Reduction of gastroenteritis morbidity in high-risk infants.

A method of predicting infants at high risk for developing gastroenteritis was validated in a prospective study. The ability to predict a high-risk subset of the population is particularly important if risk can be reduced with preventive measures. Performance of a preventive educational task in the field by community health workers was associated with a significantly lower rate of morbidity from gastroenteritis among high-risk infants, while achieving no significant reduction among the average-risk group.

Insurance status and recognition of psychosocial problems. A report from the Pediatric Research in Office Settings and the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Networks.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of insurance status on clinician recognition of psychosocial problems for pediatric primary care visits. DESIGN: A cohort study of 10,250 visits by children 4 to 15 years old for nonemergent care. SETTING: Two large primary care research networks reported data from 172 primary care clinicians in office-based practice. PATIENTS: Ten thousand two hundred and fifty unique children presenting consecutively to participating physicians for nonemergent services with a parent or caregiver. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Children were classified as positive for psychosocial problems if their score on the parent-reported Pediatric Symptom Checklist exceeded the standard cutoff of 28. Clinician recognition was obtained by report as a dichotomous variable. Insurance status was categorized by payor and plan structure. RESULTS: Clinicians did not recognize psychosocial problems for a substantial number of children with scores suggestive of marked psychosocial dysfunction on the Pediatric Symptom Checklist. Insurance type was not associated with rates of recognition. However, provider familiarity with patients, provider discipline, and patient demographics were associated with increased recognition of psychosocial problems. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in treatment among various insurance groups documented in prior studies are not likely to be related to varying recognition rates, but rather to availability and choices of treatment by insurers, families, and clinicians. Continuity of care was the strongest predictor of clinician recognition.

Community-oriented primary care: an integrated model for practice, research, and education.

Community-oriented primary care (COPC) has been widely discussed as an approach by which a primary care program may modify and more specifically address the health care needs of its service population. However, efforts to achieve COPC have been inconsistent and based on an incomplete operational model. This paper presents an operational definition of COPC that identifies discrete steps that may be taken by any primary care practice or program as it attempts to more fully develop a community-oriented approach to primary care. The model provides a conceptual basis for further progress in research, education, and the practice of COPC.

Designing and implementing a primary care intervention trial to improve the quality and outcome of care for major depression.

Complex interventions, which have been shown to improve primary care depression outcomes, are difficult to disseminate to routine practice settings. To address this problem, we developed a brief intervention to train primary care physicians and nurses employed by the practice to improve the detection and management of major depression. Before recruitment began, the research team conducted academic detailing conference calls with primary care physicians and nurses, and provided in-person training with nurses and administrative staff. Administrative staff screened over 11,000 patients before their visits to identify those with probable major depression. Primary care physicians delegated increased responsibility to office nurses, who educated over 90% of patients about effective depression treatment and systematically monitored their progress over time. Early results demonstrate that community primary care practices can rebundle traditional team roles over the short-term to provide more systematic mental health treatment without adding additional personnel. A rigorous evaluation of this effort will reduce time-consuming, expensive, and often unsuccessful efforts to "translate" research intervention findings into everyday practice.

A primary care intervention for depression.

To assess a guideline-based intervention's impact on depression care provided in rural vs. urban primary care settings, 12 community primary care practices (four rural, eight urban) were randomized to enhanced (i.e., intervention) and usual care study conditions. The study enrolled 479 depressed patients, with 432 (90.2 percent) completing telephone follow-up at six months. Multilevel analytic models revealed that rural enhanced care patients had 2.70 times the odds (P = 0.02) of rural usual care patients of taking a three-month course of antidepressant medication at recommended dosages in the six months following baseline; urban enhanced care patients had 2.43 times the odds compared with their urban usual care counterparts (P = 0.007). Rural enhanced care patients had 3.00 times the odds of rural usual care patients of making eight or more visits to a mental health specialist for counseling in the six months following baseline (P = 0.03). Comparisons of patients in enhanced care practices showed that rural enhanced care patients had 2.00 times the odds (P = 0.12) of urban enhanced care patients of making at least one visit to a mental health specialist for counseling in the six months following baseline and had comparable odds to urban enhanced care patients (odds ratio [OR] = 1.06, P = 0.77) of making eight or more visits to such specialists during that interval. The study's intervention improved the care received by both rural and urban depressed primary care patients. Moreover, the intervention's effect appears to have been greater in rural settings, particularly in terms of increasing depressed rural patients' use of mental health specialists for counseling.

Primary care epidemiology: new uses of old tools.

