Not taking sick leave for gynecologic cancer treatment is negatively associated with returning to the same workplace.

BACKGROUND: Gynecologic cancers are one of the most common types of malignancies in working-age women. We aimed to determine the factors that impede women from returning to the same workplace after treatment for such cancers. METHODS: A questionnaire-based survey was conducted on 194 women who underwent treatment for gynecologic cancer at the Okayama University (≥1 year after cancer treatment and <65 years of age). We performed a logistic regression analysis to determine the relationship between returning to the same workplace and not taking sick leave. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis was 49.0 years, and the median time from cancer treatment to questionnaire completion was 3.8 years. Not returning to the same workplace was positively associated with not being regularly employed (P = 0.018), short work time per day (P = 0.023), low personal income (P = 0.004), not taking sick leave (P < 0.001), advanced cancer stage (P = 0.018) and long treatment time (P = 0.032). Interestingly, not taking sick leave was strongly associated with not returning to the same workplace in the multivariable analysis (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Not taking sick leave likely was negatively associated with returning to the same workplace after the treatment for gynecologic cancer. Therefore, we suggest that steps be taken to formally introduce a sick leave system over and above the paid leave system in Japan.

Association between financial toxicity and health-related quality of life of patients with gynecologic cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Patients often struggle with their financial situation during cancer treatment due to treatment-related costs or loss of income. This resulting negative effect is called financial toxicity, which is a known as a side effect of cancer care. This study aimed to evaluate the association between financial toxicity and health-related quality of life among patients with gynecologic cancer using validated questionnaires. METHODS: In this multicenter study, patients with gynecologic cancer receiving anti-cancer drug treatment for > 2 months were recruited. Patients answered the COmprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) tool, EORTC-QLQ-C30, disease-specific tools (EORTC-QLQ-OV28/CX24/EN24), and EQ-5D-5L. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient was used to determine associations. RESULTS: Between April 2019 and July 2021, 109 cancer patients completed the COST questionnaire. The mean COST score was 19.82. Strong associations were observed between financial difficulty (r = - 0.616) in the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and body image (r = 0.738) in the EORTC-QLQ-CX24, while weak associations were noted between the global health status/quality of life (r = 0.207), EQ-5D-5L index score (r = 0.252), and several function and symptom scale scores with the COST score. CONCLUSIONS: Greater financial toxicity was associated with worse health-related quality of life scores, such as financial difficulty in gynecologic cancer patients and body image in cervical cancer patients as strong associations, and weakly associated with general health-related quality of life scores and several function/symptom scales.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer: GOTIC-019 study.

INTRODUCTION: Three randomized controlled trials have resulted in extremely extensive application of the strategy of using neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by interval debulking surgery (IDS) for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in Japan. This study aimed to evaluate the status and effectiveness of treatment strategies using NAC followed by IDS in Japanese clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a multi-institutional observational study of 940 women with Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stages III-IV epithelial ovarian cancer treated at one of nine centers between 2010 and 2015. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between 486 propensity-score matched participants who underwent NAC followed by IDS and primary debulking surgery (PDS) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Patients with FIGO stage IIIC receiving NAC had a shorter OS (median OS: 48.1 vs. 68.2 months, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.34; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99-1.82, p = 0.06) but not PFS (median PFS: 19.7 vs. 19.4 months, HR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.80-1.31, p = 0.88). However, patients with FIGO stage IV receiving NAC and PDS had comparable PFS (median PFS: 16.6 vs. 14.7 months, HR: 1.07 95% CI: 0.74-1.53, p = 0.73) and OS (median PFS: 45.2 vs. 35.7 months, HR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.65-1.47, p = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: NAC followed by IDS did not improve survival. In patients with FIGO stage IIIC, NAC may be associated with a shorter OS.

Veliparib with frontline chemotherapy and as maintenance in Japanese women with ovarian cancer: a subanalysis of efficacy, safety, and antiemetic use in the phase 3 VELIA trial.

