Phase I and pharmacologic studies of topotecan in patients with impaired hepatic function.

BACKGROUND: Topotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor that has demonstrated anticancer activity toward leukemias and solid tumors in clinical trials, is eliminated via hepatic and renal routes. However, dosing guidelines for the administration of topotecan to patients with impaired hepatic function have not yet been established. PURPOSE: We compared the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs), the toxic effects, and the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of topotecan in patients who had refractory, malignant, solid tumors and who either had or lacked hepatic injury. The potential role of three substrate markers of liver function (indocyanin green [ICG]-- a marker of hepatic blood flow; lorazepam--a substrate marker of hepatic glucuronidation; and antipyrine--a substrate marker for cytochrome P450 activity) in optimizing topotecan doses for patients with liver injury was also evaluated. METHODS: Twenty-one cancer patients, 14 of whom had hepatic injury due to metastatic disease, biliary obstruction, or cirrhosis, were treated with intravenously delivered courses of topotecan consisting of 0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 mg/m2 of drug per day for 5 days. Most patients received more than one course of treatment, with new courses initiated at 3-week intervals. Patient responses (evaluated by tumor measurements) and treatment-induced toxic effects were assessed. Prior to the initiation of topotecan treatment, patients were given intravenous injections of ICG, lorazepam, and antipyrine to determine the plasma pharmacokinetics of these compounds. The pharmacokinetics of topotecan (both the lactone and the carboxylate forms) were determined by analysis of plasma and urine samples collected on the first day of the first course of drug treatment. Scatter plots of area under the plasma concentration versus time curves in relation to percent decreases in either absolute neutrophil count or platelet count were used to explore the pharmacodynamics of topotecan. The Student's t test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare pharmacokinetic parameters between patients with and without abnormal hepatic function. Correlations were assessed using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs). Reported P values are based on two-tailed tests of significance. RESULTS: Patients with hepatic injury tolerated topotecan doses up to 1.5 mg/m2, i.e., the MTD of this drug established in previous studies. The nature and severity of treatment-induced toxic effects and the pharmacokinetics of topotecan were similar in patients with and without liver injury. No differences were observed in the urinary excretion of topotecan between the two patient groups. Clearances of total topotecan and its lactone species correlated only with clearance of ICG (rs = .64, P = .004; and rs = .68, P = .0017, respectively). The pharmacodynamic effects of topotecan were not altered by liver dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Cancer patients with hepatic injury can be treated with topotecan at a starting dose of 1.5 mg/m2, given daily for 5 days and administered every 3 weeks. Topotecan dose modifications do not appear to be required for patients with hepatic dysfunction and normal renal function.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of hepsulfam (NSC 329680).

Hepsulfam (NSC 329680), a bifunctional alkylating agent structurally related to busulfan, has entered clinical trial based on its broader preclinical antitumor activity compared with that of busulfan and its i.v. formulation which may circumvent the many problems arising from the p.o. administration of busulfan, such as significant individual differences in bioavailability. In this Phase I study, 53 patients received 95 courses of hepsulfam at doses ranging from 30 to 480 mg/m2 administered i.v. over 30 min every 28 days. Hematological toxicity was dose limiting. Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were dose related, delayed in onset, and sustained for long durations. Toxicity was cumulative in most patients receiving more than one course. This pattern of myelosuppression suggests that hepsulfam is cytotoxic to hematopoietic stem cells. Although hematological toxicity was not particularly severe during most courses, its lengthly duration precluded the prompt administration of subsequent courses. Minimal nonhematological effects were observed. Pharmacokinetic studies revealed that the clearance rate of hepsulfam is linear over the dose range studied and that its plasma disposition is biphasic with mean alpha and beta half-lives of 19 +/- 18 (SE) min and 337 +/- 248 (SE) min, respectively. The area under the plasma clearance curve correlated with the percentage of change in WBC using a sigmoidal Emax model and with the duration of thrombocytopenia in patients with hematological toxicity. Based on the protracted duration of the toxicity of multiple doses that were greater than 210 mg/m2, the recommended starting dose for Phase II trials is 210 mg/m2. However, these trials should be pursued with caution because of the protracted nature of hepsulfam's myelosuppression. Because hepsulfam produced minimal nonhematological toxicity, substantial dose escalation above 480 mg/m2 may be possible with hematopoietic stem cell support.

Phase I and pharmacological study of the novel topoisomerase I inhibitor 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecin (CPT-11) administered as a ninety-minute infusion every 3 weeks.

