RESUMO
Aortic dissection (AD) is a catastrophic life-threatening cardiovascular emergency with a 1-2% per hour mortality rate post-diagnosis, characterized physiologically by the separation of aortic wall layers. AD initially presents as intense pain that can then radiate to the back, arms, neck, or jaw along with neurological deficits like difficulty in speaking, and unilateral weakness in some patients. This spectrum of clinical features associated with AD is often confused with acute myocardial infarction, hence leading to a delay in AD diagnosis. Cardiac and vascular biomarkers are structural proteins and microRNAs circulating in the bloodstream that correlate to tissue damage and their levels become detectable even before symptom onset. Timely diagnosis of AD using biomarkers, in combination with advanced imaging diagnostics, will significantly improve prognosis by allowing earlier vascular interventions. This comprehensive review aims to investigate emerging biomarkers in the diagnosis of AD, as well as provide future directives for creating advanced diagnostic tools and imaging techniques.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: This meta-analysis seeks to evaluate the efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD), end-stage renal disease (ESRD), and undergoing hemodialysis (HD) who also have atrial fibrillation (AF). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, clinicaltrials.gov, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database for relevant studies reporting the usefulness of OAC therapy for CKD, ESRD, and HD patients with AF was conducted from its inception until 1st May 2023. The studies that reported OR, RR, or HR for adult AF patients to investigate the efficacy of OAC in CKD, ESRD, and HD were included. Statistical analysis was completed using a generic inverse variance and random-effects model to calculate the combined HR and their corresponding 95% CIs for all outcomes. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The meta-analysis included 33 studies with 178,956 patients. The analysis revealed that the DOACs, when compared to VKA, significantly lowered the risk of stroke or systemic embolism (HR: 0.81 [95% CI: 0.70, 0.93]; P=0.002; I2=62%), bleeding (HR: 0.77, [95% CI: 0.67, 0.89]; P=0.0003; I2=83%), and intracranial hemorrhage (HR: 0.56, [95% CI 0.47, 0.66]; P<0.00001; I2=0%). Similarly, the risks of cardiovascular death (HR: 0.88, [95% CI 0.78, 1.00]; P=0.05; I2=0%), all-cause mortality (HR: 0.88, [95% CI 0.70, 1.10]; P=0.25; I2=96%), and myocardial infarction (HR: 0.80, [95% CI 0.54, 1.17]; P= 0.25; I2= 0%) were lowered by DOAC, but the result was insignificant. No significant difference was seen in the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding between DOAC and VKA as well (HR: 0.95, [95% CI 0.75, 1.20]; P=0.65; I2=83%). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis confirms that DOACs are effective for managing AF in patients with kidney disease, with potential clinical implications for AF and CKD management. Further research should explore DOACs' reno-protective effects.