[Dolodoc: a virtual pain management coach]. / Dolodoc : un coach virtuel pour mieux gérer la douleur chronique.

Dolodoc is a mobile application aimed at improving autonomy and quality of life for individuals living with chronic pain. Designed as a virtual coach, it offers counseling according to 7 important dimensions of quality of life. Activities, pain and fulfillment of the 7 dimensions of quality of life can be recorded in the application. Moreover, a report can be exported to enhance patient monitoring during clinical interactions. Dolodoc was developed with a user-centered approach and is based on scientific evidence related to the self-management of chronic pain. Indeed, counseling by the coach is based on a multimodal strategy, incorporating elements of physical activity, pacing, positive psychology, and relaxation, among others. Overall, Dolodoc is an innovation that can be used in various clinical settings with an individualized approach.

Dolodoc est une application ayant pour but d'améliorer l'autonomie et la qualité de vie des personnes vivant avec la douleur chronique. Conçue comme un coach virtuel, elle propose des conseils ainsi qu'un suivi d'activités se référant à 7 dimensions importantes pour la qualité de vie. Ces éléments sont consignables dans l'application et un rapport peut être exporté pour agrémenter le suivi du patient. Dolodoc a été développé selon une approche centrée sur l'utilisateur et se base sur des preuves scientifiques en lien avec l'autogestion des douleurs chroniques. En effet, les conseils sont multimodaux et intègrent, entre autres, l'activité physique, le pacing, la psychologie positive et la relaxation. Disponible gratuitement, Dolodoc est une innovation dont l'utilisation individualisée peut s'adapter à différents contextes cliniques.

[Chronic pain : from symptom to disease]. / La douleur chronique : du symptôme à la maladie.

At last, chronic pain, with its consequences and impact for patients and society, is now considered as a disease in its own in the 11th revision of the international classification of diseases (ICD). We present here in the light of two clinical cases, why the diagnosis of chronic primary pain is useful and how to utilize these new codes. We hope to rapidly see the awaited impact on the healthcare system (from the patient care to insurance issues), as on research and teaching.

La douleur chronique avec ses conséquences et son impact pour les patients et la société est enfin considérée comme une maladie à part entière dans la 11e révision de la Classification internationale des maladies (CIM). Nous présentons ici, à l'aide de deux vignettes, l'utilité du diagnostic de douleur chronique primaire et la façon d'utiliser les nouveaux codes. Nous espérons que l'impact attendu soit rapidement visible tant sur le système de santé (de la prise en charge des patients aux questions assécurologiques), que sur la recherche et l'enseignement.

The impact of a transversus abdominis plane block including clonidine vs. intrathecal morphine on nausea and vomiting after caesarean section: A randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Intrathecal morphine (ITM) is a widely used technique for postcaesarean section analgesia but entails a high risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is an alternative. OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that a TAP block including clonidine reduces the incidence of PONV after caesarean section when compared with ITM. DESIGN: A randomised, controlled, double-blinded study. SETTING: Geneva University Hospitals, Switzerland, from October 2013 to February 2017. PATIENTS: A total of 182 patients undergoing elective caesarean section were studied. Reasons for noninclusion were complicated pregnancy, contraindication to spinal anaesthesia or TAP block, extreme weight or height, allergy to any medication or previous median abdominal incision. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were allocated randomly to one of two groups (quadruple blinded): 100 µg of morphine added to the spinal local anaesthetic or a bilateral TAP block with 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.375% + 75 µg of clonidine on each side. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measure was the total number of patients presenting with PONV at 24 h. Secondary aims were to compare other adverse effects (pruritus, respiratory depression, hypotension, bradycardia, sedation), analgesic efficacy and the quality of postoperative recovery. RESULTS: At 24 h, there was no significant difference between ITM and TAP groups in the total number of patients presenting with PONV: 17/92 patients (18.5%, 95% confidence interval 11.1 to 27.9) and 27/88 patients (30.7%, 95% confidence interval 21.3 to 41.4) in TAP and ITM groups, respectively (P = 0.065). Pain scores at 6 h and cumulative morphine consumption at 24 h were lower in the ITM group (P < 0.0001 for morphine consumption at 24 h). The incidence of hypotension was higher in the TAP group (54.3 vs. 29.2%, P = 0.0006). Maternal satisfaction was high and not different between groups. CONCLUSION: A TAP block with clonidine and local anaesthetic does not reduce significantly the incidence of PONV compared with ITM. We confirm the superiority of ITM on acute postcaesarean section analgesia compared with a TAP block, even with clonidine as an adjunct. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01931215.

