High naevus count and MC1R red hair alleles contribute synergistically to increased melanoma risk.

BACKGROUND: A high total body naevus count is the highest risk factor for melanoma; the phenotype of red hair colour, freckling and pale skin that burns easily, produced by MC1R R alleles, also predisposes to melanoma. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the known melanoma risk factors of high naevus count and red hair or MC1R R alleles act synergistically to increase melanoma risk. METHODS: The Brisbane Naevus Morphology Study involved 1267 participants from volunteers presenting at a melanoma unit, dermatology outpatient clinic, private dermatology clinics, the Brisbane Longitudinal Twin Study and the QSkin Study. We examined pigmentation characteristics, total body naevus ≥ 5 mm count, and MC1R, ASIP and CDKN2A genotype in participants with and without a personal history of melanoma, living in Queensland, Australia, which is an area of high ultraviolet radiation. RESULTS: Cases were older than controls (median 57 vs. 33 years). Compared with individuals with dark brown hair and zero to four naevi, individuals with red hair and ≥ 20 naevi had a melanoma odds ratio of 10·0 (95% confidence interval 4·2-24·3). Individuals with MC1R R/R genotype and ≥ 20 naevi (≥ 5 mm diameter) had a melanoma odds ratio of 25·1 (95% confidence interval 8·4-82·7) compared with wild-type (WT)/WT individuals with zero to four naevi. The highest risk group is Australian men with the MC1R R/R genotype and ≥ 20 moles, who have an absolute risk of melanoma to age 75 years of 23·3%, compared with 0·8% for men with the WT/WT genotype and zero to four naevi. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who live in areas of high ultraviolet radiation, and have many large naevi and the red hair colour phenotype, particularly those with the MC1R R/R genotype, have a high risk of melanoma above the threshold recommended for screening in other cancers. Therefore, they should undergo intensive physician-led surveillance. What's already known about this topic? A high number of acquired melanocytic naevi, the red hair phenotype and MC1R R alleles all independently increase melanoma risk. Women with atypical naevi have an increasing melanoma risk gradient from darker hair to lighter hair. Women with many naevi have an increasing melanoma risk gradient from those with no elements of the red hair phenotype, to those with freckles but not red hair, to those with red hair. What does this study add? In Queensland, Australia, people with ≥ 20 naevi (≥ 5 mm diameter) and MC1R R/R genotype have a 25-fold increased melanoma risk, relative to people with zero to four naevi and the MC1R WT/WT genotype. In Queensland, individuals with ≥ 20 naevi and the MC1R R/R genotype have an absolute melanoma risk to age 75 years of 23·3% for men and 19·3% for women. This effect is independent of CDKN2A genotype. Further research is required to determine the effect of areas of lower ultraviolet radiation, as this study took place in the Queensland, Australia, which is an area of high ultraviolet radiation. MC1R R/r genotype is associated with increased total body naevus count but this is not the case for R/R. What is the translational message? Patients with many large naevi and the red hair colour phenotype, particularly those with an MC1R R/R genotype, have an unusually high risk of melanoma. In a high ultraviolet environment, this risk exceeds the threshold recommended for screening in other cancers, and such individuals should undergo intensive, regular, physician-led surveillance. Patients with many large naevi but with non-red colour hair may benefit further from clinical MC1R genotyping.

A multicenter DeCOG study on predictors of vemurafenib therapy outcome in melanoma: pretreatment impacts survival.

BACKGROUND: Kinase inhibitors targeting the BRAF V600 mutation have become standard in the treatment of metastatic melanoma. Albeit in wide clinical use, the patterns associated with therapy outcome are not fully elucidated. The present study was aimed to identify predictive factors of therapy response and survival under the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study analyzed patient, tumor, and pretreatment characteristics collected in BRAF V600-mutated stage IV melanoma patients before single-agent therapy with the BRAF inhibitor vemurafenib. RESULTS: A total of 300 patients from 14 centers were included into this study with a median follow-up time of 13.0 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.1 months; median overall survival (OS) was 7.6 months. Best response under vemurafenib was associated with serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; ≤ versus >upper normal limit; P = 0.0000001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) overall performance status (OPS) (0 versus ≥ 1; P = 0.00089), and BRAF mutation subtype (V600E versus V600K; P = 0.016). Multivariate analysis identified ECOG OPS ≥ 1 [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.88; P = 0.00005], immunotherapy pretreatment (HR = 0.53; P = 0.0067), elevated serum LDH (HR = 1.45; P = 0.012), age >55 years (HR = 0.72; P = 0.019), and chemotherapy pretreatment (HR = 1.39; P = 0.036) as independent predictors of PFS. For OS, elevated serum LDH (HR = 1.99; P = 0.00012), ECOG OPS ≥ 1 (HR = 1.90; P = 0.00063), age >55 years (HR = 0.65; P = 0.011), kinase inhibitor pretreatment (HR = 1.86; P = 0.014), immunotherapy pretreatment (HR = 0.57; P = 0.025), chemotherapy pretreatment (HR = 2.17; P = 0.039), and male gender (HR = 0.70; 95% confidence interval 0.50-0.98; P = 0.039) were found as predictors. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate that the type of pretreatment strongly influences the outcome of vemurafenib therapy, with a precedent immunotherapy showing a positive, and a prior chemotherapy and kinase inhibitors showing a negative impact on survival, respectively. Moreover, we show that the patient's OPS, serum LDH, age, and gender independently impact vemurafenib therapy outcome. These findings should be taken into account for the future design of therapy sequencing in BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma patients.

