Should paclitaxel be considered an old generation DCB? The limus era.

Since their introduction Drug Coated Balloons (DCBs) have slowly gained their spot into everyday cath-lab practice, first for treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR), more recently for small vessels disease; today a growing body of evidence start supporting their use in more complex lesions, from bifurcations, to large vessels, to acute lesions. Although the new generation of DCBs showed a better performance and safety than the older one, the drug of choice has always been the Paclitaxel; last year some concerns were raised on the safety of Paclitaxel devices, in particular the balloons mining their use. Recently Sirolimus ventured in the DCBs world, making its appearance on cath-lab shelves and becoming a good alternative to Paclitaxel (DCB).

Transradial approach for carotid artery stenting: A position paper from the Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology (SICI-GISE).

Carotid artery stenting (CAS) is a valid and effective alternative to endoatherectomy when performed by experienced operators. The conventional approach used is the transfemoral one, but in the last 10 years a transradial (TR) approach, the standard access for cardiac catheterization, became widely adopted for peripheral vascular interventions, included the extracranial carotids. Preliminary experiences suggest this approach as safe and effective, especially in specific anatomical and clinical settings that have been shown to be associated with high risk of complications from the femoral route. Lacking international guidelines, this document, promoted by the Italian Society of Interventional Cardiology - Gruppo Italiano Studi Emodinamici (SICI-GISE), was drawn-up by a panel of interventional cardiologists with a documented experience on the subject, focusing on the indications, techniques and materials that should be used for this type of intervention and the most recent literature on the subject.

"The heart supporters": systematic review for ventricle assist devices in congenital heart surgery.

Ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation is a widely used procedure in children with cardiac failure refractory to medical therapy as a long-term bridge to recovery or transplant. This strategy has proved to be of an enormous advantage in the cure of these children. The aim of this review is to evaluate the current strategies used for clinical monitoring of paediatric patients with a VAD, focusing on the management of several aspects such as anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy, haemorrhagic and thrombotic complications, as well as the effects that VADs have on the exposure, effectiveness and the safety of drugs. The sources used for this research are MEDLINE, PubMed and Cochrane Library. The use of key words such as "paediatric ventricular assist device", "clinical management", "anticoagulant therapy" and "infections" retrieved 146 papers. With the application of the inclusion criteria, 42 articles have been selected, but following further analysis, only 21 were eligible. The post-implant process is still complicated due to the lack of guidelines regarding clinical management and for the frequent occurrence of adverse events including bleeding, infection and thromboembolic episodes. From these findings, we can highlight the importance of establishing a suitable antithrombotic therapy, as well as ensuring that the prevention and treatment of infection are paramount during the management of these patients. The clinical management of VAD paediatric children is complex and challenging. At the moment, there are no guidelines regarding strategies to adopt, but from the analysed surveys, it has been possible to highlight a relative coherence between adopted therapies in different centres worldwide.

Long-term follow-up after sirolimus-coated balloon use for coronary artery disease. Final results of the Nanolutè study.

OBJECTIVES: To test the long-term efficacy of a sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB). BACKGROUND: Nanoluté was a prospective registry to evaluate the clinical performance of a novel SCB (Concept Medical Research Private Limited, India) for the treatment of de novo coronary lesions and in-stent restenosis (ISR). We here present the 24 months clinical data. METHODS: All patients treated with SCB for any type of coronary indication between July 2012 and September 2015 were enrolled at Indian centers and clinically followed up to 24 months. Primary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as a composite of cardiac death, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and target vessel-myocardial infarction (MI). RESULTS: A total of 484 SCBs were used in 408 patients to treat 435 lesions. In detail, the SCB was used for 183 patients with ISR, 185 with de novo small vessel disease, and 40 with de novo large vessel disease. Mean balloon length and diameter (average ± SD) were 22.3 ± 7.1 mm and 2.7 ± 0.40 mm, respectively. All patients with 24 months follow-up were included. Overall MACE rate was 4.2% (n = 17) with three cardiac deaths (0.7%), 13 TLR (3.2%), and one MI (0.2%). CONCLUSION: The Nanoluté prospective registry is the first long-term clinical evidence of the safety and feasibility of this type of SCB, both in patients with ISR or de novo lesions.

Coronary sinus perforation during reducer implantation.

Coronary Sinus Reducer (Neovasc, Inc., Richmond B.C., Canada) has shown to be an effective and safe treatment option for the treatment of refractory angina. Until now, a few number of complications related to its implantation have been reported. Coronary sinus perforation is a rare complication, more often related to cardiac surgery procedures. We report the first case of coronary sinus perforation after a sinus Reducer implantation.

