Vitamin D deficiency in solid-organ transplant recipients from a Spanish Mediterranean population.

BACKGROUND: Solid-organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) are at risk of developing vitamin D deficiency, mainly caused by reduced sunlight exposure with subsequent low vitamin D synthesis in the skin. AIM: To analyse whether SOTRs from a Spanish Mediterranean region were vitamin D-deficient. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, descriptive and observational study in a transplantation-specialized Dermatological Unit from a Mediterranean area to determine the calcidiol levels of a cohort of 78 consecutively attending patients not receiving vitamin D supplements. Serum 25(OH)D3 levels were determined and clinical characteristics were collected. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyse variables associated with dichotomized 25(OH)D3 levels (≤ or > 10 ng/mL). RESULTS: The cohort comprised 30 lung, 29 kidney and 19 liver transplant recipients. Mean calcidiol was 18 ± 9 ng/mL. Deficiency of 25(OH)D3 was present in 19% of patients, while 68% had insufficient levels and 13% had sufficient levels. Following multivariate logistic regression analysis, the season of blood sampling remained the only predictor of deficient 25(OH)D3 levels. CONCLUSION: Despite living in a mid-latitude country with sunny weather, our SOTR population was at high risk of developing hypovitaminosis D, especially in autumn/winter. Avoiding sun exposure is important to prevent skin cancer, but careful monitoring of vitamin D status is recommended, with supplementation if hypovitaminosis D is detected.

[Post-transplant diabetes mellitus depending on the pre-transplant dialysis technique]. / Diabetes mellitus post-trasplante según técnica de diálisis previa al trasplante.

Post-transplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) is one of the most important complications in kidney transplant patients because it has a significant impact on graft and patient survival. Diagnosis of PTDM should be based on the American Diabetic Association criteria. Recent studies show the value of performing an oral glucose tolerance test in all patients. Multiple risk factors promote PTDM. PTDM incidence may be reduced by controlling modifiable factors (immunosuppression, obesity, infections...). According to RMRC data, patients on peritoneal dialysis are younger, but have a greater incidence rate of dyslipidemia and obesity. Recent data suggest that subclinical information, adiponectin, and ghrelin may be a significant pathogenetic factor in development of insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus. There is no clear evidence that the dialysis procedure influences the subclinical inflammatory state and adipocytokines. According to data from the Spanish group for the study of PTDM, a relationship exists between ghrelin levels and sex in patients on peritoneal dialysis. The most common metabolic complication in patients on peritoneal dialysis is hyperglycemia. Pre-transplant hyperglycemia promotes the occurrence of PTDM. There is no clear evidence in the literature showing that the dialysis procedure is a risk factor for the occurrence of PTDM. Additional multicenter studies are required to analyze the clinical and biological characteristics of renal patients and their relationship to PTDM.

Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase expression in kidney transplantation: from alfa (alpha) to Omega (Omega).

INTRODUCTION: Overactivation of the enzyme poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP-1) can be induced by ischemia-reperfusion and involved in the renal injury subsequent to kidney transplant. The poly(ADP-ribosy)lation mechanism alters free radical-induced DNA damage, which is repair by PARP-1 polymer. However, PARP-1 overexpression induces cellular necrosis. Our aim was to study the immunohistochemical PARP-1 expression in kidney transplant biopsies associated with various events. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We studied the nuclear expression of PARP-1 in kidney tubule cells by immunohistochemistry using the monoclonal antibody PAR01 in donor biopsies without acute tubular necrosis (ATN) (n = 60; controls), allografts that suffer ATN (n = 90) or an episode of acute humoral rejection (n = 12) or acute tubulointerstitial rejection (n = 25), or chronic allograft nephropathy (n = 25). Furthermore, we also studied protocol biopsies with subclinical rejection (n = 60). Renal lesions in transplant biopsies were graded blindly using 1997 Banff criteria without any clinical information. RESULTS: Biopsies without morphological features of ATN, namely acute tubulointerstitial rejection, borderline or subclinical rejection, showed lesser PARP-1 expression compared with biopsies with ATN or with ischemic mechanism of acute humoral rejection or chronic allograft nephropathys. We observed an inverse relation between PARP-1 expression and renal function (P < .001). Overall, renal biopsies showing ATN revealed greater expression of PARP-1 (r = 0.785, Pearson test). A significant relationship with PARP-1 expression was demonstrated with renal function (effective diuresis, serum creatinine levels) and pretransplant cold ischemia time (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Kidney transplant events including ischemia were associated with the highest PARP-1 expression and worse allograft renal function.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in renal transplant recipients under treatment with cyclosporine and Myfortic.

