Prevalence of abdominal aortic aneurysms in patients with lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Concomitance of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and primary lung cancer (LC) is not uncommon due to several shared risk factors. To evaluate the incidence of this association, analysis of the National Inpatient Sample database was utilized. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample database between 2014 and 2018 for all patients diagnosed with primary LC was performed. The differences in the reported findings between the LC and control groups were assessed using the Pearson χ2, Fisher exact, Student t, and/or Mann-Whitney U tests where appropriate. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to determine independent predictors of the presence of documented AAA. RESULTS: A total of 158,904 patients were identified. Of these, 2430 patients (1.53%) were diagnosed with AAA and 156,474 (98.47%) without AAA. In the multivariable model, LC patients had higher odds of AAA compared with the general population (odds ratio, 1.43; 95% confidence interval, 1.35-1.51). In all age groups, female smokers had a higher rate of AAA compared with female nonsmokers (age <60 years, 0.13% vs 0.04%; 60-69 years, 0.77% vs 0.34%; 70-79 years, 1.65% vs 0.69%; and >80 years, 2.63% vs 1.31%; all P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: LC and AAA share similar risk factors, which may explain the higher AAA prevalence among patients with LC. Given the higher prevalence of AAA in smokers compared with nonsmokers across all age groups in both male and female patients with LC, further sex-based studies investigating the overall mortality and morbidity benefits of AAA screening among patients with LC are highly warranted. This consideration would potentially address the sex disparity in outcomes for AAA management.

Outcomes of Infrainguinal Bypass in Patients with Cannabis vs Opioid Use Disorder.

BACKGROUND: Marijuana and opioids are commonly used illicit drugs in the United States and their use continues to rise. Cannabis use disorder (CUD) and Opioid use disorder (OUD) are associated with adverse effects on public health and postoperative outcomes. However, their impact on vascular surgery, specifically infrainguinal bypass repair (IIB). is not well described in the literature. Therefore, our study aimed to assess perioperative outcomes in patients with CUD and OUD who underwent IIB. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample database for the years 2005 to 2018 was performed. Using the International Classification of Diseases Clinical Modification, Ninth and Tenth revisions, patients who were diagnosed with peripheral artery disease and underwent IIB repair.were identified. Our primary outcome was the comparison of rates of in-hospital complications between the groups, and the secondary outcomes included analysis of total hospital charges and length of stay. A 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) CUD and OUD patients to their control groups without the disease was conducted using the nearest-neighbor method. The matching was based on select patient demographics and comorbidities included in our analyses. RESULTS: A total of 190,794 patients were identified: 972 patients with CUD and 682 patients with OUD. In the matched cohorts, patients with a diagnosis of CUD had a higher incidence of in-hospital cardiac complications (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR], 1.76; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.99-3.12) and acute kidney injury (AKI) (aOR, 1.51; CI, 1.09-2.08). Additionally, total hospital charges and mean length of stay were higher in the CUD group (P < 0.001). Those with OUD had a higher incidence of postoperative respiratory complications (aOR, 1.92; CI, 1.23-2.99), sepsis (aOR, 2.39; CI, 1.32-4.34), infection (aOR, 3.55; CI, 1.16-10.84), AKI (aOR, 2.11; CI,1.47-3.04), major amputations (aOR, 1.69; CI, 1.07-2.69), along with higher total charges and mean length of stay (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Both CUD and OUD have increased incidence of postoperative complications following IIB. The OUD group had generally worse outcomes compared to patients with CUD. Both were associated with a substantial increase in total hospital charges and length of hospital stay. A further prospective study is warranted to provide better insight on the effects of substance use disorders on the procedure's short- and long-term outcomes.

Outcomes of Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Octogenarians.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare outcomes between octogenarians and non-octogenarians undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). METHODS: Using the National Inpatient Sample database, we identified octogenarians (≥80 years) and non-octogenarians (<80 years) who had undergone thoracic endovascular aortic repair between 2012 and 2017. We compared patients' demographic, socioeconomic, comorbidity data between the two groups as well as the procedure indications and perioperative outcomes. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to evaluate the impact of advanced age (≥80 years) on the in-hospital mortality rates in patients who underwent TEVAR. This analysis was also performed for a separate cohort which included only patients who underwent TEVAR for ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm. RESULTS: A total of 4108 patients were included in our study; 3432 (83.5%) patients were <80 years (37.9% female; median age, 64 years; 34.3% non-white) and 676 (16.5%) patients were ≥80 years (50.7% female; median age, 83 years; 20.4% non-white). Non-ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm was the most common indication for TEVAR in older patients (61.4%), whereas type B aortic dissection was the most common indication in younger patients (36.4%). In-hospital complications were comparable between the two groups except for respiratory complications that were higher in the younger patients (21.2% vs. 15.2%; P <.001). The multivariable analysis demonstrated that advanced age had no association with increased in-hospital mortality rates (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], .97-2.05), However, in ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm cohort, octogenarians had higher in-hospital mortality rates (aOR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.04-3.32). CONCLUSIONS: Octogenarians have acceptable rates of perioperative morbidity and mortality compared to the younger group and should be considered for TEVAR. Octogenarians are at higher risk for in-hospital mortality in the setting of ruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm, supporting the appropriateness of elective TEVAR in selected Octogenarians.