An Integrated Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model for Studying Significant Factors Associated with Frequent Lane Changing.

Frequent lane changes cause serious traffic safety concerns, which involve fatalities and serious injuries. This phenomenon is affected by several significant factors related to road safety. The detection and classification of significant factors affecting lane changing could help reduce frequent lane changing risk. The principal objective of this research is to estimate and prioritize the nominated crucial criteria and sub-criteria based on participants' answers on a designated questionnaire survey. In doing so, this paper constructs a hierarchical lane-change model based on the concept of the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) with two levels of the most concerning attributes. Accordingly, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) procedure was applied utilizing fuzzy scale to evaluate precisely the most influential factors affecting lane changing, which will decrease uncertainty in the evaluation process. Based on the final measured weights for level 1, FAHP model estimation results revealed that the most influential variable affecting lane-changing is 'traffic characteristics'. In contrast, compared to other specified factors, 'light conditions' was found to be the least critical factor related to driver lane-change maneuvers. For level 2, the FAHP model results showed 'traffic volume' as the most critical factor influencing the lane changes operations, followed by 'speed'. The objectivity of the model was supported by sensitivity analyses that examined a range for weights' values and those corresponding to alternative values. Based on the evaluated results, stakeholders can determine strategic policy by considering and placing more emphasis on the highlighted risk factors associated with lane changing to improve road safety. In conclusion, the finding provides the usefulness of the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to review lane-changing risks for road safety.

Evaluating the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on medical waste disposal using preference selection index with CRADIS in a fuzzy environment.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a surge in essential medical supplies usage, leading to a notable increase in medical waste generation. Consequently, extensive research has focused on sustainable disposal methods to handle used medical equipment safely. Given the necessity to evaluate these methods considering qualitative and quantitative criteria, this falls within the realm of multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM). This study introduces a framework for selecting the most suitable medical waste treatment methods, taking into account economic, technological, environmental, and social aspects. Sixteen criteria were assessed using the Fuzzy Preference Selection Index (F-PSI) to determine the optimal waste disposal approach. Additionally, the Fuzzy Compromise Ranking of Alternatives from Distance to Ideal Solution (F-CRADIS) method was employed to evaluate nine technologies for medical waste disposal. Notably, disinfection efficiency emerged as the most crucial criterion, with autoclaving identified as the preferred method for medical waste treatment. A practical case study conducted in Sivas, Turkey, validates the feasibility of these strategies. Multiple sensitivity analyses were performed to ensure the stability and reliability of the proposed approach.

Decision algorithm for picture fuzzy sets and Aczel Alsina aggregation operators based on unknown degree of wights.

Aggregation operators (AOs) are well-known and efficient mathematical tools that are utilized to overcome the impact of imprecise and vague information during the aggregation process. The theoretical concepts of Aczel Alsina aggregation expressions are an extension of triangular norms and become a hot research topic in the environment of the fuzzy framework. The power operators provide a smooth approximation and are used to mitigate the influence of redundant or insufficient information on the attributes or criteria. Some robust aggregation approaches are developed by combining two different theories, like power operators and Aczel Alsina aggregation tools. This article aims to explore the theory of picture fuzzy sets (PFSs), an extended version of fuzzy sets, and intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Some robust operations of Aczel Alsina aggregation tools are also present in light of the picture fuzzy environment. We established a class of new methodologies in the light of picture fuzzy information, including picture fuzzy Aczel Alsina power weighted average (PFAAPWA) and picture fuzzy Aczel Alsina power ordered weighted average (PFAAPOWA) operators. We also developed an appropriate approach like picture fuzzy Aczel Alsina power weighted geometric (PFAAPWG) and picture fuzzy Aczel Alsina power ordered weighted geometric (PFAAPOWG) operators. Notable properties and characteristics of proposed methodologies are also demonstrated. Our invented approaches not only aggregate complicated information but can clearly define interrelationships among several arguments. Moreover, we establish an algorithm for the multi-attribute group decision-making (MAGDM) problem to handle the impact of redundant and vague information on human opinions. Finally, we study an experimental case study to evaluate an appropriate optimal option from available options. To reveal consistency and effectiveness of developed approaches, influence study by changing various parametric values and comparative study by comparing results of existing approaches.

Multi-attribute decision-making method based on complex T-spherical fuzzy frank prioritized aggregation operators.