BACKGROUND: The phase 3 VELIA trial evaluated veliparib with carboplatin/paclitaxel and as maintenance in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma. METHODS: Patients with previously untreated stage III-IV high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma were randomized 1:1:1 to control (placebo with carboplatin/paclitaxel and placebo maintenance), veliparib-combination-only (veliparib with carboplatin/paclitaxel and placebo maintenance), or veliparib-throughout (veliparib with carboplatin/paclitaxel and veliparib maintenance). Randomization stratification factors included geographic region (Japan versus North America or rest of the world). Primary end point was investigator-assessed median progression-free survival. Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics were evaluated in a subgroup of Japanese patients. RESULTS: Seventy-eight Japanese patients were randomized to control (n = 23), veliparib-combination-only (n = 30), and veliparib-throughout (n = 25) arms. In the Japanese subgroup, median progression-free survival for veliparib-throughout versus control was 27.4 and 19.1 months (hazard ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.18-1.16; p = 0.1 [not significant]). In the veliparib-throughout arm, grade 3/4 leukopenia, neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia rates were higher for Japanese (32%/88%/32%) versus non-Japanese (17%/56%/28%) patients. Grade 3/4 anemia rates were higher in non-Japanese (65%) versus Japanese (48%) patients. Early introduction of olanzapine during veliparib monotherapy maintenance phase may help prevent premature discontinuation of veliparib, via its potent antiemetic efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Median progression-free survival was numerically longer in Japanese patients in the veliparib-throughout versus control arm, consistent with results in the overall study population. Pharmacokinetics were comparable between Japanese and non-Japanese patients. Data for the subgroup of Japanese patients were not powered to show statistical significance but to guide further investigation.

Olaparib plus Bevacizumab as First-Line Maintenance in Ovarian Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Olaparib has shown significant clinical benefit as maintenance therapy in women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer with a BRCA mutation. The effect of combining maintenance olaparib and bevacizumab in patients regardless of BRCA mutation status is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, international phase 3 trial. Eligible patients had newly diagnosed, advanced, high-grade ovarian cancer and were having a response after first-line platinum-taxane chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. Patients were eligible regardless of surgical outcome or BRCA mutation status. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive olaparib tablets (300 mg twice daily) or placebo for up to 24 months; all the patients received bevacizumab at a dose of 15 mg per kilogram of body weight every 3 weeks for up to 15 months in total. The primary end point was the time from randomization until investigator-assessed disease progression or death. RESULTS: Of the 806 patients who underwent randomization, 537 were assigned to receive olaparib and 269 to receive placebo. After a median follow-up of 22.9 months, the median progression-free survival was 22.1 months with olaparib plus bevacizumab and 16.6 months with placebo plus bevacizumab (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.72; P<0.001). The hazard ratio (olaparib group vs. placebo group) for disease progression or death was 0.33 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.45) in patients with tumors positive for homologous-recombination deficiency (HRD), including tumors that had BRCA mutations (median progression-free survival, 37.2 vs. 17.7 months), and 0.43 (95% CI, 0.28 to 0.66) in patients with HRD-positive tumors that did not have BRCA mutations (median progression-free survival, 28.1 vs. 16.6 months). Adverse events were consistent with the established safety profiles of olaparib and bevacizumab. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with advanced ovarian cancer receiving first-line standard therapy including bevacizumab, the addition of maintenance olaparib provided a significant progression-free survival benefit, which was substantial in patients with HRD-positive tumors, including those without a BRCA mutation. (Funded by ARCAGY Research and others; PAOLA-1 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02477644.).

