Randomized phase II trial of cisplatin with mitomycin or doxorubicin for malignant mesothelioma by the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

PURPOSE: The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) conducted a randomized phase II multicenter trial to evaluate the activity of two cisplatin-containing regimens (cisplatin and mitomycin [CM], or cisplatin and doxorubicin [CD]) in patients with malignant pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma (protocol CALGB 8435). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Seventy-nine patients were entered between June 1984 and October 1986. Eligibility included a performance status of 0 to 2 by CALGB criteria, and no prior chemotherapy. Central pathology review was performed. Randomization was stratified according to the cell type (epithelial v mixed or sarcomatous) and the presence of measurable versus assessable disease. Of the 79 patients entered, 70 were included in this analysis (35 on CM and 35 on CD), including 48 with epithelial cell type and 22 with mixed or sarcomatous cell types. Sixty-six patients had pleural mesothelioma and four had peritoneal mesothelioma. There were 34 cases with measurable disease and 36 with assessable disease. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 26% for CM (two complete responses [CRs], three partial responses [PRs], and four regressions) and 14% for CD (four PRs and one regression). Median time to treatment failure was 3.6 months for CM and 4.8 months for CD, and median survival duration from study entry was 7.7 and 8.8 months, respectively, with no significant differences between treatments. Good performance status (0 or 1) was associated with significantly longer survival duration (P = .013). Both regimens were well tolerated and there were no treatment-related deaths due to toxicity. CONCLUSION: Moderate antitumor activity has been observed with both regimens. In this randomized phase II trial, the overall response rates, time to treatment failure, and overall survival appear to be similar for the two regimens tested.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy followed by surgery in stage IIIA non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung: report of a Cancer and Leukemia Group B phase II study.

PURPOSE: This phase II trial was designed to evaluate the feasibility, toxicity, response rates, and survival for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy (RT) followed by surgical resection in newly diagnosed patients with surgically staged IIIA non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Previously untreated patients with NSCLC underwent bronchoscopy, chest and abdominal computed tomography (CT), bone scan, and surgical staging of the mediastinum. Neoadjuvant treatment consisted of concurrent chemotherapy and RT. Patients then underwent surgical resection, which was followed in turn by additional chemotherapy and RT. Chemotherapy included cisplatin 100 mg/m2 on days 1 and 29, vinblastine 3 mg/m2 on days 1 and 3 and 29 and 31, and fluorouracil (5-FU) 30 mg/kg/d by infusion on days 1 to 3 and 29 to 31 (FVP). RT began on day 1 and included 3,000 cGy in 15 fractions. Surgery took place on day 55, and one more cycle of chemotherapy and an additional 3,000 cGy of RT began on day 85. RESULTS: Forty-one eligible patients (median follow-up, 53 months) were studied. N2 disease was present in 80%, whereas 20% had T3N0 or T3N1 lesions. Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and RT included no complete responses (CR), 21 (51%) partial responses (PR) or regressions, 19 (46%) stable disease (SD), and one (2%) progressive disease (PD). Thirty-one patients underwent surgery, and 25 were resected. In four of the 25 resection specimens, no viable tumor was present, whereas in three of the six unresectable patients, extensive biopsy results demonstrated only necrotic tumor. The maximum response achieved using all protocol treatment was 27 (66%) CRs, seven (17%) PRs or regression, six (15%) SDs, and one (2%) PD. Toxicity was substantial and primarily hematologic. There were six (15%) treatment-related deaths, which included three perioperative deaths and three chemotherapy-related toxicity deaths. The Kaplan-Meier curve indicated a 1-year survival of 58% and a median survival of 15.5 months. Nine patients (22%) remain disease-free. CONCLUSIONS: There was a reasonably high rate of PR associated with concurrent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and RT, and a high percentage of patients who ultimately were rendered completely disease-free. However, treatment-related morbidity and mortality was common. Median survival seemed to be only modestly improved beyond that achieved with less intensive means of treatment. However, a group has emerged of patients who enjoy prolonged disease-free survival and possible cure.

Cisplatin-carboplatin therapy in extensive non-small cell lung cancer: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.