Lack of activity of betulin-based Oleogel-S10 in the treatment of actinic keratoses: a randomized, multicentre, placebo-controlled double-blind phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: Betulinic acid and other triterpenes have shown strong antitumour activity in vitro and in vivo. A triterpene extract of birch bark formed the base of Oleogel-S10 and allowed topical application. Two previous trials have shown efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of actinic keratoses (AKs) with betulin-based Oleogel-S10. OBJECTIVES: To confirm the efficacy and tolerability/safety of Oleogel-S10 in the treatment of AKs in a multicentre placebo-controlled study. METHODS: Patients (n = 165) were treated topically for 3 months in a four-arm parallel study design, randomly allocated to A (n = 53) Oleogel-S10 once daily, B (n = 51) Oleogel-S10 twice daily, or C (n = 25) or D (n = 28) placebo (petroleum jelly) once or twice daily, respectively. Clinical efficacy in this double-blind study was assessed by the investigators. Final and baseline biopsies were evaluated by central histopathology. RESULTS: Complete clearance of the target lesions was seen in 4% of patients in group A and 7% in group B, but not in the placebo groups. A clearance rate of > 75% was seen for 15% and 18% of patients in groups A and B, respectively, and for 13% in the placebo groups. These differences were not statistically significant. Histopathologically, 43·9% of patients showed a downgrading or clearance of the marker AK with no significant differences between the groups. Treatment with Oleogel-S10 was well tolerated. The tolerability as assessed by the investigator was mostly 'very good' (78·8%), followed by 'good' (18·2%) and only 1·2% assessed it as 'intolerable'. Patient-assessed tolerability was graded mostly 'very good' (56·4%) or 'good' (34·5%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with Oleogel-S10 was well tolerated during a treatment period of 3 months, yet was no better than placebo in terms of efficacy in the treatment of AKs.

Serum markers lactate dehydrogenase and S100B predict independently disease outcome in melanoma patients with distant metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Established prognostic factors are of limited value to predict long-term survival and benefit from metastasectomy in advanced melanoma. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors in patients with distant metastasis. METHODS: We analysed overall survival of 855 institutional melanoma patients with distant metastasis by bivariate Kaplan-Meier survival probabilities and multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis. RESULTS: Serum lactate dehydrogenases (LDH), S100B, the interval between initial diagnosis and occurrence of distant metastasis, the site of distant metastases, and the number of involved distant sites were significant independent prognostic factors in both bivariate and multivariate analyses. Visceral metastases other than lung (hazard ratio (HR) 1.8), elevated S100B (HR 1.7) and elevated LDH (HR 1.6) had the highest negative impact on survival. Complete metastasectomy was likewise an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis. This treatment was associated with favourable survival for patients with normal LDH and S100B values (5-year survival, 37.2%). CONCLUSION: The serum markers LDH and S100B were both found to be prognostic factors in melanoma patients with distant metastasis. Furthermore, complete metastasectomy had an independent favourable prognostic impact in particular for the patient subgroup with normal LDH and S100B values.

Open label randomized study comparing 3 months vs. 6 months treatment of actinic keratoses with 3% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronic acid gel: a trial of the German Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: Actinic keratoses (AK) are carcinomata in situ with the potential to develop into invasive carcinoma. Several studies have demonstrated that 3% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronic acid gel (HA) is effective and well tolerated in the treatment of AK. To date there are no large randomized multicentre trials with treatment durations longer than 90 days and histopathological control of treatment outcome. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether a prolonged treatment with diclofenac in HA of 6 vs. 3 months adds to the efficacy in treatment for AK and if this will influence tolerability and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: This was a multicentre, randomized open-label study in which 418 patients with mild to moderate AKs were randomized into two treatment groups. Group A received diclofenac in HA for 3 months and group B for 6 months. Treatment efficacy was assessed by size measurement and a final biopsy of a defined marker AK. Quality of life was measured using the Dermatology Life Quality Index questionnaire. RESULTS: Clinical complete clearance was observed in 40% in group A and in 45% in group B (P = 0.38). Histopathological clearance was confirmed in 30% in group A and in 40% in group B (P = 0.16). Treatment was well tolerated and QoL was significantly improved after treatment in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Treatment with diclofenac in HA is effective and well tolerated during a treatment period of 3 months as well as 6 months. Prolongation of the treatment duration did not significantly affect treatment outcome.

Topical 3.0% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronic acid gel induces regression of cancerous transformation in actinic keratoses.

BACKGROUND: Actinic keratoses (AKs) are frequently diagnosed in dermatological patients. As they represent in situ carcinomas, effective treatment is required. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the effect of topical 3.0% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronic acid gel on AK. METHODS: Sixty-five patients with AKs were clinically evaluated before and after 3 months' treatment with topical 3.0% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronic gel. Biopsy specimens were taken and stained with haematoxylin-eosin and immunohistological markers. Specimens were evaluated for histological type of AKs using the AK classification scheme suggested by Röwert-Huber et al. [(early) in situ squamous cell carcinoma type AK Grade I-III], number of mitoses per high-power field and expression of immunohistological markers. RESULTS: Complete clinical resolution was observed in 11 patients (16.9%). A significant (P<0.001) downgrading of AK grade was observed. Complete histological resolution was achieved in 15 patients (23.1%). The number of mitoses per high-power field was reduced significantly (P<0.001). The expression of anti-p53-antibody decreased significantly (P=0.009), as did the expression of anti-MiB-1 antibody (P=0.021). CONCLUSIONS: 3.0% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronic acid gel causes regression of signs of cancerous transformation after 3 months' therapy.