Intraoperative monitoring of analgesia using nociceptive reflexes correlates with delayed extubation and immediate postoperative pain: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Immediate postoperative pain could be prevented by the administration of long-lasting analgesics before the end of the anaesthesia. However, to prevent over or underdosing of analgesics under anaesthesia, tools are required to estimate the analgesia-nociception balance. OBJECTIVE: We investigated whether the pupillary dilation reflex (PDR) and the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) at the end of general anaesthesia correlate with immediate postoperative pain, as a sign of analgesic underdosing, and with delayed tracheal extubation as a sign of analgesic overdosing. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany, from May 2013 to April 2015. PATIENTS: A total of 110 patients scheduled for primary hip arthroplasty under general anaesthesia. OBSERVATIONS: Psychometric and clinical data were obtained preoperatively. The PDR and the NFR were assessed preoperatively and at the end of anaesthesia. Shortly after extubation of the trachea, patients rated their pain intensity. ENDPOINTS: The primary endpoint was the immediate postoperative numeric rating scale pain intensity (0 to 10) and the secondary endpoint was the length of the time interval between reflex measurements and tracheal extubation. RESULTS: PDR correlated significantly with the immediate postoperative pain intensity (Spearman's ρ = -0.28, P < 0.01). PDR and NFR correlated significantly with the time interval until extubation (ρ = 0.33/0.26, both P < 0.01). Multivariable linear regression models were able to predict 38% of the variability of immediate postoperative pain intensity and 44% of the variability of the time interval until extubation. The intraoperative nociceptive reflex thresholds were the strongest factors in both multivariable models, only exceeded by the preoperative reflex measurements in the model for postoperative pain. CONCLUSION: The investigated nociceptive reflexes reflected the analgesia-nociception balance under general anaesthesia. The preoperative reflexes provide additional information about individual subjective pain sensitivity. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien, DRKS (registration number DRKS00000665).

Comparison of trigeminal and spinal modulation of pain and nociception.

Modulation of pain and nociception by noxious counterstimulation, also called "diffuse noxious inhibitory controls" or DNIC-like effect, is often used in studies of pain disorders. It can be elicited in the trigeminal and spinal innervation areas, but no study has previously compared effects in both innervation areas. Therefore, we performed a study comparing DNIC-like effects on the nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) and the nociceptive blink reflex as well as the respective pain sensations. In 50 healthy volunteers, the blink reflex elicited with a concentric electrode and the NFR were recorded before and after immersion of the contralateral hand in cold water. Responses were recorded as the subjective pain sensation and the reflex size. The cold water immersion of the contralateral hand elicited a reduction of both subjective pain sensation and reflex amplitude following the stimulation of both reflexes. However, there were no strong correlations between the individual reductions of both subjective pain sensation and reflex amplitude for both reflexes, and neither when results of the two reflexes were compared with each other. The dissociation between DNIC-like effects on pain and on nociception, which had been found previously already for the NFR, implies that both effects need to be studied separately.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of three risk factors for chronic postsurgical pain: age, sex and preoperative pain.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) is a common and disabling postoperative complication. Several risk factors for CPSP have been established, but it is unclear whether they are significant for any type of surgery. This systematic review aimed to assess the risk of CPSP related to three known preoperative risk factors "age, sex and preoperative pain" in the adult population after any type of elective non-obstetrical surgery. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted a systematic literature search using PubMed and EMBASE databases retrieving 1458 abstracts; 320 publications were screened and 71 papers were included. Odds ratios were combined across studies and quality of evidence graded using GRADE. Sub-groups comparisons were conducted for type of surgery, time point for CPSP and definition of CPSP. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: The pooled unadjusted ORs were 1.34 for female sex, 2.43 for preoperative pain at surgical site, 1.75 for preoperative pain elsewhere and 3.95 for preoperative pain at an unspecified site. The pooled unadjusted OR for age was 2.04 in the younger (age midpoint <40 years) compared with the older population of patients (age midpoint >62.5 years). In the subgroup analysis, preoperative pain was a more important risk factor for orthopedic surgery and age for breast surgery. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review confirms that younger age, female sex, and preoperative pain are associated with higher risk of developing CPSP in any type of elective non-obstetrical surgery. However, effect sizes are small and quality of evidence low-moderate only, limiting comparisons of different types of surgery.

Preventing pain after breast surgery: A systematic review with meta-analyses and trial-sequential analyses.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to indirectly compare the efficacy of any intervention, administered perioperatively, on acute and persistent pain after breast surgery. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT: We searched for randomized trials comparing analgesic interventions with placebo or no treatment in patients undergoing breast surgery under general anaesthesia. Primary outcome was intensity of acute pain (up to 6 hr postoperatively). Secondary outcomes were cumulative 24-hr morphine consumption, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), and chronic pain. We used an original three-step approach. First, meta-analyses were performed when data from at least three trials could be combined; secondly, trial sequential analyses were used to separate conclusive from unclear evidence. And thirdly, the quality of evidence was rated with GRADE. RESULTS: Seventy-three trials (5,512 patients) tested loco-regional blocks (paravertebral, pectoralis), local anaesthetic infiltrations, oral gabapentinoids or intravenous administration of glucocorticoids, lidocaine, N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonists or alpha2 agonists. With paravertebral blocks, pectoralis blocks and glucocorticoids, there was conclusive evidence of a clinically relevant reduction in acute pain (visual analogue scale > 1.0 cm). With pectoralis blocks, and gabapentinoids, there was conclusive evidence of a reduction in the cumulative 24-hr morphine consumption (> 30%). With paravertebral blocks and glucocorticoids, there was conclusive evidence of a relative reduction in the incidence of PONV of 70%. For chronic pain, insufficient data were available. CONCLUSIONS: Mainly with loco-regional blocks, there is conclusive evidence of a reduction in acute pain intensity, morphine consumption and PONV incidence after breast surgery. For rational decision making, data on chronic pain are needed. SIGNIFICANCE: This quantitative systematic review compares eight interventions, published across 73 trials, to prevent pain after breast surgery, and grades their degree of efficacy. The most efficient interventions are paravertebral blocks, pectoralis blocks and glucocorticoids, with moderate to low evidence for the blocks. Intravenous lidocaine and alpha2 agonists are efficacious to a lesser extent, but with a higher level of evidence. Data for chronic pain are lacking.

Analysis of Memory Formation during General Anesthesia (Propofol/Remifentanil) for Elective Surgery Using the Process-dissociation Procedure.

