RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Although HCV cure after direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatment is associated with hepatic and extrahepatic benefits, few studies have assessed the impact of HCV treatment in people with mental disorders (PWMDs). Using quasi-exhaustive national data from the French administrative health care databases (SNDS), we explored whether DAA treatment in PWMDs affected hospitalizations in both psychiatric and non-psychiatric settings. METHODS: All adult PWMDs identified in the SNDS with DAA treatment initiation between 2015 and 2018 and 12 months of data pre- and post-treatment were included. Individuals were algorithmically classified into one or several subgroups: "addictive disorders", "neurotic and mood disorders", "psychotic disorders" and "other psychiatric disorders". A longitudinal approach was used to compare the frequency and duration of hospitalizations one year before and one year after DAA treatment. RESULTS: In total, 17,203 individuals met the inclusion criteria. The number of patients with at least one hospitalization (any type) decreased by 28% after HCV cure. The mean numbers of hospitalizations in non-psychiatric units per patient per year were 1·2 during the pre-DAA period and 0·8 during the post-DAA period (p < 0·0001). Similarly, the number of hospitalizations in psychiatric wards decreased from 1·4 to 1·2 (p = 0.006). The duration of hospital stays decreased from 20·2 days to 16·7 days in non-psychiatric settings (p < 0·0001). These results were also homogeneous and significant across all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: HCV cure significantly lowered the frequency and duration of hospitalizations during the year following treatment in all PWMDs subgroups, including the psychotic disorders subgroup. FUNDING: This study was funded by Gilead Sciences.
Assuntos
Antivirais , Bases de Dados Factuais , Hospitalização , Transtornos Mentais , Humanos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Transtornos Mentais/terapia , Transtornos Mentais/epidemiologia , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Hepatite C/tratamento farmacológico , Hepatite C/epidemiologia , Idoso , Estudos Longitudinais , Adulto JovemRESUMO
Data on the SARS-CoV-2 infection among primary health care workers (PHCWs) are scarce but essential to reflect on policy regarding prevention and control measures. We assessed the prevalence of PHCWs who have been infected by SARS-CoV-2 in comparison with modeling from the general population in metropolitan France, and associated factors. A cross-sectional study was conducted among general practitioners (GPs), pediatricians, dental and pharmacy workers in primary care between May and August 2021. Participants volunteered to provide a dried-blood spot for SARS-CoV-2 antibody assessment and completed a questionnaire. The primary outcome was defined as the detection of infection-induced antibodies (anti-nucleocapsid IgG, and for non-vaccinees: anti-Spike IgG and neutralizing antibodies) or previous self-reported infection (positive RT-qPCR or antigenic test, or positive ELISA test before vaccination). Estimates were adjusted using weights for representativeness and compared with prediction from the general population. Poisson regressions were used to quantify associated factors. The analysis included 1612 PHCWs. Weighted prevalences were: 31.7% (95% CI 27.5-36.0) for GPs, 28.7% (95% CI 24.4-33.0) for pediatricians, 25.2% (95% CI 20.6-31.0) for dentists, and 25.5% (95% CI 18.2-34.0) for pharmacists. Estimates were compatible with model predictions for the general population. PHCWs more likely to be infected were: GPs compared to pharmacist assistants (adjusted prevalence ratio [aPR] = 2.26; CI 95% 1.01-5.07), those living in Île-de-France (aPR = 1.53; CI 95% 1.14-2.05), South-East (aPR = 1.57; CI 95% 1.19-2.08), North-East (aPR = 1.81; CI 95% 1.38-2.37), and those having an unprotected contact with a COVID-19 case within the household (aPR = 1.48; CI 95% 1.22-1.80). Occupational factors were not associated with infection. In conclusion, the risk of SARS-CoV-2 exposure for PHCWs was more likely to have occurred in the community rather than at their workplace.