[Evolution of blood loss in total knee prosthesis with blood recovery system vs conventional drainage]. / Evolución de la pérdida sanguínea en la prótesis total de rodilla con recuperador de sangre vs drenaje convencional.

INTRODUCTION: knee prosthetic surgery can be associated with significant blood loss that can account for up to 20% of blood volume. The objective of our study is to analyze blood loss (BL) after total knee replacement (TKR), with the use of a blood recovery system vs a normal drain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: prospective, comparative, and observational study of two groups of 30 patients who underwent TKR, one control (CG) and another study group with a recovery system (RG). We analyzed PS, hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Htc), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate (HR) at 3-, 24-, 48-, 72- and 96-hours post-surgery, the need for transfusion, and the percentage of discharges in 72 hours and complications. RESULTS: the highest percentage of change in Htc and Hb occurred in the first 3 hours post-surgery and recovery began at 72 hours in the RG (p = 0.02) and at 96 hours in the CG (p = 0.04). The decrease in Hb and Htc began his recovery at 72 hours in the RG and at 96 hours in the CG. The TAS, TAD and FC began their recovery at 72 hours in both groups. The decrease in SBP was greater in the CG at 3 hours (p = 0.02), 24 hours (p = 0.02) and 48 hours (p = 0.01) post-surgery. Six patients were transfused in RG and 10 in CG (p = 0.22). 20% and 74% of the patients were discharged at 72 hours in the CG and RG, respectively. CONCLUSION: the greatest BL occurs in the first 3 hours post-surgery and recovery begins at 72-96 hours. Recovery blood system decreases BL during the first 3 hours, enhance the recuperation of Hb and SBP, decreases the need for transfusion and favors early discharge.

INTRODUCCIÓN: la cirugía protésica total de rodilla (PTR) se puede asociar a pérdidas sanguíneas (PS) significativas. El objetivo es analizar la evolución de la PS tras PTR con recuperador sanguíneo vs drenaje convencional. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: estudio prospectivo de dos grupos de 30 pacientes intervenidos de PTR, uno control (GC) y otro estudio con recuperador (GR). Se analizó la PS, hematocrito (Hcto), hemoglobina (Hb), tensión arterial sistólica (TAS) y diastólica (TAD) y frecuencia cardíaca (FC) a las tres, 24, 48, 72 y 96 horas postquirúrgicas, la necesidad de transfusión, el porcentaje de altas en 72 horas y las complicaciones. RESULTADOS: la mayor PS y porcentaje de cambio de Hcto y Hb se produjo a las tres horas postquirúrgicas e inició su recuperación a las 72 horas en el GR (Hcto, p = 0.02) (Hb, p = 0.04) y a las 96 horas en el GC. La TAS, TAD y FC empezó su recuperación a las 72 horas en ambos grupos. El descenso de TAS fue mayor en el GC a las tres horas (p = 0.02), 24 horas (p = 0.02) y 48 horas (p = 0.01) postquirúrgicas. Veinte y 33% de los pacientes fueron transfundidos, además 20 y 74% fueron dados de alta a las 72 horas en el GC y GR, respectivamente. CONCLUSIÓN: la mayor PS y porcentaje de cambio de Hcto y Hb se produce a las tres horas postquirúrgicas y empieza su recuperación a las 72-96 horas. El recuperador favorece la recuperación del Hcto, Hb y TAS, disminuye la necesidad de transfusión y favorece el alta precoz.

Evolución de la pérdida sanguínea en la prótesis total de rodilla con recuperador de sangre vs drenaje convencional / Evolution of blood loss in total knee prosthesis with blood recovery system vs conventional drainage

Resumen: Introducción: la cirugía protésica total de rodilla (PTR) se puede asociar a pérdidas sanguíneas (PS) significativas. El objetivo es analizar la evolución de la PS tras PTR con recuperador sanguíneo vs drenaje convencional. Material y métodos: estudio prospectivo de dos grupos de 30 pacientes intervenidos de PTR, uno control (GC) y otro estudio con recuperador (GR). Se analizó la PS, hematocrito (Hcto), hemoglobina (Hb), tensión arterial sistólica (TAS) y diastólica (TAD) y frecuencia cardíaca (FC) a las tres, 24, 48, 72 y 96 horas postquirúrgicas, la necesidad de transfusión, el porcentaje de altas en 72 horas y las complicaciones. Resultados: la mayor PS y porcentaje de cambio de Hcto y Hb se produjo a las tres horas postquirúrgicas e inició su recuperación a las 72 horas en el GR (Hcto, p = 0.02) (Hb, p = 0.04) y a las 96 horas en el GC. La TAS, TAD y FC empezó su recuperación a las 72 horas en ambos grupos. El descenso de TAS fue mayor en el GC a las tres horas (p = 0.02), 24 horas (p = 0.02) y 48 horas (p = 0.01) postquirúrgicas. Veinte y 33% de los pacientes fueron transfundidos, además 20 y 74% fueron dados de alta a las 72 horas en el GC y GR, respectivamente. Conclusión: la mayor PS y porcentaje de cambio de Hcto y Hb se produce a las tres horas postquirúrgicas y empieza su recuperación a las 72-96 horas. El recuperador favorece la recuperación del Hcto, Hb y TAS, disminuye la necesidad de transfusión y favorece el alta precoz.