INTRODUCTION: Efficacious prophylaxis of acute rejection episodes (ARE) requires adequate exposure to each component of the immunosuppressive treatment from the first days after renal transplantation. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the correlation between cyclosporine (CsA) and mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure based upon pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) and 6-month biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR) episodes and chronic allograft nephropathy on 6 month protocol biopsies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We examined twenty-two first or second de novo renal transplant recipients treated with steroids, Sandimmune Neoral (CsA) and Myfortic (720 mg twice a day). PK (C0, C2, and AUC(0-12h)) for both drugs were determined on days 7, 90, and 180. Calcineurin activity, interleukin-2 and interferon-gamma synthesis as well as %CEM were tested at days 7 and 180. CsA dosages were adjusted by C2 monitoring. Collected data included: BPAR during the first 6 months and Banff histological parameters on the 6-month protocol biopsies. RESULTS: Eighteen of 22 patients completed 1 year follow-up under treatment. The 6-month BPAR was 18% (4/22). Six-month protocol biopsies in 50% of 14 recipients showed chronic allograft nephropathy 1. At day 7, CsA C2 and AUC median values were 138 ng/mL and 6377 ng x h/mL, while C0 MPA was 1.0 microg/mL and AUC = 23.9 microg x h/mL. CsA C2 medians at 3 and 6 months were 1468 and 1720 ng/mL. MPA-AUC reached therapeutic targets at 3 months (32.3 microg x h/mL) and was 48.3 microg x h/mL at 6 months. Patients with BPAR showed lower CsA AUC (P = .06) and a significantly lower baseline inhibition of calcineurin activity (P < .005) than patients with no BPAR. An increase in mesangial matrix in 6-month protocol biopsies correlated with higher CsA C2 (P = .01). All biomarkers evaluated were significantly inhibited compared with the standard population. CONCLUSIONS: When Myfortic is administered together with CsA, it is advisable to begin with higher doses (720 mg x 3 days) to reach adequate PK targets and improve BPAR rates. To prevent chronic allograft nephropathy, lower CsA C2 should be targeted from 3 months.

Donor structural and functional parameters are independent predictors of renal function at 3 months.

INTRODUCTION: Epidemiological studies have shown that demographic, clinical, and histological donor characteristics influence renal function after transplantation, but whether these variables are independent predictors has not been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relative contribution of different donor variables on glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) at 3 months. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed single renal transplants performed at our center from January 2000 to July 2004. Donor variables included age, gender, weight and height, cause of death, duration of brain death, serum creatinine at admission and preprocurement, history of arterial hypertension or diabetes mellitus, and smoking habit. Donor chronic damage score was calculated in preimplantation biopsies as was the addition of interstitial fibrosis, fibrous intimal thickening, and glomerulosclerosis (<10% = 0, >10% = 1). Donor and recipient GFRs were calculated according to the Cockroft-Gault formula. RESULTS: We analyzed 202 transplants obtained from 113 deceased donors. A renal biopsy was available in 111 transplants. Recipient GFR at 3 months correlated negatively with donor age (R = -0.32, P < .01) and donor chronic damage score (R = 0.32, P < .01). GFR was lower among recipients of female versus male donors (50 +/- 15 vs 60 +/- 20 mL/min; P < .01). Donor cerebrovascular accident death (53 +/- 19 vs 63 +/- 19 mL/min; P < .01) and hypertension (48 +/- 16 vs 59 +/- 20 mL/min; P < .01) were also associated with lower GFR at 3 months. There was a positive correlation between GFR at admission, GFR preprocurement, and GFR at 3 months (R = 0.32 and R = 0.18 respectively; P < .01). Stepwise regression analysis included chronic damage score, GFR at admission, and donor gender but not donor age as independent predictors of GFR at 3 months (R = 0.50; P < .01). CONCLUSION: Donor structural and functional parameters are independent predictors of renal function at 3 months.

[How can we improve symptomatic hypotension in hemodialysis patients: cold dialysis vs isothermic dialysis]. / Cómo mejorar la hipotensión sintomática en hemodiálisis: diálisis fría versus diálisis isotérmica.