7-Ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]carbonyloxycamptothecin (CPT-11; Irinotecan), a semisynthetic analogue of camptothecin (CPT) with broad preclinical antitumor activity, has demonstrated impressive activity in phase II trials in Japan in advanced small and non-small cell lung, colorectal, cervical, and ovarian carcinomas, as well as in refractory lymphomas and leukemias. In this phase I and pharmacological study, 90-min infusions of CPT-11 were administered every 3 weeks at doses ranging from 100 to 345 mg/m2 to patients with solid malignancies. Acute, severe, and refractory vomiting, diarrhea, and/or abdominal cramps associated with flushing, warmth, and diaphoresis occurred in the immediate posttreatment period at the 240-mg/m2 dose level in several patients who were not treated with premedications. The characteristics and temporal nature of these toxicities, the prompt resolution of symptoms following treatment with diphenhydramine, and the successful use of a premedication regimen consisting of ondansetron and diphenhydramine in preventing these acute effects suggest that vasoactive substances are involved in the mediation of these acute toxicities. With the routine use of these premedications, there was no single toxicity type that limited the escalation of CPT-11 doses. Instead, a constellation of severe hematological and gastrointestinal effects precluded the repetitive administration of CPT-11 at doses above 240 mg/m2, the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase II dose on this schedule. Major responses were observed in patients with advanced colorectal, cervical, and renal cancers. The disposition of total CPT-11 in plasma was fit by a biexponential kinetic model with renal elimination accounting for 37 +/- 4% (SE) of total drug disposition. The Cmax for the active metabolite of CPT-11, 7-ethyl-10-hydroxycamptothecin (SN-38), was achieved at 2.2 +/- 0.1 h after treatment, and mean residence times for both CPT-11 and SN-38 were long, 9.1 and 10.0 h, respectively. Compared with topotecan, another CPT analogue under development, a larger proportion of total drug exposure was accounted for by the active lactone (closed-ring) forms of CPT-11 and SN-38; areas under the time-versus concentration curve for their respective lactone were 44 and 50% of areas under the time-versus-concentration curve for total CPT-11 and SN-38. Although intermittent dosing schedules appear to be superior to single dosing schedules for CPT and some CPT analogues in preclinical tumor models, the maintenance of biologically relevant concentrations of SN-38 for relatively long durations may negate the potential pharmacological benefits of intermittent and continuous administration schedules for CPT-11.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Phase I and pharmacological study of the pulmonary cytotoxin 4-ipomeanol on a single dose schedule in lung cancer patients: hepatotoxicity is dose limiting in humans.

4-Ipomeanol (IPO), a naturally occurring pulmonary toxin, is the first cytotoxic agent to undergo clinical development based on a biochemical-biological rationale as an antineoplastic agent targeted specifically against lung cancer. This rationale is based on preclinical observations that metabolic activation and intracellular binding of IPO, as well as cytotoxicity, occurred selectively in tissues and cancers derived from tissues that are rich in specific P450 mixed function oxidase enzymes. Although tissues capable of activating IPO to cytotoxic intermediates in vitro include liver, lung, and kidney, IPO has been demonstrated in rodents and dogs to undergo in situ activation, bind covalently, and induce cytotoxicity preferentially in lung tissue at doses not similarly affecting liver or kidneys. Although the drug was devoid of antitumor activity in the conventional murine preclinical screening models, cytotoxic activity was observed in human lung cancers in vitro and in human lung cancer xenografts in vivo, adding to the rationale for clinical development. Somewhat unexpectantly, hepatocellular toxicity was the dose-limiting principal toxicity of IPO administered as a 30-min infusion every 3 weeks to patients with lung cancer. In this study, 55 patients received 254 courses at doses almost spanning 3 orders of magnitude, 6.5 to 1612 mg/m2. Transient and isolated elevations in hepatocellular enzymes, predominantly alanine aminotransferase, occurred in the majority of courses of IPO at 1032 mg/m2, which is the recommended IPO dose for subsequent phase II trials. At higher doses, hepatocellular toxicity was more severe and was often associated with right upper quadrant pain and severe malaise. Toxic effects were also noted in other tissues capable of activating IPO, including possible nephrotoxicity in a patient treated with one course of IPO at 154 mg/m2 and severe, reversible pulmonary toxicity in another patient who received nine courses of IPO at doses ranging from 202 to 826 mg/m2. Although individual plasma drug disposition curves were well described by a two-compartment first order elimination model, The relationship between IPO dose and area under the disposition curve was curvilinear, suggesting saturable elimination kinetics. At the maximum tolerated dose, the mean half-lives (lambda 1 and lambda 2) were 6.7 and 114.5 min, respectively. Renal excretion of parent compound accounted for less than 2% of the administered dose of IPO. An unidentified metabolite was detected in the plasma of patients treated at higher doses. No objective antitumor responses were observed; however, stable disease persisted for at least eight courses in 27% of patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Phase I and pharmacologic study of topotecan in patients with impaired renal function.

