Ductal lavage for detection of cellular atypia in women at high risk for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer originates in breast epithelium and is associated with progressive molecular and morphologic changes. Women with atypical breast ductal epithelial cells have an increased relative risk of breast cancer. In this study, ductal lavage, a new procedure for collecting ductal cells with a microcatheter, was compared with nipple aspiration with regard to safety, tolerability, and the ability to detect abnormal breast epithelial cells. METHODS: Women at high risk for breast cancer who had nonsuspicious mammograms and clinical breast examinations underwent nipple aspiration followed by lavage of fluid-yielding ducts. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The 507 women enrolled included 291 (57%) with a history of breast cancer and 199 (39%) with a 5-year Gail risk for breast cancer of 1.7% or more. Nipple aspirate fluid (NAF) samples were evaluated cytologically for 417 women, and ductal lavage samples were evaluated for 383 women. Adequate samples for diagnosis were collected from 111 (27%) and 299 (78%) women, respectively. A median of 13,500 epithelial cells per duct (range, 43-492,000 cells) was collected by ductal lavage compared with a median of 120 epithelial cells per breast (range, 10-74,300) collected by nipple aspiration. For ductal lavage, 92 (24%) subjects had abnormal cells that were mildly (17%) or markedly (6%) atypical or malignant (<1%). For NAF, corresponding percentages were 6%, 3%, and fewer than 1%. Ductal lavage detected abnormal intraductal breast cells 3.2 times more often than nipple aspiration (79 versus 25 breasts; McNemar's test, P<.001). No serious procedure-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Large numbers of ductal cells can be collected by ductal lavage to detect atypical cellular changes within the breast. Ductal lavage is a safe and well-tolerated procedure and is a more sensitive method of detecting cellular atypia than nipple aspiration.

Pharmacokinetics of piroxantrone in a phase I trial of piroxantrone and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor.

Piroxantrone is an anthrapyrazole derivative with broad antitumor activity in vitro. In previous phase I trials, the dose-limiting toxicity of this agent was myelosuppression. Therefore, a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of a 1-h infusion of piroxantrone in combination with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor was conducted. In this article, we report the results of the pharmacokinetic analysis. Thirty-seven patients were studied over a dosage range of 150 to 555 mg/m2. The plasma elimination of piroxantrone was biexponential with a mean (+/- SD) t1/2 alpha of 3.2 +/- 2.7 min and a mean (+/- SD) t1/2 beta of 82 +/- 92 min. Clearance was 840 +/- 230 ml/min/m2. A limited sampling strategy was developed to allow the estimation of total drug exposure (area under the plasma concentration-time curve) from the plasma piroxantrone concentrations at 30, 60, and 120 min after the start of the infusion. The pharmacokinetic behavior of a presumed piroxantrone metabolite not previously described in plasma was also characterized. Based on in vitro cytotoxicity studies with partially purified extract of this compound, we do not believe that it contributes to the antitumor effects of piroxantrone at the concentrations observed in plasma. Finally, piroxantrone elimination was linear over the nearly 4-fold dose range studied, indicating that when dose adjustments are made, systemic drug exposure will remain predictable.

Effect of R-verapamil on the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in women with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To study the effect of the multidrug-resistance reversal agent R-verapamil on the pharmacokinetic behavior of paclitaxel. METHODS: Six women with breast cancer who received paclitaxel as a 3-hour infusion with and without R-verapamil were monitored with frequent plasma sampling up to 24 hours postinfusion. Paclitaxel concentrations were measured using a reverse-phase high-pressure liquid chromatography assay. RESULTS: Concomitant administration of R-verapamil resulted in a decrease in mean (+/- SD) paclitaxel clearance from 179 +/- 67 mL/min/m2 to 90 +/- 34 mL/min/m2 (P < .03) and in a twofold increase in paclitaxel exposure (area under the curve [AUC]). The mean end-infusion paclitaxel concentration was also twofold higher: 5.1 +/- 1.8 mumol/L versus 11.3 +/- 4.1 mumol/L (P < .03). CONCLUSION: The alteration in paclitaxel pharmacokinetics when paclitaxel and R-verapamil are coadministered complicates the interpretation of response and toxicity data from clinical trials of this drug combination.

