Automated Neutrophil Quantification and Histological Score Estimation in Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: In the management of ulcerative colitis (UC), histological remission is increasingly recognized as the ultimate goal. The absence of neutrophil infiltration is crucial for assessing remission. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) system capable of accurately quantifying and localizing neutrophils in UC biopsy specimens to facilitate histological assessment. METHODS: Our AI system, which incorporates semantic segmentation and object detection models, was developed to identify neutrophils in hematoxylin and eosin-stained whole slide images. The system assessed the presence and location of neutrophils within either the epithelium or lamina propria and predicted components of the Nancy Histological Index and the PICaSSO Histologic Remission Index. We evaluated the system's performance against that of experienced pathologists and validated its ability to predict future clinical relapse risk in patients with clinically remitted UC. The primary outcome measure was the clinical relapse rate, defined as a partial Mayo score of ≥3. RESULTS: The model accurately identified neutrophils, achieving a performance of 0.77, 0.81, and 0.79 for precision, recall, and F-score, respectively. The system's histological score predictions showed a positive correlation with the pathologists' diagnoses (Spearman's ρ = 0.68-0.80; P < .05). Among patients who relapsed, the mean number of neutrophils in the rectum was higher than in those who did not relapse. Furthermore, the study highlighted that higher AI-based PICaSSO Histologic Remission Index and Nancy Histological Index scores were associated with hazard ratios increasing from 3.2 to 5.0 for evaluating the risk of UC relapse. CONCLUSIONS: The AI system's precise localization and quantification of neutrophils proved valuable for histological assessment and clinical prognosis stratification.

A novel artificial intelligence-assisted "vascular healing" diagnosis for prediction of future clinical relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis: a prospective cohort study (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Image-enhanced endoscopy has attracted attention as a method for detecting inflammation and predicting outcomes in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC); however, the procedure requires specialist endoscopists. Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted image-enhanced endoscopy may help nonexperts provide objective accurate predictions with the use of optical imaging. We aimed to develop a novel AI-based system using 8853 images from 167 patients with UC to diagnose "vascular-healing" and establish the role of AI-based vascular-healing for predicting the outcomes of patients with UC. METHODS: This open-label prospective cohort study analyzed data for 104 patients with UC in clinical remission. Endoscopists performed colonoscopy using the AI system, which identified the target mucosa as AI-based vascular-active or vascular-healing. Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES), AI outputs, and histologic assessment were recorded for 6 colorectal segments from each patient. Patients were followed up for 12 months. Clinical relapse was defined as a partial Mayo score >2 RESULTS: The clinical relapse rate was significantly higher in the AI-based vascular-active group (23.9% [16/67]) compared with the AI-based vascular-healing group (3.0% [1/33)]; P = .01). In a subanalysis predicting clinical relapse in patients with MES ≤1, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the combination of complete endoscopic remission and vascular healing (0.70) was increased compared with that for complete endoscopic remission alone (0.65). CONCLUSIONS: AI-based vascular-healing diagnosis system may potentially be used to provide more confidence to physicians to accurately identify patients in remission of UC who would likely relapse rather than remain stable.

Artificial intelligence-assisted colonoscopy to identify histologic remission and predict the outcomes of patients with ulcerative colitis: A systematic review.

This systematic review evaluated the current status of AI-assisted colonoscopy to identify histologic remission and predict the clinical outcomes of patients with ulcerative colitis. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) has increased substantially across several medical fields, including gastrointestinal endoscopy. Evidence suggests that it may be helpful to predict histologic remission and relapse, which would be beneficial because current histological diagnosis is limited by the inconvenience of obtaining biopsies and the high cost and time-intensiveness of pathological diagnosis. MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies published between January 1, 2000, and October 31, 2023. Nine studies fulfilled the selection criteria and were included; five evaluated the prediction of histologic remission, two assessed the prediction of clinical outcomes, and two evaluated both. Seven were prospective observational or cohort studies, while two were retrospective observational studies. No randomized controlled trials were identified. AI-assisted colonoscopy demonstrated sensitivity between 65 %-98 % and specificity values of 80 %-97 % for identifying histologic remission. Furthermore, it was able to predict future relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis. However, several challenges and barriers still exist to its routine clinical application, which should be overcome before the true potential of AI-assisted colonoscopy can be fully realized.

Artificial intelligence-assisted video colonoscopy for disease monitoring of ulcerative colitis: A prospective study.