Validity of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) in patients with gynecologic cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Financial toxicity is a financial burden of cancer care itself, which leads to worse quality of life and higher mortality and is considered an adverse effect. The COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) tool is a patient-reported outcome measurement used to evaluate financial toxicity. We aimed to validate the internal consistency and reproducibility of the COST tool in patients with gynecologic cancer. METHODS: In this multicenter study covering the period April 2019 to July 2021, using the COST tool in Japan, patients diagnosed with ovarian, cervical, or endometrial cancer receiving systemic anti-cancer drug therapy for more than 2 months were eligible. Patients with no out-of-pocket costs for direct medical costs were excluded. The patients answered the initial test and a retest, which was completed from 2 to 14 days after the initial test. Internal consistency and reproducibility were assessed using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Cronbach's alpha ≥0.8 indicates good internal consistency, and ICC ≥0.8 is highly reliable. RESULTS: A total of 112 patients (ovarian: 50, cervical: 26, endometrial: 36) responded to the initial test, and 89 patients answered the retest from 2 to 14 days after the initial test. The median patient age was 58 (range, 28-78) years. The median COST score was 19. Cronbach's alpha showed good internal consistency at 0.83 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.87). The ICC at 0.850 (95% CI 0.777 to 0.900) showed high reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The COST tool has good internal consistency and reliable reproducibility in patients with gynecologic cancer in Japan. The COST tool quantifies financial toxicity in the insurance system, where patients have limited out-of-pocket direct medical costs. The results support the use of the COST tool in patients with gynecologic cancer.

Clinical practice guideline for the treatment of malignant ascites: section summary in Clinical Practice Guideline for peritoneal dissemination (2021).

Patients with peritoneal dissemination (PD) caused by abdominal malignancies are often associated with massive ascites, which shows extremely dismal prognosis because of the discontinuation of systemic chemotherapy mostly due to poor performance status. Many treatment methods, such as simple drainage, peritoneovenous shunting (PVS) and cell-free and concentrated reinfusion therapy (CART), have been used for symptom relief. However, the clinical efficacies of these methods have not been fully investigated yet. Recently, we developed the Clinical Practice Guideline for PD caused by various malignancies according to "Minds Clinical Practice Guideline Development Guide 2017". In this guideline, we systematically reviewed information on clinical diagnosis and treatments for PD using PubMed databases (2000 - 2020), and clarified the degree of recommendation for clinical questions (CQ). The evidence level was divided into groups by study design and quality. The literature level and a body of evidence were evaluated in reference to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Based on the results of systematic review, the strength of the recommendations was evaluated at a consensus meeting of the Guideline Committee. This is the English synopsis of the part of treatment of malignant ascites in Clinical Practice Guideline for PD, 2021 in Japanese. The guidelines summarize the general aspect of the treatment of malignant ascites and statements with recommendation strengths, evidence levels, agreement rates and future perspective for four raised clinical questions.

Effect of prior olaparib maintenance therapy for platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer on response to subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy.

AIM: Several years have passed since olaparib maintenance therapy was approved in patients with platinum sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (PSROC). We speculated that the response to platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) would be impaired at the time of recurrence after olaparib maintenance therapy. We conducted a noninterventional retrospective study to clarify this clinical question in a single institution. METHODS: We included all patients with PSROC who received olaparib after second or later line of PBC between April 18, 2018, and August 31, 2021. We evaluated the effect of olaparib maintenance therapy on PBC after progression. RESULTS: We identified 42 patients who received olaparib maintenance therapy after second or later line of PBC. Twenty-four patients relapsed after olaparib maintenance therapy, and 17 patients received PBC again. Four of 17 patients (complete response 2, partial response 2) responded to the PBC. The median progression-free survival was longer in patients with platinum-free interval ≥12 months than platinum-free interval of 6-12 months (9.7 vs 2.6 months, hazard ratio, 0.20: 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.90; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: In the patients with PSROC who experienced disease progression after olaparib maintenance therapy, especially in those with platinum-free interval of 6-12 months, the response to subsequent PBC was extremely poor. The efficiency of re-administration of PBC for PSROC patients with a short-term recurrence after olaparib treatment may need to be reconsidered.

