Rituximab is an effective treatment in patients with pemphigus vulgaris and demonstrates a steroid-sparing effect.

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroids (CS) with or without adjuvant immunosuppressant agents are standard treatment for pemphigus vulgaris (PV). The efficacy of adjuvant therapies in minimizing steroid-related adverse events (AEs) is unproven. OBJECTIVES: To utilize data collected in a French investigator-initiated, phase III, open-label, randomized controlled trial to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of rituximab and seek approval for its use in PV. METHODS: This was an independently conducted post hoc analysis of the moderate-to-severe PV subset enrolled in the Ritux 3 study. Patients were randomized to rituximab plus 0·5 or 1·0 mg kg-1 per day prednisone tapered over 3 or 6 months, or 1·0 or 1·5 mg kg-1 per day prednisone alone tapered over 12 or 18 months, respectively (according to disease severity). The primary end point was complete remission at month 24 without CS (CRoff) for ≥ 2 months, and 24-month efficacy and safety results were also reported. RESULTS: At month 24, 34 of 38 patients (90%) on rituximab plus prednisone achieved CRoff ≥ 2 months vs. 10 of 36 patients (28%) on prednisone alone. Median total cumulative prednisone dose was 5800 mg in the rituximab plus prednisone arm vs. 20 520 mg for prednisone alone. Eight of 36 patients (22%) who received prednisone alone withdrew from treatment owing to AEs; one rituximab-plus-prednisone patient withdrew due to pregnancy. Overall, 24 of 36 patients (67%) on prednisone alone experienced a grade 3/4 CS-related AE vs. 13 of 38 patients (34%) on rituximab plus prednisone. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with moderate-to-severe PV, rituximab plus short-term prednisone was more effective than prednisone alone. Patients treated with rituximab had less CS exposure and were less likely to experience severe or life-threatening CS-related AEs. What's already known about this topic? Pemphigus vulgaris (PV) is the most common type of pemphigus. Corticosteroids, a standard first-line treatment for PV, have significant side-effects. Although their effects are unproven, adjuvant corticosteroid-sparing agents are routinely used to minimize steroid exposure and corticosteroid-related side-effects. There is evidence that the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab is effective in the treatment of patients with severe recalcitrant pemphigus and in patients with newly diagnosed pemphigus. What does this study add? This study provides a more detailed analysis of patients with PV enrolled in an investigator-initiated trial. Rituximab plus prednisone had a steroid-sparing effect and more patients achieved complete remission off prednisone. Fewer patients experienced grade 3 or grade 4 steroid-related adverse events than those on prednisone alone. This collaboration between academia and industry, utilizing independent post hoc analyses, led to regulatory authority approvals of rituximab in moderate-to-severe PV.

Recurrence of drug-induced reactions in DRESS patients.

BACKGROUND: Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) may relapse following introduction of drugs structurally unrelated to the initial culprit drug. OBJECTIVE: To assess the frequency and characteristics of recurrent drug eruptions in patients with history of DRESS. METHODS: Patients who had developed adverse cutaneous reaction after DRESS occurrence were recruited from the regional database of Upper Normandy in France. Rate of recurrences were compared with patients with Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) and Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) patients during the same time frame. RESULTS: Of the 60 cases of DRESS collected, 15 (25%) with recurrences were retained for analysis. Seven patients had a single recurrence, whereas eight patients had several relapses. In the patients with pre-existing DRESS, recurrences were incomplete, corresponding to cutaneous rash in 13 cases and associated with eosinophilia in seven cases. Internal organ involvement was observed in two cases. In contrast, a single recurrence was found out of 61 patients with TEN/SJS. CONCLUSION: Incomplete recurrences with structurally unrelated culprit drugs are a frequent phenomenon in DRESS patients.

Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) in patients receiving strontium ranelate.