The response to cisplatin in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is limited by the renal and neurological toxicities of this agent. Carboplatin has modest activity in NSCLC and when given in conventional doses has a different spectrum of toxicity. Both drugs were administered to 76 eligible patients with advanced NSCLC. No patient had been previously treated with chemotherapy. Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 and carboplatin 350 mg/m2 were administered every 28 days until disease progression occurred. There was 1 complete response and the overall response rate among the 68 evaluable for response patients was 13%. Neither histological subtype nor initial performance status was a significant factor influencing response. Median survival was 5.1 months with significant differences based on initial performance status but not on histological subtype. Severe or life-threatening leukopenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 23% and 36% of the 76 patients, respectively. There were 2 toxic deaths, 1 each due to infection and haemorrhage. The efficacy of this combination is not different from that of carboplatin alone, and the combination may be of greater benefit in patients with more responsive tumours than NSCLC.

Carboplatin and vinblastine in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase II study.

Between July 2, 1987, and August 21, 1987, Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) conducted a phase II evaluation of carboplatin (CBDCA) and vinblastine (VBL) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Of the 58 patients who entered the study, 55 were eligible and produced follow-up data. Chemotherapy, which was carried out in 28-day cycles, consisted of 4 mg/m2 VBL given on days 1 and 3 and 125 mg/m2 CBDCA given on days 1-3. Partial responses were observed in 10 cases (18%), and 1 patient (2%) exhibited regression of evaluable disease. No complete responses were achieved. The overall objective response rate was 20%. The median survival was 6.1 months, and the median time to treatment failure was 3.3 months. Life-threatening (grade 4) toxicity was mainly leukopenia (20%), followed by anemia (7%), infection (4%), thrombocytopenia (2%), fever (2%), nausea and vomiting (2%), and weight loss (2%). There were two deaths due to infection. The results of this study demonstrate that the combination CBDCA/VBL is active in advanced NSCLC; however, whether this combination is more active than either CBDCA or VBL alone is unknown.

Phase I/II trial of etoposide and carboplatin in extensive small-cell lung cancer. A report from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B.

Previously untreated extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients with performance status 0-2 were treated with etoposide 200 mg/m2/day on days 1-3 and carboplatin doses of 50, 100, or 125 mg/m2/day on days 1-3 in a Phase I format. Among the ten eligible patients treated with 125 mg/m2/day of carboplatin, grade 3 or 4 infection occurred in six patients, grade 4 thrombocytopenia in four patients, and there was one death with myelosuppression. Thus, this dose was considered the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and a Phase II trial was then conducted utilizing this treatment program. In the Phase II trials, 81% of the 48 eligible patients had grade 3 or 4 leukopenia, 76% had grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, and 55% had grade 3 or 4 anemia. There were three (6%) toxic deaths from myelosuppression. The objective response rate was 63% (17% complete responders) with a median response duration of 6.2 months for complete responders and 6.4 months for partial responders. Median survival was 12 months. The MTD defined by this Phase I trial represents a 67-100% increase in etoposide and a 25% increase in carboplatin compared to prior studies. Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) plans to study further dose intensification of this regimen with colony-stimulating factors.

Phase II trial of high-dose 24-hour continuous intravenous 5-fluorouracil for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study.

Eighty-six eligible patients with non-small cell lung cancer were treated on a Phase II, CALGB study with high-dose, 24-h continuous intravenous 5-fluorouracil every 2 weeks. Objective responses were seen in 7 (8%) patients with 1 (1%) complete response and 6 (7%) partial responses. The median survival for these patients without prior chemotherapy was 3.8 months. Gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicity were acceptable for most patients. However, two patients experienced acute clinical deterioration characterized by worsening central nervous system and hemodynamic function beginning near the completion of chemotherapy treatment and resulting in death. Because of its potential for severe, unpredictable neurologic and cardiac toxicity, we do not recommend this dose and schedule of 5-FU for future trials.

High-dose etoposide therapy for extensive small cell lung cancer: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B Study.

Twenty-one previously untreated patients with extensive small cell lung cancer were treated with etoposide, 400 mg/m2/day for 3 consecutive days. Myelosuppression was severe, with a treatment-related death rate of 28%. Five partial responses were achieved. High-dose etoposide as given in this study produced unacceptable toxicity and no complete responses.

