Comparative Analysis of Optical Quality of Monofocal, Enhanced Monofocal, Multifocal, and Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses: A Mobile Model Eye Study.

Purpose: To use the revised model eye to observe and compare how the world is perceived by patients with monofocal intraocular lens (IOL), Eyhance, bifocal IOL, and Symfony, and check its performance. Methods: The new mobile model eye consists of an artificial cornea, an IOL, a wet cell, an adjustable lens tube, a lens tube, an objective lens, a tube lens, and a digital single-lens reflex camera. We collected photographs of distant buildings and streets at night, videos of the focusing process, and videos of United States Air Force resolution target from 6 m to 15 cm and analyzed them quantitatively. Results: In this revised model eye using an objective lens, an artificial cornea similar to the human cornea could be used. Using a digital single-lens reflex camera, high-resolution imaging was possible without an additional computer. Fine focusing was possible using an adjustable lens tube. For monofocal IOL, the contrast modulation was 0.39 at 6 m and decreased consistently. It was nearly 0 as the model eye got closer than 1.6 m. For Eyhance, the contrast modulation was 0.40 at 6 m. It then decreased and increased again. At 1.3 m, it was 0.07 and then decreased again. For Symfony, the contrast modulation was 0.18 at 6 m. Symfony showed the characteristics of a bifocal IOL with low add diopter. Halos (234 pixels) were observed around lights, although smaller than those seen with bifocal IOL (432 pixels). Conclusions: We could objectively observe and compare how patients with monofocal IOL, Eyhance, bifocal IOL, and Symfony perceived the world using this revised model eye. Translational Relevance: Data obtained by this new mobile model eye can be used to help patients select their IOLs before cataract surgeries.

Increased risk of cataract surgery in patients with allergic disease: a population based cohort study.

We investigated the association between cataract and allergic diseases, including atopic dermatitis (AD), allergic rhinitis (AR), and asthma using 2,631,015 subjects' data from the 2009 National Health Insurance Service-Health Screening Cohort in Korea. Each allergic disease was defined as three or more occasions of diagnosis within 1 year with dedicated ICD-10 codes. The primary endpoint was newly received cataract surgery during the follow-up period. In total, 447,883 subjects had at least one allergic disease. During the mean follow-up of 7.8 ± 1.7 years, newly developed cataract surgery was observed in 301,693 subjects (allergic group, n = 69,321; non-allergic group, n = 232,372). After adjusting for demographic characteristics (age, sex), systemic and ocular comorbidities, socioeconomic status, and lifestyle factors (smoking, drinking, regular exercise), the allergic group had a higher hazard ratio (HR) for cataract development compared with the non-allergic group. We further performed a subgroup analysis for patients regarding sex and age. In the subgroup analysis of subjects with AD, men aged < 50 years had a higher HR compared to women of the same age group. In conclusion, subjects with allergic diseases had a higher risk of cataract surgery than their counterparts, and the combination of AD and AR resulted in the highest risk. Particularly, the association was more evident in male than female patients with AD aged < 50 years.

A Novel Intraocular Lens Simulator that Allows Patients to Experience the World Through Multifocal Intraocular Lenses Before Surgeries.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the intraocular lens (IOL) simulator can simulate how the world appears to patients with multifocal IOLs by allowing the patients to see far and near objects through the IOL simulator. Methods: Twenty eyes from 20 patients (age = 50-70 years old) were included in the study. The IOL simulator we developed consists of a trial lens frame adapter, a lens tube, a concave lens, a spacer, a wet cell, and an IOL. We used two IOLs: Tecnis monofocal and Tecnis bifocal IOL (add +3.25 diopter [D]). Patients wore a trial lens frame with an IOL simulator on distant corrected trial lenses and underwent the following tests: defocus curve, satisfaction with distance and near vision, halo around the light, and near point accommodation (NPA). To check how the world appears to the patients through this simulator, a machine vision lens and a scientific camera were attached to the simulator, and far and near objects were photographed. Results: In the defocus curve of multifocal IOL, the visual acuity showed the second peak at -4 D. Compared to monofocal IOL, satisfaction with distant vision was slightly worse, more halos were felt, satisfaction with near vision was higher, and the NPA was shorter in multifocal IOL. In the scientific camera test, through the multifocal IOL, the waiting room was blurry, the halo around the ceiling light was prominent, and the characteristics on the near visual acuity chart were clear. Conclusion: Subjects could experience the functions of multifocal IOLs with our newly developed IOL simulator. Translational Relevance: This IOL simulator using geometric optics allows patients to experience the function of multifocal IOLs before cataract surgery.