Diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography in the diagnosis of neurological complications after endovascular treatment of acute ischaemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate dual-energy computed tomography's (DECT) diagnostic performance in detecting neurological complications following endovascular therapy (EVT) of acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). METHODS: We performed the literature search using Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, EBSCO, and Science Direct databases for published related studies. The selected studies estimated the validity of DECT in the detection of neurological complications after EVT for AIS. Study quality assessment was performed utilizing the Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 Tool. Our meta-analysis calculated the pooled sensitivity, negative likelihood ratio, specificity, and positive likelihood ratio for each detected complication. The summary receiver operating characteristics (sROC) curve was utilized to estimate the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: Of 22 studies, 21 were included in the quantitative synthesis. In the detection of intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), DECT pooled overall sensitivity and specificity were 69.9% (95% CI, 44.5%-86.8%) and 100% (95% CI, 92.1%-100%); whereas, in the detection of ischaemia, they were 85.9% (95% CI, 80.4%-90%) and 90.7% (95% CI, 87%-93.5%), respectively. On the sROC curve, AUC values of 0.954 and 0.952 were recorded for the detection of ICH and ischaemia, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: DECT demonstrated high accuracy and specificity in the detection of neurological complications post-endovascular treatment of AIS. However, further prospective studies with a standardized reference test and a larger sample size are recommended to support these findings. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: DECT is a rapid and valid imaging tool for the prediction of ICH and cerebral ischaemia after the EVT of AIS.

Conventional anatomical landmark versus preprocedural ultrasound for thoracic epidural analgesia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Thoracic epidural analgesia is the gold standard for major thoracic and abdominal surgeries. AIM: Ultrasound-guided and landmark-based thoracic epidural insertion are compared in this systematic review. METHODS: Randomised controlled trials were sought in six databases for a systematic review and meta-analysis. With a 95% confidence interval, a fixed-effects model calculated risk ratio or mean difference. Cochrane risk of bias assessed bias. Four randomised controlled trials were examined. FINDINGS: Preprocedural ultrasound increased thoracic epidural placement first-puncture success rate (risk ratio = 1.28, 95% confidence interval (1.05 to 1.56), p value = 0.02) and decreased the need for two or more skin punctures (mean difference = -2.41, 95% confidence interval (-3.34 to -1.47), p value = 0.00001). The ultrasound group reduced needle redirections (risk ratio = 0.6, 95% confidence interval (0.38 to 0.94), p value = 0.02). The epidural block success rate was equal in both groups (risk ratio = 1.02, 95% confidence interval (0.96 to 1.07), p value = 0.6). CONCLUSION: Thoracic epidural insertion is improved by ultrasound but not the success rate. Quality research with larger samples is needed to emphasise these conclusions.

Posterior pericardiotomy for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 25 randomised controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) associated with postoperative pericardial effusion is the most commonly reported adverse event after cardiac surgery. AIMS: We aimed to determine the role of posterior pericardiotomy in preventing postoperative AF (POAF). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Ovid, and EBSCO from inception until 30 June 2022. We included randomised clinical trials (RCTs) that compared posterior pericardiotomy (PP) versus control (no PP) in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The primary endpoint was the incidence of POAF after cardiac surgery. The secondary endpoints were supraventricular arrhythmias, early/late pericardial effusion, pericardial tamponade, pleural effusion, length of hospital/intensive care unit stay, intra-aortic balloon pump use, revision surgery for bleeding, and mortality. RESULTS: Twenty-five RCTs comprising 4,467 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The overall incidence rate of POAF was 11.7% in the PP group compared with 23.67% in the no PP or control group, with a significant decrease in the risk of POAF following PP (odds ratio [OR] 0.49, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.38-0.61). Compared with the control group, the risk of supraventricular tachycardia (OR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.43-0.89), early pericardial effusion (OR 0.32, 95% CI: 0.22-0.46), late pericardial effusion (OR 0.15, 95% CI: 0.09-0.25), and pericardiac tamponade (OR 0.18, 95% CI: 0.10-0.33) were lower in the PP group. CONCLUSIONS: PP is an effective intervention for reducing the risk of POAF after cardiac surgery. Also, PP is economically efficient in terms of decreasing the length of hospital stay.