RESUMO
Marine ecosystems and their associated biodiversity sustain life on Earth and hold intrinsic value. Critical marine ecosystem services include maintenance of global oxygen and carbon cycles, production of food and energy, and sustenance of human wellbeing. However marine ecosystems are swiftly being degraded due to the unsustainable use of marine environments and a rapidly changing climate. The fundamental challenge for the future is therefore to safeguard marine ecosystem biodiversity, function, and adaptive capacity whilst continuing to provide vital resources for the global population. Here, we use foresighting/hindcasting to consider two plausible futures towards 2030: a business-as-usual trajectory (i.e. continuation of current trends), and a more sustainable but technically achievable future in line with the UN Sustainable Development Goals. We identify key drivers that differentiate these alternative futures and use these to develop an action pathway towards the desirable, more sustainable future. Key to achieving the more sustainable future will be establishing integrative (i.e. across jurisdictions and sectors), adaptive management that supports equitable and sustainable stewardship of marine environments. Conserving marine ecosystems will require recalibrating our social, financial, and industrial relationships with the marine environment. While a sustainable future requires long-term planning and commitment beyond 2030, immediate action is needed to avoid tipping points and avert trajectories of ecosystem decline. By acting now to optimise management and protection of marine ecosystems, building upon existing technologies, and conserving the remaining biodiversity, we can create the best opportunity for a sustainable future in 2030 and beyond.
RESUMO
The majority of the skeleton of elasmobranch fishes (sharks, rays and relatives) is tessellated: uncalcified cartilage is overlain by a superficial rind of abutting, mineralized, hexagonal blocks called tesserae. We employed a diversity of imaging techniques on an ontogenetic series of jaw samples to investigate the development of the tessellated skeleton in a stingray (Urobatis halleri). We compared these data with the cellular changes that characterize cartilage calcification in bony skeletons. Skeletal growth is characterized by the appearance of tesserae as well as changes in chondrocyte shape, arrangement and density. Yolk sac embryos (35-56 mm disc width, DW) have untessellated lower jaw tissue wrapped in perichondrium and densely packed with chondrocytes. Chondrocyte density decreases dramatically after yolk sac absorption (histotroph stage: 57-80 mm DW) until the formation of tesserae, which are first visible using our techniques as thin (approximately 60 microm), sub-perichondral plaques. During the histotroph stage, flattened chondrocytes align parallel to the perichondrium at the tissue periphery, where we believe they are incorporated into developing tesserae to form the cell-rich laminae observed within tesserae; in older animals peripheral cells in the uncalcified phase are rounder and less uniformly oriented. By parturition (approximately 75 mm DW), cell density and the number of adjoining chondrocyte pairs (an indicator of cell division) have dropped to less than a third of their initial values; these remain low and tesserae continue to grow in size. The tessellated skeleton is a simple solution to the conundrum of growth in an endoskeleton with external mineralization and no remodeling. Although we see parallels with endochondral ossification (e.g. chondrocytes decreasing in density with age), the lack of chondrocyte hypertrophy and the fact that mineralization is sub-perichondral (not the case in mammalian cartilage) suggest that the similarities end there.