PURPOSE: To determine the toxicities, pharmacokinetics, and recommended doses of the topoisomerase I inhibitor, topotecan, in patients with varying degrees of renal excretory dysfunction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with normal renal function [creatinine clearance (CrCl) > or = 60 mL/min] and 28 patients with varying degrees of renal dysfunction were treated with topotecan 0.4 to 2.0 mg/m2/d as a 30-minute infusion for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks. Plasma and urine samples were obtained to determine the disposition of topotecan. RESULTS: In patients with mild renal dysfunction (CrCl = 40 to 59 mL/min), dose-limiting hematologic toxicity was observed in three of eight patients receiving topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d and in two of five patients receiving topotecan 1.5 mg/m2/d. In patients with moderate renal dysfunction (CrCl = 20 to 39 mL/min), dose-limiting hematologic toxicity was observed in three of eight patients who received topotecan 0.5 mg/m2/d, and in two of four patients receiving topotecan 1.0 mg/m2/d; these events were more frequently observed in extensively pretreated patients. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed significant correlations between CrCl and the plasma clearance of both total topotecan [Spearman's correlation coefficient (r2) = 0.65, P = .00001] and topotecan lactone (r2 = 0.65, P = .00003). Mean systemic plasma clearance of total topotecan was significantly reduced in patients with mild (P = .04) and moderate (P = .00006) renal dysfunction. There was no evidence of changes in the pharmacodynamic relationship between topotecan exposure (AUC) and myelotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Dose adjustments are required in patients with moderate, but not mild, renal impairment. For patients with moderate renal dysfunction, the recommended starting dose of topotecan is 0.75 mg/m2/d for 5 days every 3 weeks. Moreover, extensively pretreated patients need further dose reductions.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of sequences of paclitaxel and cyclophosphamide supported by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in women with previously treated metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Pacltaxel is active in metastatic breast cancer, but limited information is available on combinations of this agent with other cytotoxic agents. Study aims were to determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) of paclitaxel (24-hour infusion) and cyclophosphamide (1-hour infusion) administered every 21 days with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, filgrastim) to determine the effect of drug sequence on toxicity and pharmacology and to evaluate the activity of this combination in women with anthracycline-resistant disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-seven women with metastatic breast cancer were treated. Starting doses were paclitaxel 135 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, with filgrastim 5 microG/kg/d subcutaneously beginning 24 hours after chemotherapy. Four patients were treated at each dose level. The sequence of drug administration was alternated between sequential patients, and with subsequent courses of therapy in each patient, to enable evaluation of effects of drug sequence on toxicity and pharmacology. Patients were treated every 21 days and disease status was reevaluated every two courses. RESULTS: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 1,250 mg/m2 is the MTD for this combination on this schedule. The hematopoietic toxicity of therapy was sequence-dependent. Paired analysis of toxicity data indicated more severe toxicity in courses in which paclitaxel was administered first. Sequence-dependent pharmacologic effects did not account for this phenomenon. Responses were noted in 29% of patients with anthracycline-resistant disease. CONCLUSION: Paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 1,250 mg/m2 with filgrastim administered every 21 days are the doses recommended for further study.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of high doses of the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of escalating doses of the topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitor topotecan (TPT) with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) in minimally pretreated adults with solid tumors and to study whether G-CSF scheduling variably affects the ability to escalate TPT doses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients received 121 courses of TPT as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days every 3 weeks at doses that ranged from 2.0 to 4.2 mg/m2/d. G-CSF 5 microg/kg/d subcutaneously (SC) was initiated concurrently with TPT (starting on day 1). Because the concurrent administration of TPT and G-CSF resulted in severe myelosuppression at the lowest TPT dose level, an alternate posttreatment G-CSF schedule in which G-CSF dosing began after TPT (starting on day 6) was subsequently evaluated. Plasma sampling was performed to characterize the pharmacologic behavior of high-dose TPT and to determine whether G-CSF altered the pharmacokinetic profile of TPT. RESULTS: Severe myelosuppression precluded the administration of TPT at the first dose, 2.0 mg/m2/d, with G-CSF on the concurrent schedule. However, dose escalation of TPT with G-CSF on a posttreatment schedule proceeded to 4.2 mg/m2/d. The dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were thrombocytopenia and neutropenia. One partial response was noted in a patient with colorectal carcinoma refractory to fluoropyrimidines. Pharmacokinetics were linear within the dosing range of 2.0 to 3.5 mg/m2/d, but TPT clearance was lower at the 4.2-mg/m2/d dose level. At 3.5 mg/m2/d, which is the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose for subsequent-phase studies of TPT with G-CSF, the area under the concentration-versus-time curves (AUCs) for total TPT and lactone averaged 2.2- and 2.3-fold higher, respectively, than the AUCs achieved at the lowest TPT dose, 2.0 mg/m2/d. The pharmacologic behavior of high-dose TPT was not significantly altered by the scheduling of G-CSF. CONCLUSION: G-CSF administered after 5 daily 30-minute infusions of TPT permits a 2.3-fold dose escalation of TPT above the MTD in solid-tumor patients, whereas concurrent therapy with G-CSF and TPT results in severe myelosuppression.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of paclitaxel and cisplatin with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor: neuromuscular toxicity is dose-limiting.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated doses (MTD), the principal toxicities, and the pharmacologic behavior of high doses of Taxol (paclitaxel; Bristol-Myers Squibb, New York, NY) combined with cisplatin and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Untreated and minimally pretreated solid-tumor patients received 24-hour infusions of Taxol on day 1 followed by cisplatin on day 2 and G-CSF, 5 micrograms/kg/d subcutaneously (SC), beginning on day 3. Treatment was repeated every 3 weeks. Starting doses of Taxol and cisplatin were 135 and 75 mg/m2, respectively. RESULTS: The development of a severe peripheral neuropathy and/or severe myalgias precluded the chronic administration of Taxol and cisplatin with G-CSF at doses greater than 250 mg/m2 and 75 mg/m2, respectively. At this dose, the mean Taxol steady-state plasma concentration (Css) exceeds concentrations capable of inducing pertinent antimicrotubule effects in vitro. The severity of the neuropathy was related to the cumulative dose of Taxol, the magnitude of the dose administered during each treatment, and the presence of a pre-existing medical disorder associated with peripheral neuropathy. A proximal myopathy of modest severity also was documented. Although severe neutropenia occurred frequently, especially at the MTD, it was rarely associated with fever (8% of courses), and absolute neutrophil counts (ANCs) less than 500/microL never persisted for more than 5 days. Responses were noted in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and head and neck, breast, and esophageal cancers. CONCLUSION: Taxol and cisplatin doses of 250 mg/m2 and 75 mg/m2, respectively, can be administered repetitively with G-CSF to untreated and minimally pretreated patients. However, these doses are not recommended for patients with pre-existing neuropathies until additional experience in high-risk patients is obtained. Although this Taxol dose is nearly 85% higher than the dose that can be combined with cisplatin in the absence of G-CSF, this high-dose regimen should not be used outside the investigational setting until a dose-response relationship has been demonstrated for Taxol in randomized clinical trials.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of topotecan: a novel topoisomerase I inhibitor.