Transradial versus transfemoral ancillary approach in complex structural, coronary, and peripheral interventions. Results from the multicenter ancillary registry: A study of the Italian Radial Club.

OBJECTIVES: to understand the role of a transradial (TR) secondary approach during complex percutaneous interventions. BACKGROUND: The value of the TR route for ancillary vascular approach has not been adequately validated in this setting, and there is scant data on its role in reducing bleeding complications. METHODS: In the present study we retrospectively included patients undergoing the following interventions requiring two vascular approaches at nine high-volume centers in Italy: structural cardiac interventions, complex PCI, endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and complex lower limb angioplasty. We compared procedural outcomes according to the type of ancillary vascular approach selected, namely TR or transfemoral/transbrachial (TF/TB). Primary endpoints of the study were procedural success and in-hospital BARC grade 3-5 bleedings. RESULTS: We included 906 patients, 433 receiving TR and 473 TF/TB ancillary approaches. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly. Patients underwent the following types of intervention: structural 50%, complex coronary PCI 37%, EVAR 11%, peripheral angioplasty 2%. Procedural success was similar (90% in TR and 92% TF/TB, P = NS). In-hospital BARC 3/5 bleedings were more common in TF/TB group as compared to TR group (19.7% vs. 6.7%,P < 0.001). In TF/TB group we also observed a higher postprocedural hemoglobin drop (1.92 vs 1.13 g/dl, P = 0.008) and longer hospital stay as compared to TR group. Similar results were observed in a propensity score-matched population of 450 patients. CONCLUSIONS: In our study TR ancillary approach was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of major bleedings, without jeopardizing the success of complex structural, coronary, and peripheral percutaneous interventions. The value of the transradial route for ancillary vascular approach during percutaneous interventions has not been adequately validated yet. We retrospectively included 906 patients, 433 receiving TR and 473 TF/TB ancillary approach at nine high-volume centers for the following interventions: structural cardiac interventions, complex PCI, EVAR and complex peripheral angioplasty. Procedural success was similar, whereas in-hospital BARC bleedings were more common in the transfemoral/brachial group. Similar results were observed in a propensity score-matched population. In our study TR ancillary approach was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of major bleedings, without jeopardizing the success of complex interventions. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold vs. everolimus-eluting metallic stent in small vessel disease: A propensity matched analysis of COMPARE II, RAI, and MAASSTAD-ABSORB studies.

BACKGROUND: Patients with small vessel disease (SVD) are at higher risk of adverse events after PCI compared to non-SVD patients. In this subset, the use of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) has raised particular concern. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare outcomes of Absorb BVS versus a 2nd-generation metallic everolimus-eluting stents (EES) in the SVD setting, by pooling patients from three large, prospective studies. METHODS: Patients with SVD (reference vessel diameter ≤2.75 mm by QCA) and treated with Absorb BVS were identified in the Italian RAI and the MAASSTAD-Absorb registries. EES controls were identified in the COMPARE II Trial. We performed a propensity-score matching using several clinical and angiographic variables. Implantation technique was not object of matching, being device-specific. RESULTS: Out of 4635 enrolled subjects, 1147 belonged to the SVD population. After matching, we obtained 337 pairs of patients. High clinical and angiographic complexity was found in both groups. Predilation and postdilation rates were significantly higher in BVS patients. No differences were found in terms of the device-oriented composite end-point at 1-year (HR = 1.08, 95%CI 0.5-2.3, P = .8) and 2-years (HR = 1.28, 95% CI: 0.68-2.43, P = .5). Notwithstanding, higher incidence of definite/probable stent thrombosis was observed in the BVS group at 1 year (HR 4.7, 95%CI 0.8-31.4, P = .08) and 2-years (HR = 8.34 95%CI 1.1-60.2, P = .04). CONCLUSION: In this propensity-matched analysis pooling SVD patients of three large prospective studies, incidence of composite device-related events was comparable between BVS and EES up to 2 years follow-up. However, higher rates of stent thrombosis were found in the BVS group.

Fracture with the newer bioresorbable vascular scaffolds.

Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds (BVS) are being increasingly used in complex, real-world lesions. The possibility of strut fractures is a rare entity with the use of drug eluting stents (DES), but has not yet been adequately described for the BVS technology. In this report, we present a case of scaffold fracture of DEsolve BVS (Elixir Medical Corporation, USA) that was diagnosed both angiographically and by optical coherence tomography(OCT). Scaffold fracture with the newer BVS is a new Achilles' heel in the BVS technology. This gap in knowledge about the etiology such as over-expansion and potential predictors of strut fracture need to be deeply investigated before a widespread use of such technologies is adopted. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Clinical and angiographic outcome of a single center, real world population treated with a dedicated technique of implantation for bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. The FAtebenefratelli Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold (FABS) registry.