The emergence of interest in community oriented primary care (COPC) has emphasized the need for applications of epidemiologic principles to the practice of primary health care. A recent report from the Institute of Medicine has demonstrated the feasibility of COPC in a variety of practice settings, and has recommended the development of simple and easily applied quantitative techniques to support this form of primary care. The purposes of primary care practice, research, and education would be well served by techniques that improve the physician's knowledge of the patient population. Epidemiology offers the fundamental principles and methods to support primary care, but these have been neither appropriately modified nor integrated into primary care practice. The potential benefits of and the requirements for an epidemiology for primary care are presented and discussed.

Epidemiology and practice management: an example of community-oriented primary care.

Community-oriented primary care (COPC) has been described as an application of the principles of epidemiology to the practice of primary care. Yet further development of COPC practice within family practice has been hampered by difficulties in defining a target population that can be addressed in the variety of practice settings typical of family practice. This paper describes the application within a residency practice of the principles of COPC to the practice population, consisting of all members of the households of active patients. The results suggest that this approach is feasible, applicable in virtually any practice setting, and likely to reveal a large number of health and health care problems that can be remedied but that might otherwise have been unnoticed. The implications of this approach to COPC on the practice and training of family physicians are discussed.

Non-health professionals and the school-age child: early intervention for behavioral problems.

A methodology is described to utilize dormitory parents in direct care activities for the early intervention of behavioral problems of the school-age child. Specific information gathering, assessment, treatment, referral and follow-up tasks were defined and incorporated into a problem-solving protocol which served to guide the dormitory parents through the defined problem-solving process, to promote early identification of students with a behavioral problem, and to expedite referral to a professional for students with more severe problems. The methodology was pilot-tested in a large American Indian boarding school and demonstrated the feasibility and efficacy of dormitory parents in a therapeutic role as one component of a team approach to the management of behavioral problems. The pilot study resulted in a significant reduction in the rates of alcohol abuse and school dropouts and deserves application in a variety of settings.

Population-based family practice: the next challenge of primary care.

In its first 15 years family medicine has moved the focus of clinical care from the individual to the family unit. Assuming responsibility for the care of a denominator population is an important challenge to primary care and a potential next step for family medicine. This paper presents a model of denominator-based practice and discusses its particular applicability to family practice. In addition to offering the potential for improving the health of its denominator population, this innovation in primary care may provide an important opportunity to lever family practice into a more favorable competitive position in the health care market.

Practice-based research networks: building the infrastructure of primary care research.

Family practice and primary care are rapidly achieving prominence as the foundation of a rapidly changing health care system, driven not by systematic reform but by the rapid advance of managed care. The knowledge base to support primary care practice, however, lags far behind after decades of neglect in the headlong rush toward overspecialization. The success of biomedical research in the United States in the last 50 years is due in large part to the network of tertiary care hospitals, where the specialized care of highly selected patients supports broad programs of teaching and research. There are no comparable laboratories, however, for research on the important content areas of primary care. The emergence and success of practice-based research networks over the past decade provide an important infrastructure for careful study of the health and health care phenomena that comprise primary care. Practice-based research networks have made a great deal of progress in methods development and have begun to contribute important information to the primary care knowledge base. They continue, however, to be underfunded and underdeveloped, existing on large infusions of volunteerism by the participating physicians. The study recently completed by the Institute of Medicine's Committee on the Future of Primary Care will play a critical role in promoting widespread appreciation of the gap in the scientific base necessary to support primary care practice, the need for research in primary care, and the complementary relationship of this body of research and the more traditional biomedical research that has been so well funded.

Practice-based research networks: the view from the office.

Practice-based research networks have developed rapidly in the United States during the past decade in response to the pressing need for research into the clinical issues faced daily in family practice and primary care. To be responsive to the needs of practice, most networks are organized to maximize the wisdom of the practicing clinician in identifying and framing research questions. This assures that the results will be directly applicable to practice. Reuniting practice and research is an important benefit of practice-based research, and it is essential that the views of practicing clinicians be incorporated into the development of this form of research.

Potential of practice-based research networks: experiences from ASPN. Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network.

During the past 20 years, the feasibility of practice-based research in networks has been established in the United States. The initial work of these networks has revealed the need for a better understanding of family practice and the rest of primary care in order to address the challenges facing our health care system. This paper explores the nature, potential, and limitations of practice-based research networks based on the results of a dozen studies conducted by the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network (ASPN).

Competing demands of primary care: a model for the delivery of clinical preventive services.

Despite a high level of support for the importance of clinical prevention, physician delivery of preventive services falls well below recommended levels. Competing demands faced by physicians during the medical encounter present a major barrier to the provision of specific preventive services to patients. These demands include acute care, patient requests, chronic illnesses, psychosocial problems, screening for asymptomatic disease, counseling for behavior change, other preventive services, and administration and management of care. This paper outlines how competing demands affect physician delivery of clinical preventive services and provides a model designed to help practicing physicians improve the delivery of preventive services. This model can be helpful in the planning of preventive interventions in primary care settings and can facilitate a better understanding of physician behavior.