PURPOSE: A phase I and pharmacologic study was undertaken to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), describe the principal toxicities, and characterize the pharmacologic behavior of topotecan, which is a semisynthetic analog of camptothecin with broad preclinical antitumor activity and the first topoisomerase I-targeting agent to enter clinical development in the United States since studies of sodium camptothecin over 2 decades ago. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-minute infusions of topotecan were administered daily for 5 consecutive days every 3 weeks to patients with advanced solid malignancies at doses ranging from 0.5 to 2.5 mg/m2/d. RESULTS: At doses of 1.5 and 2.0 mg/m2, grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in most courses; however, neutropenia was brief and rarely associated with fevers or treatment delays. Neutropenia was more severe in patients with extensive prior treatment than in minimally pretreated patients, but these differences were not substantial. At 2.5 mg/m2, topotecan induced profound and prolonged neutropenia that was frequently associated with fever and treatment delays in minimally pretreated patients. Topotecan also induced mild depressions in the hematocrit level in the majority of courses; however, precipitous drops requiring transfusional therapy occurred in 14% of courses and suggested a drug-induced hemolytic effect. Unlike sodium camptothecin, hemorrhagic cystitis was not observed. Thrombocytopenia, skin rash, diarrhea, and vomiting occurred infrequently and were modest in severity. Responses were observed in non-small-cell lung carcinoma and platinum-refractory ovarian carcinoma. Drug disposition in plasma was described by a biexponential model, with renal elimination accounting for 38.7% of drug disposition. Topotecan was rapidly hydrolyzed in vivo to a less active, open-ring form. CONCLUSIONS: Neutropenia is the dose-limiting toxicity, and 1.5 mg/m2 is the recommended starting dose of topotecan for both minimally and heavily pretreated patients in future phase II trials, with escalation to 2.0 mg/m2 if treatment is well tolerated. Non-small-cell lung and platinum-refractory ovarian carcinomas should be among those evaluated in phase II trials of topotecan.

Pharmacokinetic, bioavailability, and feasibility study of oral vinorelbine in patients with solid tumors.

