The Incremental Cost of Incompatible Living Donor Kidney Transplantation: A National Cohort Analysis.

Incompatible living donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) has been established as an effective option for end-stage renal disease patients with willing but HLA-incompatible living donors, reducing mortality and improving quality of life. Depending on antibody titer, ILDKT can require highly resource-intensive procedures, including intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, and/or cell-depleting antibody treatment, as well as protocol biopsies and donor-specific antibody testing. This study sought to compare the cost and Medicare reimbursement, exclusive of organ acquisition payment, for ILDKT (n = 926) with varying antibody titers to matched compatible transplants (n = 2762) performed between 2002 and 2011. Data were assembled from a national cohort study of ILDKT and a unique data set linking hospital cost accounting data and Medicare claims. ILDKT was more expensive than matched compatible transplantation, ranging from 20% higher adjusted costs for positive on Luminex assay but negative flow cytometric crossmatch, 26% higher for positive flow cytometric crossmatch but negative cytotoxic crossmatch, and 39% higher for positive cytotoxic crossmatch (p < 0.0001 for all). ILDKT was associated with longer median length of stay (12.9 vs. 7.8 days), higher Medicare payments ($91 330 vs. $63 782 p < 0.0001), and greater outlier payments. In conclusion, ILDKT increases the cost of and payments for kidney transplantation.

Safe Conversion From Tacrolimus to Belatacept in High Immunologic Risk Kidney Transplant Recipients With Allograft Dysfunction.

There is no literature on the use of belatacept for sensitized patients or regrafts in kidney transplantation. We present our initial experience in high immunologic risk kidney transplant recipients who were converted from tacrolimus to belatacept for presumed acute calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) toxicity and/or interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy. Six (mean age = 40 years) patients were switched from tacrolimus to belatacept at a median of 4 months posttransplant. Renal function improved significantly from a peak mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 23.8 ± 12.9 mL/min/1.73 m(2) prior to the switch to an eGFR of 42 ± 12.5 mL/min/1.73 m(2) (p = 0.03) at a mean follow-up of 16.5 months postconversion. No new rejection episodes were diagnosed despite a prior history of rejection in 2/6 (33%) patients. Surveillance biopsies performed in 5/6 patients did not show subclinical rejection. No development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) was noted. In this preliminary investigation, we report improved kidney function without a concurrent increase in risk of rejection and DSA in six sensitized patients converted from tacrolimus to belatacept. Improvement in renal function was noted even in patients with chronic allograft fibrosis without evidence of acute CNI toxicity. Further studies with protocol biopsies are needed to ensure safety and wider applicability of this approach.

Quantifying the risk of incompatible kidney transplantation: a multicenter study.

Incompatible live donor kidney transplantation (ILDKT) offers a survival advantage over dialysis to patients with anti-HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA). Program-specific reports (PSRs) fail to account for ILDKT, placing this practice at regulatory risk. We collected DSA data, categorized as positive Luminex, negative flow crossmatch (PLNF) (n = 185), positive flow, negative cytotoxic crossmatch (PFNC) (n = 536) or positive cytotoxic crossmatch (PCC) (n = 304), from 22 centers. We tested associations between DSA, graft loss and mortality after adjusting for PSR model factors, using 9669 compatible patients as a comparison. PLNF patients had similar graft loss; however, PFNC (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-2.23, p = 0.007) and PCC (aHR = 5.01, 95% CI: 3.71-6.77, p < 0.001) were associated with increased graft loss in the first year. PLNF patients had similar mortality; however, PFNC (aHR = 2.04; 95% CI: 1.28-3.26; p = 0.003) and PCC (aHR = 4.59; 95% CI: 2.98-7.07; p < 0.001) were associated with increased mortality. We simulated Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services flagging to examine ILDKT's effect on the risk of being flagged. Compared to equal-quality centers performing no ILDKT, centers performing 5%, 10% or 20% PFNC had a 1.19-, 1.33- and 1.73-fold higher odds of being flagged. Centers performing 5%, 10% or 20% PCC had a 2.22-, 4.09- and 10.72-fold higher odds. Failure to account for ILDKT's increased risk places centers providing this life-saving treatment in jeopardy of regulatory intervention.