OBJECTIVES: With this prospective study we aim at investigating the long-term outcome of a consecutive cohort of patients successfully treated with bioresorbable scaffold (BVS) implantation. BACKGROUND: It is not clearly understood if there is a relation between the technique of BVS implantation and the outcome. METHODS: Between December 2012 and December 2014, all consecutive patients treated with BVS were included in this registry and received an angiographic follow-up. After a run-in phase, all BVS were implanted using a specific technique consisting of aggressive predilation, correct scaffold sizing, visually determined, and high-pressure post-dilation with a noncompliance balloon. Primary endpoint was late lumen loss (LLL) at 1-year angiographic follow-up and ischemia-driven target-lesion revascularization (ID-TLR) at 2-year clinical follow-up. Secondary endpoints were the occurrence of binary restenosis, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and every single component of MACE (cardiac death, myocardial infarction, TLR) at 2 years. RESULTS: A total of 144 lesions in 122 patients treated consecutively with BVS, were enrolled. Diabetics were 29.5% and acute coronary syndrome at presentation occurred in 29.5% of patients. At the angiographic follow-up LLL was 0.38 ± 0.9. At 2-year clinical follow-up, ID-TLR occurred in eight patients (5.6%). We observed two cases of scaffold thrombosis (1.38%, one early and one very late). At multivariate statistical analysis, STEMI presentation remained a significant predictor for TLR. CONCLUSIONS: In a complex, all-comers real world population, BVS implantation with a specific, and standardized technique showed to be feasible, with acceptable mid-term angiographic and long-term clinical outcome.

Comparative Analysis: Implementation of a Pre-operative Educational Intervention to Decrease Anxiety Among Parents of Children With Congenital Heart Disease.

PURPOSE: The present study evaluated the efficacy of a nursing educational intervention in alleviating the level of parental anxiety in the parents of children who required heart surgery for the first time. DESIGN AND METHODS: A comparative study was used to explore the parents of children who had to undergo cardiac surgery. Parents of children were randomized into 2 groups: 1) control group and 2) experimental group or parents that received the educational intervention about PICU stay. RESULT: The results of STAY-1 showed that the average anxiety score of group 1 was lower than that of group 2 (63.0 [SD=3.5] vs. 70.4 [SD=2.8]). CONCLUSION: In order to decrease levels of parental anxiety and stress prior to paediatric surgery, parents should be adequately informed about planned therapeutic procedures. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: We speculate that pre-surgery parent education on what to expect before, during and after their child's cardiac surgery may improve parents' knowledge and satisfaction and decrease anxiety.

Inflammation and cardiovascular disease: from pathogenesis to therapeutic target.

Atherosclerosis represents the most common pathological substrate of coronary heart disease (CHD), and the characterization of the disease as a chronic low-grade inflammatory condition is now largely accepted. A number of mediators of inflammation have been widely studied, both as surrogate biomarkers and as causal agents, in the pathophysiological network of atherogenesis and plaque vulnerability. The epidemiological observation that biomarkers of inflammation are associated with clinical cardiovascular risk supports the theory that targeted anti-inflammatory treatment appears to be a promising strategy in reducing residual cardiovascular risk on the background of traditional medical therapy. A large number of randomized controlled trials have shown that drugs commonly used in cardiovascular disease (CVD), such as statins, may be effective in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular events through an anti-inflammatory effect. Moreover, several anti-inflammatory drugs are being tested for their potential to reduce residual cardiovascular risk on the background of validated medical therapy for atherosclerotic disease. In this paper, we review relevant evidence with regard to the relationship between inflammation and CVD, from pathogenesis to therapeutic strategies.