This article aims to introduce new aggregation operators (AOs) by assigning the positive real values known as priority degree among the strict priority levels. To Develop the complex T-spherical fuzzy (TSF) frank prioritized (CTSFFP) AOs, using the frank t-norm (FTN) and frank t-conorm (FTCN) operational laws, also explain sum, product, and power operations under complex TSF information. The TSF set framework has a superior structure for uncertain data handling than an existing intuitionistic fuzzy set (FS), Pythagorean FS (PyFS), q-rung orthopair FS (q-ROFS), picture FS (PFS), and spherical FS (SFS). Because the structure of the TSF set has the most generalized form of IFS, PyFS, q-ROFS, PFS, and SFS, it provides greater freedom to decision experts for handling information where these discussed sets fail to aggregate ambiguous details. Utilizing the idea of priority degree, proposed new AOs called CTSFFP weighted averaging (CTSFFPWA), CTSFFP ordered weighted averaging (CTSFFPOWA), CTSFFP hybrid weighted averaging (CTSFFPHWA), CTSFFP weighted geometric (CTSFFPWG), CTSFFP ordered weighted geometric (CTSFFPOWG), CTSFFP hybrid weighted geometric (CTSFFPHWG) operators. Some desirable properties of AOs, such as idempotency, monotonicity, and boundedness, are also discussed. To show the importance of proposed AOs, the real-life problem of multi-attribute decision-making (MADM) is solved with the help of developed CTSFFPWA and CTSFFPWG operators. To enhance the proposed AOs' superiority, compare the diagnosed theory with existing AOs and give conclusions.

Decision algorithm for educational institute selection with spherical fuzzy heronian mean operators and Aczel-Alsina triangular norm.

This article presents a novel study of spherical fuzzy sets (SFSs), a more comprehensive framework of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and picture fuzzy sets. The SFS allows the decision-makers (DMs) to cope with complicated and insufficient information during the aggregation process. The Heronian mean (HrM) model theory is also utilized to express correlation among different input arguments or characteristics. Recently, the theory of Aczel Alsina triangular norms gained a lot of attention from various research scholars and has many capabilities to provide smooth approximations during decision analysis. In this article, we developed some appropriate operations of Aczel Alsina t-norms and t-conorms in light of spherical fuzzy (SF) information. We develop new mathematical ways to look at SF data to keep clarity and sufficient information. These are the SF Aczel Alsina Heronian mean (SFAAHrM) and SF Aczel Alsina weighted Heronian mean (SFAAWHrM) operators. Furthermore, we also present a list of new strategies based on Aczel Alsina operations, such as SF Aczel Alsina geometric Heronian mean (SFAAGHrM) and SF Aczel Alsina weighted geometric Heronian mean (SFAAWGHrM) operators. Some notable properties are also characterized to show the validity and effectiveness of our derived mathematical approaches. Considering our derived strategies, an algorithm for the multiple attribute decision-making (MADM) problem is established to resolve complicated real-life applications. A numerical example presents the compatibility of derived approaches and provides a solid mechanism to improve the performance of educational institutes. A comparison technique is also demonstrated to show the applicability and consistency of diagnosed approaches by contrasting the findings of pioneered approaches with existing methodologies.

An extension of the best-worst method based on the spherical fuzzy sets for multi-criteria decision-making.

The ambiguous information in multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) and the vagueness of decision-makers for qualitative judgments necessitate accurate tools to overcome uncertainties and generate reliable solutions. As one of the latest and most powerful MCDM methods for obtaining criteria weight, the best-worst method (BWM) has been developed. Compared to other MCDM methods, such as the analytic hierarchy process, the BWM requires fewer pairwise comparisons and produces more consistent results. Consequently, the main objective of this study is to develop an extension of BWM using spherical fuzzy sets (SFS) to address MCDM problems under uncertain conditions. Hesitancy, non-membership, and membership degrees are three-dimensional functions included in the SFS. The presence of three defined degrees allows decision-makers to express their judgments more accurately. An optimization model based on nonlinear constraints is used to determine optimal spherical fuzzy weight coefficients (SF-BWM). Additionally, a consistency ratio is proposed for the SF-BWM to assess the reliability of the proposed method in comparison to other versions of BWM. SF-BWM is examined using two numerical decision-making problems. The results show that the proposed method based on the SF-BWM provided the criteria weights with the same priority as the BWM and fuzzy BWM. However, there are differences in the criteria weight values based on the SF-BWM that indicate the accuracy and reliability of the obtained results. The main advantage of using SF-BWM is providing a better consistency ratio. Based on the comparative analysis, the consistency ratio obtained for SF-BWM is threefold better than the BWM and fuzzy BWM methods, which leads to more accurate results than BWM and fuzzy BWM.

Complex spherical fuzzy Aczel Alsina aggregation operators and their application in assessment of electric cars.

The multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) tool is a robust decision-making technique utilized in several fields like networking, risk management, digital analysis, cybercrime investigation, artificial intelligence, waste management enterprises and many other selection criteria. Complex SFS (CSFS) is a new edition of the spherical fuzzy set (SFS) that offers substantial information about any item in terms of amplitude and phase terms in a wider range of real terms. Complex SFS (CSFS) can be an extension of the spherical fuzzy set (SFS). The Aczel-Alsina aggregation tools are more appropriate aggregation operators (AOs), and they are used to conquer the impact of inconsistent and uncertain data. In this paper, we reveal some new approaches based on Aczel-Alsina aggregation tools under consideration of Complex Spherical Fuzzy (CSF) information. These new approaches include the CSF Aczel-Alsina weighted average (CSFAWA) operator, and the CSF Aczel-Alsina ordered weighted average (CSFOWA) operator. In addition to this, we also introduce a list of novel techniques by making use of the theory of Aczel-Alsina aggregation tools such as CSF Aczel-Alsina weighted geometric (CSFAWG) and CSF Aczel-Alsina ordered weighted geometric (CSFOWG) operators. To demonstrate the resilience and efficacy of the approaches that have been mentioned, we will examine a few exceptional examples and remarkable properties of the methodology that we have devised. In addition, a characterization is provided for an approach to the MCDM issue using the CPF information system. We use the example of electric automobiles as a case study to illustrate the uniformity and dependability of the methodology that we have established. This example was chosen because of the high cost of fuel and the present economic challenges that are being encountered by families in the middle class. An empirical case study is also constructed to determine an electric car that is desirable based on the techniques that we have proposed. To evaluate the correctness and superiority of the established strategies, we compare the outcomes of previously used techniques with the AOs currently being provided.