BACKGROUND: There have been reports of memory formation during general anesthesia. The process-dissociation procedure has been used to determine if these are controlled (explicit/conscious) or automatic (implicit/unconscious) memories. This study used the process-dissociation procedure with the original measurement model and one which corrected for guessing to determine if more accurate results were obtained in this setting. METHODS: A total of 160 patients scheduled for elective surgery were enrolled. Memory for words presented during propofol and remifentanil general anesthesia was tested postoperatively by using a word-stem completion task in a process-dissociation procedure. To assign possible memory effects to different levels of anesthetic depth, the authors measured depth of anesthesia using the BIS XP monitor (Aspect Medical Systems, Norwood, MA). RESULTS: Word-stem completion performance showed no evidence of memory for intraoperatively presented words. Nevertheless, an evaluation of these data using the original measurement model for process-dissociation data suggested an evidence of controlled (C = 0.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-0.08) and automatic (A = 0.11; 95% CI 0.09-0.12) memory processes (P < 0.01). However, when the data were evaluated with an extended measurement model taking base rates into account adequately, no evidence for controlled (C = 0.00; 95% CI -0.04 to 0.04) or automatic (A = 0.00; 95% CI -0.02 to 0.02) memory processes was obtained. The authors report and discuss parallel findings for published data sets that were generated by using the process-dissociation procedure. CONCLUSION: Patients had no memories for auditory information presented during propofol/remifentanil anesthesia after midazolam premedication. The use of the process-dissociation procedure with the original measurement model erroneously detected memories, whereas the extended model, corrected for guessing, correctly revealed no memory.

Effects of sevoflurane and propofol on the nociceptive withdrawal reflex and on the H reflex.

BACKGROUND: The predominant target of anesthetics to suppress movement responses to noxious stimuli is located in the spinal cord. Although volatile anesthetics appear to produce immobility by actions on the ventral rather than the dorsal horn, the site of action of propofol remains unclear. METHODS: In a crossover design, the authors compared in 13 volunteers the effects of sevoflurane and propofol on the amplitudes of the H reflex, which is mediated exclusively in the ventral horn and a withdrawal reflex (RIII Reflex), which integrates dorsal and ventral horn function. The concentrations were adjusted according to a Dixon up-and-down approach, depending on movement responses to tetanic stimulation. RESULTS: Sevoflurane and propofol concentrations ranged from 1.2 to 1.6 Vol% and 3 to 6 mg/l, respectively. Sevoflurane reduced the H reflex amplitude significantly to 66 +/- 17% (mean +/- SD) of its control values. Propofol did not significantly reduce the H reflex. The reductions under the two drugs differed significantly. The RIII reflex amplitude was significantly reduced to 19 +/- 10% and 27 +/- 12% (mean +/- SD) of the control values by sevoflurane and propofol, respectively. The reductions did not differ between the drugs. CONCLUSIONS: Probably because of the polysynaptic relay, the attenuation of the withdrawal reflex exceeds the attenuation of the H reflex. Sevoflurane produces a larger inhibitory effect on the H reflex than propofol, which confirms that the ventral horn is a more important target for volatile anesthetics, whereas effects of propofol on this site of action are rather limited. Our findings indirectly suggest for propofol a relatively stronger effect within the dorsal horn.

Variability comparison of the composite auditory evoked potential index and the bispectral index during propofol-fentanyl anesthesia.

BACKGROUND: Monitors of hypnotic depth help anesthesiologists to guide the anesthetic. The performance of different monitors depends on several factors, index variability at a steady state of hypnotic depth being one. We compared the recently introduced AAI1.6 with the established bispectral index (BIS), regarding index variability during stable values of propofol effect-site concentration. METHODS: After ethics committee approval and written informed consent, anesthesia was performed in 40 patients with propofol as the target controlled infusion and fentanyl. Variability of BIS and AAI1.6 was calculated during periods of constant predicted propofol effect compartment concentration and constant levels of surgical stimulation as the median absolute deviation (MAD) from the median value. A variability index was calculated as 1.48*MAD/(threshold - median value), with threshold being the division line between awake and asleep. Threshold crossing time was used to evaluate the performance in predicting return of consciousness. RESULTS: Variability index, however, was significantly larger for the AAI1.6, despite similar absolute variability measured as MAD. Lightening of anesthesia before recovery could be noticed earlier using the BIS than the AAI1.6, although consciousness was detected with a significantly higher Pk-value by the AAI1.6. CONCLUSION: Variability in relation to the difference between the median index value during anesthesia and the threshold necessary to detect consciousness with high sensitivity is higher for the AAI1.6 than for the BIS. This, as well as the steeper concentration-response function found for AAI1.6, impairs the performance of the AAI1.6 in predicting imminent return of consciousness during decreasing propofol concentrations. However, it makes AAI1.6 well suited to detect consciousness when it has occurred.