Multimodality therapy and liver transplantation in patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma: 6 years, single-center experience.

The treatment of patients with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has improved dramatically over the past 10 years. We conducted a 6-year prospective study, using multimodality ablation therapy (MMT) combined with liver transplantation (LTx) for patients with cirrhosis and unresectable HCC. Subjects were classified as: group 1 (n = 35), intention to treat with MMT + LTx; group 2 (n = 16), contemporaneous LTx with "incidental" HCC on explants; group 3 (n = 94), MMT alone; and group 4 (n = 19), palliative care alone. MMT included trans-arterial chemo-embolization (54.4%), trans-arterial chemo-infusion (28.6%), and radio frequency ablation (17%). Group 1, with a mean wait time of 11.6 months pre-MELD era and 5.4 months post-MELD era, had a mean of 2.4 +/- 1.2 MMTs and achieved 1- 3-, and 5-year patient survivals of 100, 100, and 76%, respectively, which was not different from group 2 (incidental HCC), namely 93, 93, and 93%, respectively; or to a contemporaneous non-HCC LTx group: namely 84.3, 78.7, and 73.9%, respectively. Despite careful pretransplant HCC staging, 22.8% (8 of 35) group 1 subjects were understaged. Those subjects in group 1 with true T1-2 stage HCC achieved 100% cancer-free survival at 5 years. Only three cases of HCC recurrence occurred in our series, all of whom were understaged. Our data suggest that pretransplant MMT followed by timely LTx provides excellent disease-free survival at 5 years for patients with true T1-2 stage HCC and cirrhosis. Pretransplant HCC understaging contributes to posttransplant HCC recurrence after LTx.

Molecular markers in stored kidneys using perfluorocarbon-based preservation solution: preliminary results.

BACKGROUND: Delayed graft function (DGF) is a problem in kidney transplantation and cold ischemia has been identified as a risk factor. Perfluorocarbons (PFC) have an enhanced ability to dissolve and release oxygen. We evaluated histologically and a number of molecular changes induced by ischemia in stored kidneys with University of Wisconsin (UW) and PFC-based preservation solutions (PFC-UW). MATERIALS AND METHODS: ACI rats were used as kidney donors. UW (control group) or PFC-UW (study group) preservation solutions were used for kidney perfusion. All kidneys were stored at 4 degrees C for 12, 24, and 36 hours. After this time, intragraft histologic evaluation as well as mRNA HO-1 and iNOS levels were also analyzed. RESULTS: In the kidneys stored at 24 hours, mRNA HO-1 levels were elevated in the study group when compared with the control and mRNA iNOS was decreased. CONCLUSION: We observed overexpression of HO-1 and underexpression of iNOS in the kidney tissue stored with PFC-UW solution at 24 hours. These preliminary data suggest that increasing oxygen delivery by PFC added to the perfusion solution triggers cytoprotective mechanism in kidney transplantation.

The importance of the Lewis system in cadaver renal transplantation.

Previous reports have suggested that Lewis (Le) antigens may exert a significant effect on cadaver renal allograft (CRA) survival, especially in black recipients in whom there is a higher frequency of Le-negative phenotypes. We review our experience with this problem in 70 donor-recipient pairs of CRA who underwent prospective Le typing and received conventional immunosuppression between 1980 and 1983. Recipient typing alone yielded the following graft survival (GS) and patient survival (PS) at 2 years by life table analysis: (a+,b;-) (n = 12) 51% GS, 93% PS; (a-, b+) (n = 44) 57% GS, 88% PS; and (a-,b-) (n = 14) 51% GS, 93% PS(P-ns for GS, PS). Recipient racial characteristics did not effect ultimate graft survival, as whites and blacks had similar two-year GS in all phenotypic groups. When Le matching was considered, no significant differences in one-year graft survivals could be ascertained between Le-matched and Le-mismatched donor-recipient pairs, and this effect persisted despite stratification for race and HLA-A,B and DR histoincompatibilities. In light of these results, we do not recommend using Lewis compatibility as a criterion for donor selection in cadaver renal allografting, as this substantially increases the difficulty in finding suitable matches, especially in the (a-,b-) recipient group.

