RESUMO
We sought to perform a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis to identify predictors of treatment response following thalamic neuromodulation in pediatric patients with medically refractory epilepsy. Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane) were searched, with no language or data restriction, to identify studies reporting seizure outcomes in pediatric populations following deep brain stimulation (DBS) or responsive neurostimulation (RNS) implantation in thalamic nuclei. Studies featuring individual participant data of patients with primary or secondary generalized drug-resistant epilepsy were included. Response to therapy was defined as >50% reduction in seizure frequency from baseline. Of 417 citations, 21 articles reporting on 88 participants were eligible. Mean age at implantation was 13.07 ± 3.49 years. Fifty (57%) patients underwent DBS, and 38 (43%) RNS. Sixty (68%) patients were implanted in centromedian nucleus and 23 (26%) in anterior thalamic nucleus, and five (6%) had both targets implanted. Seventy-four (84%) patients were implanted bilaterally. The median time to last follow-up was 12 months (interquartile range = 6.75-26.25). Sixty-nine percent of patients achieved response to treatment. Age, target, modality, and laterality had no significant association with response in univariate logistic regression. Until thalamic neuromodulation gains widespread approval for use in pediatric patients, data on efficacy will continue to be limited to small retrospective cohorts and case series. The inherent bias of these studies can be overcome by using individual participant data. Thalamic neuromodulation appears to be a safe and effective treatment for epilepsy. Larger, prolonged prospective, multicenter studies are warranted to further evaluate the efficacy of DBS over RNS in this patient population where resection for curative intent is not a safe option.
Assuntos
Estimulação Encefálica Profunda , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos , Tálamo , Humanos , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/terapia , Epilepsia Resistente a Medicamentos/fisiopatologia , Estimulação Encefálica Profunda/métodos , Criança , Tálamo/fisiopatologia , Adolescente , Resultado do Tratamento , Feminino , MasculinoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a neurosurgical treatment used for the treatment of movement disorders. Surgical and perioperative complications, although infrequent, can result in clinically significant neurological impairment. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we evaluated the incidence and risk factors of intracranial bleeding in DBS surgery. METHOD: Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane were screened in line with PRISMA 2020 guidelines to capture studies reporting on the incidence of hemorrhagic events in DBS. After removing duplicates, the search yielded 1,510 papers. Abstracts were evaluated by two independent reviewers for relevance. A total of 386 abstracts progressed to the full-text screen and were assessed against eligibility criteria. A total of 151 studies met the criteria and were included in the analysis. Any disagreement between the reviewers was resolved by consensus. Relevant data points were extracted and analyzed in OpenMeta [Analyst] software. RESULTS: The incidence of intracranial bleeding was 2.5% (95% CI: 2.2-2.8%) per each patient and 1.4% (95% CI: 1.2-1.6%) per each implanted lead. There was no statistically significant difference across implantation targets and clinical indications. Patients who developed an intracranial bleed were on average 5 years older (95% CI: 1.26-13.19), but no difference was observed between the genders (p = 0.891). A nonsignificant trend was observed for a higher risk of bleeding in patients with hypertension (OR: 2.99, 95% CI: 0.97-9.19) (p = 0.056). The use of microelectrode recording did not affect the rate of bleeding (p = 0.79). CONCLUSIONS: In this review, we find that the rate of bleeding per each implanted lead was 1.4% and that older patients had a higher risk of hemorrhage.
Assuntos
Estimulação Encefálica Profunda , Transtornos dos Movimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Estimulação Encefálica Profunda/efeitos adversos , Hemorragias Intracranianas/epidemiologia , Hemorragias Intracranianas/etiologia , Transtornos dos Movimentos/cirurgia , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the methodology, performance, and generalizability of diagnostic models for predicting the risk of healthcare-facility-onset (HO) Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in adult hospital inpatients (aged ≥18 years). BACKGROUND: CDI is the most common cause of healthcare-associated diarrhea. Prediction models that identify inpatients at risk of HO-CDI have been published; however, the quality and utility of these models remain uncertain. METHODS: Two independent reviewers evaluated articles describing the development and/or validation of multivariable HO-CDI diagnostic models in an inpatient setting. All publication dates, languages, and study designs were considered. Model details (eg, sample size and source, outcome, and performance) were extracted from the selected studies based on the CHARMS checklist. The risk of bias was further assessed using PROBAST. RESULTS: Of the 3,030 records evaluated, 11 were eligible for final analysis, which described 12 diagnostic models. Most studies clearly identified the predictors and outcomes but did not report how missing data were handled. The most frequent predictors across all models were advanced age, receipt of high-risk antibiotics, history of hospitalization, and history of CDI. All studies reported the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) as a measure of discriminatory ability. However, only 3 studies reported the model calibration results, and only 2 studies were externally validated. All of the studies had a high risk of bias. CONCLUSION: The studies varied in their ability to predict the risk of HO-CDI. Future models will benefit from the validation on a prospective external cohort to maximize external validity.
