (CTCAE) grading system were recorded. RESULTS: From 2015 to 2022, 206,619 SpaceOAR devices were sold. From January 2015 to May 2023, we identified 981 reports describing 990 SpaceOAR-related adverse events. Malfunctions were the most common event type (N = 626), followed by patient injuries (N = 350) with few reported deaths (N = 5). Device positioning problems were the most frequent device issue (N = 686). Pain was the most reported patient problem (N = 216). Abscesses and fistulas related to the device were each reported in 91 events. A noteworthy portion of relevant adverse events occurred before the initiation of radiation (N = 35, 22.4%), suggesting the device, rather than the radiation, was responsible. In total, 470 (50.2%) and 344 (36.7%) of the adverse events were CTCAE grade 1 and 2, respectively. There were 123 (13.1%) events that were CTCAE grade ≥3. CONCLUSION: We identified multiple reports of SpaceOAR-related adverse events, many of which are more serious than have been reported in clinical trials. While SpaceOAR use is common, suggesting these events are rare, these data highlight the need for continued postmarket surveillance.