UNLABELLED: We have reviewed 47 drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) cases associated to strontium ranelate reported up to March 2011 to the Marketing Holder. The main signs were skin rash, fever, face oedema hypereosinophilia and liver involvement. For ten patients, persistence of DRESS symptoms was reported at the latest news obtained, and DRESS was identified as the direct cause of death in one case. The maximum incidence of DRESS associated with strontium ranelate was 1/24,112 [95 % CI (1/14,859; 1/42,194)] newly treated patients in France. Because DRESS is a severe drug reaction, the occurrence of a rash in a patient treated with strontium ranelate should lead to prompt and permanent treatment discontinuation. INTRODUCTION: This study aims to describe cases of DRESS reported to the Marketing Authorisation Holder worldwide for patients receiving strontium ranelate by practitioner or by regulatory authorities. METHODS: Spontaneously reported hypersensitivity events from the strontium ranelate pharmacovigilance database since marketing authorisation (2004) to March 2011 were reviewed by an expert committee. Cases of DRESS were classified as established, probable, possible or no DRESS according to expert judgement. National incidences of DRESS were estimated in relation to the number of newly treated patients. RESULTS: Up to March 2011, 325 cases of strontium ranelate-induced hypersensitivity events were assessed from which 47 DRESS cases were confirmed. Mean age was 68.7 years and besides skin rash, the main signs and symptoms were hypereosinophilia, liver involvement, fever and face oedema. Median time to skin reaction was 33.5 days after treatment start. Most patients (62 %) recovered at the time of reporting or were recovering. For ten patients, persistence of DRESS symptoms was reported at the latest news obtained. Relapses were observed in a single case. The mortality rate was 8.5 %. The maximum incidence of DRESS associated with strontium ranelate was 1/24,112 [95 % CI (1/14,859; 1/42,194)] newly treated patients in France. CONCLUSION: DRESS is a well-identified and characterised adverse reaction to strontium ranelate. This risk should be integrated in the risk-benefit balance evaluation of patient treatment, and the occurrence of a rash should lead to prompt and permanent treatment discontinuation with careful follow-up.

Treatment of osteoporosis: recognizing and managing cutaneous adverse reactions and drug-induced hypersensitivity.

UNLABELLED: Cutaneous adverse reactions are reported for many treatments including antiosteoporotic agents. This position paper includes an algorithm for their recognition. With early recognition and proper management, including immediate and permanent withdrawal of the culprit agent, accompanied by hospitalization, rehydration, and systemic corticosteroids, if necessary, the prognosis is good. INTRODUCTION: Cutaneous adverse reactions are reported for many therapeutic agents and observed in between 0% and 8% of treated patients depending on the drug. The antiosteoporotic agents are reputed to be safe in terms of cutaneous effects; however, there have been a number of case reports of cutaneous adverse reactions, which merit consideration. This was the subject of a Working Group meeting of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis in April 2009, to focus on the impact of cutaneous adverse reactions and drug-induced hypersensitivity in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. We prepared this position paper following these discussions, and include an algorithm for their recognition. METHODS: We reviewed cutaneous adverse reactions observed with antiosteoporotic agents, including information from case reports, regulatory documents, and pharmacovigilance. RESULTS: The cutaneous adverse reactions range from benign reactions including exanthematous or maculopapular eruption (drug rash), photosensitivity, and urticaria to the severe and potentially life-threatening reactions, angioedema, drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), Stevens Johnson syndrome (SJS), and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). Review of available evidence shows that cutaneous adverse reactions occur with all commonly used antiosteoporotic agents. Notably, there are reports of SJS and TEN for bisphosphonates, and of DRESS and TEN for strontium ranelate. These severe reactions remain very rare (<1 in 10,000 cases). CONCLUSION: With early recognition and proper management, including immediate and permanent withdrawal of the culprit agent, accompanied by hospitalization and rehydration and systemic corticosteroids if necessary, the prognosis is good.

[Imatinib-induced DRESS]. / Syndrome d'hypersensibilité médicamenteuse à l'imatinib.

BACKGROUND: Imatinib (Glivec) is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor used to treat certain cases of leukaemia. We report a case of a drug-induced reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) caused by imatinib. CASE-REPORT: A 77-year-old woman with a chronic myeloid leukaemia was treated with imatinib and allopurinol. Nineteen days after the start of treatment, the patient presented fever with a generalized polymorphous rash associated with oral erosions, facial oedema, diffuse lymphadenopathy and blood hypereosinophilia. Histological analysis of skin biopsy specimens suggested a drug-induced reaction. The outcome was favourable two weeks after discontinuation of treatment. Three months later, imatinib was reintroduced because of progression of the patient's chronic myeloid leukaemia, and recurrence of the skin rash and fever was observed within 12 hours. DISCUSSION: Allopurinol was stopped definitively because of its more frequent imputability. Imatinib was reintroduced after considering the benefit-risk ratio and in full knowledge of the existence of cutaneous reactions to imatinib, despite there being only one recent report of DRESS following treatment with imatinib. According to the causality criteria of Bégaud et al. regarding imatinib, inherent causality of the drug in our patient was initially possible (I2) and appeared likely (I3) after the rechallenge test. This case clearly illustrates that imatinib is a potential cause of DRESS.

