Scar border zone mass and presence of border zone channels assessed with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are associated with ventricular arrhythmia in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

AIMS: Late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) permits characterization of left ventricular ischaemic scars. We aimed to evaluate if scar core mass, border zone (BZ) mass, and BZ channels are risk markers for subsequent ventricular arrhythmia (VA) in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: A sub-study of the DANish Acute Myocardial Infarction-3 multi-centre trial and Danegaptide phase II proof-of-concept clinical trial in which a total of 843 STEMI patients had a 3-month follow-up CMR. Of these, 21 patients subsequently experienced VA during 100 months of follow-up and were randomly matched 1:5 with 105 controls. A VA event was defined as: ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, or sudden cardiac death. Ischaemic scar characteristics were automatically detected by specialized software. We included 126 patients with a median left ventricular ejection fraction of 51.0 ± 11.6% in cases with VA vs. 55.5 ± 8.5% in controls (P = 0.10). Cases had a larger mean BZ mass and more often BZ channels compared to controls [BZ mass: 17.2 ± 10.3 g vs. 10.3 ± 6.0 g; P = 0.0002; BZ channels: 17 (80%) vs. 44 (42%); P = 0.001]. A combination of ≥17.2 g BZ mass and the presence of BZ channels was five times more prevalent in cases vs. controls (P ≤ 0.00001) with an odds ratio of 9.40 (95% confidence interval 3.26-27.13; P ≤ 0.0001) for VA. This identified cases with 52% sensitivity and 90% specificity. CONCLUSION(S): Scar characterization with CMR indicates that a combination of ≥17.2 g BZ mass and the presence of BZ channels had the strongest association with subsequent VA in STEMI patients. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: Unique identifier: NCT01435408 (DANAMI 3-iPOST and DANAMI 3-DEFER), NCT01960933 (DANAMI 3-PRIMULTI), and NCT01977755 (Danegaptide).

Long-term risk of new-onset arrhythmia in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction according to revascularization status.

AIMS: Emerging data show that complete revascularization (CR) reduces cardiovascular death and recurrent myocardial infarction in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, the influence of revascularization status on development of arrhythmia in the long-term post-STEMI phase is poorly described. We hypothesized that incomplete revascularization (ICR) compared with CR in STEMI is associated with an increased long-term risk of new-onset arrhythmia. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with STEMI treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) at Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark, with CR or ICR were identified via the Eastern Danish Heart registry from 2009 to 2016. Using unique Danish administrative registries, the outcomes were assessed. The primary outcome was new-onset arrhythmia defined as a composite of atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF), sinoatrial block, advanced second- or third-degree atrioventricular block, ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT), or cardiac arrest (CA), with presentation >7 days post-PPCI. Secondary outcomes were the components of the primary outcome and all-cause mortality. A total of 5103 patients (median age: 62.0 years; 76% men) were included, of whom 4009 (79%) and 1094 (21%) patients underwent CR and ICR, respectively. Compared with CR, ICR was associated with a higher risk of new-onset arrhythmia [hazard ratio (HR), 1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07-1.66; P = 0.01], AF (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.00-1.66; P = 0.05), a combined outcome of VT and CA (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.10-2.84; P = 0.02) and all-cause mortality (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.05-1.53; P = 0.01). All HRs adjusted. CONCLUSION: Among patients with STEMI, ICR was associated with an increased long-term risk of new-onset arrhythmia and all-cause mortality compared with CR.

Long-term prognostic outcomes and implication of oral anticoagulants in patients with new-onset atrial fibrillation following st-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: New-onset atrial fibrillation (NEW-AF) following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is a common complication, but the true prognostic impact of NEW-AF is unknown. Additionally, the optimal treatment of NEW-AF among patients with STEMI is warranted. METHODS: A large cohort of consecutive patients with STEMI treated with percutaneous coronary intervention were identified using the Eastern Danish Heart Registry from 1999-2016. Medication and end points were retrieved from Danish nationwide registries. NEW-AF was defined as a diagnosis of AF within 30 days following STEMI. Patients without a history of AF and alive after 30 days after discharge were included. Incidence rates were calculated and multivariate analyses performed to determine the association between NEW-AF and long-term mortality, incidence of ischemic stroke, re-MI, and bleeding leading to hospitalization, and the comparative effectiveness of OAC therapy on these outcomes. RESULTS: Of 7944 patients with STEMI, 296 (3.7%) developed NEW-AF. NEW-AF was associated with increased long-term mortality (adjusted HR 1.48, 95% CI 1.20-1.82, P<.001) and risk of bleeding leading to hospitalization (adjusted HR 1.36, 95% CI 1.00-1.85, P=.050), and non-significant increased risk of ischemic stroke (adjusted HR 1.45, 95% CI 0.96-2.19, P=.08) and re-MI (adjusted HR 1.14, 95% CI 0.86-1.52, P=.35) with a median follow-up of 5.8 years. In NEW-AF patients, 38% received OAC therapy, which was associated with reduced long-term mortality (adjusted HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.47-1.00, P=.049). CONCLUSIONS: NEW-AF following STEMI is associated with increased long-term mortality. Treatment with OAC therapy in NEW-AF patients is associated with reduced long-term mortality.

