RESUMO
AIM: To validate the role of lymph node density as a prognostic marker in patients undergoing primary surgery and postneoadjuvant therapy in pathological node-positive urothelial bladder carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 503 patients who underwent radical cystectomy from 2006 to 2019 for muscle-invasive urothelial bladder carcinoma, of which 152 patients with pathological node-positive disease were analyzed. Demographic details, pathological findings, treatment details, disease-free, and overall survival were documented. X tile program analysis was used to divide patients with positive lymph nodes into 3 groups: LD1: <= 7, LD2 :>7 to <15, LD3: >15, and the optimal cut-off value obtained was 15%. To evaluate the impact of lymph node ratio, patients with positive lymph nodes into 3 categories for each cut-off point estimation method, the application generates the histogram, Kaplan-Meier plot and calculates hazard ratio, confidence intervals and P-values. Univariate and multivariate cox regression analysis was done with a P-value of <.05, considered significant. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-two patients (30.2%) had pathological nodal metastasis, with 87 of them having perinodal extension. Ninety-six underwent primary surgery, and 56 were postneoadjuvant chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 55.42 months. 68 of the 152 node-positive patients died of the disease. Median number of lymph nodes removed was 17.11. Lymph node density divided into tertiles were LD1 <7%, LD2 7-<15%, LD3 >15% showed 5-year RFS 40.5%,29.3%, 22.6% and 5 year OS was 55.5%, 42.4%,32.1% respectively. Cox regression analysis showed that age less than 55 years ,higher tumor stage, lymphovascular invasion, and higher lymph node ratio were significant in univariate and multivariate analysis. The lymph node density cut-off value of 15% was substantial among node-positive patients (P = .027), and subgroup analysis in upfront surgery with the adjuvant treatment group and postneoadjuvant chemotherapy group was also significant (P =.021). CONCLUSION: Pathological higher T stage, Age <55 years, Lymphovascular invasion, adjuvant chemotherapy , adjuvant radiation treatment and lymph node density had prognostic significance in both cohorts of patients who underwent upfront surgery and neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Lymph node density cut-off value of <15% was prognostically significant.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células de Transição , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células de Transição/cirurgia , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Excisão de Linfonodo , Linfonodos/cirurgia , Linfonodos/patologia , CistectomiaRESUMO
This study evaluated the repositioning of the ketolide antibacterial telithromycin (TLT) against the oomycete Pythium insidiosum and verified the combination of TLT and the antimicrobials azithromycin (AZM) and amorolfine hydrochloride (AMR), which have known anti-P. insidiosum activity. Susceptibility tests of P. insidiosum isolates (n = 20) against the drugs were carried out according to CLSI protocol M38-A2, and their combinations were evaluated using the checkerboard microdilution method. The minimum inhibitory concentrations were 0.5-4 µg/mL for TLT, 2-32 µg/mL for AZM, and 16-64 µg/mL for AMR. For the TLT+AZM combination, 52.75 % of interactions were indifferent, 43.44 % were antagonistic, and 9.70 % were synergistic. As for interactions of the TLT+AMR combination, 60.43 % were indifferent, 39.12 % were antagonistic, and 10.44 % synergistic interactions. This study is the first to evaluate the repositioning of the antibacterial TLT against mammalian pathogenic oomycetes, and our results show that its isolated action is superior to its combinations with either AZM or AMR. Therefore, we recommend including TLT in future research to evaluate therapeutic approaches in different clinical forms of human and animal pythiosis.
Assuntos
Cetolídeos , Morfolinas , Pitiose , Pythium , Animais , Humanos , Antifúngicos/farmacologia , Azitromicina/farmacologia , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Cetolídeos/farmacologia , Cetolídeos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Pitiose/tratamento farmacológico , Pitiose/microbiologia , MamíferosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Penile cancer is a rare malignancy with scant data on the impact of systemic therapy on outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of patients with a histological diagnosis of carcinoma penis treated with systemic therapy at the Tata Memorial Centre (Mumbai, India) between August 2010 and February 2018. Primary objective was overall survival (OS); secondary objectives included assessment of clinical characteristics, treatment approaches, and toxicity profiles. RESULTS: We included 91 patients with penile carcinoma who received systemic therapy at our center. Intent of therapy was curative in 71 patients (78%), and palliative in 20 (22%). Median age was 57 years (interquartile range [IQR], 50-65.5) for curatively treated patients and 58.5 years (IQR, 44-65.2) for those with advanced disease. Common presenting symptoms were lumps (70%), and pain (57%). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) with paclitaxel + platinum was administered to 19 patients (20.9%), of which 7 (37%) attained complete or partial response. Six patients (31.5%) underwent R0 surgery post-NACT. All 71 patients underwent primary surgery; 47 (66.2%) undergoing partial penectomy. Of the 20 patients treated with palliative first-line chemotherapy, 4(20%) attained a partial response. Median OS of patients treated in curative and palliative settings was 33.8 months (95% CI, 17.2-not recorded) and 11.4 months (95% CI, 9.53-23.3), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with penile cancer treated with systemic therapy have poor outcomes. Little over a third of the patients respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and those with advanced disease have poor survival despite systemic therapy, emphasizing the need for early detection and optimum management of primary and nodal disease.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Penianas , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Penianas/patologia , Neoplasias Penianas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Penianas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Penianas/terapia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Índia , Centros de Atenção Terciária/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Paclitaxel/administração & dosagem , Paclitaxel/uso terapêutico , Cuidados PaliativosRESUMO
