Effect of Gender-affirming Facial Feminization Surgery on Psychosocial Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigates the effect of gender-affirming facial feminization surgery (FFS) on psychosocial outcomes in patients with gender dysphoria. BACKGROUND: Comprehensive analyses of psychosocial outcomes after gender-affirming FFS are absent in the literature resulting in a paucity of information on the impact of FFS on quality of life as well as ramifications in health insurance coverage of FFS. METHODS: Scores from 11 validated, quantitative instruments from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) assessing anxiety, anger, depression, global mental health, global physical health, satisfaction with sex life, positive affect, emotional support, social isolation, companionship, and meaning and purpose. Patients within the preoperative group (pre-FFS) were evaluated >30 days before surgery and patients within the postoperative group (post-FFS) were evaluated ≥10 weeks after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 169 patients [mean (SD) age, 33.5 (10.8) years] were included. Compared with the pre-FFS group (n=107), the post-FFS group (n=62) reported improved scores anxiety (56.8±8.8 vs 60.1±7.9, P =0.01), anger (47.4±7.6 vs 51.2±9.6, P =0.01), depression (52.2±9.2 vs 57.0±8.9, P =0.001), positive affect (46.6±8.9 vs 42.9±8.7, P =0.01), meaning and purpose (49.9±10.7 vs 46.2±10.5, P =0.03), global mental health (46.7±7.6 vs 43.1±9.2, P =0.01), and social isolation (52.2±7.5 vs 55.4±7.4, P =0.01). Multivariable analysis to account for the effects of other gender-affirming surgeries, hormone therapy duration, preexisting mental health diagnoses, socioeconomic disparities, and patient-reported quality of social relationships on psychosocial functioning demonstrated that completion of FFS was independently predictive of improved scores. CONCLUSIONS: Gender-affirming FFS improves the quality of life by multiple psychosocial domains in transfeminine patients.

United States Health Policies on Gender-Affirming Care in 2022.

BACKGROUND: Within the United States, access to gender-affirming operations covered by health insurance has increased dramatically over the past decade. However, the perpetually changing landscape and inconsistencies of individual state health policies governing private and public insurance coverage present a lack of clarity for reconstructive surgeons and other physicians attempting to provide gender-affirming care. This work systematically reviewed the current U.S. health policies for both private insurance and Medicaid on a state-by-state basis. METHODS: Individual state health policies in effect as of August of 2022 on gender-affirming care were reviewed using the LexisNexis legal database, state legislature publications, and Medicaid manuals. Primary outcomes were categorization of policies as protective, restrictive, or unclear for each state. Secondary outcomes included analyses of demographics covered by current health policies and geographic differences. RESULTS: Protective state-level health policies related to gender-affirming care were present in approximately half of the nation for both private insurance (49.0%) and Medicaid (52.9%). Explicitly restrictive policies were found in 5.9% and 17.6% of states for private insurance and Medicaid, respectively. Regionally, the Northeast and West had the highest rates of protective policies, whereas the Midwest and South had the highest rates of restrictive policies on gender-affirming care. CONCLUSIONS: State-level health policies on gender-affirming care vary significantly across the United States with regional associations. Clarity in the current and evolving state-specific health policies governing gender-affirming care is essential for surgeons and physicians caring for transgender and gender-diverse individuals.

Medicaid coverage for gender-affirming surgery: A state-by-state review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review Medicaid policies state-by-state for gender-affirming surgery coverage. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SETTING: Primary data were collected for each US state utilizing the LexisNexis legal database, state legislature publications, and Medicaid manuals. STUDY DESIGN: A cross-sectional study evaluating Medicaid coverage for numerous gender-affirming surgeries. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: We previously reported on state health policies that protect gender-affirming care under Medicaid coverage. Building upon our prior work, we systematically assessed the 27 states with protective policies to determine coverage for each type of gender-affirming surgery. We analyzed Medicaid coverage for gender-affirming surgeries in four domains: chest, genital, craniofacial and neck reconstruction, and miscellaneous procedures. Medicaid coverage for each type of surgery was categorized as explicitly covered, explicitly noncovered, or not described. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Among the 27 states with protective Medicaid policies, 17 states (63.0%) provided explicit coverage for at least one gender-affirming chest procedure and at least one gender-affirming genital procedure, while only eight states (29.6%) provided explicit coverage for at least one craniofacial and neck procedure (p = 0.04). Coverage for specific surgical procedures within these three anatomical domains varied. The most common explicitly covered procedures were breast reduction/mastectomy and hysterectomy (n = 17, 63.0%). The most common explicitly noncovered surgery was reversal surgery (n = 12, 44.4%). Several states did not describe the specific surgical procedures covered; thus, final coverage rates are indeterminate. CONCLUSIONS: In 2022, 52.9% of states had health policies that protected gender-affirming care under Medicaid; however, coverage for various gender-affirming surgical procedures remains both variable and occasionally unspecified. When specified, craniofacial and neck reconstruction is the least covered anatomical area compared with chest and genital reconstruction.

An enhanced recovery after surgery protocol for facial feminization surgery reduces perioperative opioid usage, pain, and hospital stay.

BACKGROUND: Prescription drug misuse in transgender individuals is estimated to be three times higher than that of the general population in the United States, suggesting that opioid-reduction strategies deserve significant consideration in gender-affirming surgeries. In this work, we describe the implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol to reduce opioid use after facial feminization surgery. METHODS: A total of 79 patients who underwent single-stage facial feminization surgery before (n = 38) or after (n = 41) ERAS protocol implementation were included. Primary outcomes assessed were perioperative opioid consumption (morphine equivalent dose/kilogram, MED/kg), average patient-reported pain scores, and length of hospital stay. Comparisons between groups and multivariable linear regression analyses were conducted to define the contribution of the ERAS protocol to each of the three primary outcomes. RESULTS: Age, body mass index, mental health diagnoses, and length of surgery did not differ between pre-ERAS and ERAS groups. Compared to pre-ERAS patients, patients treated under the ERAS protocol consumed less opioids (median [interquartile range, IQR], 0.8 [0.5-1.1] versus 1.5 [1.0-2.1] MED/kg, p < 0.001), reported lower pain scores (2.5 ± 1.8 versus 3.7 ± 1.6, p = 0.002), and required a shorter hospital stay (median [IQR], 27.3 [26.3-49.8] versus 32.4 [24.8-39.1] h, p < 0.001). When controlling for other contributing variables such as previous gender-affirming surgeries, mental health diagnoses, and length of surgery using multivariable linear regression analyses, ERAS protocol implementation independently predicted reduced opioid use, lower pain scores, and shorter hospital stay after facial feminization surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The current work details an ERAS protocol for facial feminization surgery that reduces perioperative opioid consumption, patient-reported pain scores, and hospital stays.