A phase I trial of ifosfamide, mesna, and cisplatin in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A cancer and leukemia group B study.

BACKGROUND: This Phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of ifosfamide-mesna with a fixed dose of cisplatin without growth factor or hematopoietic precursor support. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with previously untreated advanced non-small cell lung cancer were treated at four dose levels. Initially, the cisplatin dose was 100 mg/m2 given on day 1. Seven patients were treated with ifosfamide 2.0 g/m2 days 1 to 3, and six patients received ifosfamide 2.5 g/m2 days 1 to 3. Mesna was given at 20% of the ifosfamide dose at 0, 4, and 6 hours after ifosfamide. Cycles were repeated every 4 weeks. RESULTS: Dose-limiting toxicities (myelosuppression and renal toxicity) were seen at dose level 2 (ifosfamide 2.5 g/m2). Because 5 of the first 13 patients experienced Grade 3 renal toxicity, the study was amended to give cisplatin in divided doses. An additional six patients each were treated at dose level 3 (ifosfamide 2.0 g/m2 days 1-3) and dose level 4 (ifosfamide 2.5 g/m2 days 1-3) with cisplatin 33 mg/m2 days 1 to 3. Dose-limiting toxicity (myelosuppression) was reached at ifosfamide 2.5 g/m2. No further Grade 3 renal toxicity was seen. Grade 3 or worse toxicities were seen as follows: neutropenia 80%, thrombocytopenia 48%, nausea/vomiting 36%, anemia 32%, renal 20%, central nervous system 16%, and infection 16%. Two toxic deaths occurred, both with infection, renal failure, and neutropenia. Partial responses were seen in 8 of 25 eligible patients (32%). CONCLUSIONS: The maximum tolerated dose in this group of patients was defined as ifosfamide 2.0 g/m2 days 1 to 3 when given with cisplatin 33 mg/m2 days 1 to 3. When combining high-dose cisplatin with ifosfamide, it is advisable to give cisplatin in divided doses.

Effect of radiologic stage III substage on nonsurgical therapy of non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose cases are staged or treated surgically have different prognoses, depending on the substage (IIIa, IIIb). It is not known whether the prognostic differences apply to clinically staged nonsurgical cases. The authors wanted to determine whether radiologic Stage III substages, determined by computerized axial tomography (CT) scans, are prognostically important in these patients with NSCLC: In addition, they wanted to determine whether the observed superior survival of selected patients with Stage III NSCLC receiving chemotherapy in addition to radiation therapy (chemo-RT) (Cancer and Leukemia Group B protocol 8433: N Engl J Med 1990; 323:940-5) was influenced by an imbalance in the radiologic Stage III substage. METHODS: Review of pretreatment chest radiographs and CT scans with determination of TNM status and stage was done by the consensus of three readers, who were unaware of which treatment each patient had received (radiation therapy alone [RT] or chemo-RT). RESULTS: Patient characteristics in the two treatment arms were similar. Fifty-five percent of patients receiving RT had Stage IIIa and 33% Stage IIIb disease; in the chemo-RT treatment arm, 73% had Stage IIIa and 25% Stage IIIb disease (P = 0.11). Seven patients (12%) who received RT and one in the chemo-RT treatment arm (2%) had Stage I-II disease on CT scan. Patients with Stage IIIa disease had superior survival to those with Stage IIIb disease (median, 16.5 versus 10.5 months, respectively; P = 0.0045). Within each substage, survival was superior in the chemo-RT (versus RT) treatment arm (Stage IIIa, 17.2 versus 10.7 months, respectively; P = 0.16; Stage IIIb, 12.0 versus 6.9 months, respectively; P = 0.089). CONCLUSIONS: The survival advantage for selected patients with Stage III NSCLC treated with chemo-RT in this study did not result from a more favorable pretreatment radiologic Stage III substage. An advantage for induction chemotherapy was seen in patients with Stage IIIa and IIIb disease. Future studies in this population should prospectively assess and consider stratification for Stage III substage.

Phase II trial of 4'-deoxydoxorubicin (DxDx) in non-small cell lung cancer: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial.