PURPOSE: The feasibility of administering vinorelbine (Navelbine, Burroughs Wellcome Co, Research Triangle Park, NC), a semisynthetic vinca alkaloid with broad activity, as a liquid-filled gelatin capsule was evaluated in a bioavailability (F) and pharmacokinetic study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Each of 17 cancer patients had pharmacokinetic studies performed after receiving vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 intravenously (IV), which is the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) for weekly IV administration, and twice after receiving the oral formulation at a nominal dose of 100 mg/m2. Subsequently, these patients and 10 other subjects received the oral formulation at a dose of 100 mg/m2/wk to evaluate the feasibility of chronic oral administration. RESULTS: Plasma drug disposition was well described by a triphasic model. Mean central volume of distribution and steady-state volume of distribution (Vss) were large (0.66 +/- 0.46 L/kg and 20.02 +/- 8.55 L/kg, respectively); the mean harmonic terminal half-life (t1/2) was long (18 hours); and the high mean clearance (CI) rate (0.80 +/- 0.68 L/h/kg) approached hepatic blood flow. F was low (0.27 +/- 12), and absorption was rapid (mean time of maximum plasma concentration [Tmax], 0.91 +/- 0.22 hours). Absorption parameters after the first and second oral doses were similar, with mean F values of 0.27 +/- 0.14 and 0.25 +/- 0.11, respectively. Coefficients of variability (CVs) for F, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), and Tmax were 32%, 42%, and 78%, respectively, indicating moderate intraindividual variability. The pharmacologic profile of this oral formulation indicates that there is a large first-pass effect. Neutropenia was the principal toxicity of oral vinorelbine. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia occurred in 63% of patients, but only 11% developed neutropenia and infection. Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea were also common with oral administration, but these effects were rarely severe and could be ameliorated by using a divided-dose schedule and/or prophylactic antiemetic and antidiarrheal agents. The mean nominal oral dose was 82 mg/m2, and the mean percentage of intended dose that was received was 92%. Although dose escalations were permitted for negligible toxicity, doses were not escalated to greater than 100 mg/m2/wk in any patient. Vinorelbine given as a liquid-filled gelatin capsule at 100 mg/m2 provided equivalent pharmacologic exposure as 30 mg/m2 IV. CONCLUSION: The oral administration of vinorelbine, specifically as a liquid-filled, soft gelatin capsule, is a feasible route of administration. Weekly oral dosing at 100 mg/m2 induces a consistent degree of myelosuppression, but the high frequency of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, albeit brief and uncomplicated, warrants the recommendation of a slightly lower starting dose, ie, 80 mg/m2/d, for subsequent phase II evaluations, especially in heavily pretreated patients.

Sequences of topotecan and cisplatin: phase I, pharmacologic, and in vitro studies to examine sequence dependence.

PURPOSE: A phase I and pharmacologic study was performed to evaluate the feasibility of administering the topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitor topotecan (TPT) in combination with cisplatin (CDDP) in minimally pretreated adults with solid tumors. The study was designed to evaluate the magnitude of the toxicologic and pharmacologic differences between the two sequences of drug administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TPT was administered as a 30-minute infusion daily for 5 days and CDDP was given either before TPT on day 1 or after TPT on day 5. Each patient was treated with both schedules on an alternating basis every 3 weeks. Sequential dose escalation of TPT or CDDP resulted in three dosage permutation of TPT/CDDP (mg/m2): 0.75/50, 1/50, and 0.75/75. After the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) level was achieved, the feasibility of using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) to permit further dose escalation was studied. To examine the interaction of TPT and CDDP in vitro, human A549 lung cancer cells were exposed to these agents concurrently and sequentially. RESULTS: Dose-limiting neutropenia and thrombocytopenia resulted after the doses of TPT or CDDP were increased to greater than 0.75 and 50 mg/m2, respectively, without and with G-CSF. The sequence of CDDP before TPT induced significantly worse neutropenia and thrombocytopenia than the alternate sequence. In vitro studies failed to provide any evidence for the differences in the cytotoxicity of these two sequences. Instead, pharmacokinetic studies suggested that the differences in toxicity were due, in part, to lower TPT clearance and exposure when CDDP preceeds TPT, possibly due to subclinical renal tubular toxicity induced by CDDP. CONCLUSION: The sequence of CDDP before TPT at doses of 50 and 0.75 mg/m2, respectively, is recommended for subsequent clinical trials in tumor types in which both agents have significant single-agent activity. The potential for sequence-dependent cytotoxic, toxicologic, and pharmacologic effects should be evaluated in concurrent clinical and laboratory studies in the course of developing combination chemotherapy regimens that consist of topo I-targeting agents and other antineoplastic agents, particularly DNA-damaging agents.

Pharmacokinetic, oral bioavailability, and safety study of fluorouracil in patients treated with 776C85, an inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase.