Phase II study of a new multidisciplinary therapy using once every 3 week carboplatin plus dose-dense weekly paclitaxel before and after radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: We proposed a novel treatment strategy, consisting of triweekly cisplatin plus dose-dense weekly paclitaxel before and after radical hysterectomy without adjuvant radiation therapy to treat locally advanced cervical cancer. However, cisplatin-related severe non-hematologic toxicities were frequent during this strategy. This study aimed to assess the applicability of replacing cisplatin with carboplatin in our proposed strategy. METHODS: Women with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2008 stage IB2, IIA2, or IIB cervical cancer received three cycles of carboplatin (based on an area under the curve of six), each 21 days apart, starting on day 1, and 80 mg/m2 of paclitaxel on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 21-day cycle before undergoing radical hysterectomy. Patients with one or more high-risk factors, including lymph vascular invasion, parametrial invasion, lymph-node metastasis, or positive margins, received three additional cycles of chemotherapy after hysterectomy. Concurrent chemoradiation therapy was only applied to those patients who failed to respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS: Between September 2014 and July 2016, 50 women (13 women with FIGO stage IB2, 5 with stage IIA2, and 32 with stage IIB) were enrolled in this study. The overall response rate to chemotherapy was 92%, including 22% with pathological complete response. Forty-nine women (98%) completed the planned radical hysterectomy, and 11 (22%) women with one or more high-risk factors received three additional cycles of chemotherapy. Only four women (8%) received concurrent chemoradiation therapy after surgery. The 2- and 3-year progression-free survival rates were 88.0% and 83.8%, respectively, and the 2- and 3-year overall survival rates were 98.0% and 95.4%, respectively. Only two patients reported grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicities including grade 3 nausea in one patient and grade 3 liver dysfunction in one patient. CONCLUSIONS: Replacement the platinum agent resulted in equivalent efficacy, with reduced toxicity, in women with locally advanced cervical cancer. This strategy could considerably diminish the application of radiation therapy without reduced survival. A study to identify those patients who will benefit from this new multidisciplinary strategy is warranted.

Docetaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy for treating patients with stage IVB or recurrent non-squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: This phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of docetaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy for treating patients with stage IVB or recurrent non-squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix. METHODS: A total of 50 patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IVB or recurrent non-squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix were enrolled and administered docetaxel at a dose of 60 mg/m2, followed by carboplatin at a dose based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 6. The treatments were repeated every 21 days until disease progression or unacceptable adverse events. Except for two patients, 48 were eligible for evaluation. Another patient withdrew consent before treatment; adverse events were evaluated in 47. RESULTS: The response rate was 47.9% with 5 patients achieving complete response, 18 partial response, 14 stable disease, and 6 progressive disease. The disease control rate was 77.1%. With a median follow-up duration of 368 days, the median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6.1 months (95% CI 5.5-8.6) and 15.8 months (95% CI 18.2-28.3), respectively. The most frequent grade 3 and grade 4 hematological toxicity was neutropenia, with 38 patients (81%) having grade 4 and 4 (9%) having grade 3 neutropenia. The non-hematological toxicities were mainly grade 1 or 2 in severity. CONCLUSION: Docetaxel/carboplatin chemotherapy was effective, with a higher disease control rate and well-tolerated chemotherapeutic regimen for patients with stage IVB or recurrent non-squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix.

Validation of tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2 as a specific biomarker for preoperative prediction of clear cell carcinoma of the ovary.

BACKGROUND: Tissue factor pathway inhibitor 2 (TFPI2) is a novel serum biomarker that discriminates ovarian clear cell carcinoma (CCC) from borderline ovarian tumors (BOTs) and non-clear cell epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs). Here, we examined the performance of TFPI2 for preoperative diagnosis of CCC. METHODS: Serum samples were obtained preoperatively from patients with ovarian masses, who needed surgical treatment at five hospitals in Japan. The diagnostic powers of TFPI2 and cancer antigen 125 (CA125) serum levels to discriminate CCC from BOTs, other EOCs, and benign lesions were compared. RESULTS: A total of 351 patients including 69 CCCs were analyzed. Serum TFPI2 levels were significantly higher in CCC patients (mean ± SD, 508.2 ± 812.0 pg/mL) than in patients with benign lesions (154.7 ± 46.5), BOTs (181 ± 95.5) and other EOCs (265.4 ± 289.1). TFPI2 had a high diagnostic specificity for CCC (79.5%). In patients with benign ovarian endometriosis, no patient was positive for TFPI2, but 71.4% (15/21) were CA125 positive. TFPI2 showed good performance in discriminating stage II-IV CCC from BOTs and other EOCs (AUC 0.815 for TFPI2 versus 0.505 for CA125) or endometriosis (AUC 0.957 for TFPI2 versus 0.748 for CA125). The diagnostic sensitivity of TFPI2 to discriminate CCC from BOTs and other EOCs was improved from 43.5 to 71.0% when combined with CA125. CONCLUSIONS: High specificity of TFPI2 for preoperative detection of CCC was verified with the defined cutoff level of TFPI2 in clinical practice. TFPI2 and CA125 may contribute substantially to precise prediction of intractable CCC.