BACKGROUND: Symptomatic hypotension is the most frequent acute complication affecting patients during chronic hemodialysis treatment sessions. Many reports have demonstrated that the use of cool dialysate has a protective effect on blood pressure during hemodialysis treatments. In the present study, we investigated whether preventing the hyperthermic response had favourable effects on hemodynamic stability during the hemodialysis procedure while affording good tolerance to patients. METHODS: We investigated the effect of thermal control of dialysate on hemodynamic stability in hypotension-prone patients in our center. Patients were eligible for the study if they had symptomatic hypotensive episodes (> 3/12session/ month) during the screening phase. The study was designed with two phases for the same selected patients and two treatment arms, each phase lasting 4 weeks. In the first phase, we adjusted dialysate temperature on 36 masculineC for 12 sessions (cold dialysis) and in the second phase we used a device allowing the regulation of thermal balance (Blood Temperature Monitor; Fresenius Medical Care, Bad Homberg, Germany), that keep body temperature unchanged (isothermic dialysis). RESULTS: Nine HD patients were enrolled and completed the study. During the screening phase the mean ultrafiltration was 4 1% of dry weight, and blood pressure decreased from 9916 to 8016 mm Hg (p<0.001). In 5.01.7 sessions of 12 treatments were complicated by hypotension. In the first and second phase we observed a decrease of complicated treatments with symptomatic hypotension (5.01.7 versus 2.71.6 y 2.81.7; p<0.01). Both procedures: Cold dialysis and Isothermic dialysis was well tolerated by patients. CONCLUSION: Results show that active control of body temperature can significantly improve intradialytic tolerance in hypotension-prone patients.

[Adherence to treatment after kidney transplantation as quality indicator of the information received: Longitudinal study of 2 years follow-up]. / Adherencia al tratamiento tras trasplante renal como indicador de calidad de la información recibida: estudio longitudinal con un seguimiento de 2 años.

INTRODUCTION: Transplantation is an optimal form of treatment for end-stage renal disease, but requires lifelong adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. The aim of this study was to longitudinally assess the adherence to treatment after kidney transplant, as well as to compare the amount of information about the treatment received at one month and 18 months post-transplantation, and its influence on adherence to treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Self-Reported Measure of Medication Adherence was administered at month (T1), 6 months (T2), 12 months (T3), 18 months (T4), and 24 months (T5) post-transplantation. Survey about aspects of knowledge and attitudes about medication, was administered at one month and 18 months post-transplant. Measures of central tendency and non-parametric tests were used to compare the data. RESULTS: The study included a total of 73 patients with a median age of 57 years. The percentage of patients non-adherent to medication was 9.6% (T1), 22.5% (T2), 29.2% (T3), 29.8% (T4), and 28.1% (T5). One month after transplantation "not consulting with the doctor on forgetting to take medication (P=.034) significantly influenced the non-adherence to treatment. At 18 months post- transplantation, none of the issues raised on medication knowledge had an influence on non-adherence to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Longer times since transplantation increased the non-adherence to treatment. Some issues regarding the information of treatment influenced the non-adherence in the immediate transplant period, but not in the follow-up.

Therapy with plasmapheresis and intravenous immunoglobulin for acute humoral rejection in kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Acute humoral rejection (AHR) is characterized by acute graft dysfunction associated with de novo production of donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) and C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries of the renal allograft. It has been reported the combination of plasmapheresis (PP) and intravenous gamma globulin (IVIG) as effective rescue therapy for established AHR. METHODS: Between 1999 and 2004, seven kidney allografts recipients suffered from AHR diagnosed by severe rejection and C4d staining in peritubular capillaries. All patients had a negative cross-match before renal transplantation. RESULTS: All patients were treated with daily sessions of PP and in four cases IVIG was added after the last PP session. Tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil were employed as maintenance immunosuppressive regimen. In one case, rituximab was added to PP and IVIG owing to refractory humoral rejection. At 1 year, patient survival was 100%, allograft survival was 70%, and the mean serum creatinine was 201 micromol/L. CONCLUSIONS: AHR is a severe form of rejection associated with a poor prognosis, but its early diagnosis and treatment with PP and IVIG allows reversal of AHR reaching a 70% graft survival at 1 year.

Long-term effect of hepatitis C virus chronic infection on patient and renal graft survival.