PURPOSE: To study the absolute bioavailability and pharmacokinetics of an oral solution of fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients treated with 776C85, an oral inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), and to evaluate the feasibility of administering oral 5-FU and 776C85 on a multiple-daily dosing schedule. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twelve patients with refractory solid tumors were enrolled onto this three-period study. In periods 1 and 2, patients were randomly assigned to treatment with 5-FU 10 mg/m2 on day 2 given by either the oral or intravenous (IV) route with oral 776C85 3.7 mg/m2/d on days 1 and 2. In period 3, patients received escalating doses of 5-FU (10 to 25 mg/ m2/d) orally for 5 days (days 2 to 6) with 776C85 3.7 mg/m2/d orally (days 1 to 7) every 4 weeks. Pharmaco-kinetic studies were performed in periods 1 and 2, and after the fifth oral dose of 5-FU in period 3. RESULTS: Twelve patients completed the bioavailability and pharmacokinetic studies. Following oral 5-FU 10 mg/m2, the bioavailability was 122% +/- 40% (mean +/- SD), the terminal half-life (t1/2 beta) was 4.5 +/- 1.6 hours, the apparent volume of distribution (V beta) was 21.4 +/- 5.9 L/ m2, and the systemic clearance (Clsys) was 57.6 +/- 16.4 mL/min/m2. A correlation was observed between oral 5-FU systemic clearance and calculated creatinine clearance (r = .74; P = .009). Multiple-daily dosing did not appear to affect the pharmacokinetics of oral 5-FU. Neutropenia was the principal toxicity of oral 5-FU and 776C85, precluding escalation of oral 5-FU to doses greater than 25 mg/m2/d for 5 days every 4 weeks with 776C85. CONCLUSION: The oral DPD inactivator 776C85 enables oral administration of 5-FU and may alter conventional 5-FU administration practices.

Sequences of taxol and cisplatin: a phase I and pharmacologic study.

Untreated and minimally pretreated solid tumor patients received alternating sequences of taxol and cisplatin. Sequential dose escalation of each agent using taxol doses of 110 or 135 mg/m2 and cisplatin doses of 50 or 75 mg/m2 resulted in four dosage permutations that induced grades 3 and 4 neutropenia in 72% to 84% and 50% to 53% of courses, respectively. Neutropenia was brief, and hospitalization for neutropenia and fever was required in 13% to 24% of courses. However, further escalation of taxol to 170 or 200 mg/m2 induced grade 4 neutropenia in 79% to 82% of courses. At the highest taxol-cisplatin dose level (200 mg/m2 to 75 mg/m2), the mean neutrophil count nadir was 98/microL, and hospitalization for neutropenia and fever was required in 64% of courses. The sequence of cisplatin before taxol, which has less antitumor activity in vitro, induced more profound neutropenia than the alternate sequence. Pharmacologic studies indicated that this difference was probably due to 25% lower taxol clearance rates when cisplatin preceded taxol. Although neurotoxicity was initially thought to be a potentially serious effect of the combination, mild to modest neurotoxicity occurred in only 27% of patients. Adverse effects also included myalgias, alopecia, vomiting, diarrhea, bradycardia, and asymptomatic ventricular tachycardia. Objective responses were noted in melanoma, as well as non-small-cell lung, ovarian, breast, head and neck, colon, and pancreatic carcinomas. Based on these results, the sequence of taxol before cisplatin at doses of 135 and 75 mg/m2, respectively, is recommended for phase II/III trials, with escalation of taxol to 170 mg/m2 if treatment is well tolerated.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of oral fluorouracil on a chronic daily schedule in combination with the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inactivator eniluracil.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of oral fluorouracil (5-FU) administered twice daily in combination with oral eniluracil, an inactivator of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, administered for 28 days every 35 days. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Oral 5-FU 1.35 mg/m(2) twice daily was administered with oral eniluracil 10 mg daily for 14 to 28 days, followed by a 1-week rest period. Eniluracil was started 1 day before 5-FU. Patients then received escalated doses of oral 5-FU 1. 35 to 1.8 mg/m(2) twice daily with an increased dose of eniluracil 10 mg twice daily for 28 days. A reduced dose of 5-FU 1.0 mg/m(2) with eniluracil 20 mg twice daily was evaluated. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients with solid malignancies were enrolled onto the study. Diarrhea was the principal dose-limiting toxicity of oral 5-FU and eniluracil given on this chronic schedule. The recommended phase II dose is 5-FU 1.0 mg/m(2) twice daily with eniluracil 20 mg twice daily. Mean (SD) values for terminal half-life, apparent volume of distribution, and systemic clearance of 4.5 hours (0.83 hours), 19 L/m(2) (3.0 L/m(2)), and 51 mL/min/m(2) (13 mL/min/m(2)), respectively. An average of 77% of 5-FU was excreted unchanged in urine after 28 days of treatment. The mean (range) 5-FU C(SS,min) values achieved at the 1.0 mg/m(2) dose level were 22 ng/mL (8 to 38 ng/mL). CONCLUSION: Chronic oral administration of 5-FU with oral eniluracil is tolerable and produces 5-FU steady-state concentrations similar to those achieved with protracted intravenous administration of 5-FU on clinically relevant dose schedules. Eniluracil provides an attractive means of administering 5-FU on protracted schedules.