The benefit of complete revascularization after primary PCI for STEMI is attenuated by increasing age: Results from the DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI randomized study.

OBJECTIVES: To ascertain the effect of age on outcomes after culprit-only and complete revascularization after Primary PCI (PPCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: The numbers of older patients being treated with PPCI are increasing. The optimal management of nonculprit stenoses in such patients is unclear. METHODS: We conducted an analysis of patients aged ≥75 years randomized in the DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI study to either culprit-only or complete FFR-guided revascularization. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, nonfatal reinfarction, and ischaemia-driven revascularization of lesions in noninfarct-related arteries after a median of 27 months of follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred and ten of six hundred and twenty seven patients in the DANAMI-3-PRIMULTI trial were aged ≥75 years. These patients were more likely female (p < .001), hypertensive (p < .001), had lower hemoglobin levels (p < .001), and higher serum creatinine levels (p < .001) than the younger patients in the trial. Other than less use of drug-eluting stents (96.6 versus 88.0%: p = .02), there were no significant differences in procedural technique and success between patients aged <75 years and those ≥75 years of age. There was no significant difference in the incidence of the primary endpoint in patients ≥75 years randomized to culprit-only or FFR-guided complete revascularization (HR 1.49 [95% CI 0.57-4.65]; log-rank p = .19; p for interaction versus patients <75 years <.001). There was a significant interaction between age as a continuous variable, treatment assignment, and the primary outcome (p < .001); beyond the age of about 75 years, there may be no prognostic advantage to complete revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: In patients ≥75 years, after treatment of the culprit lesion in STEMI, there is no significant prognostic benefit to prophylactic complete revascularization of nonculprit stenoses. Pending further study, data would support a symptom-guided approach to further invasive treatment.

Electrocardiogram to predict reperfusion success in late presenters with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Clinical decision-making in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) presenting beyond 12 h of symptom onset (late presenters) is challenging. However, the electrocardiogram (ECG) may provide helpful information. We investigated the association between three ECG-scores and myocardial salvage and infarct size in late presenters treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (primary PCI). METHODS: Sixty-six patients with STEMI and ongoing symptoms presenting 12-72 h after symptom onset were included. Cardiac magnetic resonance was performed at day 1 (interquartile range [IQR], 1-1) and at follow-up at day 93 (IQR, 90-98). The pre-PCI ECG was analyzed for the presence of pathological QW (early QW) as well as Anderson-Wilkins acuteness score (AW-score), the classic Sclarovsky-Birnbaum Ischemia Grading System (classic SB-IG-score) and a modified SB-IG-score including any T-wave morphologies. RESULTS: Early QW was associated with a larger myocardium at risk (39 ± 12 versus 33 ± 12; p = 0.030) and final infarct size (20 ± 11 versus 14 ± 9; p = 0.021) as well as a numerical lower final myocardial salvage (0.52 ± 0.19 versus 0.61 ± 0.23; p = 0.09). The association with final infarct size disappeared after adjusting for myocardium at risk. An AW-score < 3 showed a trend towards a larger final infarct size (18 ± 11 versus 11 ± 11; p = 0.08) and was not associated with salvage index (0.55 ± 0.20 versus 0.65 ± 0.30; p = 0.23). The classic and modified SB-IG-score were not associated with final infarct size (modified SB-IG-score, 17 ± 10 versus 21 ± 13; p = 0.28) or final myocardial salvage (0.53 ± 0.20 versus 0.53 ± 0.26; p = 0.96). CONCLUSION: Of three well-established ECG-scores only early QW and AW-score < 3 showed association with myocardium at risk and infarct size to some extent, but the association with myocardial salvage was weak. Hence, neither of the three investigated ECG-scores are sufficient to guide clinical decision-making in patients with STEMI and ongoing symptoms presenting beyond 12 h of symptom onset.

