Utilization and perception of same-day discharge in electrophysiological procedures and device implantations: an EHRA survey.

The aim of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey was to assess the utilization of same-day discharge (SDD) in electrophysiology (EP). An online-based questionnaire was shared with the EHRA community between 12 and 30 June 2020 and recorded institutional information, complication assessment, recent experiences, and opinions regarding possible advantages or concerns with SDD. In total, 218 responses from 49 countries provided information on current SDD management. Overall, SDD was implemented in 77.5%, whereas this proportion was significantly higher in tertiary and high-volume centres (83.8% and 85.3%, both P < 0.01). The concept of SDD was most commonly used following implantations of cardiac event recorders (97%), diagnostic EP procedures (72.2%), and implantations of pacemakers with one or two intracardiac leads (50%), while the lowest SDD utilization was observed after catheter ablations of left atrial or ventricular arrhythmias. Within SDD-experienced centres, ∼90% respondents stated that this discharge concept is recommendable or highly recommendable and reported that rates of increased rehospitalization and complication rates were low. Most respondents assumed a better utilization of hospital resources (78.2%), better cost effectiveness (77.3%), and an improved patients' comfort but were concerned about possible impairment of detection (72.5%) and management (78.7%) of late complications. In conclusion, >75% of respondents already implement SDD following EP interventions with a large heterogeneity with regard to specific procedures. Further research is needed to confirm or disprove existing and expected benefits and obstacles.

High incidence of newly diagnosed obstructive coronary artery disease regardless of chest pain detected on pre-procedural cardiac computed tomography angiography in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac computed tomography (CT) is often performed before catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation to map atrial and pulmonary anatomy. Incident coronary artery disease (CAD) may also be diagnosed during cardiac CT angiography (CTA). Our aim was to assess whether coronary CTA might be able to identify a significant proportion of patients with obstructive CAD prior to their catheter ablation procedure event, even in asymptomatic patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing pre-ablation coronary CTA for atrial fibrillation between 2013 and 2020 were retrospectively selected. Patients with previously diagnosed CAD were excluded. Obstructive CAD was defined as ≥50% luminal stenosis. We analyzed the relationship between obstructive CAD, any chest pain, and traditional risk factors. RESULTS: Overall, 2321 patients [median age 63.0 (54.4-69.2), 1052/2321 (45.3%) female] underwent coronary CTA and 488/2321 (21.0%) were diagnosed with obstructive CAD. There was no difference regarding the rate of obstructive CAD in patients with any chest pain compared to patients without any chest pain [91/404 (22.5%) vs. 397/1917 (20.7%), P = 0.416, respectively). The following parameters were associated with obstructive CAD: age > 65 years [odds ratio (OR) = 2.51; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.02-3.13; P < 0.001), male sex (OR = 1.59; 95% CI, 1.28-1.98; P < 0.001), hypertension (OR = 1.40; 95% CI, 1.08-1.81; P = 0.012), diabetes (OR = 1.50; 95% CI, 1.13-1.99; P = 0.006), dyslipidaemia (OR = 1.33; 95% CI, 1.07-1.66; P = 0.011) and history of smoking (OR = 1.34; 95% CI, 1.07-1.68; P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: The high prevalence of obstructive CAD even in patients without chest pain highlights the importance of additional coronary artery diagnostics in patients undergoing left atrial CTA awaiting catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. These patients regardless of chest pain thus may require further risk modification to decrease their potential ischemic and thromboembolic risk.

Novel protocol for optimal utilization of HPSD approach for pulmonary vein isolation.

Background: The efficiency of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) depends on the durability of RF lesions. Recent studies documented sustained continuity of ablation lines, improvements in durability, and expected clinical outcomes through altered settings in duration and power. However, the ablation strategy has not been adapted to this new approach and different biophysics of lesion formation. Purpose: The aim of this study was to demonstrate that by adjusting the ablation approach to the broader geometry of lesions by increasing the minimal spacing between adjacent RF, a further significant reduction of procedural time while maintaining sufficient long-term outcomes is achievable. Methods: The presented study was a prospective, observational multi-center trial. The periprocedural data were compared with data from a consecutively collected historical cohort. Results: In total, 196 patients were included (mean age 62 ± 11 years, male 64.3%). Procedural duration, RF time, and LA dwelling time were significantly shorter in the HPSD group compared with the standard group (73 ± 26 min vs. 98 ± 36 min, p < .001; 14 ± 7 min vs. 33 ± 12 min, p < .001; and 59 ± 21 min vs. 77 ± 32 min, p < .001, respectively). Mean AF-free survival in the first year of follow-up was 304 ± 14 days in the HPSD group versus 340 ± 10 days in the standard group (log-rank p = .403). There were no statistically significant differences in the complication rates between the groups. Conclusion: Increasing the minimal distance between individual application points simplifies AF ablation and further reduces procedure time without negative effects on efficacy and safety. Larger studies are needed to optimally utilize this approach.