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection increases morbimortality in renal transplantation. The immune response against the HVC is not predictable in a great proportion of patients developing into chronic liver disease, glomerulonephritis, or both. PATIENTS: We analyzed the impact of posttransplant chronic hepatitis development on patient and graft survival in 200 HCV-positive/HBsAg-negative renal allograft recipients transplanted between 1981 and 2003. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients developed chronic ALT elevation (ALT+), while 102 did not (ALT-). There was no difference in acute rejection episodes (ARE), acute tubular necrosis, donor and recipient age, gender, HLA mismatches, and number of previous renal transplants. Development of ALT+ was associated with a worse patient survival (90% vs 65% at 15 years of follow-up, P = .007; RR = 3.8, CI = 1.4-10.1), an effect that was independent of other variables as time on dialysis and age. The main causes of death among ALT+ were chronic liver disease (52%), cardiovascular (26%), and infection (13%), whereas in ALT- they were cardiovascular (33%), cancer (33%), and chronic liver disease (16%). Conversely, graft survival (censoring for patient death with a functioning graft) was higher among ALT+ (50% vs 35% at 15 years of follow-up, P = .04; RR = 1.5, CI = 1.19-2.22). Causes of graft loss in ALT- patients were chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN, 53%), glomerulonephritis (GN, 18%), acute rejection episode (AR, 22%), and death (5%), whereas among ALT+ they were CAN (36%), GN (31%), ARE (10%), and death (21%; P = .01). By multivariate analysis, ALT- (RR = 1.6, CI = 1.07-2.55, P = .02) and de novo GN (RR = 2, CI = 1.29-3.09, P = .002) were associated with worse renal allograft survival. CONCLUSION: Our results suggested that a better immune response against the HCV lead to greater patient survival but poorer graft survival.

Arterial elasticity measurement in renal transplant patients under anticalcineurin immunosuppression.

INTRODUCTION: Calcineurin inhibitors may be associated with decreased arterial elasticity and increased vascular risk. We measured pulse wave velocity (PWV) in large or small arteries as an index of elasticity. The aim of our study was to determine aortic and radial arterial elasticity in 30 stable kidney transplant patients treated with calcineurin inhibitor immunosuppression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In stable kidney transplant patients we determined the usual biochemical parameters as well as lipid profiles, 24-hour blood pressure (BP) monitoring (CBPM) using a chronobiological program (Garapa), and PWV with a HDI-PWV CR-2000 monitor. RESULTS: Sixteen patients received cyclosporine (CsA, G-1) and 14 tacrolimus (G-2) immunosuppression. There were no baseline differences regarding age (G-1: 56 +/- 12 years, G-2: 56 +/- 14 years), renal transplant follow-up (G-1: 7 +/- 3 years, G-2: 7.5 +/- 3 years), Systolic BP, pulse pressure or plasma creatinine (G-1: 163 +/- 35 umol/L, G-2: 173 +/- 26 umol/L). Patients in the G-1 showed higher diastolic BP (79 +/- 11 vs 74 +/- 8 mm Hg), greater proteinuria (1.26 +/- 0.4 vs 0.6 +/- 0.2 g/d, P < .05), total cholesterol (5.51 +/- 1.2 mmol/L) and low-density lipoprotein (3.08 +/- 0.3 vs 2.99 +/- 0.3 mmol/L, P = NS). Aortic arterial elasticity was decreased in G-1 patients (10.4 +/- 6 vs 14.3 +/- 2 mL/mm Hg x10, P < .05) as well as that in the radial artery (G-1: 5.52 +/- 1 vs 5.57 +/- 1.2 mL/mm Hg x100, P = NS). Almost 100% of the patients presented normal diurnal BP with high nocturnal BP in a nondipper pattern in both groups. CONCLUSION: Calcineurin immunosuppression may contribute to arterial stiffness in kidney transplant patients. No differences between CsA or tacrolimus were observed in our study. CBPM and PWV are useful tools to evaluate subclinical atherosclerosis in renal transplant patients.

Practice variations in the evaluation of adult candidates for cadaveric kidney transplantation: a survey of the European Transplant Centers.