Phase I study of paclitaxel in combination with cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in metastatic breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: In vitro data suggest that prolonged exposure to paclitaxel enhances breast cancer cytotoxicity. Our objective in this phase I study was to determine the tolerability of paclitaxel administered by 72-hour continuous intravenous (i.v.) infusion (CIVI) in combination with high-dose cyclophosphamide and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in the ambulatory setting to metastatic breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Paclitaxel was administered over 72 hours by CIVI and cyclophosphamide was given daily by i.v. bolus on days 1, 2, and 3, followed by G-CSF every 21 days. The availability of ambulatory infusion pumps and paclitaxel-compatible tubing permitted outpatient administration. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with metastatic breast cancer who had been previously treated with a median of two prior chemotherapy regimens were entered onto the study. Dose-limiting toxicity of grade 4 neutropenia for longer than 5 days and grade 4 thrombocytopenia occurred in three of five patients treated with paclitaxel 160 mg/m2 CIVI and cyclophosphamide 3,300 mg/m2 followed by G-CSF. The maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was paclitaxel 160 mg/m2 CIVI and cyclophosphamide 2,700 mg/m2 in divided doses with G-CSF. Nonhematologic toxicities were moderate and included diarrhea, mucositis, and arthalgias. Although hemorrhagic cystitis developed in six patients, recurrence was prevented with i.v. and oral mesna, which permitted continued outpatient delivery. One hundred seventy-four cycles were safely administered in the ambulatory setting using infusional pumps and tubing. Objective responses occurred in 23 (one complete and 22 partial) of 42 patients with bidimensionally measurable disease (55%; 95% confidence interval, 38% to 70%), with a response rate of 73% (11 of 15) seen at the highest dose levels. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel by 72-hour CIVI with daily cyclophosphamide followed by G-CSF can be administered safely in the ambulatory setting, has acceptable toxicity, and is an active regimen in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Phase I study of high-dose piroxantrone with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

PURPOSE: We performed a phase I trial of piroxantrone with and without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to determine whether the use of this cytokine would enable us to increase the dose-intensity of piroxantrone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients received 121 courses of piroxantrone administered once every 21 days. Initial patient cohorts received piroxantrone alone starting at 150 mg/m2 and the dose was escalated in subsequent patients until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was reached. Patient cohorts then received escalating doses of piroxantrone starting at 185 mg/m2 administered with G-CSF beginning day 2. RESULTS: Dose-limiting neutropenia occurred in three of six patients treated with 185 mg/m2 piroxantrone; the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of piroxantrone alone was 150 mg/m2. Three of six patients treated with piroxantrone and G-CSF exhibited dose-limiting thrombocytopenia at 445 mg/m2; the MTD of piroxantrone with G-CSF was thus 355 mg/m2. Seven patients developed symptomatic congestive heart failure (CHF) at cumulative piroxantrone doses ranging from 855 to 2,475 mg/m2 and two have died of cardiotoxicity. Of these patients, six of seven had previously received doxorubicin. Other nonhematologic toxicity was mild. CONCLUSION: The use of G-CSF results in a more than twofold increase in the MTD of piroxantrone. However, symptomatic cardiotoxicity is prominent, especially in patients who have received prior treatment with anthracyclines.

Commentary concerning demonstration of safety and efficacy of investigational anticancer agents in clinical trials.

Expeditious clinical development and approval of new drugs that are beneficial to patients are matters of high priority. There has been a great deal of discussion within the oncology community about what should constitute evidence of effectiveness of new anticancer agents for purposes of drug approval. This commentary is intended to illustrate a variety of end points that can lead to approval of new anticancer agents for specific clinical situations. Although the ultimate hope of antineoplastic therapy is prolongation of life, there are other effects of anticancer drugs that constitute clear clinical benefit and represent evidence of effectiveness. The guiding principle is that the beneficial effects obtained from a new drug should sufficiently outweigh the adverse effects such that the potential risk:benefit ratio achieved by an individual patient is favorable. The assessment of a new drug should flexibly evaluate safety and efficacy in the context of the specific clinical condition being treated. Early discussions with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the National Cancer Institute (NCI) are recommended to identify prospectively the end points and trial designs needed to demonstrate effectiveness of a new drug. The general principles discussed will likely apply to the drug approval process for other medical disciplines as well.