The interrelationship between portal and arterial blood flow after adult to adult living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: When adults are transplanted with segmental grafts, disparity between the size of the graft and the native organ is almost universal. These grafts presumably still receive all of the native portal inflow despite a reduced vascular bed and dramatically elevated blood flow may result. The hemodynamic changes after segmental transplantation in adults have not yet been studied and their clinical significance is unknown. METHODS: Portal venous and hepatic arterial blood flow were measured intraoperatively in right lobe liver donors and recipients with electromagnetic flow probes. Postoperative evolution was monitored in recipients with ultrasonography. RESULTS: Portal flow to the right lobe ranged from 601 to 1,102 ml/min before resection and from 1,257 to 2,362 ml/min after transplantation. There was a statistically significant linear correlation between the change in portal flow and graft to recipient body weight ratio. Arterial blood flow ranged from 213 to 460 ml/min before resection and from 60 to 300 ml/min after transplantation. Preoperative portal peak systolic velocity was uniformly around 10 cm/sec. Values on postoperative day 1 were increased to 30 cm/sec in recipients of cadaveric organs, to 50 cm/sec in recipients of organs with graft to recipient body weight ratios of more than 1.2%, and to 115 cm/sec in recipients of organs with ratios less than 0.9%. A decreasing tendency was universally observed. Arterial systolic velocity was inversely related to portal systolic velocity. Neither graft dysfunction nor vascular complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: The hemodynamic pattern after right lobe transplantation is predictable and intraoperative measurements and ultrasonography are useful for monitoring. The size of the graft influences the magnitude of the hemodynamic changes.

Intragraft cytokine expression and tolerance induction in rat renal allografts.

BACKGROUND: Intragraft cytokine expression was evaluated in a model of renal transplantation. ACI and Lewis rats were used as donors and recipients, respectively, for heterotopic renal transplantation. METHODS: Treated allograft rats (n=10) received a preoperative dose of rapamycin and cyclosporine, followed by 7 days of cyclosporine postoperatively. Isograft rats (n=5) and control allograft rats (n=4) received no immunosuppression. Sacrifice was performed after 120 days. Expression of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-10, and interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) transcripts was determined with semiquantitative reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: All treated allograft rats had normal function with 50% histologic rejection. All isografts had normal function. IL-4 and IL-10 were in greater density in allografts with normal histology, whereas IFN-gamma was only seen in allografts with cellular rejection. No IL-10 was seen in isografts, but IL-4 was detected in 3/5 isografts. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the lymphocyte population's elaboration of IL-4 and IL-10 is associated with tolerance, whereas the production of IFN-gamma and absence of IL-4 is associated with histology suggestive of acute cellular rejection.

Hepatocyte transplantation as a bridge to orthotopic liver transplantation in terminal liver failure.

The limited donor organ supply has led to several bridging techniques to sustain patients with acute and subacute liver failure. We report here the prospective, controlled trial of transplanted isolated fresh and cryopreserved human hepatocytes as a bridge to orthotopic liver transplantation. Five hepatocyte transplant recipients with grade IV encephalopathy and multisystem organ failure and four patients of equal illness severity due to liver failure were studied. Medical therapy resulted in a significant (P<0.05), but not normal, fall in blood ammonia, and a significant (P<0.02) resolving biochemical marker of liver injury that did not improve cardiovascular or cerebral stability; this lead to death within 3 days in all control patients. The five hepatocyte-treated patients maintained normal cerebral perfusion and cardiac stability, with withdrawal of medical support for 2 to 10 days before orthotopic liver transplantation. Biochemical evidence of liver injury improved significantly (P=0.004) and blood ammonia levels decreased significantly (P=0.0005) to normal levels in the hepatocyte-treated patients. Three of five patients who successfully bridged to whole liver allograft transplant are alive, home, and normal with more than 20 months of follow-up. No infections or embolic or pulmonary complications resulted from intra-arterial splenic hepatocyte infusion. Specific antiprotease production in a patients with genetically deficient alpha-1-antitrypsin disease, and immunohistochemical and electron microscopic evidence of splenic "hepatization" are presented as evidence of the viability of hepatocyte splenic seeding. In conclusion, splenic transplantation of differentiated adult hepatocytes can control hyper-ammonemia, correct genetic defects in liver function, and bridge life to orthotopic liver transplantation in human liver failure.