Chronic respiratory disorders due to aberrant innominate artery: a case series and critical review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Tracheal compression (TC) due to vascular anomalies is an uncommon, but potentially serious cause of chronic respiratory disease in childhood. Vascular slings are congenital malformations resulting from abnormal development of the great vessels; in this group of disorders the most prevalent entity is the aberrant innominate artery (AIA). Here we provide a report on diagnosis and treatment of AIA in nine children with unexplained chronic respiratory symptoms. We describe the cases, perform a literature review, and provide a discussion on the diagnostic workup and treatment that can help manage AIA. METHODS: Clinical history, diagnostic procedures and treatment before and after the AIA diagnosis were retrospectively reviewed in nine children (5 boys and 4 girls), who were referred for recurrent-to-chronic respiratory manifestations over 10 years (2012-2022). We performed a comprehensive report on the ongoing clinical course and treatment as well as an electronic literature search on the topic. RESULTS: Diagnoses at referral, before AIA was identified, were chronic dry barking cough associated with recurrent pneumonia (n = 8, 89%), lobar/segmental atelectasis (n = 3, 33%), atopic/non atopic asthma (n = 3, 33%); pneumomediastinum with subcutaneous emphysema complicated the clinical course in one case. When referred to our Unit, all patients had been previously treated with repeated antibiotic courses (n = 9, 100%), alone (n = 6, 67%) or combined with prolonged antiasthma medications (n = 3, 33%) and/or daily chest physiotherapy (n = 2, 22%), but reported only partial clinical benefit. Median ages at symptom onset and at AIA diagnosis were 1.5 [0.08-13] and 6 [4-14] years, respectively, with a relevant delay in the definitive diagnosis (4.5 years). Tracheal stenosis at computed tomography (CT) was ≥ 51% in 4/9 cases and ≤ 50% in the remaining 5 subjects. Airway endoscopy was performed in 4 cases with CT evidence of tracheal stenosis ≥ 51% and confirmed CT findings. In these 4 cases, the decision of surgery was made based on endoscopy and CT findings combined with persistence of clinical symptoms despite medical treatment. The remaining 5 children were managed conservatively. CONCLUSIONS: TC caused by AIA may be responsible for unexplained chronic respiratory disease in childhood. Early diagnosis of AIA can decrease the use of expensive investigations or unsuccessful treatments, reduce disease morbidity, and accelerate the path toward a proper treatment.

Coronary lithotripsy for the treatment of underexpanded stents: the international & multicentre CRUNCH registry.

BACKGROUND: Stent underexpansion increases the risk of cardiac adverse events. At present, there are limited options to treat refractory stent underexpansion. In this context, the intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) system might be a safe and effective strategy. AIMS: We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of IVL in addressing resistant stent underexpansion due to heavy underlying calcification. METHODS: This was an international multicentre registry including patients receiving IVL therapy to treat stent underexpansion from December 2017 to August 2020. Angiographic and intracoronary imaging data were collected. The efficacy endpoint was device success (technical success with a final percentage diameter stenosis <50%). The safety endpoint was in-hospital major adverse cardiac events (MACE). RESULTS: Seventy patients were included, the mean age was 73±9.2 years and 76% were male. The median time from stent implantation to IVL therapy was 49 days (0-2,537). Adjuvant treatment with non-compliant balloon dilatations pre- and post-IVL was performed in 72.3% and 76.8% of patients, respectively, and additional stenting was performed in 22.4%. Device success was 92.3%. Minimum lumen diameter increased from 1.49±0.73 mm to 2.41±0.67 mm (p<0.001) and stent expansion increased by 124.93±138.19% (p=0.016). No IVL-related procedural complications or MACE were observed. The use of bailout IVL therapy directly after stenting and the presence of ostial underexpanded lesions negatively predicted lumen diameter gain. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary lithotripsy is safe and effective in increasing lumen and stent dimensions in underexpanded stents secondary to heavily calcified lesions.

Intravascular Lithotripsy and Dual Drug-Coated Balloons for the Treatment of Severely Calcific Renal In-Stent Restenosis: All Is Fair in War.

Optimal treatment of renal artery "in-stent restenosis" (ISR) is still debated; drug eluting stents (DES), drug coated balloons (DCB) and scoring balloons have all been used, with mixed long term results. The shockwave lithotripsy for the treatment of heavily calcified atherosclerotic plaques has proven to be an effective tool and preliminary data support its use in case of underexpanded stents. Here we present the case of a 60 year old male with a known significant atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis and refractory hypertension who already underwent bilateral renal angioplasty with bare metal stents (BMS) in 2011 and angioplasty with DCB in 2012 for right renal artery ISR. In May 2020 he presented with worsening hypertension and CT scan showed total occlusion of the right with critical ISR of the left renal artery. Because of the high calcium burden he underwent balloon lithotripsy for plaque modification and subsequent renal angioplasty with sirolimus and paclitaxel DCB, with a good angiographic result. This is the first case of recurrent renal ISR successfully treated with Shockwave IVL and double-drug DCB therapy.

Comparison Between Sirolimus- and Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon for Revascularization of Coronary Arteries: The SIRPAC (SIRolimus-PAClitaxel) Study.