The use of objective measures of asthma severity in primary care: a report from ASPN.

BACKGROUND: The rising incidence of and mortality from asthma have prompted the development of practice guidelines for diagnosis and management. A cornerstone of these guidelines is the use of objective measures of asthma severity: spirometry or peak expiratory flow rates. We studied the extent to which primary care clinicians used objective measures of asthma severity. METHODS: Practices affiliated with the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network in the United States and Canada collected data on 490 asthma-related encounters involving 439 patients. For each encounter, the practice recorded the availability of the results of spirometry, peak expiratory flow rates, oxygenation (arterial blood gas or pulse oximetry), and chest radiograph to the clinician. RESULTS: Objective data about asthma severity were infrequently available to ASPN clinicians at the time of the encounter. In 67.8% of encounters, there was no current or past spirometry result, in 55.1% there was no current or past peak flow measurement, and in 74.3% there was no current or past determination of oxygenation. Chest radiographs, on the other hand, were available for most (64.7%) patients. The lack of objective measures was not related to lack of access to the relevant technologies. Most practices noted easy access to spirometry (72.2% of practices), peak flow meters (72.2%), oxygenation determination (61.1%), and radiography (83.3%). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, most primary care clinicians did not have objective data about the severity of their patients' asthma at the time of the encounter. This relative lack of objective data was not explained by lack of access to the relevant technology for determining severity. It may instead reflect the opinion of primary care physicians that such information is not necessary in the care of these patients.

Alcohol-related discussions in primary care: a report from ASPN. Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network.

BACKGROUND: Problem drinking is common, and a 15-minute intervention can help some patients reduce drinking to safe levels. Little is known, however, about the frequency and duration of alcohol-related discussions in primary care. METHODS: Nineteen clinicians in the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network (ASPN) collected data about alcohol-related discussions for 1 week following their usual office routine (Phase 1) and for 1 week with the addition of routine screening for problem drinking (Phase 2). Of those, 15 clinicians collected data for a third week after receiving training in brief interventions with problem drinkers (Phase 3). Clinicians collected data on standard ASPN reporting cards. RESULTS: In Phase 1 the clinicians discussed alcohol during 9.6% of all visits. Seventy-three percent of those discussions were shorter than 2 minutes long, and only 10% lasted longer than 4 minutes. When routine screening was added (Phase 2), clinicians were more likely to discuss alcohol at acute-illness visits, but the frequency, duration, and intensity of such discussions did not change. Only 32% of Phase 2 discussions prompted by a positive screening result lasted longer than 2 minutes. After training, the duration increased (P <.004). In Phase 3, 58% of discussions prompted by a positive screening result lasted longer than 2 minutes, but only 26% lasted longer than 4 minutes. CONCLUSION: Routine screening changed the kinds of visits during which clinicians discussed alcohol use. Training in brief-intervention techniques significantly increased the duration of alcohol-related discussions, but most discussions prompted by a positive screening result were still shorter than effective interventions reported in the literature.

Carpal tunnel syndrome in primary care: a report from ASPN. Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network.

BACKGROUND: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common condition in primary care, yet little is known about its presentation and management. This study was designed to provide a better understanding of the frequency of CTS in a primary care population, and its presentation, diagnosis, and management. METHODS: Clinicians in 74 Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network (ASPN) practices from 30 states and three Canadian provinces collected data on all patients presenting with symptoms of CTS during a 30-month period. RESULTS: The adjusted frequencies of all visits and of first visits for symptoms of CTS were 1.01 and 0.68 per 1000 patient visits, respectively. Women visited more frequently than men with new onset symptoms of CTS (0.81 vs 0.55 per 1000 visits), and homemakers accounted for 15.9% of all new cases. Clinicians judged 43.1% of all CTS incident visits to be job-related. The diagnostic evaluation of patients seldom included nerve conduction studies (12.9%) or electromyography (11.8%). The most frequent treatments were splints (56.3%) and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (50.8%). Four-month follow-up data were obtained for 68.5% of the patients, and symptom relief was reported by 55.2% of patients. Ninety percent of patients were able to continue working at the same job, and 96% were able to continue their usual activities. CONCLUSIONS: Carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms are common in primary care, and most cases occur among women, many of whom are homemakers. Most patients with CTS symptoms are treated conservatively by their primary care clinicians with minimal testing or referral, and most patients report improvement or resolution of symptoms at 4 months.

The family APGAR and psychosocial problems in children: a report from ASPN and PROS.