Biochemical and histologic evaluation of recurrent hepatitis C following orthotopic liver transplantation.

It is well recognized that hepatitis recurs in virtually all patients who undergo orthotopic liver transplantation for cirrhosis secondary to chronic hepatitis C (HCV). The present report describes the biochemical and histologic findings of recurrent hepatitis in 25 such patients. One patient was found to have hepatocellular carcinoma at the time of OLT and was excluded from further analysis. All post-OLT laboratory values were reviewed. Liver biopsies were performed on protocol 6, 12, 24, and 36 months following OLT. Additional biopsies were performed as necessary to evaluate abnormalities in serum liver chemistries. A total of 104 biopsies was obtained; hepatitis consistent with recurrent HCV was present in 68 (65%). Other biopsy findings included cytomegalovirus hepatitis; acute, chronic, or resolving rejection; cholestasis with or without an underlying hepatitis; steatosis, and centrilobular necrosis. Histologic hepatitis appeared in all patients within 12 months following OLT. Despite these histologic findings, serum ALT was normal for prolonged periods in over 50% of such patients. In all cases this hepatitis was mild and did not progress over a mean follow-up of 22 months (maximum 44 months), as judged by Knodell histologic activity score (mean score: 4.0 +/- 0.3). Five patients developed cholestatic jaundice, far out of proportion to the degree of histologic hepatitis. In 2 patients this was secondary to chronic rejection. The other 3 patients had drug-induced cholestasis that resolved after various medications were discontinued. HCV did not contribute to graft dysfunction in any of the 24 patients. To date, our data suggest that post-OLT hepatitis in patients with preexisting HCV is a relatively benign process. Severe cholestatic jaundice in such patients is not secondary to HCV, and should stimulate a search for other possible causes of graft dysfunction. The long-term consequences of recurrent HCV following hepatic transplantation remain to be determined.

Right lobe living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The shortage of livers for transplantation has prompted transplant centers to seek alternatives to conventional cadaveric liver transplantation. Left lateral segmentectomy from living donors has proven to be a safe operation for the donor with excellent results in the pediatric population. Left lobectomy, conceived to supply more tissue, still provides insufficient liver mass for an average size adult patient. Right lobectomy could supply a graft of adequate size. METHODS: Donors were considered only after recipients were listed according to United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) criteria. Donor evaluation included liver biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging, and celiac and mesenteric angiography. The donor operation consisted of a right lobectomy uniformly performed throughout the series as described herein. RESULTS: Twenty-five right lobe living donor liver transplants were performed between adults, with no significant complications in donors. Recipient and graft survival was 88%, with three recipient deaths secondary to uncontrolled sepsis in patients at high risk for liver transplant; all three had functioning grafts. CONCLUSIONS: Right lobe living donor liver transplantation poses challenges that require a meticulous surgical technique to minimize morbidity in the recipient. Right lobectomies for living donation can be performed safely with minimal risk to both donor and recipient although providing adequate liver mass for an average size adult patient.

Pretransplant warm B cell antibodies in recipients of primary and retransplanted cadaver renal allografts.

Eighty-four recipients of cadaveric renal allografts were retrospectively crossmatched for donor-specific pretransplant B cell antibody. Of these, 28 were found to be positive for the antibody and 56 were negative. Actuarial survival analysis over six years revealed a slightly better graft survival overall in the B-cell-negative group as compared with the B-cell-positive group (P less than 0.07). These patients were further subgrouped into those who received primary transplants and those who were retransplanted. Fifty-four percent of the B-cell-positive group (15/28) consisted of retransplants, and only 13% (7/56) of the B-cell-negative group were retransplants. When considering primary transplants only, B-cell-negative and B-cell-positive groups had similar graft survival rates (P less than 0.25). When retransplants only were considered, the graft survivals of the B-cell-positive and B-cell-negative groups were comparable (P less than 0.32). The most significant differences were observed when comparing the B-cell-positive primary transplant group with the B-cell-positive retransplanted group. The primary transplants fared consistently better at all time intervals (P less than .007). Conversely, when primary and retransplants in the B-cell-negative group were compared, no differences were noted (P less than 0.29). Our results suggest that the identification of pretransplant B-cell antibodies may be indicative of a poorer allograft survival prognosis in patients who have been previously transplanted.

