The spectrum of paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria clinical presentation in a Brazilian single referral center.

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare hematological disorder caused by the expansion of a hematopoietic clone harboring a somatic genetic variant in the PIG-A gene translating into a wide spectrum of clinical and laboratory changes, from intravascular hemolysis, thrombosis, and bone marrow failure to subclinical presentation. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed 87 consecutive cases (39 women; median follow-up, 18 months; range, 0-151 months) in whom a PNH clone was detected by flow cytometry between 2006 and 2019 seen at a single Brazilian referral center. The median age at diagnosis was 29 years (range, 8 to 83 years); 29 patients (33%) were initially classified as PNH/bone marrow failure, 13 (15%) as classic PNH, and 45 (52%) as subclinical PNH. The median overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort was not reached during follow-up, without significant differences between groups. At diagnosis, the median PNH clone size was 2.8% (range, 0 to 65%) in erythrocytes and 5.4% (range, 0 to 80%) in neutrophils. Fourteen patients experienced clone expansion during follow-up; in other 14 patients the clone disappeared, and in 18 patients it remained stable throughout the follow-up. A subclinical PNH clone was detected in three telomeropathy patients at diagnosis, but it was persistent and confirmed by DNA sequencing in only one case. In conclusion, PNH presentation was variable, and most patients had subclinical disease or associated with marrow failure and did not require specific anticomplement therapy. Clone size was stable or even disappeared in most cases.

Acquired Angioedema due to C1 Inhibitor Deficiency Preceding Splenic Marginal Zone Lymphoma: Further Insights from Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: Acquired angioedema due to C1 inhibitor deficiency (AAE-C1-INH) is a very rare disease. In clinical practice, it may be difficult to differentiate AAE-C1-INH from hereditary angioedema due to C1-INH deficiency (HAE-C1-INH). In both conditions, patients are at an increased risk of death from asphyxiation due to upper airway obstruction. The association of AAE-C1-INH with lymphoproliferative and autoimmune diseases, and with presence of anti-C1-INH antibodies has been well documented, and treatment of the underlying condition may result in complete remission of angioedema. OBJECTIVES: To discuss the clinical evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment outcomes of AAE-C1-INH in the context of the care of 2 patients with recurrent isolated angioedema. METHODS: Two patients were followed up prospectively at our clinic. Measurements of C3, C4, C1-INH, and C1q levels were carried out by nephelometry, and the functional activity of C1-INH was determined by a chromogenic assay. Hematological investigation included morphological and immunophenotyping analysis of peripheral blood, bone marrow, and spleen histopathology. Sequencing of the 8 exons and adjacent intronic regions of the SERPING1 gene was performed using the Sanger method. RESULTS: Two patients were diagnosed with AAE-C1-INH associated with splenic marginal zone lymphoma during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Close follow-up, including detailed clinical history, physical examination, and laboratory tests, of our patients with AAE-C1-INH was essential for the early diagnosis and successful treatment of the lymphoproliferative disease, leading to the resolution of the angioedema attacks.

Chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment for localized gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of localized gastric cancer (LGC) consists of surgical resection followed by adjuvant treatment. Both chemoradiation (CRT) and chemotherapy (CT) regimens have shown benefit in survival outcomes versus observation. However, there are few data comparing these approaches. METHODS: This study included consecutive patients with LGC treated at Instituto do Cancer do Estado de Sao Paulo (ICESP) from 2012 to 2015. CRT was based on the INT-0116 regimen and CT consisted of a platinum and fluoropyrimidine doublet. Treatment choice was based on physician preference. Toxicity was evaluated for every cycle. Overall survival (OS) analysis was performed by Kaplan-Meier. A propensity score-matched analysis was performed to minimize selection bias. RESULTS: A total of 309 patients were evaluated, 227 in CRT group and 82 in CT group. The most prevalent grade 3/4 toxicities in CRT and CT groups were: nausea/vomiting (9.25 vs 4.9%), fatigue (9.3% vs 2.4%), mucositis (4.4% vs 1.2%), neutropenia (37.8% vs 20.9%), febrile neutropenia (3.9% vs 0%), anemia (4.3% vs 6.1%), thrombocytopenia (2.6% vs 4.9%), neuropathy (0 vs 2.4%) and hand-foot syndrome (0.4% vs 2.4%). Two grade 5 toxicities (febrile neutropenia and anemia) occurred in CRT group. There was no difference in the pattern of recurrence. After a median follow-up of 23.5 months (CRT) and 20.6 months (CT), there was no difference in OS between groups. CONCLUSIONS: CT and CRT present similar efficacy and tolerability as adjuvant treatment for LGC.

Systemic Therapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Stand and Perspectives.

Hepatocellular carcinoma often develops in the context of chronic liver disease. It is the sixth most frequently diagnosed cancer and the third most common cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Although the mainstay of therapy is surgical resection, most patients are not eligible because of liver dysfunction or tumor extent. Sorafenib was the first tyrosine kinase inhibitor that improved the overall survival of patients who failed to respond to local therapies or had advanced disease, and for many years, it was the only treatment approved for the first-line setting. However, in recent years, trials have demonstrated an improvement in survival with treatments based on immunotherapy and new targeting agents, thereby extending the treatment options. A phase III trial showed that a combination of immunotherapy and targeted therapy, including atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, improved survival in the first-line setting, and is now considered the new standard of care. Other agents and combinations are being tested, including the combination of nivolumab plus ipilimumab and tremelimumab plus durvalumab, and they reportedly have clinical benefits. The aim of this manuscript is to review the latest approved therapeutic options in first- and second-line settings for advanced HCC and discuss future perspectives.