Blinded, randomized, multicenter study to evaluate single administration pegfilgrastim once per cycle versus daily filgrastim as an adjunct to chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II or stage III/IV breast cancer.

PURPOSE: This multicenter, randomized, double-blind, active-control study was designed to determine whether a single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim (SD/01, sustained-duration filgrastim; 100 microg/kg) is as safe and effective as daily filgrastim (5 microg/kg/d) for reducing neutropenia in patients who received four cycles of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-two centers enrolled 310 patients who received chemotherapy with docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) and doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) on day 1 of each cycle for a maximum of four cycles. Patients were randomized to receive on day 2 either a single subcutaneous injection of pegfilgrastim 100 microg/kg per chemotherapy cycle (154 patients) or daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim 5 microg/kg/d (156 patients). Absolute neutrophil count (ANC), duration of grade 4 neutropenia, and safety parameters were monitored. RESULTS: One dose of pegfilgrastim per chemotherapy cycle was comparable to daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim with regard to all efficacy end points, including the duration of severe neutropenia and the depth of ANC nadir in all cycles. Febrile neutropenia across all cycles occurred less often in patients who received pegfilgrastim. The difference in the mean duration of severe neutropenia between the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim treatment groups was less than 1 day. Pegfilgrastim was safe and well tolerated, and it was similar to filgrastim. Adverse event profiles in the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups were similar. CONCLUSION: A single injection of pegfilgrastim 100 microg/kg per cycle was as safe and effective as daily injections of filgrastim 5 microg/kg/d in reducing neutropenia and its complications in patients who received four cycles of doxorubicin 60 mg/m(2) and docetaxel 75 mg/m(2).

Phase I crossover study of paclitaxel with r-verapamil in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I crossover study of escalating doses of both paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers, Squibb, Princeton, NJ) and r-verapamil, the less cardiotoxic stereoisomer, in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine patients refractory to paclitaxel by 3-hour infusion were treated orally with r-verapamil every 4 hours starting 24 hours before the same-dose 3-hour paclitaxel infusion and continuing for a total of 12 doses. Once the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination was determined, seven additional patients who had not been treated with either drug were evaluated to determine whether the addition of r-verapamil altered the pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel. Consenting patients had tumor biopsies for P-glycoprotein (Pgp) expression before receiving paclitaxel and after becoming refractory to paclitaxel therapy. RESULTS: The MTD of the combination was 225 mg/m2 of r-verapamil every 4 hours with paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 by 3-hour infusion. Dose-limiting hypotension and bradycardia were observed in three of five patients treated at 250 mg/m2 r-verapamil. Fourteen patients received 32 cycles of r-verapamil at the MTD as outpatient therapy without developing cardiac toxicity. The median peak and trough serum verapamil concentrations at the MTD were 5.1 micromol/L (range, 1.9 to 6.3), respectively, which are within the range necessary for in vitro modulation of Pgp-mediated multidrug resistance (MDR). Increased serum verapamil concentrations and cardiac toxicity were observed more frequently in patients with elevated hepatic transaminases and bilirubin levels. Hematologic toxicity from combined paclitaxel and r-verapamil was significantly worse compared with the previous cycle of paclitxel without r-verapamil. In the pharmacokinetic analysis, r-verapamil delayed mean paclitaxel clearance and increased mean peak paclitaxel concentrations. CONCLUSION: r-Verapamil at 225 mg/m2 orally every 4 hours can be given safely with paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 by 3-hour infusion as outpatient therapy and is associated with serum levels considered active for Pgp inhibition. The addition of r-verapamil significantly alters the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel.

Alpha-difluoromethylornithine as treatment for metastatic breast cancer patients.