Early Versus Standard Care Invasive Examination and Treatment of Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) and revascularization in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome is not well defined. We tested the hypothesis that a strategy of very early ICA and possible revascularization within 12 hours of diagnosis is superior to an invasive strategy performed within 48 to 72 hours in terms of clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients admitted with clinical suspicion of non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in the Capital Region of Copenhagen, Denmark, were screened for inclusion in the VERDICT trial (Very Early Versus Deferred Invasive Evaluation Using Computerized Tomography) ( ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02061891). Patients with ECG changes indicating new ischemia or elevated troponin, in whom ICA was clinically indicated and deemed logistically feasible within 12 hours, were randomized 1:1 to ICA within 12 hours or standard invasive care within 48 to 72 hours. The primary end point was a combination of all-cause death, nonfatal recurrent myocardial infarction, hospital admission for refractory myocardial ischemia, or hospital admission for heart failure. RESULTS: A total of 2147 patients were randomized; 1075 patients allocated to very early invasive evaluation had ICA performed at a median of 4.7 hours after randomization, whereas 1072 patients assigned to standard invasive care had ICA performed 61.6 hours after randomization. Among patients with significant coronary artery disease identified by ICA, coronary revascularization was performed in 88.4% (very early ICA) and 83.1% (standard invasive care). Within a median follow-up time of 4.3 (interquartile range, 4.1-4.4) years, the primary end point occurred in 296 (27.5%) of participants in the very early ICA group and 316 (29.5%) in the standard care group (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.78-1.08). Among patients with a GRACE risk score (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) >140, a very early invasive treatment strategy improved the primary outcome compared with the standard invasive treatment (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-1.01; P value for interaction=0.023). CONCLUSIONS: A strategy of very early invasive coronary evaluation does not improve overall long-term clinical outcome compared with an invasive strategy conducted within 2 to 3 days in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. However, in patients with the highest risk, very early invasive therapy improves long-term outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02061891.

Long-term survival and causes of death in patients with ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome without obstructive coronary artery disease.

Aims: We aimed to study survival and causes of death in patients with ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (STE-ACS) with and without obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD). Methods and results: We included 4793 consecutive patients with STE-ACS triaged for acute coronary angiography at a large cardiac invasive centre (2009-2014). Of these, 88% had obstructive CAD (stenosis ≥50%), 6% had non-obstructive CAD (stenosis 1-49%), and 5% had normal coronary arteries. Patients without obstructive CAD were younger and more often female with fewer cardiovascular risk factors. Median follow-up time was 2.6 years. Compared with patients with obstructive CAD, the short-term hazard of death (≤30 days) was lower in both patients with non-obstructive CAD [hazard ratio (HR) 0.49, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27-0.89, P = 0.018] and normal coronary arteries (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.83, P = 0.021). In contrast, the long-term hazard of death (>30 days) was similar in patients with non-obstructive CAD (HR 1.15, 95% CI 0.77-1.72, P = 0.487) and higher in patients with normal coronary arteries (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.58-3.76, P < 0.001), regardless of troponin levels. Causes of death were cardiovascular in 70% of patients with obstructive CAD, 38% with non-obstructive CAD, and 32% with normal coronary arteries. Finally, patients without obstructive CAD had lower survival compared with an age and sex matched general population. Conclusions: STE-ACS patients without obstructive CAD had a long-term risk of death similar to or higher than patients with obstructive CAD. Causes of death were less often cardiovascular. This suggests that STE-ACS patients without obstructive CAD warrant medical attention and close follow-up.