OBJECTIVE: Our study sought to compare the 12-month clinical outcome of patients treated with paclitaxel-coated balloons (PCB) vs. sirolimus-coated balloons (SCB) during coronary angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Drug-coated balloons represent an established therapeutic tool for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). A comparison between PCB and SCB is still lacking. METHODS: We performed an indirect comparison between two cohorts of patients previously included into two investigator-driven registries with clinical primary endpoints, 494 treated with the Elutax SV PCB (AR Baltic, Lithuania) from the DCB RISE registry, and 596 treated with the Magic Touch SCB (Concept Medical, India) from the EASTBOURNE registry. The primary endpoint was the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) at 12-month clinical follow-up. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, a total of 580 patients were well matched for baseline clinical and procedural characteristics and were analyzed. At 12 months there was no significant difference between the matched DCB RISE and EASTBOURNE cohorts in terms of the primary endpoint MACE (10.3% DCB RISE vs. 10.7% EASTBOURNE, p = 0.892). No significant difference was observed also regarding the rate of TLR (7.9% DCB RISE vs. 8.3% EASTBOURNE; p = 0.879, respectively). By multivariate analysis, insulin-dependent diabetes was the only predictor of MACE. CONCLUSIONS: In the SIRPAC study, the first indirect comparison between paclitaxel-coated and sirolimus coated balloons, no significant difference in clinical endpoints were found at 12-month follow-up. Randomized studies are necessary to confirm these findings.

Pericardial effusion after pediatric cardiac surgery: A single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pericardial effusion (pPE) still remains a frequent complication after congenital heart surgery and it usually leads to an increased morbidity and re-hospitalization rate. There are only few published papers about pPE clinical course or large randomized studies that analyze its prevalence or preoperative risk factors. In this regard, we report a single-center 10-years retrospective analysis of prevalence, outcomes and risk factors of postoperative pericardial effusion after congenital heart surgery. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out on 624 patients who underwent congenital heart surgery from January 2010 to December 2019. Study population was divided in two groups basing of the presence of pPE during the first 30 days after the surgery and their perioperative data were compared. Univariate and multivariate analysis were used to find possible risk factors for pPE developing. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were enrolled in pPE group and 530 in ¬ pPE group. Pericardial effusion was assessed as "mild" in 57 patients (60,6%), as "moderate" in 25 (26,6%), and as "severe" in 12 patients (12,8%). Total correction of Tetralogy of Fallot/Pulmonary atresia seems to be associated with a higher prevalence of pPE in the "Infant" subgroup, while atrial septal defect showed to be a risk factor among "Toddler". In addition, pPE was proved to be much more frequent in Fontan patients in all studied subgroups. Univariate and multivariate analysis revealed that total drain amount, Fontan procedure, postoperative Warfarin therapy, Redo-operations and surgical correction of Tetralogy of Fallot/Pulmonary atresia seem to be risk factors for pPE. Postoperative pericardial effusion was diagnosed between the 4th and the 28th postoperative day but in 88,3% of the cases (83/94) it occurred before the 14th day after the operation. In 58 patients, pPE was clinically silent. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative pericardial effusion was detected in 88.3% of cases within the first 14 days after the operation. About 69% of these patients were asymptomatic therefore it suggests that routinely echocardiogram after intensive care unit discharge could be a useful tool to screen clinically silent pPE at an early stage, especially in high-risk or unstable patients.

Clinical performance of a novel sirolimus-coated balloon in coronary artery disease: EASTBOURNE registry.

AIMS: The purpose of the EASTBOURNE registry is to evaluate the immediate and long-term clinical performance of a novel sirolimus-coated balloon (SCB) in a real-world population of patients with coronary artery disease. We here present the prespecified interim analysis after the enrollment of the first 642 patients who obtained 1-year clinical follow-up. METHODS: EASTBOURNE is a prospective, international, multicenter, all-comer investigator-driven clinical registry, which is enrolling consecutive patients treated with SCB at 42 European and Asiatic centers. Primary study endpoint is target-lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints are procedural success and major adverse cardiac events through 36 months. RESULTS: Diabetes mellitus was present in 41% of patients. Acute coronary syndrome was present in 45% of patients and de novo lesions were 55%; 83% of the in-stent restenosis (ISR) patients had drug-eluting stents restenosis. Lesion predilatation was performed in 95% of the cases and bailout stenting occurred in 7.5%. So far, 642 patients have a complete 12-month follow-up. TLR occurred in 2.5%, myocardial infarction in 2.3%, total death in 1% and major adverse cardiac events in 5.8% of patients. A prespecified analysis of comparison between ISR and de-novo lesions showed a significantly higher occurrence of TLR in the ISR population (5.4 vs. 0.2%, P = 0.0008). CONCLUSION: The current interim analysis of 12-month follow-up of the EASTBOURNE registry shows good immediate performance and an adequate and encouraging safety profile through 12 months for this novel SCB.