Survival impact of adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy after radical hysterectomy in FIGO stage IIIC1 cervical adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the survival effect of adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy after radical hysterectomy in patients with clinical pelvic node-positive cervical adenocarcinoma. METHODS: Patients with pelvic node-positive cervical adenocarcinoma diagnosed between 2000 and 2016 at our institution were identified. Survival was compared between patients who underwent radical hysterectomy alone and those who received concurrent chemoradiotherapy as an adjuvant treatment. Survival analysis using log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model was performed. RESULTS: We identified 80 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy for clinical pelvic node-positive cervical adenocarcinoma; of these, four with pathological pelvic node-negative adenocarcinoma were excluded. Of the 76 patients, 27 underwent radical hysterectomy alone and 49 received radical hysterectomy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. With a median follow-up of 53 months, the 5-year overall survival rate was 51.0% in patients who underwent radical hysterectomy alone versus 53.0% in patients who received additional concurrent chemoradiotherapy (log-rank p = 0.455). CONCLUSION: The addition of concurrent chemoradiotherapy after radical hysterectomy did not significantly improve survival among patients with pelvic node-positive cervical adenocarcinoma. More appropriate treatment strategies are needed to improve the survival outcomes of these patients.

Treatment strategy for locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer with clinically positive pelvic lymph nodes metastasis.

AIM: To determine the optimal treatment for locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer with clinical positive pelvic lymph nodes metastasis (cN1). METHODS: We enrolled patients with squamous cell cervical cancer with 2008 FIGO stages IB, IIA, or IIB diagnosed with cN1, who were treated at Hyogo Cancer Center between April 2010 and December 2016. Patients with para-aortic lymph nodes metastasis were excluded. RESULTS: Of the 69 eligible patients, 24 underwent concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), 11 underwent radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy (RH) with or without adjuvant RT, and 34 underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by RH as initial treatment. The regimens of NAC included dose-dense TC (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 , days 1, 8, 15; and carboplatin at an area under the curve = 6 on day 1, every 3 weeks) and dose-dense TP (paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15; and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1, every 3 weeks). The median observation period was 57 (12-107) months. The 5-year disease-free survival rates of the CCRT, RH, and NAC groups were 78.7%, 63.6%, and 88.2%, respectively (p = 0.14). The 5-year overall survival rates of the CCRT, RH, and NAC groups were 78.6%, 70.1%, and 94.1%, respectively (p = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: We recommend avoiding RH as primary treatment for cN1 with locally advanced squamous cell cervical cancer. Although CCRT should be considered for cN1, further studies are required to determine if NAC followed by RH will serve as an effective option.

Quality of life assessment of cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy during initial treatment for advanced ovarian cancer: A prospective cohort study.

AIM: Cell-free and concentrated ascites reinfusion therapy (CART) is applied to relieve symptoms in patients with malignant ascites. We performed a prospective cohort study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CART performed on patients with advanced ovarian and peritoneal cancers with massive ascites during the initial treatment. METHODS: From April 2018 to July 2020, CART was performed during the initial treatment of 31 patients with advanced ovarian and peritoneal cancers with cancerous ascites. Patient characteristics and clinical information before and after CART were collected. We performed quality of life assessment using the Japanese version of the M.D. Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI-J) 24 h before and after CART. RESULTS: CART was performed 38 times in 24 patients before or during neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 11 times in 11 patients prior to surgery. Four patients underwent CART before primary surgery and before and/or during chemotherapy. Grade 1-2 fever was observed in 18 of 31 cases (58%), and all were controllable by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. CART did not adversely affect the main treatment, chemotherapy, or surgery. CART significantly improved the MDASI-J symptom and interference scores within 24 h after the procedure. The symptom and interference scores decreased from 2.4 to 1.8 and from 4.8 to 3.0, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: CART can be safely performed and is useful for symptom relief and improvement of general condition prior to initial surgery and during initial chemotherapy in ovarian and peritoneal cancers. Performing CART at the time of initial treatment may facilitate initiation of the main treatment.

