Combination of STING agonist with anti-vascular RGD-(KLAKLAK)2 peptide as a novel anti-tumor therapy.

Immunotherapy is one of the most promising anti-cancer treatment. It involves activating the host's own immune system to eliminate cancer cells. Activation of cGAS-STING pathway is promising therapeutic approach for cancer immunotherapy. However, in human clinical trials, targeting cGAS-STING pathway results in insufficient or unsustainable anti-tumor response. To enhance its effectiveness, combination with other anti-cancer therapies seems essential to achieve synergistic systemic anti-tumor response.The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the combination of STING agonist-cGAMP with anti-vascular RGD-(KLAKLAK)2 peptide results in a better anti-tumor response in poorly immunogenic tumors with various STING protein and αvß3 integrin status.Combination therapy inhibited growth of murine breast carcinoma more effectively than melanoma. In melanoma, the administration of STING agonist alone was sufficient to obtain a satisfactory therapeutic effect. In both tumor models we have noted stimulation of innate immune response following cGAMP administration alone or in combination. The largest population of immune cells infiltrating the TME after therapy were activated NK cells. Increased infiltration of cytotoxic CD8+ T lymphocytes within the TME was only observed in melanoma tumors. However, they also expressed the "exhaustion" PD-1 receptor. In contrast, in breast carcinoma tumors each therapy caused the drop in the number of infiltrating CD8+ T cells.The obtained results indicate an additional therapeutic benefit from combining STING agonist with an anti-vascular agent. However, this effect depends on the type of tumor, the status of its microenvironment and the expression of specific proteins such as STING and αvß3 family integrin.

The comparison of adipose-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) delivery method in a murine model of hindlimb ischemia.

BACKGROUND: Adipose-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) demonstrate ability to promote tissue healing and down-regulate excessive inflammation. ADSCs have been used to treat critical limb ischemia in preclinical and clinical trials, but still, there is little known about their optimal delivery strategy. To date, no direct analysis of different methods of ADSCs delivery has been performed in the hindlimb ischemia model. Therefore, in this study we focused on the therapeutic efficacy of different ADSCs delivery methods in a murine model of hindlimb ischemia. METHODS: For the hADSCs isolation, we used the subcutaneous adipose tissue collected during the surgery. The murine hindlimb ischemia was used as a model. The unilateral femoral artery ligation was performed on 10-12-week-old male C57BL/6. ADSCs were delivered directly into ischemic muscle, into the contralateral muscle or intravenously. 7 and 14 days after the surgery, the gastrocnemius and quadriceps muscles were collected for the immunohistochemical analysis. The results were analyzed with relevant tests using the Statistica software. RESULTS: Our research revealed that muscle regeneration, angiogenesis, arteriogenesis and macrophage infiltration in murine model of hindlimb ischemia differ depending on ADSCs delivery method. We have demonstrated that intramuscular method (directly into ischemic limb) of ADSCs delivery is more efficient in functional recovery after critical limb ischemia than intravenous or contralateral route. CONCLUSIONS: We have noticed that injection of ADSCs directly into ischemic limb is the optimal delivery strategy because it increases: (1) muscle fiber regeneration, (2) the number of capillaries and (3) the influx of macrophages F4/80+/CD206+.