Hepatic lidocaine metabolism and complications of cirrhosis. Implications for assessing patient priority for hepatic transplantation.

The number of patients awaiting hepatic transplantation continues to exceed organ donation. As a result, many liver transplant candidates will develop life-threatening complications of their liver disease and not survive the pretransplant waiting period. Recent studies have demonstrated that hepatic lidocaine metabolism into monoethylglycinexylidide (MEG-X) can predict pretransplant survival. The present study was performed to determine if MEG-X could also predict pretransplant complications and thereby be useful in stratifying persons being evaluated for hepatic transplantation. A total of 57 patients with biopsy-proven cirrhosis underwent MEG-X testing. Of 57 patients, 30 (53%) developed life-threatening complications of their liver disease--i.e., variceal bleeding, grade II hepatic encephalopathy or worse, and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis. MEG-X values were greater in persons without complications of liver disease than in persons with complications (25.7 +/- 2.9 versus 14.7 +/- 1.4 ng/ml, respectively). No patients with MEG-X greater than 30 ng/ml developed a major complication. No significant difference in any of the standard liver function tests existed between persons who developed complications and patients who did not. In this group of 57 patients, 4 (7%) died from complications of cirrhosis. Mean MEG-X for patients who died (5.5 +/- 1.6 ng/ml) was significantly less (P < 0.05) than observed for other patient groups. All patients who died had MEG-X values below 10 ng/ml. This suggests that MEG-X testing could be an extremely useful test in the evaluation of patients for hepatic transplantation by identifying persons at increased risk for developing complications of chronic liver disease.

The impact of a positive crossmatch upon outcome after liver transplantation.

Recent reports have shown that liver allografts transplanted against a positive lymphocytotoxic crossmatch (CDC+) are susceptible to an increased frequency of rejection, and decreases in patient and graft survival. The implication of a positive flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM+) in liver transplantation remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to determine what impact a pretransplant IgG crossmatch due to CDC+ or FCXM+ had upon the clinical outcome following liver transplantation. Preoperative crossmatch status was determined prospectively in 110 consecutive liver transplants performed between July 1991 and January 1995. Allografts were divided into three groups: negative crossmatch (NXM), positive flow cytometric crossmatch FCXM+, and positive lymphocytotoxic crossmatch CDC+. Crossmatch status did not impact patient or graft survival. Actuarial patient survival was similar between groups at 12 months (88% vs. 95% vs. 92%, NXM vs. FCXM+ vs. CDC+) and 24 months (81% vs. 93% vs. 92%, NXM vs. FCXM+ vs. CDC+) (P=0.1938). Actuarial allograft survival was similar between groups at 12 months (76% vs. 93% vs. 85%, NXM vs. FCXM+ vs. CDC+) and 24 months (76% vs. 89% vs. 85%, NXM vs. FCXM+ vs. CDC+) (P=0.0738). CDC+ allografts had a significant increase in early rejection episodes compared with NXM (46% vs. 7%, CDC+ vs. NXM) (P=0.003) or FCXM+ allografts (46% vs. 10%, CDC+ vs. FCXM+) (P=0.006). CDC+ allografts experienced significantly more rejection episodes per year than NXM (53% vs. 20%, CDC+ vs. NXM) (P=0.015) or FCXM+ allografts (53% vs. 23%, CDC+ vs. FCXM+) (P=0.02). CDC+ allografts had a significant increase in numbers of additional nonconventional therapeutic interventions compared to NXM allografts (0.9+/-0.5 vs. 0.2+/-0.1, CDC+ vs. NXM) (P=0.039). The presence of cytotoxic antibodies pretransplantation is associated with increased incidences of early rejection, and rejection episodes per year. With careful monitoring and aggressive therapeutic interventions the presence of cytotoxic antibodies are not deleterious to patient or liver allograft survival.

Analysis of functional renal allograft tolerance with single-dose rapamycin based induction immunosuppression.