DFMO (alpha-difluoromethylornithine) is an oral irreversible inhibitor of ornithine decarboxylase, the first rate-limiting enzyme in polyamine synthesis. DFMO has been shown to have antiproliferative effects against several human cancers, and some studies have suggested that DFMO may have pro-apoptotic and anti-invasive properties as well. DFMO is well tolerated with minimal toxicity but has been associated with ototoxicity with prolonged daily administration. We conducted a Phase I/II tolerability, pharmacokinetic, and efficacy study of high-dose DFMO in metastatic breast cancer patients. Twenty-one patients were treated with 4800 mg of DFMO p.o. three times a day for 14 days, followed by a 2-week drug holiday on a 28-day cycle. Urinary polyamine and blood DFMO levels were measured at multiple time points during therapy. High-dose DFMO was well tolerated, and no clinically significant ototoxicity was noted. No patient achieved an objective antitumor response; however, one patient with heavily pretreated liver metastases has achieved stable disease for 18 months to date on DFMO. Putrescine, spermine, and spermidine urinary levels were suppressed with DFMO treatment and remained low during the 2-week drug holiday. High-dose DFMO on a schedule of 2 weeks on treatment followed by 2 weeks off is well tolerated, is not associated with ototoxicity, and leads to sustained suppression of urinary polyamine levels. Although not an active cytotoxic agent for metastatic breast cancer, the intriguing prolonged growth arrest of liver metastases in one patient highlights the potential clinical growth inhibitory properties of DFMO. We believe that DFMO is worthy of study as adjuvant therapy in primary breast cancer patients and as a chemopreventive agent.

Transforming growth factor-beta1 circulates in normal human plasma and is unchanged in advanced metastatic breast cancer.

A method has been developed to determine true plasma transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) levels by using the platelet alpha granule-specific marker, platelet factor 4, to correct for the TGF-beta contributed by platelets degranulated ex vivo. TGF-beta levels were measured on acid-ethanol extracts of human plasma using isoform-specific sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Normal human subjects had 4.1 +/- 2.0 ng/ml TGF-beta1 (range, 2.0-12.0; n = 42), <0.2 ng/ml TGF-beta2, and <0.1 ng/ml TGF-beta3 in their plasma. There were no significant changes with age or with hormonal status, but any given individual showed fluctuations of up to 3-fold in measured plasma TGF-beta levels due to unknown factors. Of 28 patients with advanced metastatic breast cancer, 2 had greatly elevated TGF-beta1 levels, while the rest were in the normal range. The presence of physiologically significant levels of TGF-beta1 in the plasmas of normal human subjects may indicate previously unsuspected endocrine roles for this peptide, while TGF-beta2 and TGF-beta3 appear to act only in a local autocrine/paracrine fashion.

A phase I study of topotecan followed sequentially by doxorubicin in patients with advanced malignancies.

Inhibitors of topoisomerase I and topoisomerase II have demonstrated synergy when administered sequentially in several tumor models while having a diminished antitumor effect when given concurrently. To explore the potential for clinical sequence-dependent synergy, we instituted a Phase I study of topotecan (a topoisomerase I inhibitor) followed by doxorubicin (a topoisomerase II inhibitor) in patients with advanced malignancies. Thirty-three patients with advanced malignancies or malignancies for whom no standard therapy exists were entered into the study. Topotecan was administered in escalating doses by 72-h continuous infusion on days 1, 2, and 3, followed by a bolus of doxorubicin given on day 5. To explore the hematological toxicity associated with this sequence, bone marrow aspirates were obtained both prior to the topotecan infusion and immediately prior to the doxorubicin in 10 patients to determine by fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis whether CD34+ cell synchronization was occurring using this sequential schedule. Dose-limiting hematological toxicity occurred at the first dose-level in three of six patients. Therefore, we defined the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) below our starting dose-level. Further dose-escalation and a new MTD were defined with the addition of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF). The MTD was, therefore, topotecan 0.35 mg/m2/day continuous i.v. infusion on days 1, 2, and 3, followed by doxorubicin 45 mg/m2 on day 5 without G-CSF, whereas the MTD with G-CSF was topotecan 0.75 mg/m2/day by 72-h continuous i.v. infusion, followed by doxorubicin 45 mg/m2 i.v. bolus on day 5. Ten patients with paired bone marrow aspirates obtained before topotecan and before doxorubicin administrations were available for evaluation. In 7 of 10 patients, there was an increase (16.6 +/- 2.9% to 25.0 +/- 3.5%; P < 0.02) in the proportion of CD34+ cells in S-phase 24 h after the topotecan infusion and prior to doxorubicin compared to the pretreatment values, whereas 1 patient had a decrease in the proportion of CD34+ cells in S phase and 2 patients had no change. Topotecan and doxorubicin with this sequence and schedule can be given safely; the dose-limiting toxicity is hematological toxicity. Alterations in the fraction of hematopoietic progenitor CD34+ cells in S-phase may account for the increased granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia observed at relatively low dose levels of the combination with and without G-CSF.