Phase I and pharmacological study of CI-980, a novel synthetic antimicrotubule agent.

CI-980 (NSC 613862) is one of a novel class of 1,2-dihydropyrido[3, 4-b]pyrazines that inhibits tubulin polymerization, presumably by binding to the colchicine binding site of tubulin. In a Phase I and pharmacological study, 16 patients with advanced solid neoplasms were treated with CI-980 on a continuous 72-h infusion schedule at doses ranging from 3.0-5.4 mg/m2/day every 3 weeks. High rates of central nervous system (CNS) toxicity and neutropenia occurred in both minimally and heavily pretreated patients who were treated with CI-980 doses above 3.75 mg/m2/day, which is the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended dose for additional evaluations. CNS effects, characterized by neurocortical, mood, and cerebellar manifestations, were generally observed toward the end of the infusion and immediately posttreatment and usually resolved within 48 h after the completion of treatment. Toxicity was mild to modest at the 3.75 mg/m2/day dose level. Neither clinical nor pharmacological risk factors that may predispose patients to the development of CNS effects were evident. Although no objective antineoplastic activity was observed in this Phase I study, CI-980 steady-state plasma concentrations achieved at the recommended dose of 3.75 mg/m2/day (mean +/- SE, 5.74 +/- 0.54 nM) approached and exceeded concentrations that have been associated with significant activity in preclinical studies, indicating that additional disease-directed evaluations of CI-980 may be warranted.

Sequence-dependent hematological toxicity associated with the 3-hour paclitaxel/cyclophosphamide doublet.

Paclitaxel is active in metastatic breast cancer. Combination studies have demonstrated complex interactions between paclitaxel and other cytotoxic agents, including sequence-dependent cytotoxic, toxicological, and pharmacological effects. The principal objectives of this study were to determine the maximum tolerated doses of paclitaxel (3-h infusion) and cyclophosphamide (1-h infusion) administered every 3 weeks with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (Filgrastim) and to determine if the sequence-dependent toxicological effects that have previously been observed with this combination when paclitaxel was administered over 24 h were evident when paclitaxel was administered over 3 h. Fifteen women with metastatic breast cancer were treated. Starting doses were 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel and 1600 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (5 micrograms/kg/day) given s.c. beginning 24 h after chemotherapy. Doses of both drugs were escalated in cohorts of at least four patients. The sequence of drug administration was alternated with each consecutive patient and with each subsequent course of therapy in each individual patient, enabling the evaluation of sequence-dependent toxicological and pharmacological effects. Severe myelosuppression was the principal dose-limiting toxicity for this regimen, precluding dose escalation above 200 mg/m2 paclitaxel and 1600 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide, the maximum tolerated dose for this combination on this schedule. As has been previously demonstrated with this combination, when paclitaxel is administered over 24 h, the hematopoietic toxicity was sequence dependent. Paired analysis of toxicity data using each patient as her own control indicated more severe hematological toxicity in courses in which paclitaxel was administered first. There was no evidence of sequence-dependent effects on the pharmacokinetics of these drugs that might account for this phenomenon. The impact of drug sequencing on toxicity should be considered in the further development of combination therapy containing alkylating agents and paclitaxel, when the latter is administered over 3 h.

Absorption, metabolism, and excretion of 14C-temozolomide following oral administration to patients with advanced cancer.

The purpose of this study is to characterize the absorption, metabolism, and excretion of carbon 14-labeled temozolomide (14C-TMZ) administered p.o. to adult patients with advanced solid malignancies. On day 1 of cycle 1, six patients received a single oral 200-mg dose of 14C-TMZ (70.2 microCi). Whole blood, plasma, urine, and feces were collected from days 1-8 and on day 14 of cycle 1. Total radioactivity was measured in all samples. TMZ, 5-(3-methyltriazen-1-yl)imidazole-4-carboxamide (MTIC), and 4-amino-5-imidazole-carboxamide (AIC) concentrations were determined in plasma, and urine and plasma samples were profiled for metabolite/degradation products. Maximum TMZ plasma concentrations were achieved between 0.33 to 2 h (mean, 1.2 h), and half-life, apparent volume of distribution, and oral clearance values averaged 1.9 h, 17 liters/m2, and 104 ml/min/m2, respectively. A first-order absorption, one-compartment linear model, which included first-order formation of MTIC from TMZ and elimination of MTIC via degradation to AIC, and a peripheral distribution compartment for AIC, adequately described the plasma TMZ, MTIC, and AIC concentrations. MTIC systemic clearance was estimated to be 5384 ml/min/m2, and the half-life was calculated to be 2.5 min. Metabolite profiles of plasma at 1 and 4 h after treatment showed that 14C-derived radioactivity was primarily associated with TMZ, and a smaller amount was attributed to AIC. Profiles of urine samples from 0-24 h revealed that 14C-TMZ-derived urinary radioactivity was primarily associated with unchanged drug (5.6%), AIC (12%), or 3-methyl-2,3-dihydro-4-oxoimidazo[5,1-d]tetrazine-8-carboxyl ic acid (2.3%). The recovered radioactive dose (39%) was principally eliminated in the urine (38%), and a small amount (0.8%) was excreted in the feces. TMZ exhibits rapid oral absorption and high systemic availability. The primary elimination pathway for TMZ is by pH-dependent degradation to MTIC and further degradation to AIC. Incomplete recovery of radioactivity may be explained by the incorporation of AIC into nucleic acids.