BACKGROUNDS AND AIMS: The Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) is the most popular endoscopic disease activity measure of ulcerative colitis (UC). Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy is expected to reduce diagnostic variability among endoscopists. However, no study has been conducted to ascertain whether AI-based MES assignments can help predict clinical relapse, nor has AI been verified to improve the diagnostic performance of non-specialists. METHODS: This open-label, prospective cohort study enrolled 110 patients with UC in clinical remission. The AI algorithm was developed using 74713 images from 898 patients who underwent colonoscopy at three centers. Patients were followed up after colonoscopy for 12 months, and clinical relapse was defined as a partial Mayo score >2. A multi-video, multi-reader analysis involving 124 videos was conducted to determine whether the AI system reduced the diagnostic variability among six non-specialists. RESULTS: The clinical relapse rate for patients with AI-based MES = 1 (24.5% [12/49]) was significantly higher (log-rank test, P = 0.01) than that for patients with AI-based MES = 0 (3.2% [1/31]). Relapse occurred during the 12-month follow-up period in 16.2% (13/80) of patients with AI-based MES = 0 or 1 and 50.0% (10/20) of those with AI-based MES = 2 or 3 (log-rank test, P = 0.03). Using AI resulted in better inter- and intra-observer reproducibility than endoscopists alone. CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy using the AI-based MES system can stratify the risk of clinical relapse in patients with UC and improve the diagnostic performance of non-specialists.

Differentiation grade as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer.

Objectives: Japanese guidelines include high-grade (poorly differentiated) tumors as a risk factor for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in T1 colorectal cancer (CRC). However, whether the grading is based on the least or most predominant component when the lesion consists of two or more levels of differentiation varies among institutions. This study aimed to investigate which method is optimal for assessing the risk of LNM in T1 CRC. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 971 consecutive patients with T1 CRC who underwent initial or additional surgical resection from 2001 to 2021 at our institution. Tumor grading was divided into low-grade (well- to moderately differentiated) and high-grade based on the least or predominant differentiation analyses. We investigated the correlations between LNM and these two grading analyses. Results: LNM was present in 9.8% of patients. High-grade tumors, as determined by least differentiation analysis, accounted for 17.0%, compared to 0.8% identified by predominant differentiation analysis. A significant association with LNM was noted for the least differentiation method (p < 0.05), while no such association was found for predominant differentiation (p = 0.18). In multivariate logistic regression, grading based on least differentiation was an independent predictor of LNM (p = 0.04, odds ratio 1.68, 95% confidence interval 1.00-2.83). Sensitivity and specificity for detecting LNM were 27.4% and 84.1% for least differentiation, and 2.1% and 99.3% for predominant differentiation, respectively. Conclusions: Tumor grading via least differentiation analysis proved to be a more reliable measure for assessing LNM risk in T1 CRC compared to grading by predominant differentiation.

Real-world NUDT15 genotyping and thiopurine treatment optimization in inflammatory bowel disease: a multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the effectiveness of NUDT15 codon 139 genotyping in optimizing thiopurine treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Japan, using real-world data, and aimed to establish genotype-based treatment strategies. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 4628 IBD patients who underwent NUDT15 codon 139 genotyping was conducted. This study assessed the purpose of the genotyping test and subsequent prescriptions following the obtained results. Outcomes were compared between the Genotyping group (thiopurine with genotyping test) and Non-genotyping group (thiopurine without genotyping test). Risk factors for adverse events (AEs) were analyzed by genotype and prior genotyping status. RESULTS: Genotyping test for medical purposes showed no significant difference in thiopurine induction rates between Arg/Arg and Arg/Cys genotypes, but nine Arg/Cys patients opted out of thiopurine treatment. In the Genotyping group, Arg/Arg patients received higher initial doses than the Non-genotyping group, while Arg/Cys patients received lower ones (median 25 mg/day). Fewer AEs occurred in the Genotyping group because of their lower incidence in Arg/Cys cases. Starting with < 25 mg/day of AZA reduced AEs in Arg/Cys patients, while Arg/Arg patients had better retention rates when maintaining ≥ 75 mg AZA. Nausea and liver injury correlated with thiopurine formulation but not dosage. pH-dependent mesalamine reduced leukopenia risk in mesalamine users. CONCLUSIONS: NUDT15 codon 139 genotyping effectively reduces thiopurine-induced AEs and improves treatment retention rates in IBD patients after genotype-based dose adjustments. This study provides data-driven treatment strategies based on genotype and identifies risk factors for specific AEs, contributing to a refined thiopurine treatment approach.