Comparison between patients included in randomized controlled trials of ischemic heart disease and real-world data. A nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: The objective was to compare patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who were included in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) (trial participants) with patients who were not included (nonparticipants) on a trial-by-trial basis and according to indication for PCI. METHODS: In this cohort study, we compared patients with IHD who were randomized in RCTs in relation to undergoing PCI in Denmark between 2011 and 2015 were considered as RCT-participants in this study. The RCT-participants were compared with contemporary nonparticipants with IHD undergoing PCI in the same period, and they were identified using unselected national registry data. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 10,317 (30%) patients were included in 10 relevant RCTs (trial participants), and a total of 23,644 (70%) contemporary patients did not participate (nonparticipants). In all the included RCTs, nonparticipants had higher hazard ratios for mortality compared to trial participants (P < .001). Among all patients treated with PCI, the pooled estimates showed a significantly higher mortality rate for nonparticipants compared to trial participants (hazard ratio: 2.03, 95% CI: 1.88-2.19) (P < .001). When patients were stratified according to indication for PCI, the pooled estimates showed a significantly lower mortality rate for trial participants compared to nonparticipants in all strata (P for all < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Trial participants in recently performed RCTs including patients undergoing PCI were not representative of the general population of patients with IHD treated with PCI according to clinical characteristics and mortality. The difference in mortality was found irrespective of the indication for PCI. Thus, results from RCTs including patients undergoing PCI should be extrapolated with caution to the general patient population.

Deferred versus conventional stent implantation in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (DANAMI 3-DEFER): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Despite successful treatment of the culprit artery lesion by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation, thrombotic embolisation occurs in some cases, which impairs the prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). We aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of deferred stent implantation versus standard PCI in patients with STEMI. METHODS: We did this open-label, randomised controlled trial at four primary PCI centres in Denmark. Eligible patients (aged >18 years) had acute onset symptoms lasting 12 h or less, and ST-segment elevation of 0·1 mV or more in at least two or more contiguous electrocardiographic leads or newly developed left bundle branch block. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), via an electronic web-based system with permuted block sizes of two to six, to receive either standard primary PCI with immediate stent implantation or deferred stent implantation 48 h after the index procedure if a stabilised flow could be obtained in the infarct-related artery. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, hospital admission for heart failure, recurrent infarction, and any unplanned revascularisation of the target vessel within 2 years' follow-up. Patients, investigators, and treating clinicians were not masked to treatment allocation. We did analysis by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01435408. FINDINGS: Between March 1, 2011, and Feb 28, 2014, we randomly assigned 1215 patients to receive either standard PCI (n=612) or deferred stent implantation (n=603). Median follow-up time was 42 months (IQR 33-49). Events comprising the primary endpoint occurred in 109 (18%) patients who had standard PCI and in 105 (17%) patients who had deferred stent implantation (hazard ratio 0·99, 95% CI 0·76-1·29; p=0·92). Procedure-related myocardial infarction, bleeding requiring transfusion or surgery, contrast-induced nephopathy, or stroke occurred in 28 (5%) patients in the conventional PCI group versus 27 (4%) patients in the deferred stent implantation group, with no significant differences between groups. INTERPRETATION: In patients with STEMI, routine deferred stent implantation did not reduce the occurrence of death, heart failure, myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularisation compared with conventional PCI. Results from ongoing randomised trials might shed further light on the concept of deferred stenting in this patient population. FUNDING: Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation, and Danish Council for Strategic Research.