A phase I and pharmacological study of topotecan infused over 30 minutes for five days in patients with refractory acute leukemia.

The principal objectives of this study were to determine the feasibility of escalating doses of the hydrophilic topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitor topotecan (TPT) as a 30-min infusion daily for 5 days in adults with refractory or relapsed acute leukemia and to study the pharmacokinetic behavior of high doses of TPT and pharmacodynamic determinants of TPT activity. Fourteen patients received 27 courses of TPT at doses ranging from 3.5 to 5.75 mg/m2/day every 3 weeks. A constellation of unusual adverse effects, consisting of high fever, rigors, precipitous anemia, and hyperbilirubinemia, was the principal dose-limiting toxicity of high doses of TPT on this schedule. These toxicities were consistently intolerable at the 5.75 mg/m2/day dose level; however, they were neither severe nor common at lower doses. Although the precise etiology of these effects is not known, high doses of TPT may induce acute hemolytic reactions in this patient population. Severe, albeit transient, mucositis was experienced by two of eight patients in 2 of 17 courses at the next lower dose level, 4.5 mg/m2/day, which was determined to be the maximum tolerated dose and the dose recommended for further trials. The pharmacokinetic behavior of TPT at high doses was not dose dependent and resembled that at lower doses. In view of preclinical data suggesting that TPT sensitivity might correlate with topo I levels, topo I content in leukemia blasts was assessed by Western blotting. Variations in topo I content were observed. Moreover, strong correlations were evident between topo I content and two markers of proliferation, proliferating cell nuclear antigen and nuclear protein B23, raising the possibility that differences in topo I content observed among various leukemia specimens might reflect differences in the proliferating fractions of cells in various leukemia samples. Although complete clearance of circulating leukemia blasts occurred in most courses, neither sustained responses nor hematopoietic recovery were observed in the heavily pretreated, poor-risk patients enrolled in this study, and it was not possible to correlate these differences in topo I content with clinical response. These results indicate that substantial dose escalation of TPT as a 30-minute infusion for a 5-day schedule above myelosuppressive doses is feasible in adults with refractory or relapsed leukemias; however, further development of alternate high-dose schedules in leukemia may be warranted in view of the nature of the dose-limiting toxicity and the lack of sustained clinical responses in this preliminary investigation.

Nursing considerations in paclitaxel (Taxol) administration.

The administration of paclitaxel (TAXOL) presents some challenges unique among chemotherapeutic agents. Information published and presented to date has focused primarily on the most threatening and clinically significant aspects of paclitaxel administration and resultant side effects. However, there are a number of other issues that, while not as acutely dangerous, can be very significant to the success of paclitaxel therapy and to those medical, pharmacy, and nursing personnel involved in drug administration and patient management. This review will focus on the collaborative role of the nurse in the recognition and prevention of side effects related to paclitaxel therapy. A nursing plan of care describes the pertinent paclitaxel toxicities and suggests interventions related to patient care issues.

Phase I study of paclitaxel as a 3-hour infusion followed by carboplatin in untreated patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.

Preliminary results of a phase I study of paclitaxel (Taxol; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Princeton, NJ), given by 3-hour infusion, followed by carboplatin in chemotherapy-naive patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer indicate that both agents can be combined at clinically relevant single-agent doses. The paclitaxel (mg/m2)/carboplatin area under the concentration-time curve (mg.min/mL) dose level of 225/7 is projected to be the maximally tolerated and recommended phase II dose level for future evaluations. Dose-limiting neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and nausea and vomiting preclude treatment with carboplatin doses estimated to target an area under the concentration-time curve of 9 mg.min/mL when given with paclitaxel 225 mg/m2. The heterogeneous nature of the principal toxicities, as well as the ability to administer clinically relevant single-agent doses of both agents in combination, also indicate that further dose escalation of paclitaxel and carboplatin using hematopoietic growth factors would not be feasible. The preliminary antitumor activity noted to data, as well as the safety associated with the clinically relevant single-agent doses that can be given in combination, indicate that phase II/III evaluations of this regimen are warranted in patients with both advanced and early stage non-small cell lung cancer.