Development of a Simple Preoperative Risk Score for Persistent Pain After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Persistent postoperative pain is reported by 30% to 50% of patients following breast cancer surgery. Studies testing preventive measures, however, have so far failed to produce consistent positive results. If preventive measures could be targeted to a subgroup of patients at high risk of persistent pain, positive results would be more likely. Our aim was to develop a simple risk score predicting persistent pain after breast cancer surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective observational cohort study, we tested the predictive ability of a 4 simple items score for persistent pain in 200 patients scheduled for breast cancer surgery. A multivariable logistic regression model was created for the outcome of clinically important pain at 4 months. RESULTS: On the basis of literature review and univariable analysis of our data, 4 parameters were selected: preoperative pain at the surgical site, history of depression, age below 50 years and expected pain of high intensity (>6/10). Points for the score are based on the coefficients of the logistic regression model. A total score ≥2 points/5 predicts a risk of developing clinically important pain at 4 months >30%, with an area under the curve-receiver operating characteristic of 0.81. DISCUSSION: We studied known risk factors for persistent pain in patients scheduled for breast cancer surgery and constructed a preoperative risk score simple enough to select high-risk patients in future prevention studies.

Ethanol reduces motoneuronal excitability and increases presynaptic inhibition of Ia afferents in the human spinal cord.

INTRODUCTION: Already low blood concentrations of ethanol acutely impair motor control and coordination. In vitro experiments have given evidence that spinal effects of ethanol contribute to this by reducing spinal excitability and enhancing presynaptic inhibition of Ia fibers. In this study, we investigated the influence of 0.7 g per kilogram of bodyweight ethanol on motoneuronal excitability and presynaptic inhibition in humans. METHODS: The study was performed in 10 volunteers. Spinal excitability was measured by the maximal H-reflex of the soleus muscle normalized to the maximal muscular response (Hmax/Mmax). Presynaptic inhibition was measured by changes in heteronymous Ia-facilitation of the soleus H-reflex, which is achieved by stimulation of the femoral nerve. A decrease in facilitation can be ascribed to an increase in presynaptic inhibition. Changes of these parameters under the influence of 0.7 g per kilogram of bodyweight ethanol were assessed in comparison to control measurements before ethanol application. RESULTS: Both parameters, Hmax/Mmax and Heteronymous facilitation, were significantly reduced under the influence of ethanol (Wilcoxon signed-rank test with Bonferroni correction for each, p<0.01). DISCUSSION: The increase in presynaptic inhibition by ethanol is probably caused by an increase in GABAA receptor-mediated Cl-conductance, which has been shown in spinal cord cultures. The role of presynaptic inhibition in movement is assumed to be there to control the afferent input of muscle spindles and tendon organs as a mechanism of specific input-selection. This study demonstrated that ethanol reduces spinal excitability and increases GABAergic presynaptic inhibition on Ia afferent fibers in humans.

Prediction of Acute Postoperative Pain Following Breast Cancer Surgery Using the Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire: A Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: Previous studies have indicated that preoperative pain sensitivity correlates with postoperative pain intensity, and thus may be used to predict severe postoperative pain. Self-rating of pain sensitivity using the "Pain Sensitivity Questionnaire (PSQ)" may be an adjunct to these measures. METHODS: We tested the predictive ability of the PSQ as well as experimental parameters of pain sensitivity and other known risk factors for acute pain in 198 patients scheduled for breast cancer surgery. A multivariable logistic regression model was created for the binary outcome "maximum pain >3 during the first 24 hours postoperatively." RESULTS: The PSQ score proved to be an independent risk factor for at least moderate pain during the first 24 hours after surgery. Univariate analysis yielded in addition younger age, type of surgery (mastectomy vs. breast-conserving surgery), axillary dissection, expected pain, and the anxiety scores of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, as well as the score of the Beck Depression Inventory as risk factors. Of the experimental parameters of pain sensitivity, only the pain intensity elicited by a hot water bath was a predictor of at least moderate postoperative pain. Multivariable analysis led to a parsimonious model including only PSQ, the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory state score with a cutoff of ≥30, age with a cutoff of <55, mastectomy (vs. breast-conserving surgery), and axillary dissection. DISCUSSION: Results need to be validated in a larger cohort and for other types of surgery, but use of the simple PSQ may help to identify patients at risk of intense acute postoperative pain.