Propensity score-matched analysis of systemic chemotherapy versus salvage hysterectomy for persistent cervical cancer after definitive radiotherapy/concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the current study was to evaluate oncologic outcomes of patients who were treated with salvage hysterectomy (HT), compared to systemic chemotherapy (CT) for persistent cervical cancer after definitive radiotherapy (RT)/ concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). METHODS: Patients with persistent cervical cancer treated with definitive RT/CCRT at 35 institutions from 2005 to 2014 were reviewed retrospectively (n = 317). Those who underwent a HT for persistent cervical cancer after definitive RT/CCRT were matched with propensity scores for patients who underwent systemic CT. Oncologic outcomes between the two groups using a propensity score matched-cohort analysis were compared. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients with persistent cervical cancer after definitive RT/CCRT were included after matching (HT: 71, systemic CT: 71). All background factors between HT and CT groups were well balanced. Median overall survival was 3.8 and 1.5 years in the HT and CT groups, respectively (p = 0.00193, hazards ratio [HR] 0.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23-0.73), Increasing residual tumor size was significantly associated with a high incomplete resection rate (p = 0.016, Odds Ratio 1.11, 95%CI 1.02-1.22). Severe late adverse events occurred in 7 patients (9.9%) in the HT cohort. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrated that, when compared to systemic CT, the adoption of salvage HT for patients with persistent cervical cancer after definitive RT/CCRT reduced mortality rate by about 60%. This indicates that salvage HT could be curative treatment for those patients. Further prospective clinical trials with regard to salvage HT after RT/CCRT are warranted.

Leptomeningeal metastases arising from gynecological cancers.

BACKGROUND: Most cases of leptomeningeal metastasis (LM) arise from solid tumors, such as breast cancer, lung cancer, or malignant melanoma. LM arising from gynecological cancers are extremely rare. Longer survival owing to recent advances in chemotherapy and other treatments has contributed to the increased frequency of gynecological cancers metastasizing to the central nervous system (CNS). Detailed information regarding LM is scarce; therefore, we conducted a study concerning LM arising from primary gynecological cancers. METHODS: Among 24 patients with CNS metastases from gynecological cancer treated at our hospital between January 2011 and August 2018, those who were eventually diagnosed with LM were included in this retrospective study. RESULTS: Among 24 patients with CNS metastases, five patients (20.8%) were diagnosed with LM. The primary cancer was endometrial in two, cervical in one, and peritoneal in two patients. Of these five patients, three developed LM as a complication 1-11 months after the treatment of brain metastases; one patient had multiple brain metastases diagnosed at the same time as LM, and one had LM alone, without accompanying brain metastases. The median survival after the diagnosis of LM was 23 (12-69) days, while the median survival of 24 patients after the initial diagnosis of CNS metastases was 106 (13-959) days. CONCLUSION: Although LM arising from gynecological cancers is considered rare, identification of LM may be important to predict prognosis and develop new therapeutic strategies.

Suppressive effect upon carboplatin hypersensitivity reaction via pegylated liposomal doxorubicin combination therapy.