Retroviral mediated transfer of the human multidrug resistance gene (MDR-1) into hematopoietic stem cells during autologous transplantation after intensive chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Patients with metastatic breast cancer will receive 4-5 cycles of induction chemotherapy on one of the ongoing Medicine Branch protocols. Patients achieving at least a partial response, and who do not have evidence of bone marrow involvement and who do not have metastatic bone disease, will undergo PBSC and bone marrow harvest when hematologic recovery has occurred. Patients who have not achieved a PR, but who are responding to therapy, may be treated with additional cycles of therapy in an attempt to achieve a PR. Such patients will be eligible for transplant if a PR is obtained. 70% of the bone marrow and PBSC will be cryopreserved. The CD34+ subpopulation from the remaining 30% of the bone marrow and PBSC harvest will be obtained using an anti-CD34+ antibody and immunoabsorption column. The bone marrow and peripheral blood CD34 cells will be transduced with a retroviral vector expressing the human MDR-1 cDNA. Patients with positive bone scans or histologic evidence of bone marrow involvement will be excluded from the gene transfer component of the protocol. The MDR-1 transduced CD34 cells will be reinfused along with the non-transduced bone marrow and PBSC into patients following high dose ICE chemotherapy. Serial peripheral blood and bone marrow samples will be obtained to study hematopoietic reconstitution with MDR-1 transduced cells. Patients with residual or progressive disease after ABMT will be treated with taxol or vinblastine. In these relapsed patients, peripheral blood and bone marrow samples will be obtained to study whether chemotherapy amplifies the proportion of hematopoietic cells containing the MDR-1 provirus. We will monitor the nadir blood counts of each patient receiving salvage chemotherapy for evidence of myeloprotection and correlate this data with changes in the mean proviral copy number. Sites of relapsed tumor will be biopsied to test for the presence of the MDR-1 provirus.

Phase I study of Taxol, doxorubicin, plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

The objective of this phase I trial was to determine the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) of Taxol and doxorubicin administered as a simultaneous intravenous infusion over 72 hours every 21 days. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) 10 micrograms/kg, was administered on days 4-18 of each cycle. The treated population consisted of metastatic breast cancer patients previously untreated with chemotherapy for metastatic disease, who had not received doxorubicin in the adjuvant setting and who had bidimensionally measurable disease. The MTD was determined to be 75 mg/m2 of doxorubicin and 160 mg/m2 of Taxol. The dose-limiting toxicity of the combination was clinical typhlitis in three of three patients. Other significant toxicities included grade 3 diarrhea at the higher dose levels and grade 4 neutropenia in all patients. Eighteen patients were treated on this initial phase I study. The overall response rate was 62%, with 6% complete responses and 56% partial responses. The combination of doxorubicin and Taxol by 72-hour continuous infusion with G-CSF is an active regimen in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Combination paclitaxel (Taxol) and doxorubicin therapy for metastatic breast cancer.

Paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ) is a very active agent for the treatment of breast cancer, with associated complete response rates of 12% in patients with minimally pretreated metastatic disease. Simultaneous paclitaxel and doxorubicin administration by 72-hour continuous infusion in patients with previously untreated metastatic breast cancer has yielded an overall response rate of 72% with 8% complete responses. No alterations in paclitaxel or doxorubicin pharmacokinetics were observed when the drugs were administered alone versus in combination. Two phase I studies from the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) and the University of Indiana (Indianapolis, IN) have shown that administration of a 24-hour paclitaxel infusion prior to doxorubicin results in a significantly higher incidence of mucositis than the reverse sequence. Preliminary pharmacokinetic studies from M.D. Anderson suggest that peak plasma concentration and clearance of doxorubicin are altered by pretreatment with 24-hour paclitaxel. In contrast, in an ongoing phase I study at the Istituto Nazionale Tumori in Milan, Italy, no differences in toxicities have been observed with the combination of intravenous bolus doxorubicin and 3-hour infusional paclitaxel administered by either sequence. Preclinical in vitro and in vivo studies suggest that the combination of paclitaxel and doxorubicin is associated with no or minimal additive antitumor effects. The modest complete response rates that have been observed in patients with metastatic breast cancer to date are in agreement with these observations. A randomized study of paclitaxel versus doxorubicin versus intravenous bolus doxorubicin followed by 24-hour paclitaxel is now being conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

Oral alkylating agents for breast cancer therapy.

Oral cyclophosphamide is well tolerated and effective. Published data support its use as part of adjuvant and metastatic breast cancer treatment regimens. Cyclophosphamide has generally been administered at a higher dose intensity when given orally compared with intravenous infusion. However, there is currently no evidence that oral cyclophosphamide is either more toxic or more or less effective than an equivalent dose of intravenous cyclophosphamide. There is evidence in both the adjuvant and metastatic settings that classical oral cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-fluorouracil (CMF) is more effective than intravenous CMF, possibly because of the greater dose intensity of classical CMF. Prolonged administration of oral cyclophosphamide up to high cumulative doses is associated with an elevated risk of a secondary leukaemia. The rates of chemotherapy-related amenorrhoea with oral cyclophosphamide are directly related to the total dose of cyclophosphamide administered and the patient's age. With the growing availability of other oral cytotoxic agents with demonstrated effectiveness in breast cancer, it is likely that oral cyclophosphamide will be incorporated once again into regimens for both metastatic and adjuvant treatment.

Interaction of ethanol and the organophosphorus insecticide parathion.

Phosphorothioate insecticides such as parathion (O,O-diethyl-O-p-nitrophenyl phosphorothioate) undergo P450-dependent oxidative desulfuration, leading to both activation and detoxification of these compounds. Consequently, alterations in P450-dependent oxidative desulfuration may affect the acute toxicities of these insecticides. In the present study, pretreatment of mice with 15% ethanol in the drinking water for 6 days antagonized the acute toxicity of parathion, but not its toxic metabolite paraoxon (O,O-diethyl-O-p-nitrophenyl phosphate), suggesting that ethanol affected the oxidative desulfuration of this insecticide. The presence of ethanol within hepatic microsomal incubations did not alter the P450-dependent formation of paraoxon (activation) and p-nitrophenol (detoxification), although p-nitrophenol levels were increased in the presence of ethanol as a result of inhibition of its biotransformation to 4-nitrocatechol by CYP2E1. Ethanol exposure reduced hepatic pyruvate levels, but had no effect on levels of lactate, isocitrate, alpha-ketoglutarate, and malate. Calculation of cytosolic NAD+/NADH and cytosolic NADP+/NADPH redox ratios did not reveal any detectable difference in redox state between control and ethanol-treated mice. Since ethanol did not alter directly the P450-dependent activation or detoxification of parathion, and did not decrease NADPH levels, ethanol's antagonism of the acute toxicity of parathion may result from reduced availability of O2.

Treating breast precancer.

Recent studies strongly support the theory that breast precancers such as atypical hyperplasia (AH) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are closely related to the development of invasive breast cancer. There is growing belief that reduction in the burden of breast intraepithelial neoplasia (IEN) through intervention may translate into a decreased burden of invasive cancer. Current research is focusing on two issues. First, improved modalities for detecting precancers are needed; breast epithelial cell analysis appears particularly promising. Second, clinical trials are needed that would permit rapid evaluation of agents that can reduce breast cancer risk. Results of the few available trials suggest that several agents may effectively reduce the burden of breast precancer.