H-reflex depression by propofol and sevoflurane is dependent on stimulus intensity.

OBJECTIVE: The H-reflex has been widely used to investigate effects of drugs on motoneuron excitability in humans. However, up to now no systematic investigation has been done to examine the effects at different stimulus intensities. Here, the M. soleus recruitment curves were compared under influence of propofol and sevoflurane with control conditions to investigate these stimulus intensity dependent effects. METHODS: The study was performed in 10 volunteers for propofol and sevoflurane each, aged 23-32 years. The M. soleus H-reflex was evoked by stimulation of the tibial nerve. Recruitment curves were gained by increasing the stimulation current stepwise from below the threshold of a minimal H-reflex up to a maximal (m-response. Measurements were performed under the influence of the respective drug (2mg/l propofol, 0.8 vol% sevoflurane) and compared to control measurements before and after drug administration. RESULTS: The relative amount of depression of the H-reflex at high stimulus intensities is for both drugs significantly (p<0.001, Friedman's test) lower than at low stimulus intensities. CONCLUSIONS: Stimulus dependent effects have to be taken into consideration when experimental settings to investigate the effects of drugs on the H-reflex are being designed. According to the size principle of motoneuron excitation, it can also be assumed that under the influence of propofol and sevoflurane larger motoneurons are not depressed in the same amount as smaller motoneurons. SIGNIFICANCE: Different drug effects on the H-reflex at different stimulus intensities are not only of methodological importance, but also indicate different drug effects on motoneurons of different sizes.

Reliability of subjective pain ratings and nociceptive flexion reflex responses as measures of conditioned pain modulation.

BACKGROUND: The endogenous modulation of pain can be assessed through conditioned pain modulation (CPM), which can be quantified using subjective pain ratings or nociceptive flexion reflexes. However, to date, the test-retest reliability has only been investigated for subjective pain ratings. OBJECTIVE: To compare the test-retest reliability of CPM-induced changes, measured using subjective pain ratings and nociceptive flexion reflexes, to provide a reliable scoring parameter for future studies. METHOD: A total of 40 healthy volunteers each received painful electrical stimuli to the sural nerve to elicit nociceptive flexion reflexes. Reflex sizes and subjective pain ratings were recorded before and during the immersion of the contralateral hand in hot water to induce CPM as well as innocuous water as control. Measurements were repeated in a retest 28 days later. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients showed good test-retest reliabilities of CPM during the hot water stimulus for both scoring parameters. Subjective pain ratings also correlated between test and retest during the control stimulus. CONCLUSIONS: Subjective pain ratings and nociceptive flexion reflexes show comparable test-retest reliabilities, but they reflect different components of CPM. While subjective pain ratings appear to incorporate cognitive influences to a larger degree, reflex responses appear to reflect spinal nociception more purely.

Habituation of the nociceptive flexion reflex is dependent on inter-stimulus interval and stimulus intensity.