Invasive angiography and revascularization in patients with stable angina following prior coronary artery bypass grafting: Results from the East Denmark heart registry.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data to guide the optimum approach to patients presenting with angina after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Although often referred for invasive angiography, the effectiveness of this is unknown; angina may also result from diffuse distal or micro-vascular coronary disease and it is not known how often targets for intervention are identified. METHODS: Retrospective review of 50,460 patients undergoing angiography in East Denmark between January 2010 and December 2014. Clinical and procedural data were prospectively stored in a regional electronic database. Follow-up data were available for all patients, by means of records linked to each Danish social security number. RESULTS: In patients with prior CABG and stable angina (n = 2,309), diagnostic angiography led to revascularization in 574 (24.9%) cases. Chronic kidney disease (HR 1.93 [1.08-3.44], P = 0.027), significant angina (HR 1.49 [1.18-1.88], P = 0.006 for angina class ≥ II, and HR 2.04 [1.61-2.58], P < 0.001 for angina class ≥ III) and a positive pre-procedural stress test (HR 2.56 [1.42-4.60], P < 0.001) were independent predictors of revascularization. Stress testing was, however, used less frequently than in patients without prior CABG (17.2% vs. 24.2%, P < 0.001). The positive predictive values for subsequent revascularization were 47.8%, 51.4%, and 66.9% for exercise ECG, stress echocardiography, and myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Invasive angiography leads to revascularization in a quarter of patients with angina and prior CABG; the threshold for referral may be too low. Non-invasive stress testing predicts the need for revascularization but appears underused and MPS, in particular, may better identify patients likely to require revascularization. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Complete revascularisation versus treatment of the culprit lesion only in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease (DANAMI-3­PRIMULTI): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel coronary disease have a worse prognosis compared with individuals with single-vessel disease. We aimed to study the clinical outcome of patients with STEMI treated with fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided complete revascularisation versus treatment of the infarct-related artery only. METHODS: We undertook an open-label, randomised controlled trial at two university hospitals in Denmark. Patients presenting with STEMI who had one or more clinically significant coronary stenosis in addition to the lesion in the infarct-related artery were included. After successful percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) of the infarct-related artery, patients were randomly allocated (in a 1:1 ratio) either no further invasive treatment or complete FFR-guided revascularisation before discharge. Randomisation was done electronically via a web-based system in permuted blocks of varying size by the clinician who did the primary PCI. All patients received best medical treatment. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, non-fatal reinfarction, and ischaemia-driven revascularization of lesions in non-infarct-related arteries and was assessed when the last enrolled patient had been followed up for 1 year. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01960933. FINDINGS: From March, 2011, to February, 2014, we enrolled 627 patients to the trial; 313 were allocated no further invasive treatment after primary PCI of the infarct-related artery only and 314 were assigned complete revascularization guided by FFR values. Median follow-up was 27 months (range 12­44 months). Events comprising the primary endpoint were recorded in 68 (22%) patients who had PCI of the infarct-related artery only and in 40 (13%) patients who had complete revascularisation (hazard ratio 0∙56, 95% CI 0∙38­0∙83; p=0∙004). INTERPRETATION: In patients with STEMI and multivessel disease, complete revascularisation guided by FFR measurements significantly reduces the risk of future events compared with no further invasive intervention after primary PCI. This effect is driven by significantly fewer repeat revascularisations, because all-cause mortality and non-fatal reinfarction did not differ between groups. Thus, to avoid repeat revascularisation, patients can safely have all their lesions treated during the index admission. Future studies should clarify whether complete revascularization should be done acutely during the index procedure or at later time and whether it has an effect on hard endpoints. FUNDING: Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation and Danish Council for Strategic Research.

The prevalence and prognostic importance of possible familial hypercholesterolemia in patients with myocardial infarction.

AIMS: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a common genetic disorder causing accelerated atherosclerosis and premature cardiovascular disease. The aim of this study was to examine the prevalence and prognostic significance of possible FH in patients with myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS AND RESULTS: By individual-level linkage of data from the Eastern Danish Heart Registry and national administrative registries, a study population of patients referred for coronary angiography due to MI was selected. The study population was divided into "unlikely FH" and "possible FH" based on the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network criteria, which included a plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and age for onset of cardiac disease. A score of ≥3 points was used as the cutpoint between the 2 groups. Among the study population of 13,174 MI patients, 1,281 (9.7%) had possible FH. These patients were younger (59.1 vs 65.7 years, P ≤ .0001), had similar levels of comorbidities, and were treated more aggressively with cholesterol-lowering drugs compared with patients with unlikely FH. During a median of 3.3 years of follow-up, the unadjusted and adjusted event rates of recurrent MI were higher in patients with possible FH compared with unlikely FH (16% vs 11%, adjusted hazard ratio 1.28, 95% CI 1.09-1.51, P = .003.). Differences in adjusted all-cause mortality were not statistically significant (17% vs 23%, adjusted hazard ratio 0.89 [0.74-1.04], P = .1). CONCLUSION: We found that MI patients with possible FH have higher risk of recurrent MI but similar risk of mortality compared with unlikely FH patients. Further studies on secondary prevention are warranted.

Tailored antiplatelet therapy to improve prognosis in patients exhibiting clopidogrel low-response prior to percutaneous coronary intervention for stable angina or non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome.