An application of the hybrid AHP-PROMETHEE approach to evaluate the severity of the factors influencing road accidents.

The evaluation of the severity of the factors influencing road accidents with a detailed severity distribution is critical to plan evidence-based road safety improvements and strategies. However, currently available studies use statistical and machine learning (ML) models to evaluate the severity of factors causing road accidents without a detailed severity distribution. Further, most of these available models require significant pre-data processing and have certain data-centric limitations. However, the multi criteria decision-making (MCDM) techniques have the potential to combine expert opinions for robust analysis without any pre-data processing calculations. Thus, this study uses a hybrid analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and the preference ranking organisation method for enrichment evaluation (PROMETHEE) approach to analyse the severity of factors and characteristics that influence road accidents within the Gujarat state, using injury types as criteria and minor road accident influencing factors as alternatives. These 82 minor factors have been further characterised into 18 characteristics and 4 major factors. Further, AHP integrated 40 expert inputs to determine criterion weights, while PROMETHEE ranked all minor variables. Then, after applying k-mean clustering, each ranked factor has been classified as very severe, moderately severe, or severe. The result clearly highlights that overspeeding, male gender, and clear weather conditions have been concluded to be the highly severe factors for Gujarat state. Thus, by providing a clear severity analysis and distribution of factors influencing road accidents, the proposed research may help government stakeholders, researchers, and politicians build severity-based road safety reforms and strategies with clarity.

Assessment of Significant Factors Affecting Frequent Lane-Changing Related to Road Safety: An Integrated Approach of the AHP-BWM Model.

Frequent lane changes cause serious traffic safety concerns for road users. The detection and categorization of significant factors affecting frequent lane changing could help to reduce frequent lane-changing risk. The main objective of this research study is to assess and prioritize the significant factors and sub-factors affecting frequent lane changing designed in a three-level hierarchical structure. As a multi-criteria decision-making methodology (MCDM), this study utilizes the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) combined with the best-worst method (BWM) to compare and quantify the specified factors. To illustrate the applicability of the proposed model, a real-life decision-making problem is considered, prioritizing the most significant factors affecting lane changing based on the driver's responses on a designated questionnaire survey. The proposed model observed fewer pairwise comparisons (PCs) with more consistent and reliable results than the conventional AHP. For level 1 of the three-level hierarchical structure, the AHP-BWM model results show "traffic characteristics" (0.5148) as the most significant factor affecting frequent lane changing, followed by "human" (0.2134), as second-ranked factor. For level 2, "traffic volume" (0.1771) was observed as the most significant factor, followed by "speed" (0.1521). For level 3, the model results show "average speed" (0.0783) as first-rank factor, followed by the factor "rural" (0.0764), as compared to other specified factors. The proposed integrated approach could help decision-makers to focus on highlighted significant factors affecting frequent lane-changing to improve road safety.

Analyzing the Importance of Driver Behavior Criteria Related to Road Safety for Different Driving Cultures.

Driver behavior has been considered as the most critical and uncertain criteria in the study of traffic safety issues. Driver behavior identification and categorization by using the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) can overcome the uncertainty of driver behavior by capturing the ambiguity of driver thinking style. The main goal of this paper is to examine the significant driver behavior criteria that influence traffic safety for different traffic cultures such as Hungary, Turkey, Pakistan and China. The study utilized the FAHP framework to compare and quantify the driver behavior criteria designed on a three-level hierarchical structure. The FAHP procedure computed the weight factors and ranked the significant driver behavior criteria based on pairwise comparisons (PCs) of driver's responses on the Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ). The study results observed "violations" as the most significant driver behavior criteria for level 1 by all nominated regions except Hungary. While for level 2, "aggressive violations" is observed as the most significant driver behavior criteria by all regions except Turkey. Moreover, for level 3, Hungary and Turkey drivers evaluated the "drive with alcohol use" as the most significant driver behavior criteria. While Pakistan and China drivers evaluated the "fail to yield pedestrian" as the most significant driver behavior criteria. Finally, Kendall's agreement test was performed to measure the agreement degree between observed groups for each level in a hierarchical structure. The methodology applied can be easily transferable to other study areas and our results in this study can be helpful for the drivers of each region to focus on highlighted significant driver behavior criteria to reduce fatal and seriously injured traffic accidents.