Incidence of liver retransplantation and its effect on patient survival.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to review our institutional experience with re-liver transplantation (OLT) after split and full-size OLT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated data corresponding to retransplanted patients over an 8-year period who underwent deceased donor OLT at our institution. Variables analyzed included indications for primary OLT, and re-OLT, the type of graft used during the initial versus re-OLT, the time from initial to re-OLT, and patient survival after re-OLT. RESULTS: Sixty-four of 697 first OLT (9.2%) required re-OLT. Forty-nine cases were among 637 (7.6%) full-size OLT, while 15 were among 60 (25%) split OLT (P < .001). Median time to re-OLT was 8 days (range = 1-1885 days). Main indications for re-OLT were primary nonfunction/initial poor function (44%), hepatic artery thrombosis (26%), biliary complications (11%), and hepatitis C recurrence (6%). Forty-eight percent of the re-OLTs were performed within the first posttransplant week. The overall survival for these 64 patients was 55% and 48% at 1 and 3 years after the primary OLT, and 44% at both 1 and 3 years after the re-OLT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The overall incidence of re-OLT remains 9%. Approximately half of all re-OLT occured within the first posttransplant week. Early retransplantation was associated with the best patient survival. Overall survival after re-OLT was about 10% to 20% lower than that after primary OLT.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients beyond the Milan but within the UCSF criteria.

AIM: Liver transplantation (LT) is the best therapy for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis. Whereas the Milan criteria are routinely applied, the University of California San Francisco (UCSF) criteria are occasionally considered in large-volume transplant centers. Poor information is available about the real "gain" in patients' outcome when extending the listing criteria from Milan to UCSF. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Out of 100 patients transplanted for HCC at our center, 4 patients exceeding the Milan but meeting the UCSF criteria were identified. Data of these patients were analysed for the purposes of this study. RESULTS: Three of them are currently alive after a median follow up of 57 months. One patient died 20 months post-transplant as a result of complications from hepatitis. Of the three who are alive, one underwent surgery for HCC recurrence 81 months post transplant. The remaining two have no evidence of tumor 56 and 57 months post transplant, respectively. CONCLUSION: Our results, as well as the reviewed literature, showed that only a small percentage of transplanted HCC patients can be classified as "beyond Milan-within UCSF". These patients seem to have acceptable overall, as well as recurrence free survivals. Large-volume patients' series, intention- to-treat analysis based on the radiological findings and multi-center prospective studies are required, in order to further explore the outcome of patients "beyond Milan-within UCSF" criteria and in order to better define the risk/benefit ratio of a potential expansion of the current listing criteria.