PURPOSE: To study the late urinary toxicity in patients with prostate cancer with prior transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) and treated with hypofractionated prostate radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients diagnosed with prostate cancer, with a prior TURP, and treated with moderate or extreme hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy (moderate hypofractionated radiation therapy [MHRT], stereotactic body radiation therapy [SBRT]), were included in this study. Severity and duration of urinary symptoms observed during serial follow-up after at least 3 months from radiation therapy were graded per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0 using information from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Impact of hypofractionation and other potential contributory factors on cumulative grade 2+ late urinary toxicity was analyzed with univariable and multivariable binary logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 203 eligible patients were included (MHRT = 114, 64-68 Gy/25#; SBRT = 89, 35-37.5 Gy/5#). Median time from TURP to radiation therapy was 10 months (IQR, 7-16 months), similar for MHRT and SBRT. Overall, mean cavity volume was 1.17 cc (IQR, 0.5-1.35 cc), whereas in MHRT and SBRT groups it was 1.03 cc (IQR, 0.4-1.15 cc) and 1.27 cc (IQR, 0.5-1.4 cc), respectively. At a median follow-up of 37 months, cumulative grade 3 and grade 2 late urinary toxicity was 8.4% (n = 17) and 23.2% (n = 47), respectively. Grade 3 symptoms were observed at median 29 months (IQR, 19-62 months) after radiation therapy completion, lasting for a median duration of 8 months (IQR, 2-14 months). Hematuria (6.4%) and urinary obstruction (3.4%) were the chief grade 3 symptoms. Multivariable analysis for age, diabetes, pelvic radiation therapy, fraction size, prostate volume, TURP to radiation therapy duration, and TURP cavity volume showed no significant association with late grade 2+ urinary toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: In this large cohort of patients with prior TURP and treated with hypofractionated prostate radiation therapy, incidence of severe late urinary adverse effects was <10%, mainly hematuria or urinary obstruction. Most of these were temporary, and no significant contributory factors were identified for late urinary morbidity after TURP and radiation therapy.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: The POP-RT phase 3 randomized trial showed improved biochemical failure-free survival and metastasis-free survival with whole pelvic radiation therapy versus prostate-only radiation therapy for high and very high-risk prostate cancer, albeit with worse RTOG late urinary toxicity. We report updated late urinary adverse effects and bladder dose-effect relations within this trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Late urinary toxicity and the cumulative severity of each symptom during the follow-up period were graded using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), version 5.0. Bladder dosimetry in 5-Gy increments (V5, V10, V15, V65, V68Gy) in the approved radiation therapy plans was compared with urinary symptoms and overall grade 2+ toxicity. Potential factors influencing urinary toxicity were tested using multivariable logistic regression analysis. Updated urinary quality of life (QOL) scores were compared between the trial arms. RESULTS: Complete combined data for late urinary symptoms and dosimetry was available for 193 of 224 patients. At a median follow-up of 75 months, cumulative late urinary CTCAE grade 3 toxicity was low and similar for whole pelvic radiation therapy and prostate-only radiation therapy (5.2% vs 4.1%, P = .49), and grade 2 toxicity was 31.3% versus 22.7%, respectively (P = .12). Cumulative rates of each urinary symptom were similar between both arms. Multivariable analysis with age at diagnosis, known diabetes, tumor stage, trial arm, prior transurethral resection of prostate, grade 2+ acute urinary toxicity, low bladder dose (V10Gy), and moderate bladder dose (V40Gy) did not identify any significant association with late urinary toxicity. Urinary QOL scores was similar between both the arms for all the symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: During long-term follow-up, whole pelvic radiation therapy resulted in low (â¼5%) and similar grade 3 cumulative urinary toxicity as prostate-only radiation therapy. The long-term patient-reported QOL scores were similar. No causative factors affecting the late urinary toxicity were identified.
RESUMO
Clear cell urothelial carcinoma is a rare variant of urothelial carcinoma. It's recognition and accurate diagnosis are essential in deciding appropriate treatment protocols considering the prognosis of this variant. A 57-year-old male presented with a history of hematuria and lower urinary tract symptoms for 6 months. Microscopically, the tumor was arranged in sheets and had a nested pattern. The tumor was composed of round to polygonal cells with abundant clear cytoplasm (>90% clear cell differentiation), resembling a conventional clear renal cell carcinoma. On special stain, the tumor was positive for periodic acid-Schiff (PAS) and negative for periodic acid-Schiff with diastase (PAS-D) and mucicarmine stain. The urothelial origin of clear cells was confirmed by positivity for GATA Binding protein 3(GATA3) and High Molecular Weight Cytokeratin (HMWCK) immunohistochemistry and negativity for NK3 homeobox 1(NKX3.1), Prostate specific antigen (PSA) and Paired box gene 8 (PAX8) immunohistochemistry.