BACKGROUND: This survey was conducted to investigate similarities and differences in the diagnostic evaluation of adult candidates for cadaveric renal transplantation and the criteria for acceptance to the cadaveric renal transplant waiting-list in the European transplant centers. METHODS: A questionnaire listing 45 diagnostic procedures (consultations of 9 specialties, 18 imaging techniques and 18 laboratory investigations), 45 medical conditions constituting possible reasons for exclusion from renal transplantation, and 10 properties characterizing the responding transplant center was sent to 214 European transplant centers. RESULTS: A completed questionnaire was returned by 154 of 214 centers (72%). Significant disagreement (P<0.001) exists about the necessity of 28 of the 45 surveyed diagnostic procedures and about the acceptability of transplant candidates for 15 of the 45 surveyed medical conditions. The influence of center characteristics on the observed practice variations was examined by multinomial logistic regression (factors: Center size, waiting-list pressure, responsibility for organizing the diagnostic work-up, status of transplant center, responsibility for decision about acceptance of candidates and geographic location of center): In 13 of 28 controversial diagnostic procedures, geographic location of the centers turned out to be the only significant determining factor (P<0.001), whereas the dissent about medical conditions is not influenced significantly by the analyzed factors. CONCLUSION: The detected significant practice variations in the evaluation of renal transplant candidates may either indicate where scientific evidence is missing and more clinical research is needed or where the existing evidence has not been adequately disseminated and convincing guidelines should be established.

Steroid withdrawal in mycophenolate mofetil-treated renal allograft recipients.

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection is an inherent risk of the withdrawal of steroids in renal allograft recipients. Mycophenolate mofetil is a potent immunosuppressant that, when given with cyclosporine (CsA), reduces the incidence of acute rejection and may facilitate discontinuation of steroids without increasing the risk of rejection. METHODS: In an open pilot study, steroids were withdrawn from 26 adult cadaveric kidney transplant recipients. Corticosteroids were discontinued between 4 and 30 (mean 17) months after transplantation, and steroid-free follow-up ranged from 7 to 18 (mean 10) months. RESULTS: Mean CsA doses, CsA blood levels, and serum creatinine at the time of steroid withdrawal and at last patient visit after cessation of steroids were 4.2+/-1.2 mg/kg/day and 3+/-0.8 mg/kg/day (P<0.001), 170+/-53 ng/ml and 113+/-34 ng/ml (P<0.001), and 133+/-36 microM/L and 130+/-37 microM/L (NS), respectively. No rejection episodes occurred after steroid withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: This open study shows that corticosteroids can be safely and successfully withdrawn from renal allograft recipients receiving CsA and mycophenolate mofetil.

Recipient body surface area as a predictor of posttransplant renal allograft evolution.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to analyze whether minor differences in recipient body surface area have any predictive value on renal allograft evolution. METHODS: For this study, we considered 236 pairs of recipients who received a kidney from the same donor at our center between March 1985 and December 1995. Pairs in whom at least one patient presented any of the following events were excluded: graft loss during the first year of follow-up, diabetes mellitus, noncompliance with treatment, chronic pyelonephritis, and recurrent or de novo glomerulonephritis. Recipients of each pair were classified as large or small according to their body surface area (BSA). The percentage difference of BSA in each pair was calculated, and two cohorts of pairs were defined: BSA difference < or = 10% (n=76 pairs) and BSA difference >10% (n=70 pairs). RESULTS: The large recipients of the cohort with a BSA difference >10% showed a higher incidence of posttransplant delayed graft function (22/70 vs. 12/70, P=0.075), hypertension at 1 year of follow-up (51/70 vs. 35/70, P=0.006), and a higher serum creatinine level at 1-year follow-up (173 vs. 142 micromol/L, P=0.003), whereas in the cohort with a BSA difference < or = 10%, posttransplant evolution in large and small recipients was not different. Multivariate analysis showed that recipient BSA was an independent predictor of delayed graft function, posttransplant hypertension, and serum creatinine at 1-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Relatively small differences in recipient BSA influence renal allograft evolution. Consequently, our data support that recipient size should be taken into consideration for renal allograft allocation.

A good alternative to reduce the kidney shortage: kidneys from nonheartbeating donors.