Abstract: Introduction: knee prosthetic surgery can be associated with significant blood loss that can account for up to 20% of blood volume. The objective of our study is to analyze blood loss (BL) after total knee replacement (TKR), with the use of a blood recovery system vs a normal drain. Material and methods: prospective, comparative, and observational study of two groups of 30 patients who underwent TKR, one control (CG) and another study group with a recovery system (RG). We analyzed PS, hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Htc), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate (HR) at 3-, 24-, 48-, 72- and 96-hours post-surgery, the need for transfusion, and the percentage of discharges in 72 hours and complications. Results: the highest percentage of change in Htc and Hb occurred in the first 3 hours post-surgery and recovery began at 72 hours in the RG (p = 0.02) and at 96 hours in the CG (p = 0.04). The decrease in Hb and Htc began his recovery at 72 hours in the RG and at 96 hours in the CG. The TAS, TAD and FC began their recovery at 72 hours in both groups. The decrease in SBP was greater in the CG at 3 hours (p = 0.02), 24 hours (p = 0.02) and 48 hours (p = 0.01) post-surgery. Six patients were transfused in RG and 10 in CG (p = 0.22). 20% and 74% of the patients were discharged at 72 hours in the CG and RG, respectively. Conclusion: the greatest BL occurs in the first 3 hours post-surgery and recovery begins at 72-96 hours. Recovery blood system decreases BL during the first 3 hours, enhance the recuperation of Hb and SBP, decreases the need for transfusion and favors early discharge.

[Adherence to treatment after kidney transplantation as quality indicator of the information received: Longitudinal study of 2 years follow-up]. / Adherencia al tratamiento tras trasplante renal como indicador de calidad de la información recibida: estudio longitudinal con un seguimiento de 2 años.

INTRODUCTION: Transplantation is an optimal form of treatment for end-stage renal disease, but requires lifelong adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. The aim of this study was to longitudinally assess the adherence to treatment after kidney transplant, as well as to compare the amount of information about the treatment received at one month and 18 months post-transplantation, and its influence on adherence to treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Self-Reported Measure of Medication Adherence was administered at month (T1), 6 months (T2), 12 months (T3), 18 months (T4), and 24 months (T5) post-transplantation. Survey about aspects of knowledge and attitudes about medication, was administered at one month and 18 months post-transplant. Measures of central tendency and non-parametric tests were used to compare the data. RESULTS: The study included a total of 73 patients with a median age of 57 years. The percentage of patients non-adherent to medication was 9.6% (T1), 22.5% (T2), 29.2% (T3), 29.8% (T4), and 28.1% (T5). One month after transplantation "not consulting with the doctor on forgetting to take medication (P=.034) significantly influenced the non-adherence to treatment. At 18 months post- transplantation, none of the issues raised on medication knowledge had an influence on non-adherence to treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Longer times since transplantation increased the non-adherence to treatment. Some issues regarding the information of treatment influenced the non-adherence in the immediate transplant period, but not in the follow-up.

[Treatment of bipolar II disorder with lamotrigine]. / Tratamiento del trastorno bipolar II con lamotrigina.

INTRODUCTION: This study analyzes the effectiveness and safety of lamotrigine in the treatment of bipolar II disorder. Patients and methods. Seventeen patients with DSM-IV bipolar II disorder with a history of poor response to lithium or other mood-stabilizers gave their consent to be treated with lamotrigine. Th ey we re followed-up for 6 months and assessed with the Young Mania Scale (YMRS), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS-17) and the modified version of the Global Clinic Impresion Scale for Bipolar Disorder ( CG I-BP-M). RESULTS: Twelve patients completed the study. Three patients dropped out due to side effects (two because of mild rash, which vanished after treatment was discontinued and one because of vomiting) and two due to lack of efficacy. The mean dose of lamotrigine for patients completing the study was 202.1 64.4 mg/day. There was a significant improvement in HDRS-17 scores (p= 0.004) and the depressive (p=0.002) and overall (p= 0.002) subscales of the CGI-BP-M. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms previous findings concerning the antidepressant profile of lamotrigine and its potential effectiveness in bipolar II disorder.