Pathologic Outcomes in Single Versus Multiple Areas of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.

BACKGROUND. Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) has led to increased detection of architectural distortion (AD). Management of patients with multiple areas of AD is not established. OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to compare pathologic outcomes between single and multiple areas of AD identified on DBT. METHODS. This retrospective study included 402 patients (mean age, 56 years) who underwent image-guided core needle biopsy of AD visualized on DBT between April 7, 2017, and April 16, 2019. Patients were classified as having a single or multiple areas of AD according to the presence of distinct areas of AD described in the clinical radiology reports. The pathologic diagnosis for each AD was on the basis of the most aggressive pathology identified on either biopsy or surgical excision, if performed. Patients with single and multiple areas of AD were compared. RESULTS. The sample included 372 patients with a single AD (145 benign, 121 high risk, 105 malignant, one other) and 30 patients with multiple visualized ADs, including 66 biopsied ADs (10 benign, 35 high risk, 21 malignant). At pathologic assessment on a per-lesion basis, multiple compared with single ADs showed higher frequency of high-risk pathology (53.0% vs 32.5%, p = .002) but no difference in frequency of malignancy (31.8% vs 28.2%, p = .56). In multivariable analysis of a range of patient-related characteristics, the presence of single versus multiple areas of AD was not independently associated with malignancy (p = .51). In patients with multiple areas of AD, the most aggressive pathology (benign, high risk, or malignant) across all ADs was not associated with the number of ADs (p = .73). In 8 of 24 patients with at least two ipsilateral biopsied ADs, the ipsilateral areas varied in terms of most aggressive pathology; in 5 of 10 patients with contralateral biopsied ADs, the contralateral areas varied in most aggressive pathology. CONCLUSION. The presence of multiple areas of AD, compared with a single AD, was significantly more likely to yield high-risk pathology but was not significantly different in yield of malignancy. In patients with multiple ADs, multiple ipsilateral or contralateral ADs commonly varied in pathologic classification (benign, high risk, or malignant). CLINICAL IMPACT. These findings may help guide management of AD visualized by DBT, including multiple ADs. For patients with multiple areas of AD, biopsy of all areas may be warranted given variation in pathologic diagnoses.

Atypical lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ at core breast biopsy: use of careful radiologic-pathologic correlation to recommend excision or observation.

PURPOSE: To assess the utility of precise radiologic and pathologic correlation for establishing imaging-histologic concordance or discordance as a method to limit the number of patients requiring surgical excision when atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) is diagnosed at core biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was approved by the institutional review board, and the requirement to obtain informed consent was waived. The pathology database was searched from 2000 to 2010 for core biopsies yielding ALH or LCIS devoid of any additional lesion that independently necessitated excision. All cases had to have either subsequent surgical excision or a minimum of 2 years of imaging follow-up. This yielded 50 cases from 49 women aged 40-73 years (mean age, 59 years). The authors performed detailed radiologic-pathologic analysis while blinded to subsequent follow-up information, comparing all biopsy-related images with the histologic findings at core biopsy and then designating each core biopsy finding as concordant or discordant. Then, results of subsequent surgery or extended follow-up for each case were unblinded and compared with original concordant or discordant designations. Outcomes and confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 43 benign concordant core biopsy findings, none were upgraded at surgery (n = 38) or extended follow-up (n = 5) (95% CI: 0%, 8%). Of the seven discordant biopsy findings, two were upgraded to ductal carcinoma in situ at surgery (n = 5); none of the cases were upgraded at follow-up (n = 2). CONCLUSION: When careful radiologic-pathologic correlation is performed and concordance is achieved, women with ALH or LCIS at core biopsy can be observed.

Reducing False Negatives in Biopsy of Suspicious MRI Findings.

Breast MRI is a highly sensitive imaging modality that often detects findings that are occult on mammography and US. Given the overlap in appearance of benign and malignant lesions, an accurate method of tissue sampling for MRI-detected findings is essential. Although MRI-directed US and correlation with mammography can be helpful for some lesions, a correlate is not always found. MRI-guided biopsy is a safe and effective method of tissue sampling for findings seen only on MRI. The unique limitations of this technique, however, contribute to false negatives, which can result in delays in diagnosis and adverse patient outcomes; this is of particular importance as most MRI examinations are performed in the high-risk or preoperative setting. Here, we review strategies to minimize false negatives in biopsy of suspicious MRI findings, including appropriate selection of biopsy modality, use of meticulous MRI-guided biopsy technique, management after target nonvisualization, assessment of adequate lesion sampling, and determination of radiology-pathology concordance. A proposed management algorithm for MRI-guided biopsy results will also be discussed.