Assuntos
Clostridioides difficile , Infecções por Clostridium , Infecção Hospitalar , Adulto , Humanos , Adolescente , Clostridioides , Estudos Prospectivos , Infecções por Clostridium/diagnóstico , Infecções por Clostridium/epidemiologia , Pacientes Internados , Estudos Retrospectivos , Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Wernicke's encephalopathy (WE) is a serious neurological disorder that is underdiagnosed. Despite limited clinical guidelines, the standard use of intravenous (IV) thiamine is underutilized and remains an area of research deserving much attention. OBJECTIVES: We conducted a systematic review using Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases to identify and summarize the literature on IV thiamine treatment in WE. Human studies with WE patients who received ≥100 mg of thiamine IV met inclusion criteria. Randomized controlled trials, cross-sectional studies, and case reports were included. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies were included: 20 case reports, five retrospective studies, one prospective study and one randomized control trial. Of the case reports, 11 (55%) cases were female, and the average age of all cases was 45 years (SD = 15). The other seven studies included 688 patients; the average age was 52 years (SD = 9), and 266 (38.7%) were female. Among the case reports, neurological and clinical findings were used to diagnose WE in 16 (80%) cases. MRI was utilized to diagnose 15 (75%) cases. 500 mg IV thiamine TID was reported in 12 case reports (60%). 18 (90%) of case reports had partial or complete resolution of symptoms following IV thiamine. CONCLUSION: IV thiamine can alleviate neurological symptoms, cognitive dysfunction, and brain imaging lesions associated with WE. We found key limitations in the evidence for IV thiamine and diagnostic standards for WE. Future targeted research should establish clear diagnostic and treatment guidelines for WE to prevent this serious condition from being underdiagnosed or undertreated.
Assuntos
Tiamina , Complexo Vitamínico B , Encefalopatia de Wernicke , Encefalopatia de Wernicke/tratamento farmacológico , Encefalopatia de Wernicke/diagnóstico , Humanos , Tiamina/administração & dosagem , Tiamina/uso terapêutico , Complexo Vitamínico B/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , FemininoRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: There are several options for surgical management of subglottic stenosis, including endoscopic and open procedures. However, treatment algorithms, outcomes, and anesthetic management of subglottic stenosis during pregnancy are not well described. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases. REVIEW METHODS: A scoping review of management of subglottic stenosis during pregnancy was performed, and then reported in compliance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Inclusion criteria consisted of those with subglottic or tracheal stenosis aged greater than 18 years, those in whom management was performed during pregnancy, and those who reported delivery related outcomes. RESULTS: After systematic review and detailed search of 330 identified articles, 15 articles met inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. All studies were case reports or case series (level 4 evidence). This study identified 27 patients. The median age was 29 and the median gestational age at intervention was 28 weeks. Left lateral positioning and fetal heart rate monitoring were used in nearly every case. The most common intervention performed was endoscopic balloon dilation. In many cases, jet ventilation or transnasal humidified rapid insufflation ventilatory exchange was satisfactory for maintenance of the airway. Three women ultimately required tracheostomy prior to labor and delivery. There was no fetal death or complications reported in these studies, and all but one woman proceeded to deliver at term. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic balloon dilation during pregnancy is safe and effective, resulting in optimized respiratory outcomes for the mother and safe delivery of the fetus. The third trimester appears to be safe for airway intervention. Laryngoscope, 134:1014-1022, 2024.
Assuntos
Laringoestenose , Estenose Traqueal , Gravidez , Humanos , Feminino , Idoso , Adulto , Lactente , Constrição Patológica/cirurgia , Endoscopia/métodos , Traqueostomia , Estenose Traqueal/cirurgia , Terceiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Laringoestenose/cirurgiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to identify published articles that evaluated all phenibut toxicity and withdrawal cases to understand better their clinical presentations and treatments. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted using Medline (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), and Cochrane Library databases to capture all published cases on the presentations and management of phenibut toxicity or withdrawal. RESULTS: Sixty-two cases from 36 studies on presentation and management of phenibut toxicity or phenibut withdrawal were identified. Of all subjects, 80.7% were male. The average age was 30.9 years (SD, 13.2 years; range, 0-71 years). A total of 86.8% reported obtaining phenibut online, and 63.2% reported concomitant substance use with other addictive agents; benzodiazepines and alcohol were the most combined drugs. The average length of hospital stay was 5.0 days (n = 25; SD, 5.4 days; range, 1-25 days) for phenibut toxicity and 7.7 days (n = 20; SD, 7.8 days; range, 0-30 days) for phenibut withdrawals. The most common symptoms reported during phenibut toxicity were altered mental status, somnolence, psychosis, and movement disorders. Of the phenibut toxicity cases, 48.7% required intubation. Benzodiazepines and antipsychotics were most used to treat phenibut toxicity. For phenibut withdrawal cases, 95.7% reported daily use. The most common symptoms reported during phenibut withdrawals were anxiety, irritability or agitation, insomnia, and psychosis. Sixteen (69.6%) of phenibut withdrawal cases required multiple medications for treatment. Benzodiazepines, baclofen, atypical antipsychotics, gabapentanoids, and barbiturates were commonly used to treat phenibut withdrawals. CONCLUSIONS: The seriousness of presentations, combined with the assortments of medications used for both syndromes, reflects the potential dangers of phenibut use and the need for systematized treatment protocols.