BACKGROUND: Our study examined whether the lack of social support as measured by the Family APGAR was related to parents' and physicians' identification of child psychosocial problems and sociodemographic and symptom characteristics of the children screened. METHODS: The parents of 9626 children, ages 4 to 15 years, seen for outpatient medical visits participated in this national study. Parents completed the Family APGAR and the Pediatric Symptom Checklist (PSC), a measure of psychosocial dysfunction. Physicians rated the presence of a new or recurrent psychosocial problem in the child. RESULTS: Children from families with a lack of social support were 4.3 times as likely to receive scores indicating impairment on the PSC and 2.2 times as likely to be identified as having psychosocial problems by physician report. Families with low social support were significantly more likely to report low parental educational achievement, single parent status, and a history of mental health services for the child. Fifty percent of children from families with low social support were identified as having a psychosocial problem by either the PSC or physician rating, or both; however, only 21% of the children identified with psychosocial impairment by these two measures had scores indicating poor family functioning on the Family APGAR. CONCLUSIONS: A lack of family social support is associated with child psychosocial dysfunction as assessed by two different measures. However, the Family APGAR was not a sensitive measure of child psychosocial problems, and thus it supplements, but does not replace, information concerning the child's overall psychosocial functioning.

Does managed care restrictiveness affect the perceived quality of primary care? A report from ASPN. Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network.

BACKGROUND: The competitive managed care marketplace is causing increased restrictiveness in the structure of health plans. The effect of plan restrictiveness on the delivery of primary care is unknown. Our purpose was to examine the association of the organizational and financial restrictiveness of managed care plans with important elements of primary care, the patient-clinician relationship, and patient satisfaction. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 15 member practices of the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network selected to represent diverse health care markets. Each practice completed a Managed Care Survey to characterize the degree of organizational and financial restrictiveness for each individual health care plan. A total of 199 managed care plans were characterized. Then, 1475 consecutive outpatients completed a patient survey that included: the Components of Primary Care Instrument as a measure of attributes of primary care; a measure of the amount of inconvenience involved with using the health care plan; and the Medical Outcomes Study Visit Rating Form for assessing patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Clinicians' reports of inconvenience were significantly associated (P < .001) with the financial and organizational restrictiveness scores of the plan. There was no association between plan restrictiveness and patient report of multiple aspects of the delivery of primary care or patient satisfaction with the visit. CONCLUSIONS: Plan restrictiveness is associated with greater perceived hassle for clinicians but not for patients. Plan restrictiveness seems to be creating great pressures for clinicians, but is not affecting patients' reports of the quality of important attributes of primary care or satisfaction with the visit. Physicians and their staffs appear to be buffering patients from the potentially negative effects of plan restrictiveness.

Care of the secondary patient in family practice. A report from the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network.

BACKGROUND: Care of a secondary patient (an individual other than the primary patient for an outpatient visit) is common in family practice, but the content of care of this type of patient has not been described. METHODS: In a cross-sectional study, 170 volunteer primary care clinicians in 50 practices in the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network reported all occurrences of care of a secondary patient during 1 week of practice. These clinicians reported the characteristics of the primary patient and the secondary patient and the content of care provided to the secondary patient. Content of care was placed in 6 categories (advice, providing a prescription, assessment or explanation of symptoms, follow-up of a previous episode of care, making or authorizing a referral, and general discussion of a health condition). RESULTS: Physicians reported providing care to secondary patients during 6% of their office visits. This care involved more than one category of service for the majority of visits involving care of a secondary patient. Advice was provided during more than half the visits. A prescription, assessment or explanation of symptoms, or a general discussion of condition were provided during approximately 30% of the secondary care visits. Secondary care was judged to have substituted for a separate visit 60% of the time, added an average of 5 minutes to the visit, and yielded no reimbursement for 95% of visits. CONCLUSIONS: Care of a secondary patient reflects the provision of potentially intensive and complex services that require additional time and are largely not reimbursed or recognized by current measures of primary care. This provision of secondary care may facilitate access to care and represent an added value provided by family physicians.

Does the family APGAR effectively measure family functioning?

BACKGROUND: The Family APGAR has been widely used to study the relationship of family function and health problems in family practice offices. METHODS: Data were collected from 401 pediatricians and family physicians from the Pediatric Research in Office Settings network and the Ambulatory Sentinel Practice Network. The physicians enrolled 22,059 consecutive office visits by children aged 4 to 15 years. Parents completed a survey that included the Family APGAR and the Pediatric Symptom Checklist. Clinicians completed a survey that described child psychosocial problems, treatments initiated or continued, and specialty care referrals. RESULTS: Family dysfunction on the index visit often differed from dysfunction at follow-up (kappa=0.24). Only 31% of the families with positive Family APGAR scores at baseline were positive at follow-up, and only 43% of those with positive scores at follow-up had a positive score at the initial visit. There were many disagreements between the Family APGAR and the clinician. The Family APGAR was negative for 73% of clinician-identified dysfunctional families, and clinicians did not identify dysfunction for 83% of Family APGAR-identified dysfunctions (kappa=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Our data do not support the use of the Family APGAR as a measure of family dysfunction in the primary care setting. Future research should clarify what it does measure.