AIM: To investigate whether an intensified antiplatelet regimen could improve prognosis in stable or non-ST elevation in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients exhibiting high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) on clopidogrel and treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). There is a wide variability in the platelet reactivity to clopidogrel and HTPR has been associated with a poor prognosis. METHODS: In this observational study, 923 consecutive patients without ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and adequately pre-treated with clopidogrel were screened for HTPR with multiple electrode aggregometry after assessment of the coronary anatomy. Patients were grouped based on their response to clopidogrel and the assigned antiplatelet strategy. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or stent thrombosis. RESULTS: HTPR was demonstrated in 237 patients (25.7%). Of these, 114 continued on conventional clopidogrel therapy, while the remaining 123 received intensified antiplatelet therapy with either double-dose clopidogrel (150 mg daily, n = 55) or the newer P2Y12-inhibitors, prasugrel or ticagrelor (n = 68) for at least 30 days after the index procedure. The median follow-up was 571 days (interquartile range, 373-746). Intensifying antiplatelet therapy reduced the rate of the composite endpoint (p < 0.001). After adjustment for potential confounders, HTPR in combination with conventional clopidogrel therapy remained independently associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events (hazard ratio (HR), 2.92; 95% CI, 1.90-4.48), whereas intensified treatment reduced the risk to a level equivalent to that of patients exhibiting normal platelet reactivity (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.59-1.99). CONCLUSION: Tailored antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced the event rate in patients exhibiting HTPR prior to PCI.

Prasugrel or double-dose clopidogrel to overcome clopidogrel low-response--the TAILOR (Thrombocytes And IndividuaLization of ORal antiplatelet therapy in percutaneous coronary intervention) randomized trial.

High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) is associated with poor prognosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The antiplatelet effect and safety of prasugrel was compared to that of double-dose clopidogrel in patients with stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndrome (ACS) exhibiting HTPR on clopidogrel and treated with PCI, using multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) to assess platelet reactivity. Of 923 patients screened, 237 (25.7%) exhibited HTPR. Of these, 106 were eligible for participation in a randomized trial comparing two intensified antiplatelet regimen: 52 were assigned to double maintenance-dose clopidogrel and 54 to standard-dose prasugrel. At 1 month, tailoring antiplatelet therapy improved platelet inhibition to a level considered as therapeutic in 73.1% of patients. Prasugrel entailed greater platelet inhibition (p = 0.02) and a lower rate of persisting HTPR at follow-up compared to double-dose clopidogrel (HTPR persisted in 20.4% and 42% respectively, p = 0.02). Within the 30-day follow-up, no major bleeds were observed and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) was similar in the two treatment arms. Prasugrel demonstrated superiority to double-dose clopidogrel in overcoming HTPR and reducing platelet activity. Intensifying antiplatelet therapy in both ACS and stable angina pectoris (SAP) patients exhibiting HTPR prior to PCI was well tolerated.

Symptoms of angina pectoris increase the probability of disability pension and premature exit from the workforce even in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease.

AIMS: To evaluate probabilities of disability pension (DP) and premature exit from the workforce (PEW) in patients with stable angina symptoms and no obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) at angiography compared with obstructive CAD and asymptomatic reference individuals. METHODS AND RESULTS: We followed 4303 patients with no prior cardiovascular disease having a first-time coronary angiography (CAG) in 1998-2009 due to stable angina symptoms and 2772 reference individuals from the Copenhagen City Heart Study, all aged <65 years, through registry linkage until 2009 for DP and PEW. Five-year age-adjusted DP-free survival probabilities for reference individuals, patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries, angiographically diffuse non-obstructive CAD, 1 stenotic coronary vessel (1VD), 2VD, and 3VD, respectively, were 0.96, 0.88, 0.84, 0.82, 0.85, and 0.78 in women and 0.98, 0.90, 0.89, 0.89, 0.88, and 0.87 in men. Significant predictors of DP were higher age, angina symptoms, higher body mass index, diabetes, smoking, job status, non-marital status in men, lower income, lower educational level, and co-morbidity. Compared with the reference population, probabilities of DP and PEW were significantly increased in all patients with no gender difference (P > 0.2 for interaction). Thus, in pooled multivariable-adjusted analysis, patients referred to CAG for angina had a three-fold higher probability of DP and ~50% higher probability of PEW, with little difference between patients with angiographically normal coronary arteries, angiographically diffuse non-obstructive CAD, 1VD, 2VD, 3VD, the hazard ratios for DP being 2.7, 3.0, 3.3, 3.1, and 3.2 (all P < 0.001) and for PEW being 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, and 1.6 (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Patients with angina symptoms and angiographically normal coronary arteries, diffuse non-obstructive CAD, or obstructive CAD at angiography have a three-fold increased probability of DP regardless of angiographic findings.

Search and rescue helicopter-assisted transfer of ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients from an island in the Baltic Sea: results from over 100 rescue missions.