[Lymphangiosarcoma treated with liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx)]. / Lymphangiosarcome traité par doxorubicine liposomale (Caelyx).

BACKGROUND: Lymphangiosarcoma is a highly malignant tumor with a poor prognosis. Anthracyclines constitute the form of chemotherapy most commonly used in these patients. Unfortunately, they are poorly tolerated. We report a case of lymphangiosarcoma in an elderly woman with good response to liposomal doxorubicin, an anthracycline with lower toxicity. CASE REPORT: A 70 year-old-woman with a previous history of post-mastectomy lymphedema presented a painful and bleeding lymphangiosarcoma on the arm and the chest. Because of the wide extent of the tumor, surgery was not performed. The patient was treated with liposomal doxorubicin 50 mg/m2. Marked tumor regression was observed after the first course of chemotherapy. After 5 courses, 90% regression of tumor mass was seen. Pain and bleeding also stopped. Two months after the final course of liposomal doxorubicin, relapse occurred and the patient died. DISCUSSION: A dramatic response to liposomal doxorubicin was noted in the present case, as previously reported in a patient with an angiosarcoma of the scalp. Liposomal doxorubicin could be considered for the treatment of lymphangiosarcoma, particularly in elderly patients.

Pre-silencing of genes involved in the electron transport chain (ETC) pathway is associated with responsiveness to abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: In the current context of personalized medicine, one of the major challenges in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is to identify biomarkers that predict drug responsiveness. From the European APPRAISE trial, our main objective was to identify a gene expression profile associated with responsiveness to abatacept (ABA) + methotrexate (MTX) and to understand the involvement of this signature in the pathophysiology of RA. METHODS: Whole human genome microarrays (4 × 44 K) were performed from a first subset of 36 patients with RA. Data validation by quantitative reverse-transcription (qRT)-PCR was performed from a second independent subset of 32 patients with RA. Gene Ontology and WikiPathways database allowed us to highlight the specific biological mechanisms involved in predicting response to ABA/MTX. RESULTS: From the first subset of 36 patients with RA, a combination including 87 transcripts allowed almost perfect separation between responders and non-responders to ABA/MTX. Next, the second subset of patients 32 with RA allowed validation by qRT-PCR of a minimal signature with only four genes. This latter signature categorized 81% of patients with RA with 75% sensitivity, 85% specificity and 85% negative predictive value. This combination showed a significant enrichment of genes involved in electron transport chain (ETC) pathways. Seven transcripts from ETC pathways (NDUFA6, NDUFA4, UQCRQ, ATP5J, COX7A2, COX7B, COX6A1) were significantly downregulated in responders versus non-responders to ABA/MTX. Moreover, dysregulation of these genes was independent of inflammation and was specific to ABA response. CONCLUSION: Pre-silencing of ETC genes is associated with future response to ABA/MTX and might be a crucial key to susceptibility to ABA response.

[Rituximab treatment for immune thrombocytopenia associated with systemic lupus erythematosus]. / Traitement par rituximab d'un purpura thrombopénique immunologique au cours d'un lupus systémique.

BACKGROUND: Immune thrombocytopenic purpura is an autoimmune disorder occasionally associated with systemic lupus erythematosus for which oral corticosteroids constitute the first-line treatment. Therapy may be complex, particularly in the event of a contraindication to the standard treatment, namely corticosteroids, splenectomy or immunosuppressants. We report the case of a patient with systemic lupus associated with immune thrombocytopenic purpura and multisystem tuberculosis. Because of a contraindication to corticosteroids, the patient was successfully treated with rituximab (anti-CD20 antibody). This medication (Mabthera) is indicated in the treatment of relapsing or refractory follicular lymphoma. CASE REPORT: A 31-year-old North African woman had been treated for 10 years with prednisone, hydroxychloroquine, methotrexate and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for systemic lupus erythematosus. She presented severe immune thrombocytopenic purpura (platelet count: 4G/l) 3 months after initiation of antitubercular treatment for multisystem tuberculosis. The patient was unsuccessfully treated at the outset with 3 infusions of intravenous immunoglobulin. Since thrombocytopenia remained under 5 G/l, she was given rituximab 375 mg/m2/week for 4 weeks. Thrombocytopenia and native anti-DNA antibody levels decreased after the third infusion (D16). No side effects of treatment were observed. The patient did not experience any relapse during the 29 months following the final infusion. DISCUSSION: In the present case, rituximab was used because of multisystem tuberculosis. Rituximab appears to constitute a safe and effective treatment for refractory immune thrombocytopenic purpura associated with SLE in patients having a contraindication to or refractory to conventional therapy.

