RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although fat grafting is a common technique to repair defects after breast cancer reconstruction surgery and has a low complication rate, the relation between fat grafting and the risk of breast cancer is unknown. Clinical trials to investigate this connection can elucidate the benefits and potential risks of fat grafting in oncology patients. OBJECTIVES: To establish an efficient experimental model, using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, for comparing different breast tumor study groups post-fat grafting. METHODS: Breast tumor cells were injected into immunocompromised mice. After tumors formed they were removed. Liposuction was performed in a female human donor and fat was collected. Cells were extracted from the fat by enzymatic digestion. Immunocompromised mice were randomized into four groups: a preliminary experiment group and three equal groups according to the type of fat graft: (i) fresh fat enriched with adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (AdMSCs), (ii) fresh fat without cell enrichment, and (iii) no fat injected. Tumor volume was assessed by serial MRI scans. RESULTS: The rate of tumor growth was higher in the enriched fat group compared to the non-enriched fat group. CONCLUSIONS: This experimental model is an effective measurable method, allowing future investigation of the effect of autologous fat on breast cancer.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Mama/cirurgia , Mamoplastia , Gordura Subcutânea/transplante , Animais , Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/métodos , Mamoplastia/efeitos adversos , Mamoplastia/métodos , Camundongos , Modelos Teóricos , Transplante Autólogo/efeitos adversos , Transplante Autólogo/métodos , Carga TumoralRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Heterotopic ossification (HO) is the formation of lamellar bone within connective and other tissue where bone should not form and is a rare complication after burn injury. However, it leads to severe pain and distress, marked reduction in joint range of motion (ROM), impaired function and increased hospital length of stay. The pathophysiology, incidence and risk factors of HO remain poorly understood in burns and other traumas and the management, controversial. The aim of this comprehensive review, therefore, was to synthesise the available evidence on the development and treatment of HO after acute burn injury. METHODS: The review was based on a systematic search of five electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, LILACS and Scopus. RESULTS: Synthesis and analysis of the data highlighted that, despite the passage of time, little translatable evidence is available to guide any prevention, screening, diagnostic or pharmacological or physical management protocols. DISCUSSION: Causes of HO remain confounded, therefore prevention is difficult. Although spontaneous resolution is possible, surgical resection remains the recommended treatment when ROM and activities of daily living are severely affected. CONCLUSION: The findings from this review indicate that multicentre data pooling is needed to understand the optimum pathway to prevention, identification and treatment of HO in acute burn patients.