Eighty-seven patients with histologically or cytologically proven non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung were treated with 4'-deoxydoxorubicin (DxDx) 30 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Three responses (4%), all partial, were observed. All responses occurred in patients with large-cell anaplastic lung cancer and none in squamous or adenocarcinoma histologies (P less than 0.01). The durations of partial response for these three responders were 70, 198+ and 209+ days. The side effects noted were predominantly neutropenia, anemia, and weight loss. In three patients, declines in cardiac ejection fraction of 7%, 12%, and 23% occurred after cumulative drug doses of 150 mg/m2, 150 mg/m2, and 233 mg/m2, respectively. 4'-Deoxydoxorubicin had little activity in non-small-cell lung cancer at the dose used in this study.

Chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin or 5-FU, cisplatin, and vinblastine for advanced non-small cell lung cancer. A randomized phase II study of the cancer and leukemia group B.

Two hundred forty-seven patients with previously untreated nonresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were entered in a prospective, randomized Phase II trial. Response assessment was possible in 232 patients, and 237 patients were evaluable for survival. Thirteen partial responses (11%) and 5 regressions (4%) of evaluable disease were obtained for the 116 patients treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin (C) (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.5% to 21.5%). The median time to progression was 2.2 months and the median survival time was 4.6 months for 5-FU plus C. Twenty-three partial responses (20%) and 4 regressions (3%) of evaluable disease were obtained for the 116 patients treated with 5-FU, C, and vinblastine (V) (95% CI, 15.3% to 30.7%). The median time to progression was 2.8 months and the median survival time was 5.6 months for 5-FU, C, and V. The 5-FU and C doses were equivalent in the two treatment regimens. Sixteen of 85 patients (19%) with a performance status of 0 and 18 of 103 patients (17%) with a performance status of 1 responded, whereas only 2 of 44 patients (5%) with a performance status of 2 or greater responded (P = 0.009). Patients who had received locoregional radiation therapy had a lower overall response rate then those in the no prior radiation therapy group (P = 0.028). The median survival time for patients with a performance status of 0 or 1 was 6.3 months compared with 1.9 months for patients with a performance status of 2 or greater (P less than 0.001). Performance status also appeared to be a significant factor for time to progression. More frequent and severe leukopenia, fever, genitourinary (GU) toxicity, and pulmonary toxicity was reported with 5-FU, C, and V. There were three treatment-related deaths with 5-FU, C, and V and one treatment-related death with 5-FU plus C. Grade III/VI myelotoxicity was not influenced by prior radiation therapy or performance status. Neither regimen is active enough to be considered as standard therapy for advanced NSCLC.

Clinical cardiotoxicity of esorubicin (4'-deoxydoxorubicin,DxDx): prospective studies with serial gated heart scans and reports of selected cases. A Cancer and Leukemia Group B report.

Esorubicin (4'-deoxydoxorubicin, DxDx) has undergone extensive Phase II investigation for the treatment of cancer. Based on in vitro and animal data, esorubicin may possess less myocardial toxicity when compared to doxorubicin. One hundred thirty-six patients with histologically or cytologically documented non-small cell lung cancer or advanced breast cancer were enrolled in two concurrent CALGB clinical trials using esorubicin at a dose of 30 mg/m2 administered intravenously every 21 days. No patient had previously received an anthracycline agent or had evidence of severe cardiovascular disease. Cardiotoxicity was observed in eleven patients. Four patients developed symptoms of congestive heart failure and three asymptomatic patients had a significant fall in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) as measured by gated pool heart scan. Four patients had cardiac signs or symptoms of indeterminate relationship to esorubicin therapy. Of 44 patients receiving more than four cycles of therapy, 36 patients (82%) had serial gated pool heart scans permitting assessment of subclinical myocardial toxicity. A 5% drop in LVEF was observed following approximately 240 mg/m2 esorubicin; a 10% drop was observed after approximately 480 mg/m2. If further clinical studies are undertaken with esorubicin, investigators are advised to monitor cardiac function frequently once the cumulative esorubicin dose exceeds 240 mg/m2. If congestive failure appears during therapy, prompt cessation of esorubicin and institution of inotropic agents may provide effective palliation. Normal myocardial function may be restored within several months.