BACKGROUND: Because of the shortage of kidneys available for transplantation, we began in 1985 to harvest kidneys from non-heartbeating (NHB) donors. METHODS: We compared the results of a group of 66 kidney recipients from NHB donors (NHB group) with 122 kidney recipients from heartbeating donors (HB group). We analyzed, in the NHB group, the influence of ischemia times in graft survival and we tested the best cut-offs by receiver operating characteristic curves. We also studied, using a univariate and multivariate Cox hazard model, the capacity of different variables to predict graft loss. RESULTS: Patient and graft survival were similar in both groups during the follow-up. The percentage of delayed graft function was the only significant difference between both groups (NHB group 62% vs. HB group 32%; P=0.0001). Delayed graft function, in the NHB group, is influenced by the warm ischemia time, which is directly related to the number of days to achieve a serum creatinine<300 mmol/L (P=0.0001). The best cut-off times in this group were 45 min for warm ischemia time and 22 hr for cold ischemia time. Recipients have a greater likelihood of losing the graft beyond those limits (P=0.017, relative risk: 7.3). The incidence of acute rejection was similar in both groups, and it was the only predictor factor of graft loss in the complete series of patients (P=0.0001), in the NHB group (P=0.007), and in the HB group (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Reducing the incidence of acute rejection and shortening ischemia time are conditions needed to guarantee a long graft survival of kidneys from NHB donors.

Protocol renal allograft biopsies and the design of clinical trials aimed to prevent or treat chronic allograft nephropathy.

BACKGROUND: The minimum sample size to perform a clinical trial aimed to modify the natural history of chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) is very large. Since the presence of chronic tubulointerstitial damage in renal protocol biopsy specimens is an independent predictor of late outcome, we evaluated whether protocol biopsies could facilitate the design of trials aimed to prevent or treat CAN. METHODS: Two hundred eighty-two protocol biopsy specimens were obtained 3 months after transplantation in 280 patients with serum creatinine levels <300 micromol/L, proteinuria <1000 mg/day, and stable function. The specimens were evaluated according to the Banff criteria. RESULTS: Graft survival depended on the presence of CAN and renal transplant vasculopathy (RTV). Thus, biopsy specimens were classified as: (a) no CAN (n=174); (b) CAN without RTV (n=87); and (c) CAN with RTV (n=21). Graft survival at 10 years was 95%, 82%, and 41%, respectively (P=0.001). Total serum cholesterol before transplantation was 4.5+/-1.1, 4.6+/-1.1, and 5.3+/-1.6 mmol/L, respectively (P=0.009) and it was the only predictor of RTV. Power analysis (beta=20%, alpha=5%) was done to evaluate whether protocol biopsies can facilitate the design of clinical trials aimed either to prevent or treat CAN. We showed that the most feasible approach would be to use the presence of CAN as the primary efficacy end point in a prevention trial. To demonstrate a 50% reduction in the incidence of CAN at 3 months, 570 patients would be required. CONCLUSIONS: Protocol biopsies may allow a reduction of sample size and especially the time of follow-up in a trial aimed to prevent CAN.

Prevention and management of late renal allograft dysfunction.

Chronic allograft nephropathy is the leading cause of return to dialysis after transplantation. At present, no efficient therapies are available to modify the natural history of chronic allograft nephropathy, mainly because of difficulties in designing prospective clinical trials to prevent or treat this entity. The main risk factors for chronic allograft nephropathy, the utility of protocol biopsies in the design of trials, and different strategies to prevent or treat this problem are reviewed.

Preservation of renal function during maintenance therapy with cyclosporine.

During the last 20 years the management of cyclosporine (CsA) has improved due to the introduction of microemulsion technology, C2 monitoring, and combination with other new immunosuppressants. All these modifications have reduced the incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes to approximately 10%. However despite the wide experience, there are unanswered questions regarding CsA monitoring after the first year. Available clinical and histological data suggest that the therapeutic range to avoid nephrotoxicity or underimmunosuppression during the maintenance period is rather narrow. Furthermore, the combination of CsA with new immunosuppressants may modify the target CsA levels. Although the utility of C2 levels during the first year has been well characterized, there are few data on its utility for maintenance therapy, particularly the therapeutic range for C2 levels in patients receiving different immunosuppressive combinations. Since serum creatinine does not precisely reflect the progression of chronic allograft nephropathy, the efficacy of C2 monitoring during the maintenance period must be assessed not only by means of evaluation of renal function, but also histologic assessment using protocol biopsies.

Doxazosin GITS trough to peak ratio and 24-hour blood pressure monitoring in the management of hypertension in renal transplant patients.