The nociceptive flexion reflex (NFR) has become a popular tool in experimental and clinical pain research. However, the gradual decrease of the reflex size during repeated application of stimuli, which is termed habituation, may reduce its validity and the comparability of studies. We investigated the degree of habituation at different inter-stimulus intervals (ISI) commonly used in clinical studies and the dependency of habituation on stimulus intensity. Thirty subjects each received 12 sets of 50 stimuli to elicit the NFR at ISI of 1, 3, 6 and 10s, each at stimulus intensities of 1 ×, 1.5 × and 2 × the individual NFR-threshold. For each of the sets, the habituation was calculated as the relative size of the average of the last 10 reflexes compared to the average of the first 10 reflexes. The influence of the factors ISI and stimulus intensity, as well as the factor interaction, was tested using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Analysis proved that influences of ISI and stimulus intensity on reflex habituation were significant (p < 0.01, two-way ANOVA), while the interaction between the two factors had no significant influence (p = 0.99). We conclude that habituation of the NFR is dependent on ISI and stimulus intensity. Lower stimulus intensities and shorter ISI lead to stronger habituation. Therefore, to ensure habituation is avoided during repeated elicitation of the NFR, stimulation should be conducted according to the ISI for the respective stimulus intensities presented here.

Prediction of motor responses to surgical stimuli during bilateral orchiectomy of pigs using nociceptive flexion reflexes and the bispectral index derived from the electroencephalogram.

Movement responses to noxious stimuli during anaesthesia indicate nociception. Under experimental conditions consistent prediction of such movement responses has been achieved by the use of nociceptive flexion reflexes (NFRs). The aim of this study was to investigate the reliability of NFRs and the electroencephalogram bispectral index (BIS) in predicting motor responses to real surgical stimuli in pigs. The study was undertaken in 30 pigs undergoing bilateral orchiectomy under ketamine/azaperone anaesthesia. During the operation, movement responses to seven distinct surgical steps that provided noxious stimuli of different intensity were evaluated. Any movement response of limbs or the head was considered as a positive response. For each surgical step the values of NFRs and the BIS obtained just prior to the step were tested as predictors of movement responses. The prediction probability for movement responses was 0.58±0.04 for the BIS and 0.76±0.03 for the NFRs. It was concluded that NFRs but not the BIS can predict the effectiveness of ketamine anaesthesia in terms of the suppression of movement responses to surgical stimuli.

Validation of core competencies during residency training in anaesthesiology.

BACKGROUND AND GOAL: Curriculum development for residency training is increasingly challenging in times of financial restrictions and time limitations. Several countries have adopted the CanMEDS framework for medical education as a model into their curricula of specialty training. The purpose of the present study was to validate the competency goals, as derived from CanMEDS, of the Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine of the Berlin Charité University Medical Centre, by conducting a staff survey. These goals for the qualification of specialists stipulate demonstrable competencies in seven areas: expert medical action, efficient collaboration in a team, communications with patients and family, management and organisation, lifelong learning, professional behaviour, and advocacy of good health. We had previously developed a catalogue of curriculum items based on these seven core competencies. In order to evaluate the validity of this catalogue, we surveyed anaesthetists at our department in regard to their perception of the importance of each of these items. In addition to the descriptive acquisition of data, it was intended to assess the results of the survey to ascertain whether there were differences in the evaluation of these objectives by specialists and registrars. METHODS: The questionnaire with the seven adapted CanMEDS Roles included items describing each of their underlying competencies. Each anaesthetist (registrars and specialists) working at our institution in May of 2007 was asked to participate in the survey. Individual perception of relevance was rated for each item on a scale similar to the Likert system, ranging from 1 (highly relevant) to 5 (not at all relevant), from which ratings means were calculated. For determination of reliability, we calculated Cronbach's alpha. To assess differences between subgroups, we performed analysis of variance. RESULTS: All seven roles were rated as relevant. Three of the seven competency goals (expert medical action, efficient collaboration in a team, and communication with patients and family) achieved especially high ratings. Only a few items differed significantly in their average rating between specialists and registrars. CONCLUSIONS: We succeeded in validating the relevance of the adapted seven CanMEDS competencies for residency training within our institution. So far, many countries have adopted the Canadian Model, which indicates the great practicability of this competency-based model in curriculum planning. Roles with higher acceptance should be prioritised in existing curricula. It would be desirable to develop and validate a competency-based curriculum for specialty training in anaesthesiology throughout Germany by conducting a national survey to include specialists as well as registrars in curriculum development.