Suspected Symptomatic Infected Native Aortic Aneurysm Turns Out To Be Aortic Tumour Originating From Metastatic Cancer of Unknown Primary: A Case Report and Review of Literature.

Introduction: The non-specific clinical presentation of a primary aortic tumour may mimic infectious processes. Together with its rarity, this resemblance can complicate timely identification and pose diagnostic challenges. Report: The case of a 77 year old male patient complaining of abdominal pain radiating to the back, fatigue, and loss of appetite for a month, is presented. Contrast enhanced computed tomography showed a 47 mm infrarenal aortic aneurysm with peripheral enhancement. With suspicion of an infected native aortic aneurysm, open aortic repair was performed using a bovine pericardial Y prosthesis. The intra-operative biopsy revealed a malignant undifferentiated neoplasm, which later turned out to originate from metastatic cancer of unknown primary. The patient died six months later following comprehensive and extensive oncological treatment, which included radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Discussion: Given the scarcity of literature and challenges in classification, treatment recommendations rely on a multidisciplinary approach, involving surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Despite the lack of established guidelines, early intervention, even in metastatic cases, may improve clinical outcomes. Surgical resection, whenever appropriate, is advocated, as it not only alleviates symptoms, but intra-operative histological sampling also aids in obtaining a definitive diagnosis.

Midterm outcomes of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery in a heterogeneous valve pathology cohort: respect or resect?

Background: Minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (MIV) through a right lateral thoracotomy has become the standard of care at specialized centers and might soon will be the only acceptable surgical treatment option in the future era of interventional procedures. The aim of our study was to analyze the outcomes of our MIV-specialized, single-center, mixed valve pathology cohort with regard to morbidity, mortality and midterm outcomes comparing two different repair techniques (respect versus resect). Methods: Baseline and operative variables, postoperative outcomes and follow-up information about survival, valve competence and freedom from reoperation were retrospectively collected and analyzed. The repair cohort was divided into three groups (resection, neo-chordae and both) and compared for outcomes. Results: Between July 22nd 2013 and May 31st 2022 a total of 278 consecutive patients underwent MIV. Out of those, we identified 165 eligible patients for the three repair groups: 82 patients (29.5%) had "resection", 66 "neo-chordae" (23.7%) and 17 "both" (6.1%). All preoperative variables were comparable between the groups. The predominant valve pathology of the entire cohort was degenerative disease with 20.5% Barlow's, 20.5% bi-leaflet and 32.4% double segment pathology. Bypass time was 164±47, cross-clamp time 106±36 minutes. All valves planned for repair (85.6%) were successfully repaired except for 13 resulting in a repair rate of 94.5%. Only 1 patient (0.4%) had to be converted to clamshell and 2 (0.7%) needed rethoracotomy for bleeding. Mean intensive care unit (ICU) stay was 1.8 days and hospital stay 10.6±1.3 days. In-hospital mortality was 1.1% and the incidence of stroke (1.8%). All in-hospital outcomes were comparable between the groups. Follow up was complete in 86.2% (n=237) for a mean of 3.7±0.8, up to 9 years. Five-year survival was 92.6% (P=0.5) and freedom from re-intervention 96.5% (P=0.1). All but 10 patients had mitral regurgitation less than grade 2 (95.8%, P=0.2) and all but two had less than New York Heart Association (NYHA) II (99.2%, P=0.1). Conclusions: Despite a heterogeneous cohort with mixed valve pathologies, there is a high reconstruction rate, low short- and midterm morbidity, mortality and need for re-intervention with comparable outcomes of the resect and respect technique in a specialized MIV center.

Propensity Matched Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Mitral Surgery: Does a Heart-Team Approach Eliminate Female Gender as an Independent Risk Factor?

BACKGROUND: There is increasing evidence that female gender is an independent risk factor for cardiac surgery. Minimally invasive mitral surgery (MIV) has proven to have excellent long-term results, but little is known about gender-dependent outcomes. The aim of our study was to analyze our heart team's decision-based MIV-specialized cohort. METHODS: In-hospital and follow-up data were retrospectively collected. The cohort was divided into gender groups and propensity-matched groups. RESULTS: Between 22 July 2013 and 31 December 2022, 302 consecutive patients underwent MIV. Before matching, the total cohort showed that women were older, had a higher EuroSCORE II, were more symptomatic, and had more complex valve pathology and tricuspid regurgitation resulting in more valve replacements and tricuspid repairs. Intensive and hospital stays were longer. In-hospital deaths (n = 3, all women) were comparable, with more atrial fibrillation in women. The median follow-up time was 3.44 (0.008-8.9) years. The ejection fraction, NYHA, and recurrent regurgitation were low and comparable and atrial fibrillation more frequent in women. The calculated 5-year survival and freedom from re-intervention were comparable (p = 0.9 and p = 0.2). Propensity matching compared 101 well-balanced pairs; women still had fewer resections and more atrial fibrillation. During the follow-up, women had a better ejection fraction. The calculated 5-year survival and freedom from re-intervention were comparable (p = 0.3 and p = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS: Despite women being older and sicker, with more complex valve pathology and subsequent replacement, early and mid-term mortality and the need for reoperation were low and comparable before and after propensity matching, which might be the result of the MIV setting combined with our patient-tailored decision-making. We believe that a multidisciplinary heart team approach is crucial to optimize patient outcomes in MIV, and it might also reduce the widely reported increased surgical risk in female patients. Further studies are needed to prove our findings.