[Molecular advances in pathogenesis of autoimmune blistering skin diseases]. / Avancées moléculaires dans la physiopathologie des maladies bulleuses autoimmunes.

Autoimmune blistering skin diseases are characterized by the production of autoantibodies directed against adhesive structures of the skin. These organ specific autoimmune diseases included pemphigus in which autoantibodies target proteins of the desmosomal complex, and subepidermal autoimmune diseases characterized by autoantibodies directed against structural proteins of the dermoepidermal junction. Binding of autoantibodies to their targets induces a loss of adhesion between keratinocytes in pemphigus and alterations of the dermoepidermal junction in subepidermal autoimmune diseases. Progresses during the last twenty years had allowed the identification of target autoantigens and the characterization of their adhesive functions, a better understanding of the pathogenesis of these diseases and the development of new diagnostic tools.

T-cell repertoire analysis in chronic plaque psoriasis suggests an antigen-specific immune response.

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory cutaneous disease of unknown etiology. Activation of T cells is thought to play a major role in the pathophysiology of psoriasis. In order to gain insight into the nature of the antigen (superantigen or nominal protein antigen) involved in psoriatic lesions, we have used a RT-PCR method to analyze the frequency of the 24 T cell receptor V beta chain (TCRBV) subfamilies and the size of the antigen-binding region (CDR3), using the immunoscope assay, in skin lesions of patients with chronic plaque-type psoriasis. Semi-quantitative analysis showed that no significant difference in V beta subfamily usage could be detected in T lymphocytes infiltrating lesional skin as compared to blood lymphocytes. Alternatively, determination of the size distribution of the CDR3 of all the V beta subfamilies revealed only in psoriatic skin a marked TCR oligoclonality defined by the presence in 3 to 5 V beta subfamilies of a single predominant CDR3 size which was associated with a unique V beta-J beta combination. Identical patterns of CDR3 length and V beta-J beta combination profiles were found in symetrical lesional sites from two psoriatic patients. This type of skewed CDR3 size profile is reminiscent of a local stimulation of T lymphocytes by nominal protein antigens. These data suggest that T lymphocytes infiltrating plaque-type psoriatic skin comprise expansions of oligoclonal T cells in response to stimulation by an antigen present in the skin.

Immunoscope analysis of T-lymphocytes infiltrating melanocytic tumors.

Melanomas are most frequently infiltrated by actively proliferating T-lymphocytes (1). Some of these T-cells are cytolytic and recognize peptide antigens derived from melanoma-specific antigens (2). However, with the noteworthy exception of rare immune-mediated, sponaneous regressions of melanomas (3), or in the particular case of the halo nevus phenomenon in which normal melanocytes are killed by CD8(+)-specific T-cells (4), the ongoing melanocyte-specific T-cell responses are most frequently incapable of controlling the growth of the tumor, resulting in the malignant melanocytic tumors escaping an otherwise specific immune T-cell response. The understanding of the mechanisms that underlie the switch of efficient to inefficient (and vice versa) T-cell responses is thus of primary importance in conceiving specific immunotherapies of melanomas.

[Cutaneous lupus erythematosus following argon laser treatment]. / Lupus érythémateux cutané déclenché par le laser argon.

BACKGROUND: It is well known that exposure to ultraviolet light can trigger lupus manifestations. Other light sources may have the same effect. We report a case of argon laser-induced lupus erythematosus. CASE REPORT: A 59-year-old women developed an erythematous edematous infiltrated and sensitive lesion over the right cheek ten days after an argon laser treatment of the retina. The lesion spread towards the chin despite antibiotic treatment. Histology examination of a biopsy specimen and direct immunofluorescence suggested the diagnosis of cutaneous lupus erythematosus. The lesions regressed in one month with hydroxychloroquine (400 mg/d) treatment. DISCUSSION: Our patient developed argon laser induced cutaneous lupus erythematosus. It is known that ultraviolet light and non-ultraviolet frequencies (x-rays, visible light) can induce lupus manifestations. One case of discoid lupus erythematosus after argon laser has been reported. In our case, due to a technical error the laser beam was directed onto the ipsilateral cheek during the laser treatment of the retina. The low-energy beams used in ophthalmology would explain the absence of local burn but would be sufficient to trigger lupus. This case demonstrates that argon laser, a visible blue or green beam, can provoke cutaneous lupus erythematosus even if there is no heat-induced burn. It is important to be aware of this adverse effect due to the widespread use of lasers in dermatology, particularly for the treatment of cutaneous lupus lesions.