BACKGROUND: Since 2005, ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients from the island of Bornholm in the Baltic Sea have been transferred for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) by an airborne service. We describe the result of pPCI as part of the Danish national reperfusion strategy offered to a remote island population. METHODS: In this observational study, patients from Bornholm (n=101) were compared with patients from the mainland (Zealand) (n=2495), who were grouped according to time intervals (<120, 121-180, >180 min). The primary endpoint was all-cause 30-day mortality. Individual-level data from the Central Population Registry provided outcome that was linked to our inhospital PCI database. RESULTS: Treatment delay was longer in patients from Bornholm (349 min (IQR 267-446)) vs Zealand (211 (IQR 150-315)) (p<0.001). In patients from Zealand, 30-day mortality did not increase with time intervals (p=0.176), whereas, long-term mortality did (∼3 years) (p=0.007). Thirty-day mortality was similar for Bornholm and the overall Zealand group (5.9% vs 6.2% p=0.955). Early presenters (<180 min) from Zealand (37%) had similar 30-day (5.3% vs 5.9% p=0.789), but numerically reduced long-term mortality compared with Bornholm (12.8% vs 15.8% p=0.387). Age, female gender, diabetes, Killipclass >2 and preprocedural thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) flow 0/1 independently predicted 30-day mortality, however, treatment delay did not. Postprocedural TIMI flow 3 predicted improved survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this small population of STEMI patients from a remote island, airborne transfer appears feasible and safe, and their 30-day mortality after pPCI comparable with that of the mainland population despite inherent reperfusion delay exceeding guidelines.

Organized thrombus is a frequent underlying feature in culprit lesion morphology in non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. A study using optical coherence tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

The concept that the culprit lesion in non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) is caused by sudden plaque rupture with acute thrombus formation has recently been challenged. While angiography is an old gold-standard for culprit identification it merely visualizes the lumen contour. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) provides a detailed view of culprit features. Combined with myocardial edema on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), indicating acute ischemia and thus culprit location, we aimed to characterize culprit lesions using OCT. Patients with NSTEMI referred for angiography were prospectively enrolled. OCT was performed on angiographic stenoses ≥50% and on operator-suspected culprit lesions. Hierarchical OCT-culprit identifiers were defined in case of multiple unstable lesions, including OCT-defined thrombus age. An OCT-based definition of an organizing thrombus as corresponding to histological early healing stage was introduced. Lesions were classified as OCT-culprit or non-culprit, and characteristics compared. CMR was performed in a subset of patients. We included 65 patients with 97 lesions, of which 49 patients (75%) had 53 (54%) OCT-culprit lesions. The most common OCT-culprit identifiers were the presence of acute (66%) and organizing thrombus (19%). Plaque rupture was visible in 45% of OCT-culprit lesions. CMR performed in 38 patients revealed myocardial oedema in the corresponding territories of 67% of acute thrombi and 50% of organizing thrombi. A culprit lesion was identified by OCT in 75% patients with NSTEMI. Acute thrombus was the most frequent feature followed by organizing thrombus. Applying specific OCT-criteria to identify the culprit could prove valuable in ambiguous cases.

Time From Distress Call to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Outcomes in Myocardial Infarction.

Background: Early percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is recommended for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treatment. Delays in time-to-PCI, kept within guideline recommendations, have seldom been investigated. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to investigate the consequences of delay, due to system factors or hospital distance, for the time between last patient distress call and PCI. Methods: Registry-based cohort study including times of first call to medical services, admission and PCI for patients admitted with STEMI in Copenhagen, Denmark (2014-2018). The main combined outcome included death, recurrent myocardial infarction, or heart failure estimated at 30 days and 1 year from event. Outcomes according to time from call to PCI (system delay) and door-to-balloon time were standardized to the STEMI population using multivariate logistic regression. Results: In total, 1,822 STEMI patients (73.5% male, median age 63.3 years [Q1-Q3: 54.6-72.9 years]) called the emergency services ≤72 hours before PCI (1,735, ≤12 hours). The combined endpoint of 1-year cumulative incidence was 13.9% (166/1,196) for patients treated within 120 minutes of the call and 21.2% (89/420) for patients treated later. Standardized 30-day outcomes were 7.33% (95% CI: 5.41%-9.63%) for patients treated <60 minutes, and 11.1% (95% CI: 8.39%-14.2%) for patients treated >120 minutes. Conclusions: The risk of recurrent myocardial infarction, death, and heart failure following PCI treatment of STEMI increases rapidly when delay exceeds 1 hour. This indicates a particular advantage of minimizing time from first contact to PCI.