The induction of transplantation tolerance is one of the primary goals following solid organ transplantation. The combination of a single dose of rapamycin (RAPA) with a short course of cyclosporine (CsA) has been shown to induce transplantation tolerance in the nonfunctional rat heterotopic cardiac transplant model. The purpose of this study was to assess this effective induction protocol in a functional renal transplant model. Male ACI (RTl(a)) and Lewis (RT1(1)) rats were used as donor and recipients respectively. Allografts received a single RAPA dose of (1.5 mg/kg) combined with CsA (10 mg/kg) 12-14 hr prior to transplantation. CsA (5 mg/kg) was given daily on days +1 - +7. Untreated Lewis to Lewis isografts served as histological controls. Chimerism, assessed in recipient skin, and intragraft interleukin (IL) 10 expression was determined utilizing PCR and RT-PCR techniques respectively. Treated animals and isografts were sacrificed 120-130 days posttransplant for functional and histological evaluation. Allografts (n=9) were functionally tolerant with serum creatinine (0.77+/-0.1 vs. 0.88+/-0.1; P=0.275), blood urea nitrogen (37.6+/-4.6 vs. 23.3+/-1.9; P=0.123), and 24 hr protein excretion (27.0+/-4.4 vs. 17.9+/-5.2; P=0.131) similar to single kidney ACI controls. Histologically, 45% (4/9) allografts were indistinguishable from isografts with no evidence of rejection, and were considered immunologically tolerant. Donor/recipient chimerism was not detected. All immunologically tolerant allografts had evidence of intragraft IL-10 expression. Rejecting allografts and isografts did not express intragraft IL-10. This study confirms the efficacy of pre-engraftment single-dose RAPA combined with CsA in inducing true immunologic tolerance in this stringent functional renal transplant model. The expression of intragraft IL-10 in tolerant recipients suggests a Th-2 shift as the mechanism of tolerance in this model.

Liver regeneration and function in donor and recipient after right lobe adult to adult living donor liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Regeneration of the liver to a predetermined size after resection or transplantation is a well described phenomenon, but the time course over which these events occur has not been well defined. It is not clear how initial liver mass, reperfusion, immunosuppression, or steatosis influence this process. METHODS: Liver regeneration was assessed prospectively by volumetric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in living right lobe liver donors and the recipients of these grafts. Imaging was performed at regular intervals through 60 days after resection/transplantation, and liver mass was determined. Liver function tests and synthetic function were monitored throughout the study period in donors and recipients of these grafts as well as recipients of cadaveric grafts. RESULTS: MRI consistently overestimated liver mass by a mean of 45 g (+/-65) (range 10-123). Donor liver mass increased by 101%, 110%, 115%, and 144% at 7, 14, 30, and 60 days after resection, respectively. Recipient liver mass increased by 87,101, 119, and 99% at 7, 14, 30, and 60 days after transplantation, respectively. Steatosis did not influence the degree of regeneration or graft function, nor was there a functional difference between grafts of >1% graft to recipient body weight ratio or <1%. CONCLUSIONS: MRI accurately determines right lobe mass. Most liver regeneration occurs in the 1st week after resection or transplantation, and the time course does not differ significantly in donors or recipients. The mass of the graft or remnant segment affects the duration of the regeneration process, with a smaller initial liver mass prolonging the course. Steatosis of <30% had no bearing on liver function or regeneration and, therefore, should not be an absolute criterion for exclusion of donors. A calculated graft to recipient body weight ratio of 0.8% is adequate for right lobe living donor liver transplantation.

Selection and outcome of living donors for adult to adult right lobe transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The shortage of cadaveric livers has sparked an interest in adult-to-adult living donor transplantation. Right lobe donor hepatectomy is frequently required to obtain a graft of adequate size for adult recipients. Careful donor selection is necessary to minimize complications and assure a functional graft. METHODS: A four-step evaluation protocol was used for donor selection and satisfactory results of all tests in each step were required before proceeding to the next. Donors were selected based on a battery of laboratory studies chosen to exclude unrecognized infection, liver disease, metabolic disorders, and conditions representing undue surgical risk. Imaging studies included ultrasonography, angiography, magnetic resonance imaging, and intraoperative cholangiography and ultrasonography. The information obtained from liver biopsy was used to correct the estimated graft mass for the degree of steatosis. RESULTS: From March 1998 to August 1999, 126 candidates were evaluated for living donation. A total of 35 underwent donor right lobectomy with no significant complications. Forty percent of all donors that came to surgery were genetically unrelated to the recipient. A total of 69% of those evaluated were excluded. ABO incompatibility was the primary reason for exclusion after the first step (71%) and the presence of steatosis yielding an inadequate estimated graft mass after the second step (20%). CONCLUSIONS: Donor selection limits the application of living donor liver transplantation in the adult population. Unrelated individuals increase the size of the donor pool. Right lobe hepatectomy can be performed safely in healthy adult liver donors. Preoperative liver biopsy is an essential part of the evaluation protocol, particularly when the estimated graft mass is marginal.

