Serelaxin as a potential treatment for renal dysfunction in cirrhosis: Preclinical evaluation and results of a randomized phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Chronic liver scarring from any cause leads to cirrhosis, portal hypertension, and a progressive decline in renal blood flow and renal function. Extreme renal vasoconstriction characterizes hepatorenal syndrome, a functional and potentially reversible form of acute kidney injury in patients with advanced cirrhosis, but current therapy with systemic vasoconstrictors is ineffective in a substantial proportion of patients and is limited by ischemic adverse events. Serelaxin (recombinant human relaxin-2) is a peptide molecule with anti-fibrotic and vasoprotective properties that binds to relaxin family peptide receptor-1 (RXFP1) and has been shown to increase renal perfusion in healthy human volunteers. We hypothesized that serelaxin could ameliorate renal vasoconstriction and renal dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. METHODS AND FINDINGS: To establish preclinical proof of concept, we developed two independent rat models of cirrhosis that were characterized by progressive reduction in renal blood flow and glomerular filtration rate and showed evidence of renal endothelial dysfunction. We then set out to further explore and validate our hypothesis in a phase 2 randomized open-label parallel-group study in male and female patients with alcohol-related cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Forty patients were randomized 1:1 to treatment with serelaxin intravenous (i.v.) infusion (for 60 min at 80 µg/kg/d and then 60 min at 30 µg/kg/d) or terlipressin (single 2-mg i.v. bolus), and the regional hemodynamic effects were quantified by phase contrast magnetic resonance angiography at baseline and after 120 min. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in total renal artery blood flow. Therapeutic targeting of renal vasoconstriction with serelaxin in the rat models increased kidney perfusion, oxygenation, and function through reduction in renal vascular resistance, reversal of endothelial dysfunction, and increased activation of the AKT/eNOS/NO signaling pathway in the kidney. In the randomized clinical study, infusion of serelaxin for 120 min increased total renal arterial blood flow by 65% (95% CI 40%, 95%; p < 0.001) from baseline. Administration of serelaxin was safe and well tolerated, with no detrimental effect on systemic blood pressure or hepatic perfusion. The clinical study's main limitations were the relatively small sample size and stable, well-compensated population. CONCLUSIONS: Our mechanistic findings in rat models and exploratory study in human cirrhosis suggest the therapeutic potential of selective renal vasodilation using serelaxin as a new treatment for renal dysfunction in cirrhosis, although further validation in patients with more advanced cirrhosis and renal dysfunction is required. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01640964.

Comparison of a single infusion of zoledronic acid with risedronate for Paget's disease.

BACKGROUND: The advent of bisphosphonates advanced therapy for Paget's disease, but more effective and convenient agents are needed to increase adherence. Zoledronic acid, a bisphosphonate administered as a single intravenous infusion, might meet these needs. METHODS: In two identical, randomized, double-blind, actively controlled trials of 6 months' duration, we compared one 15-minute infusion of 5 mg of zoledronic acid with 60 days of oral risedronate (30 mg per day). The primary efficacy end point was the rate of therapeutic response at six months, defined as a normalization of alkaline phosphatase levels or a reduction of at least 75 percent in the total alkaline phosphatase excess. The results of the studies were pooled. RESULTS: At six months, 96.0 percent of patients receiving zoledronic acid had a therapeutic response (169 of 176), as compared with 74.3 percent of patients receiving risedronate (127 of 171, P<0.001). Alkaline phosphatase levels normalized in 88.6 percent of patients in the zoledronic acid group and 57.9 percent of patients in the risedronate group (P<0.001). Zoledronic acid was associated with a shorter median time to a first therapeutic response (64 vs. 89 days, P<0.001). Higher response rates in the zoledronic acid group were consistent across all demographic, disease-severity, and treatment-history subgroups and with changes in other bone-turnover markers. The physical-component summary score of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short-Form General Health Survey, a measure of the quality of life, increased significantly from baseline at both three and six months in the zoledronic acid group and differed significantly from those in the risedronate group at three months. Pain scores improved in both groups. During post-trial follow-up (median, 190 days), 21 of 82 patients in the risedronate group had a loss of therapeutic response, as compared with 1 of 113 patients in the zoledronic acid group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A single infusion of zoledronic acid produces more rapid, more complete, and more sustained responses in Paget's disease than does daily treatment with risedronate.

Long-term control of bone turnover in Paget's disease with zoledronic acid and risedronate.

UNLABELLED: A single 5-mg infusion of zoledronic acid restores biochemical markers of bone turnover into the reference range in the majority of patients with Paget's disease and maintains biochemical remission for at least 2 years. This effect is largely independent of pretreatment disease activity and prior bisphosphonate therapy. INTRODUCTION: Zoledronic acid (ZOL) is a potent bisphosphonate that produces a rapid and complete control of the increased bone turnover of Paget's disease. Long-term control of disease activity is an important aim of treatment in the hope that this will reduce the risk of complications such as deformity, fracture, and degenerative joint disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compares the ability of ZOL 5 mg given as a 15-minute intravenous infusion with risedronate (RIS) 30 mg daily by mouth for 60 days to maintain long-term control of bone turnover. No bisphosphonate was given during the extension study. All patients (n = 296) who achieved a therapeutic response, defined as normalization or a >75% reduction in the total alkaline phosphatase (total ALP) excess above the midpoint of the reference range, were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: ZOL maintained the mean level of total ALP at the middle of the reference range, whereas those treated with risedronate showed a linear increase in total ALP from the 6-month post-treatment time-point. Both treatments resulted in a linear relationship between the 6-month nadir and 24-month total ALP. The relationship for RIS was shifted upward, showing that for a given level of post-treatment biochemical activity, bone turnover increased with time. This was in contrast to the ZOL-treated patients where total ALP generally remained unchanged over this 18-month extension period. A similar pattern of response was seen with the other bone turnover markers. CONCLUSIONS: ZOL maintains bone turnover within the reference range over 24 months from the initiation of treatment. A reduction in the incidence and severity of long-term complications may require persistent normalization of bone turnover over many years, and this now seems a realistic possibility with ZOL.