BACKGROUND: Occurrence of hypersensitivity reaction (HSR) in patients having received multiple doses of carboplatin has been reported. Several studies demonstrated reduction of carboplatin-associated HSR with in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD). The objective of this study was to determine the suppressive effect on carboplatin-induced HSR via combined treatment with PLD within clinical practice. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of women with primary or recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or peritoneal cancer treated with carboplatin containing regimen at our hospital between January 2009 and March 2019. We compared the incidence of carboplatin-induced HSR among patients who received more than one cycle of PLD plus carboplatin (PLD-C) therapy (i.e., PLD-C group) versus patients who never received PLD-C therapy (non-PLD-C group). RESULTS: A total of 414 women were included in this study (48: PLD-C group, 366: non-PLD-C group). Carboplatin-induced HSR occurred in 34 total patients (8.2%) [1/48 (2.1%) in the PLD-C group and 33/366 (9.0%) in the non-PLD-C group], with a median cycle number of carboplatin administration at onset of HSR being 9. Incidences of carboplatin-induced HSR within the PLD-C versus non-PLD-C group at the 8th, 12th, and 16th cycles of carboplatin administration were 2.2% vs 11.2%, 2.2% vs 28.6%, and 2.2% vs 39.1%, respectively [hazard ratio: 19.2 (95% confidence interval: 9.82-39.4), p < 0.0001]. CONCLUSION: Based on the data analyzed here, a suppressive effect on carboplatin-induced HSR via combination therapy with PLD was confirmed within clinical practice.

Dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin vs. conventional paclitaxel and carboplatin as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to determine the optimal regimen of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancers. METHODS: A clinical information survey involving 171 patients with advanced epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer was conducted. These patients underwent NAC followed by interval debulking surgery at the Hyogo Cancer Center (Hyogo, Japan) between January 2006 and December 2015. RESULTS: The median observation period was 41 (range 4-138) months. Dose-dense paclitaxel and carboplatin (TC) was administered in 101 patients (59%); tri-weekly TC was administered 70 patients (41%). Median progression-free survival was 21 [95% confidence interval (CI) 18-23] months and 15 (95% CI 13-17) months in the dose-dense TC and conventional-TC group [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.69, 95% CI 0.46-0.96; p = 0.02], respectively. The median overall survival was 59 (95% CI 46-72) and 40 (95% CI 32-57) months in the dose-dense TC group and conventional-TC group (HR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.48-1.06; p = 0.09). Multivariate analysis for progression-free survival demonstrated that dose-dense TC represented an independent prognostic factor (HR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.50-0.99; p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Dose-dense TC is a promising regimen of NAC for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.

Landscape of systemic therapy for ovarian cancer in 2019: Primary therapy.

According to the statement from the 5th Ovarian Cancer Consensus Conference in 2015, the primary systemic chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer is a combination of paclitaxel plus carboplatin administered every 3 weeks (PCq3w). Optional alternatives include weekly dose-dense paclitaxel, in combination and maintenance therapy with bevacizumab, and intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Since then, in addition to the PCq3w strategy, there has been emerging new evidence, especially for poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. Moreover, there are multiple randomized, phase 3 trials testing the addition of antiangiogenic and/or immune checkpoint inhibitors in this patient population. In this article, current and future perspectives of systemic chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer are discussed.

Phase II trial of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab for advanced or recurrent cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab in patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer. METHODS: Subjects included patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer not amenable to curative treatment with surgery or radiation therapy. Treatment consisted of paclitaxel 175 mg/m2, carboplatin area under the curve 6 mg/mL/min, and bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 21 days until disease progression, complete remission, or limiting toxicity. The primary endpoint was the objective response. RESULTS: In total, 34 patients received a median of 6 treatment cycles (range 2-25). The median follow-up period was 18.5 months (range 2-29). The objective response was 88% (95% confidence interval: 72.5%-96.7%). Seventeen patients (50%) experienced complete response, whereas 13 patients experienced (38%) partial response with a median duration of 6 months. Grades 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities manifested as neutropenia in 14 (41.2%), leukopenia in 14 (41.2%), anemia in 11 (32.4%), and thrombocytopenia in 9 (26.5%) patients. One patient who underwent prior pelvic irradiation developed grade 2 rectovaginal fistula. CONCLUSION: The combination of paclitaxel, carboplatin, and bevacizumab is effective and safe in patients with advanced or recurrent cervical cancer.