UNLABELLED: We have studied 20 patients, 10 male, 10 female, mean age 52.5+/-10.9 years, who received a cadaver kidney transplant between June 1996 and January 1999. The patients presented with mild or moderate high BP and were treated on a maintained immunosuppression with an anti-calcineurin agent and steroids, associated or not to mycophenolate-mofetil. At baseline, a 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring was performed. General biochemical parameters were determined and doxazosin GITS (Gastro-Intestinal Therapeutic System) in a single dose of 4 mg/d was started. Doxazosin GITS was titrated four weeks after up to 8 mg/d if the BP was greater than 140/90 mm Hg. At week 12, biochemical analysis were repeated as well as the 24-hour BP monitoring and the T/P ratio was calculated. RESULTS: The patients were divided in responders, T/P index >50%, n=10 or not-responders, T/P index <50%, n=10 patients). No differences in systolic BP (SBP), diastolic BP(DBP), plasma creatinine or proteinuria were seen at base-line. DBP was lower in responders than in non-responders (P=ns). Doxazosin doses were 5.5+/-3 mg/d vs 5.8+/-3 and T/P ratio 0.70+/-0.13 vs 0.17+/-0.14, (P=.001). There were no variations in pl. t. cholesterol, triglycerides, glucose or uric acid. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment was safe and efficient, not increasing metabolic adverse effects. Doxazosin GITS is a safe agent which can reduce cardiovascular risk. In our patients, the good T/P ratio has been associated with a best diastolic BP control. This good profile should be taken into account for 24-hour BP control in hypertensive renal transplant patients.

Histologic findings in protocol biopsies performed in stable renal allografts under different immunosuppressive schedules.

Protocol biopsies performed in stable renal allografts show different degrees of acute and chronic lesions. Histologic findings in protocol biopsies have been related to graft outcome. We evaluated histologic lesions observed in protocol biopsies performed in patients under different immunosuppression therapies. From June 1988 a protocol biopsy was performed at approximately 4 months in patients who fulfilled the following criteria: serum creatinine <300 micromol/L; stable renal function; and proteinuria <1 g/d. Histologic lesions were graded according to 1997 Banff criteria. For the present study we considered the following groups according to immunosuppressive schedule: (i) induction therapy with polyclonal or monoclonal antilymphocytic antibodies associated with cyclosporine and prednisone (n=201); (ii) cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone (n=127); and (iii) tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone (n=51). On protocol biopsy patients treated with tacrolimus displayed a lower acute score (0.61+/-1.01 vs 1.24+/-1.23 in group I, 1.28+/-1.41 in group II; P<.0001) and a higher proportion of normal biopsies (57.1% vs 41.9% in group I, 45.1% in group II; P=.016). A similar proportion of chronic lesions (chronic score of group I: 1.30+/-1.56; group II: 1.34+/-1.80; group III: 1.51+/-0.95; P=NS) was observed in the three groups. Protocol biopsies displayed fewer acute lesions in patients treated with tacrolimus. This result suggests that the efficacy of new immunosuppression schedules can be evaluated using the protocol biopsy as a surrogate marker of graft outcome.

Beneficial effect of concomitant induction with antilymphoblast globulin, cyclosporine, and steroids on long-term renal allograft outcome.

BACKGROUND: The addition of induction therapy with antilymphocytic antibodies to cyclosporine (CsA) based immunosuppression, has reduced acute rejection incidence and improved short-term survivals, but has not had well-established effects on long-term renal transplant survival. PATIENTS: We analyzed the long-term allograft outcome of patients included in a prospective randomized clinical study conducted in our center 15 years ago by comparing two strategies: (A) horse antilymphoblast globulin (ALG) given at 10 mg/kg on alternate days to a maximum of 6 doses with low-dose CsA started at 8 mg/kg per day and prednisone at 0.25 mg/kg per day, versus (B) CsA started at 15 mg/kg per day and prednisone at 0.5 mg/kg per day. Diabetic and highly sensitized patients (PRA > 70%) were excluded from the study. RESULTS: The characteristics of the 50 patients enrolled in each group were not different. Although patient survival was not different (88% in group A vs 77% in group B), recipients treated with ALG showed a lower incidence of acute rejection episodes (20% vs 44%, P = .01) and better death-censored renal allograft survival (57% vs 41%, P = .03). Among rejection-free patients, graft survival was 15% higher in group A (60% vs 45%, P = .12). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that an acute rejection episode (relative risk [RR]: 2.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.36-4.39; P = .0029) rather than ALG immunosuppression (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.41-1.33; P = NS) was an independent predictor of death-censored graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we confirmed that concomitant induction therapy with ALG, CsA, and steroids improves long-term renal allograft survival.