Emergency adult to adult living donor liver transplantation for fulminant hepatic failure.

BACKGROUND: The high mortality rate associated with fulminant hepatic failure combined with the limited availability of cadaveric organs requires consideration of alternatives to conventional cadaveric transplantation. Use of the donor right lobe in adult-to-adult living donor transplantation holds promise in a variety of circumstances, including high-acuity situations. METHODS: A 28-year-old male with fulminant hepatic failure secondary to hepatitis B was referred to our institution. He rapidly progressed to grade IV encephalopathy, and laboratory values were indicative of a poor prognosis without transplantation. He was listed for transplantation as UNOS status I. Three siblings were simultaneously evaluated for living liver donation. Following established protocols, we completed donor evaluation in less than 24 hr, and donor right lobectomy and living donor transplantation were performed within 36 hr of the recipient's admission to our center. RESULTS: The donor surgery was uncomplicated, and the patient was discharged on postoperative day 4. The recipient experienced full recovery and was discharged home on postoperative day 14. Of note, the first offer for a cadaveric liver came more than 60 hr after living donor transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Thorough donor workup can be completed in less than 24 hr without inappropriate abbreviation of the evaluation. Simultaneous workup of willing individuals prevents unnecessary delay. Living donor transplantation should be considered for patients with fulminant hepatic failure who are appropriate transplant candidates.

Emergency portacaval shunt for control of hemorrhage from a parenchymal fracture after adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation.

As more adults undergo transplantation with partial liver grafts, the unique features of these segments and their clinical significance will become apparent. A patient presented with life-threatening hemorrhage from an iatrogenic laceration to a right lobe graft 11 days after transplantation. The creation of a portacaval shunt effectively controlled the bleeding, allowing more elective replacement of the organ with another right lobe graft. The regeneration process combined with increased portal blood flow and relative outflow limitation may have set the stage for this complication. Any disruption of the liver parenchyma during transplantation should be securely repaired and followed cautiously. Portacaval shunting is an option for controlling hemorrhage from the liver in transplant recipients. The timely availability of a second organ was likely the ultimate determinant of survival for this patient.

A prospective randomized trial of mycophenolate mofetil with neoral or tacrolimus after orthotopic liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The success of liver transplantation in this decade has become the stimulus to extend the donor and recipient pool. Reducing early posttransplant morbidity to maintain our success, as we expand our frontiers, has led us to focus on balanced testing of multidrug immunosuppression regimens. METHODS: A prospective trial in orthotopic liver transplantation using Mycophenolate Mofetil and an identical steroid taper with randomization of patients to Neoral (N) or Tacrolimus (FK) is the basis of this report. This was an intent-to-treat study designed to compare the 6-month primary endpoints of rejection and infection and to compare the 6-month secondary endpoints of liver function, renal function, bone marrow function, hypertension, and serum cholesterol levels. RESULTS: Ninety-seven patients completed the 6-month follow-up period (N=49, FK=48). The actual 6-month patient and graft survival rates were 98% and 94%, respectively. There was no difference in the number of patients with rejection episodes (N=11, FK=8) (P=0.61). There were 24 infections (3 cytomegalovirus) in the FK group and 30 infections (9 cytomegalovirus) in the N group. The cholesterol levels at 6 months were not significantly different (P=0.07) between the groups. The other secondary 6-month endpoints were not significantly different, except total bilirubin, which was lower in the FK arm (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The use of Mycophenolate Mofetil with N or FK and an identical steroid taper after orthotopic liver transplantation is associated with excellent graft and patient survival, and at 6 months, only 191% of the patients experienced rejection, with a 48% overall infection rate.