Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 33(5): 879-885, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30506299

RESUMO

Epidural maintenance technique for labour analgesia updates constantly. Thanks to infusion pumps, the recently developed programmed intermittent epidural bolus (PIEB) may reduce the use of anesthetic drugs and minimize unintended consequences such as cardio or neurotoxicity. Nevertheless, it is not yet a general practice. So far, there are no comparative studies in the literature that address levobupivacaine-based CEI + PCEA versus CEI + PIEB + PCEA. A randomized double-blind trial was carried out to evaluate if PIEB could reduce local anesthetic use compare to PCEA. Primiparous pregnant patients were divided into two groups: PIEB group (continuous infusion plus intermittent automatic doses) and PCEA group (continuous infusion plus PCEA). The primary objective was to analyze the differences between both groups regarding levobupivacaine total dose. The secondary objectives were to find out the differences concerning pain control, motor blockage, satisfaction score, labour time and delivery outcomes. Statistical analyses were done by protocol. The study recruited 200 patients (103 PIEB, 97 PCEA). The total dose administered was significantly higher in PIEB group: PCEA group 52.97 mg, IC 95% 45.65-60.28 mg and PIEB group 62.04 mg, IC 95% 55.46-68.61 mg (p = 0.021). PIEB group required fewer top up boluses (median value1; range 0-2) than CEI + PCEA group (median value 6; range 3-9) p < 0.05. Satisfaction scores were higher in PIEB group (p = 0.039, CI 95% 1.23-1.42). CEI + PIEB was found to be a good alternative to CEI + PCEA with very high rates of satisfaction in both groups although it was higher in PIEB group. PIEB group required fewer PCEA boluses. Further studies are needed to determine the best approach for epidural pain management.Clinical Trial Number and Registry URL: NCT03133091 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03133091?term=MB+Rodriguez&rank=1) .


Assuntos
Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Analgesia Obstétrica/métodos , Analgesia Controlada pelo Paciente/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Levobupivacaína/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Analgésicos/administração & dosagem , Anestesia Epidural , Método Duplo-Cego , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Trabalho de Parto , Estudos Longitudinais , Manejo da Dor , Medição da Dor , Paridade , Gravidez , Adulto Jovem
2.
Rev. mex. anestesiol ; 43(1): 60-63, ene.-mar. 2020. graf
Artigo em Espanhol | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1347689

RESUMO

Resumen: El síndrome de Moebius es una entidad rara que puede acompañarse de alteraciones que dificulten la anestesia, tales como dificultad de venoclisis, mayor incidencia de depresión respiratoria o de vía aérea difícil. En ocasiones se presenta de forma atípica y puede tener alteraciones del gen RyR con susceptibilidad a hipertermia maligna. Nuestro objetivo en este caso clínico es revisar la preparación necesaria para estos pacientes previa al acto anestésico y quirúrgico, centrándonos en la hipertermia maligna.


Abstract. Moebius syndrome is an uncommon illness that can be associated with different alterations related to anesthesia such as difficult peripheral venous catheterization, more respiratory failure incidence or difficult airway. When this syndrome is accompanied by atypical presentation it can be associated with RyR gen alterations and malignant hyperthermia susceptibility. Our objective with this case is to review which is the preparation required in order to a general anesthesia, focusing on malignant hyperthermia.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA