Comparison of insertion characteristics of LMA ProSeal from the front and head-end of the patient: A randomized pilot study.

Background and Aims: LMA ProSeal (PLMA) is a commonly used airway maintenance device in elective procedures and is routinely inserted from the head-end of the patient. It is also used in pre-hospital emergencies where it may not always be possible to access the head-end. This study aims to compare the insertion characteristics of PLMA when inserted while standing, either at the head-end or from the front. Material and Methods: After institutional ethics committee approval, 60 consenting patients of either sex, between 18 and 60 years, ASA class I/II, and scheduled to undergo elective surgeries were randomly allocated to either group H (head-end insertion) or group F (front-end insertion). Patients with anticipated difficult airway, chronic respiratory disease, obesity, and who were pregnant were excluded. Insertion time, ease of insertion, fiber optic view, ease of drain tube insertion, number of attempts and success rate were noted. Normally distributed quantitative variables were compared using t-test, and qualitative variables were compared using Chi-squared test. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: Insertion time in group H (23.76 ± 4.48 s) was lesser than in group F (30.53 ± 6.23s) (P = 0.027). Ease of insertion (P = 0.052), fiber optic view, ease of drain tube placement (P = 1.000), and number of attempts (P = 1.000) were comparable among the groups. Conclusion: Although the insertion time from the front is longer than from the head-end, the other insertion characteristics of PLMA including ease of its insertion, placement and success rate of placement are similar when it is inserted from the front or from the head-end. It is an appropriate airway device for securing the airway when the head-end is inaccessible.

Retention of Knowledge and Efficacy of a Hands-on Training Session in Oxygen Therapy for COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers.

Introduction: We conducted basic hands-on training in oxygen therapy and ventilatory management of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients to health care workers (HCWs) at our tertiary care hospital. We designed this study aiming to find out the impact of hands-on training in oxygen therapy for COVID-19 patients on the knowledge and degree of retention of this gained knowledge 6 weeks after the training session among HCWs. Materials and methods: The study was conducted after obtaining approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. A structured questionnaire consisting of 15 multiple-choice questions was given to the individual HCW. This was followed by a structured 1-hour training session on "Oxygen therapy in COVID-19", following which the same questionnaire was given to the HCWs with the questions in a different order. After 6 weeks, the same questionnaire with questions in a different format was sent to the participants as a Google form. Results: A total of 256 responses were obtained for the pre-training test and post-training test. The median [IQR] pre-training test scores and post-training test scores were 8 [7-10] and 12 [10-13], respectively. The median retention score was 11 [9-12]. The retention scores were significantly higher than the pre-test scores. Conclusion: About 89% of the HCWs had a significant gain of knowledge. About 76% of the HCWs were able to retain knowledge, which also means the training program was successful. A definitive improvement in baseline knowledge was observed after 6 weeks of training. We propose conducting reinforcement training after 6 weeks of primary training to further augment retention. How to cite this article: Singh A, Salhotra R, Bajaj M, Saxena AK, Sharma SK, Singh D, et al. Retention of Knowledge and Efficacy of a Hands-on Training Session in Oxygen Therapy for COVID-19 among Healthcare Workers. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(2):127-131.

Comparison of face-to-face tracheal intubation and conventional head-end tracheal intubation using Airtraq™ video-laryngoscope in adults - A randomised study.

Background and Aims: Tracheal intubation can be difficult in certain scenarios where the head-end of the patient is not accessible as in entrapped casualties. A face-to-face technique using a video-laryngoscope can prove to be useful in such scenarios. However, the two positions of tracheal intubation namely, face-to-face and head-end, using video-laryngoscope have never been compared in patients. Material and Methods: Fifty patients of either sex, between 18 and 60 years, ASA class I/II, MPC I/II, scheduled to undergo surgical operations requiring general anesthesia with tracheal intubation were randomly allocated to either Group F (face-to-face intubation) or Group H (head-end intubation). Intubation was performed using Airtraq™ video-laryngoscope in both groups. Time taken for successful intubation, device insertion time, glottic view as per Cormack and Lehane (CL) grade, ease, attempts, the incidence of failed intubation, and hemodynamic parameters were noted. Results: The time taken for successful intubation in Group F was significantly longer than in Group H (38.09 ± 19.45 s vs. 19.32 ± 9.86 s, respectively; P < 0.001). Three cases of failed intubation were noted in Group F compared to none in Group H (P = 0.235). Glottic view, ease, attempts, and hemodynamic parameters were comparable among the groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The time taken for successful tracheal intubation was longer in face-to-face technique than in head-end technique in patients with the normal airway. However, both techniques were similar in terms of glottic view, ease of intubation and number of intubation attempts, the incidence of failed intubation, and hemodynamic changes. Therefore, face-to-face tracheal intubation is a good alternative to secure the airway when the head-end is not accessible.

Use of Pearson and Spearman correlation testing in Indian anesthesia journals: An audit.

Background and Aims: Correct usage and interpretation of biostatistical tests is imperative. Aim of the present article was to evaluate the use of "correlation test" for biostatistical analysis in two leading Indian journals of anesthesia and sensitize the readers regarding its correct usage. Material and Methods: A prospective analysis was done for all original articles using the correlation test (Pearson or Spearman) that were published in "Indian Journal of Anaesthesia" (IJA) or "Journal of Anaesthesiology and Clinical Pharmacology" (JOACP) in the years 2019 and 2020. Results: Amongst all included original studies, correlation test were used in 6% (JOACP) and 6.5% (IJA) respectively (averaged for the years 2019 and 2020). Correlation test was usedinappropriately) for evaluating an aim of prediction/agreement/comparison, rather than association, in 25% and 10% instances each (JOACP and IJA). In both JOACP and IJA, there were high rates of using and interpreting results without citing 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of correlation coefficient (88% and 90%, respectively), P value for significance of the association (50% and 90%, respectively), or coefficient of discrimination (88% and 70%, respectively). In majority of the instances, test to ascertain presence of mandatory prerequisites such as normal distribution of data could not be found (62% and 90%, respectively). Conclusion: The complete potential of correlation test in exploring research questions is probably underappreciated. Further, even when used, its application and interpretation are prone to errors. We hope that the present analysis and narrative is a well-timed appropriate step in bridging the gaps in existing knowledge regarding use of correlation test in national anesthesia literature.

Suppression of perioperative stress response in elective abdominal surgery: A randomized comparison between dexmedetomidine and epidural block.

Background and Aims: Stress response after surgery induces local and systemic inflammation which may be detrimental if it goes unchecked. Blockade of afferent neurons or inhibition of hypothalamic function may mitigate the stress response. Material and Methods: A total of 50 consenting adult ASA I/II patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery were randomized to receive either dexmedetomidine (Group D) or epidural bupivacaine (Group E) in addition to balanced general anesthesia. Laparoscopic surgery, contraindications to epidural administration, history of psychiatric disorders, obesity (BMI >30 kg/m2), on beta blockers or continuous steroid therapy for >5 days over last 1 year, and known case of endocrine abnormalities or malignancy were excluded. Serum cortisol, blood glucose, and blood urea were estimated. Hemodynamic parameters, total dose of dexmedetomidine, bupivacaine, emergence characteristics, and analgesic consumption over 24 h postoperatively were recorded. Statistical comparisons were done using Student's t-test, repeated measure analysis of variance followed by Dunnett's test, generalized linear model and Chi-square/Fisher's exact test. A P value <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Serum cortisol levels were significantly lower in group E than group D 24 h after surgery (P = 0.029). Intraoperative and postoperative glucose level was lower in group E compared with group D. Time to request of first rescue analgesic was longer in group E than group D (P = 0.040). There was no significant difference between the number of doses of paracetamol required in the postoperative period (P = 0.198). Conclusion: Epidural bupivacaine was more effective than intravenous dexmedetomidine for suppression of neuroendocrine and metabolic response to surgery. Dexmedetomidine provided better hemodynamic stability at the time of noxious stimuli and postoperatively.

Efficacy of fixed-dose phenylephrine bolus for treating post-spinal hypotension: Comparison between pre-eclamptics and normotensives.

Background and Aims: Pre-eclamptic parturients may have an exaggerated response to vasopressors. This study compares the efficacy of a 50 µg fixed bolus of phenylephrine for treatment of post-spinal hypotension in pre-eclamptic versus normotensive parturients. Material and Methods: After written informed consent and ethics committee approval, 30 normotensive and 30 pre-eclamptic parturients between 18 and 40 years with singleton term pregnancy about to undergo cesarean section (CS) under spinal anesthesia were included. Post-spinal hypotension was treated with a 50 µg fixed bolus of phenylephrine. The cumulative dose of phenylephrine, the number of boluses, and the median dose required to treat the first hypotensive episode, total number of hypotensive episodes, maternal side effects, neonatal appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration (APGAR) scores, and umbilical arterial cord blood pH were noted. Statistical analysis was done using Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, Chi-square test/Fisher's exact test as appropriate. A P <0.05 was considered significant. Results: The cumulative dose and number of boluses of phenylephrine required to treat post-spinal hypotension were comparable. The median dose required to treat the first episode of post-spinal hypotension was also similar (p = 0.792). The time to develop the first hypotensive episode was significantly earlier for group N (p = 0.002). The efficacy of a single fixed bolus of 50 µg phenylephrine was similar in both groups (p = 1.000). Neonatal median APGAR scores at 1 min after birth were significantly higher for group N (p = 0.016). Conclusion: A fixed-dose bolus of 50 µg phenylephrine is safe and effective in treating post-spinal hypotension in pre-eclampsia. The efficacy of phenylephrine is comparable in pre-eclamptic and normotensive parturients.

Acute Kidney Injury in Severe Preeclamptic Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit: Epidemiology and Role of Serum Neutrophil Gelatinase-associated Lipocalcin.

BACKGROUND: Patients with preeclampsia admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) may have risk factors for acute kidney injury (AKI). Although the use of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalcin (NGAL) to predict AKI is previously validated, we could locate only scanty data regarding the epidemiology of AKI and role of NGAL in preeclamptic patients admitted to ICU. METHODS: Patients with preeclampsia admitted to our ICU were included. The incidence and severity of AKI during the entire ICU stay were assessed using kidney disease improving global outcomes criteria, while the a priori risk factors and serum NGAL were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 52 preeclamptic patients admitted to ICU were included, among whom the majority had eclampsia (75%). AKI developed in 25 (48.1%) patients with stages 1, 2, and 3 in 56, 36, and 8%, respectively. The incidence of sepsis (16 vs 0%), shock (40 vs 7.4%), and anemia (84 vs 59.3%) was significantly greater in patients with AKI (p < 0.05). ICU mortality (28 vs 3.7%), duration of ICU, and hospital stay were significantly higher in patients who developed AKI (p < 0.05). There was no association of serum NGAL [274 (240-335) ng/mL] with AKI or the mortality (p = 0.725, 0.861); there was, however, a significant discriminatory value for eclampsia [p = 0.019; area under curve = 0.736 (95% confidence interval: 0.569-0.904)]. CONCLUSIONS: Although AKI is common among patients with preeclampsia admitted to ICU, serum NGAL does not predict its occurrence. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Tyagi A, Yadav P, Salhotra R, Das S, Singh PK, Garg D. Acute Kidney Injury in Severe Preeclamptic Patients Admitted to Intensive Care Unit: Epidemiology and Role of Serum Neutrophil Gelatinase-associated Lipocalcin. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(9):1013-1019.

Fentanyl versus nalbuphine for intubating conditions during awake fiberoptic bronchoscopy: A randomized double-blind comparative study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patient cooperation, sedation, anxiolysis, and topicalization are important prerequisites for the successful and safe conduct of awake intubation. Because of the pharmacological properties, opioids can facilitate this process. Fentanyl is an opioid agonist and nalbuphine is an agonist-antagonist. This study aims to compare these two opioids for their effect on sedation and intubating conditions during awake fiberoptic intubation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This randomized double-blind controlled study was conducted on 62 ASA I/II patients of either sex between the age of 20 and 60 years, weight between 40 and 80 kg, with MP class I/II airways requiring general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation. All patients received standard airway topicalization and nebulization. Patients were randomly allocated to one of the two groups according to a computer-generated random number table. Group F (n = 31) received fentanyl 2 µg/kg i.v. and group N (n = 31) received nalbuphine 0.2 mg/kg i.v. over 10 min before intubation. Fiberoptic intubation was attempted and lignocaine spray and propofol boluses were administered as and when required. Hemodynamic responses and intubating conditions were recorded. Repeated measure ANOVA, McNemar test, and Chi-square test or Fischer's exact test were used for data analysis. A P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Cough score (P = 0.458), post-intubation score (P = 1.000), and sedation score (P = 1.000) were comparable among the two groups. Hemodynamic responses and propofol and lignocaine requirements were also comparable. CONCLUSION: Both fentanyl and nalbuphine provide comparable intubating conditions when used before awake fiberoptic intubation with minimal adverse effects on hemodynamic profile.

Confirmation of placement of endotracheal tube - A comparative observational pilot study of three ultrasound methods.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Confirmation of endotracheal tube (ETT) position is necessary to ensure proper ventilation. The present study was conducted with the aim to compare the efficacy of three ultrasonographic (USG) techniques in terms of time taken for confirmation of ETT position. The time taken by each USG technique was also compared with that for auscultation and capnography. The ability of the three USG techniques to identify tracheal placement of ETT was evaluated in all patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety adult American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II patients requiring general anaesthesia with tracheal intubation were randomised into three groups (n = 30 each) depending upon the initial USG transducer position used to confirm tracheal placement of ETT: group T (tracheal), group P (pleural) and group D (diaphragm). The time taken for confirmation of tracheal placement of ETT by USG, auscultation and capnography was recorded for each of the groups. Subsequently, USG confirmation of ETT placement was performed with the other two USG techniques in all patients. RESULTS: The time taken for USG in group T was significantly less (3.8 ± 0.9 s) compared to group P (12.1 ± 1.6 s) and group D (13.8 ± 1.7 s); P < 0.001. USG was significantly faster than both auscultation and capnography in group T (P < 0.001), whereas in group P and group D, USG took longer time compared to auscultation (P = 0.014 and P < 0.001, respectively) but lesser time than capnography (P < 0.001 in both groups). CONCLUSION: USG is a rapid technique for identification of ETT placement. All the three USG techniques are reliable in identifying the tracheal placement of ETT.

Isobaric ropivacaine with or without dexmedetomidine for surgery of neck femur fracture under subarachnoid block.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Dexmedetomidine has a promising role as an intrathecal adjuvant. However it's role as an adjuvant to ropivacaine has not been evaluated extensively. This study is designed to find out the effect of addition of dexmedetomidine 5 µg to isobaric ropivacaine 18.75 mg on block characteristics and hemodynamic parameters in patients undergoing surgeries for fracture neck of femur under subarachnoid block (SAB). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-one American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class I or II patients between 18-60 years undergoing surgeries for fracture neck of femur under SAB were recruited and randomized into two groups. Thirty patients in Group RN received 2.5 ml isobaric ropivacaine 0.75% (18.75 mg) with 0.5 ml normal saline (NS) to make a total volume of 3 ml, while 31 patients in Group RD received 2.5 ml isobaric ropivacaine 0.75% with dexmedetomidine 5 µg diluted with NS to make a total volume of 3 ml. The block characteristics, hemodynamic parameters, and side effects were recorded in both the groups. RESULTS: Patients in Group RD had significantly longer duration of sensory block (202.90 ± 50.2 min) compared to Group RN (157.33 ± 31.6 min), P < 0.001. Time to first rescue analgesia request was significantly longer in the Group RD compared to Group RN (265.16 ± 71.4 min vs 203.67 ± 35.6 min, respectively) (P < 0.001). However, the sensory block onset, maximum block height, time to two dermatomal regression, and motor block intensity remained unaltered. Incidence of side effects like hypotension, bradycardia, nausea, vomiting, and shivering were statistically similar in both the groups. CONCLUSION: Addition of 5 µg dexmedetomidine enhances the analgesic effect of intrathecal 18.75 mg isobaric ropivacaine for the conduct of fracture neck of femur surgeries with minimal adverse events.

Intrathecal ropivacaine with or without tramadol for lower limb orthopedic surgeries.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Preservative free tramadol has been used as an adjuvant to intrathecal bupivacaine. However, the effect of the addition of tramadol on intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine has never been studied. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted in 50 adult male American Society of Anesthesiologists grade I or II patients, aged 18-60 years, being operated for unilateral femur fractures. An epidural catheter was inserted in L2-L3 interspace and subarachnoid block was given in L3-L4 space. The patients were randomized to receive 0.5 mL normal saline (group R) or 0.5 mL (25 mg) preservative free tramadol (group RT) with 2.5 mL of 0.75% intrathecal ropivacaine. Hemodynamic parameters, sensory level, motor block, sedation and side-effects were recorded. Statistical analysis was done using Student's t-test, Chi-square test, Fischer's exact test and repeated measures ANOVA. RESULTS: The time of sensory block onset was 9.2 ± 4.9 min and 8.6 ± 5.3 min (P = 0.714) in group R and group RT, respectively. The motor block onset was also comparable in both the groups (P = 0.112). The duration of sensory block was 147.2 ± 37.4 min in group R and 160.4 ± 40.9 min in group RT (P = 0.252). The median maximum block height achieved in both the groups was T6 and the time to achieve the maximum block was also comparable statistically (P = 0.301). CONCLUSION: The addition of intrathecal tramadol 25 mg to the isobaric ropivacaine does not alter the block characteristics produced by intrathecal ropivacaine alone.

Minimum effective volume of normal saline for epidural volume extension.

BACKGROUND: Rescue strategies like changes in tilt of table are used to raise the level of an inadequate sensory block following intrathecal injection. Epidural volume extension (EVE) refers to an injection of normal saline through epidural catheter following an intrathecal block. It results in a rapid increase in the sensory level of subarachnoid block. Thus, it has been postulated that EVE may be used as a rescue strategy for an inadequate post-spinal sensory block. However, the minimum effective volume (MEV) of normal saline for EVE induced increase in level of spinal block has not been researched till date. We proposed to determine the MEV of normal saline required for EVE induced increase in post-spinal block sensory level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective sequential allocation study was conducted in consenting adult males after institutional ethical committee approval scheduled for lower limb surgery under combined spinal epidural (CSE) anesthesia, who had an inadequate level of sensory block. Herein, an inadequate level was defined as lower than T10 at 10 min after the intrathecal injection, with no ascent for two consecutive readings taken 2 min apart. The EVE was performed with normal saline injected through epidural catheter, and was considered successful if the level of sensory block increased by two or more dermatomal segments within 5 min of the injection. The volume of normal saline for EVE was decided by using the up-and-down method, with the first patient receiving 10 mL and a dosing interval of 1 mL in subsequent patients. The analysis was done using the formula of Dixon and Massey, which enabled calculation of the MEV with 95% CI. Quantitative parametric data is represented as mean ± SD and nonparametric data as median (range). RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: The MEV of normal saline to raise the level of sensory block by two or more dermatomal segments within 5 min of EVE is 7.4 mL (95% CI: 5.5-9.9 mL).

Is midazolam superior to triclofos and hydroxyzine as premedicant in children?

BACKGROUND: Search for an ideal premedicant drug for children is still on. A prospective, randomized trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of midazolam, triclofos and hydroxyzine as premedication in children undergoing lower abdominal surgeries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty American Society of Anesthesiologists I or II patients 2-8 years of age, scheduled for elective lower abdominal surgery were included. The patients were randomly divided into three groups M, T and H of 20 children each who received midazolam 0.5 mg/kg, triclofos 75 mg/kg and hydroxyzine 0.5 mg/kg respectively, orally 60 min before surgery. The acceptability of drugs, level of sedation, anxiety during separation and on mask application was assessed. RESULTS: The acceptability of midazolam and hydroxyzine was better than triclofos. Hydroxyzine was found to have lesser sedative effect as compared to both midazolam and triclofos. No major adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSION: Midazolam was found to be a better premedicant in terms of sedation, anxiolysis and safety.

Effect of Preoperative Oral Carbohydrate Intake on Perioperative Hyperglycemia in Indian Patients Undergoing Hip Fracture Fixation.

Objective: Preoperative fasting leads to a catabolic state aggravated by surgical stress. This leads to poor patient outcomes. This study aimed to determine the effect of preoperative oral carbohydrate administration on perioperative hyperglycemia and patient comfort. Methods: This prospective, randomized study was conducted on 60 adult American Society of Anesthesiologist I/II patients undergoing hip fracture fixation after obtaining institutional ethical committee clearance. Patients were randomly kept conventionally fasted before surgery (group F, n = 30) or were given oral carbohydrate 2 h before surgery (group C, n = 30). Under all aseptic precautions, a combined spinal epidural block was administered, and surgery was allowed. The primary outcome was blood glucose, and secondary outcomes included incidence of postoperative hyperglycemia, insulin level, blood urea, hunger, thirst, and anxiety. Results: Blood glucose levels were not statistically different between the two groups at baseline (T0; P=0.400), immediately after surgery (T1; P=0.399) and 24h after surgery (T2; P=0.619). The incidence of postoperative hyperglycemia was significantly higher in group F than in group C (P=0.045) at T2. Insulin levels, blood urea levels, and hunger scores were also not statistically different between the groups. The thirst and anxiety scores were lower at T0 and T1 in group C. Conclusion: Preoperative oral carbohydrate administration does not prevent perioperative increases in blood glucose levels. However, it reduces the incidence of perioperative hyperglycemia and decreases perioperative thirst and anxiety, thereby improving the quality of perioperative patient care.

Comparison of Nalbuphine Versus Clonidine as an Adjuvant to Intrathecal Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Orthopedic Lower Limb Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Double-Blind Study.

BACKGROUND: Nalbuphine and clonidine are used as adjuvants to intrathecal local anesthetics, but studies on their comparative efficacy have shown inconsistent results. This study aimed to compare nalbuphine, clonidine, or normal saline as adjuvants to intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine in orthopedic lower limb surgeries.  Method: Sixty-three American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) I/II patients between 18 and 60 years old with lower limb fractures were randomized into three groups (n=21 each). Patients with contraindications to spinal block, bilateral lower limb fractures, or long-term opioid therapy were excluded. The subarachnoid block was given in L3-L4 interspace. Group N received 1 mg of nalbuphine, group Cl received 30 mcg of clonidine, and group C received 0.5 ml of normal saline with 15 mg (0.5%) of hyperbaric bupivacaine. Sensory and motor block characteristics, hemodynamic variables and side effects were noted, and the data were analyzed using Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney test, Chi-square test, and ANOVA followed by Tukey's test. RESULTS: Patients receiving intrathecal nalbuphine (group N) and clonidine (group Cl) had a faster onset of the sensory and motor block than controls (group C) (p=0.000). The time to two-segment regression was more prolonged in group Cl when compared to group N (p=0.000). Duration of spinal analgesia was 216.75 ± 25.96 minutes, 292.86 ± 24.92 minutes, and 178.50 ± 16.06 minutes in groups N, Cl, and C, respectively (p=0.000). The 24-hour rescue analgesic requirement was maximum in group C and least in group Cl (p=0.000). The three groups were comparable to each other in terms of side effects. CONCLUSION: Clonidine was found to be superior to nalbuphine as an intrathecal adjuvant with no significant side effects.

Comparison of insertion characteristics of LMA ProSeal and Ambu AuraGain in adult patients under controlled ventilation: A randomised study.

Background and Aims: Supraglottic devices are preformed or flexible, and the insertion characteristics of the two types may be different. This study aims to compare the insertion characteristics of Ambu AuraGain (AAG), preformed) and LMA ProSeal (PLMA), flexible, requires an introducer tool for placement. Methods: Forty American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I/II patients of either sex between 18 and 60 years with no anticipated airway difficulty were randomly allocated to either group AAG or PLMA (n = 20 each). Pregnant females, known case of chronic respiratory disorders and gastroesophageal reflux were excluded. After induction of anaesthesia and muscle relaxation, appropriately sized AAG or PLMA was inserted. Time for successful insertion (primary outcome), ease of device insertion and gastric drain insertion, first attempt success rate (secondary outcomes) were recorded. Statistical analysis was done using SPSS version 20.0. Quantitative parameters were compared using Student's t-test, and qualitative parameters were compared using Chi-square test. A P value of <0.05 was considered significant. Results: Time taken for successful insertion of PLMA was 22.94 ± 6.12 s and for AAG was 24.32 ± 4.96 s, (P = 0.458). Device insertion was significantly easy in PLMA group (P < 0.002). First attempt success rate was achieved in 17 (94.4%) cases in PLMA group compared to 15 (78.9%) cases in AAG group (P = 0.168). Ease of drain tube insertion was comparable among the groups (P = 0.298). The haemodynamic variables were also comparable. Conclusion: PLMA is easier to insert as compared to AAG, but the insertion time and first attempt success rate are similar. The preformed curvature in AAG does not provide any added advantage over the non-preformed PLMA.