Prehospital Pulse-Dose Glucocorticoid in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The PULSE-MI Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: In patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), acute inflammation is related to the extent of myocardial damage and may increase infarct size. Thus, administration of pulse-dose glucocorticoid in the very early phase of infarction may reduce infarct size. Objective: To determine the cardioprotective effect of prehospital pulse-dose glucocorticoid in patients with STEMI. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a 1:1 investigator-initiated, blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial conducted between November 14, 2022, and October 17, 2023, with last follow-up on January 17, 2024. Patients 18 years and older with less than 12 hours of acute chest pain and STEMI were included in the prehospital setting throughout the Region Zealand and Capital Region of Denmark and transferred to Rigshospitalet, Denmark. Intervention: Patients were randomly allocated to intravenous glucocorticoid (methylprednisolone, 250 mg) or placebo in the prehospital setting. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was final infarct size on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) at 3 months. The power calculation was based on an anticipated final infarct size of 13%. Secondary outcomes included CMR outcomes on acute scan and at 3 months, peak of cardiac biomarkers, clinical end points at 3 months, and adverse events. Results: Of 530 included patients (median [IQR] age, 65 [56-75] years; 418 male [78.9%]) with STEMI, 401 (76%) were assessed for the primary outcome, with 198 patients treated with glucocorticoid and 203 with placebo. Median final infarct size was similar in the treatment groups (glucocorticoid, 5%; IQR, 2%-11% vs placebo, 6%; IQR, 2%-13%; P = .24). Compared with placebo, the glucocorticoid group had smaller acute infarct size (odds ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61-1.00), less microvascular obstruction (relative risk ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.71-0.99), and greater acute left ventricular ejection fraction (mean difference, 4.44%; 95% CI, 2.01%-6.87%). Other secondary outcomes were similar in both groups. Conclusions and Relevance: In patients with STEMI, treatment with prehospital pulse-dose glucocorticoid did not reduce final infarct size after 3 months. However, the trial was likely underpowered as the final infarct size was smaller than anticipated. The glucocorticoid group had improved acute parameters compared with placebo. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05462730.

Pre-hospital diagnosis and transfer of patients with acute myocardial infarction--a decade long experience from one of Europe's largest STEMI networks.

Early reperfusion in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is essential. Although primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is the preferred revascularization technique, it often involves longer primary transportation or secondary inter-hospital transfers and thus longer system related delays. The current ESC Guidelines state that PCI should be performed within 120 minutes from first medical contact, and door-to-balloon time should be <60 minutes in order to reduce long term mortality. STEMI networks should be established with regionalization of pPCI treatment to address the challenges regarding pre-hospital treatment, triage and transport of STEMI patients and collaborations between hospitals and Emergency Medical Services (EMS). We report on a regional decade long experience from one of Europe's largest STEMI networks located in Eastern Denmark, which serves a catchment area of 2.5 million inhabitants by processing ~4000 prehospital ECGs annually transmitted from 4 EMS systems to a single pPCI center treating 1100 patients per year. This organization has led to a significant improvement of the standard of therapy for acute myocardial infarction (MI) patients leading to historically low 30-day mortality for STEMI patients (<6%). About 70-80% of all STEMI patients are being triaged from the field and rerouted to the regional pPCI center. Significant delays are still found among patients who present to local hospitals and for those who are first admitted to a local emergency room and thus subject to inter-hospital transfer. In the directly transferred group, approximately 80% of patients can be treated within the current guideline time window of 120 minutes when triaged within a 185 km (~115 miles) radius. Since 2010, a Helicopter Emergency Medical Service has been implemented for air rescue. Air transfer was associated with a 20-30 minute decrease from first medical contact to pPCI, at distances down to 90 km from the pPCI center and with a trend toward better survival among air transported patients. The pPCI center also serves a small island in the Baltic Sea, where STEMI patients are rescued via air force helicopters. Based on data from more than 100 patients transferred over the past decade, we have found a similar in-hospital and long term mortality rate compared to the main island inhabitants. In conclusion, with the optimal collaboration within a STEMI network including local hospitals, university clinics, EMS and military helicopters using the same telemedicine system and field triage of STEMI patients, most patients can be treated within the time limits suggested by the current guidelines. These organizational changes are likely to contribute to the improved mortality rate for STEMI patients.