Phase 1 trial evaluating cisplatin, gemcitabine, and veliparib in 2 patient cohorts: Germline BRCA mutation carriers and wild-type BRCA pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: A phase 1 trial was used to evaluate a combination of cisplatin, gemcitabine, and escalating doses of veliparib in patients with untreated advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in 2 cohorts: a germline BRCA1/2-mutated (BRCA+) cohort and a wild-type BRCA (BRCA-) cohort. The aims were to determine the safety, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), maximum tolerated dose, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of veliparib combined with cisplatin and gemcitabine and to assess the antitumor efficacy (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1) and overall survival. METHODS: Gemcitabine and cisplatin were dosed at 600 and 25 mg/m2 , respectively, over 30 minutes on days 3 and 10 of a 21-day cycle. Four dose levels of veliparib were evaluated: 20 (dose level 0), 40 (dose level 1), and 80 mg (dose level 2) given orally twice daily on days 1 to 12 and 80 mg given twice daily on days 1 to 21 (dose level 2A [DL2A]). RESULTS: Seventeen patients were enrolled: 9 BRCA+ patients, 7 BRCA- patients, and 1 patient with an unknown status. DLTs were reached at DL2A (80 mg twice daily on days 1 to 21). Two of the 5 patients in this cohort (40%) experienced grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. Two grade 5 events occurred on protocol. The objective response rate in the BRCA+ cohort was 7 of 9 (77.8%). The median overall survival for BRCA+ patients was 23.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.8-30.2 months). The median overall survival for BRCA- patients was 11 months (95% CI, 1.5-12.1 months). CONCLUSIONS: The RP2D of veliparib was 80 mg by mouth twice daily on days 1 to 12 in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine; the DLT was myelosuppression. Substantial antitumor activity was seen in BRCA+ PDAC. A randomized phase 2 trial is currently evaluating cisplatin and gemcitabine with and without veliparib for BRCA+ PDAC (NCT01585805). Cancer 2018;124:1374-82. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Dexrazoxane added to doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer: a retrospective cohort study with a comparative analysis of toxicity and survival.

Dexrazoxane is indicated as a cardioprotective agent for patients receiving doxorubicin who are at increased risk for cardiotoxicity. Concerns have been raised on the use of dexrazoxane, particularly in adjuvant therapy, because of the risk of interference with the antitumor effect of doxorubicin. Two meta-analyses in metastatic breast cancer have rejected this hypothesis, but have shown an apparent increase in the severity of myelosuppression when dexrazoxane is used. Here, we analyzed retrospectively a cohort of our institute database to assess whether the addition of dexrazoxane causes more bone marrow suppression in breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin-based adjuvant therapy. The secondary objectives were assessment of the incidence of febrile neutropenia, dose-schedule modifications, recorded cardiac events or cardiac test abnormalities, and overall survival. Eight hundred and twenty-two female patients who received adjuvant (or neoadjuvant) doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide for breast cancer between 2001 and 2013 were included. One hundred and four of these patients also received dexrazoxane concurrently with the adjuvant treatment. Hospital records and, when accessible, community clinic records were reviewed. The median follow-up duration was 7 years for patients receiving dexrazoxane and 7.5 years for patients not receiving dexrazoxane. 85.6% of patients were alive at data lock. Compared with the nondexrazoxane group, patients who received dexrazoxane were older (median age at diagnosis 59 vs. 52 years) and more likely to receive dose-dense AC therapy (73 vs. 59%) and adjuvant trastuzumab treatment (29 vs. 15%). Compared with the nondexrazoxane group, dexrazoxane treatment was associated with a higher rate of hematological side effects: leukopenia (48 vs. 39%), neutropenia (45 vs. 31%, P=0.003), anemia (86 vs. 73%, P=0.005), and thrombocytopenia (37 vs. 22%, P=0.001). There were more febrile neutropenia hospitalizations (20 vs. 10%, P=0.001) and dose reductions (22 vs. 8%, P<0.001) in the dexrazoxane group, but no significant difference in the incidence of treatment delays or cancellations. The incidence of cardiac events was the same in both treatment groups with and without dexrazoxane. There was a nonsignificantly lower mortality rate in the dexrazoxane group (9.6%) compared with the nondexrazoxane group (15.0%) at data lock. Adding dexrazoxane to doxorubicin in adjuvant therapy patients leads to higher rates of bone marrow suppression in all blood components, as well as more febrile neutropenia events, and dose reductions. No differences in events defined as cardiac toxicities were detected. Dexrazoxane had no detrimental effect on survival, despite the higher hematological toxicity, the older median age, and the higher prevalence of HER2-positive disease in the dexrazoxane group.

Biomarker-Driven Therapy in Metastatic Gastric and Esophageal Cancer: Real-Life Clinical Experience.

BACKGROUND: Precision treatment of cancer uses biomarker-driven therapy to individualize and optimize patient care. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate real-life clinical experience with biomarker-driven therapy in metastatic gastric and esophageal cancer in Israel. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with metastatic gastric or esophageal cancer who were treated in the participating institutions and underwent biomarker-driven therapy. Treatment was considered to have a benefit if the ratio between the longest progression-free survival (PFS) post biomarker-driven therapy and the last PFS before the biomarker-driven therapy was ≥1.3. The null hypothesis was that ≤15% of patients gain such benefit. RESULTS: The analysis included 46 patients (61% men; median age, 58 years; 57% with poorly-differentiated tumors). At least one actionable (i.e., predictive of response to a specific therapy) biomarker was identified for each patient. Immunohistochemistry was performed on all samples and identified 1-8 (median: 3) biomarkers per patient (most commonly: low TS, high TOPO1, high TOP2A). Twenty-eight patients received therapy after the biomarker analysis (1-4 lines). In the 1st line after biomarker analysis, five patients (18%) achieved a partial response and five (18%) stable disease; the median (range) PFS was 129 (12-1155) days. Twenty-four patients were evaluable for PFS ratio analysis; in seven (29.2%), the ratio was ≥1.3. In a one-sided exact binomial test vs. the null hypothesis, p = 0.019; therefore, the null hypothesis was rejected. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrated that implementing biomarker-driven analysis is feasible and could provide clinical benefit for a considerable proportion (~30%) of patients with metastatic gastric or esophageal cancer.

Phase II trial of veliparib in patients with previously treated BRCA-mutated pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: BRCA-associated cancers have increased sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis). This single arm, non-randomised, multicentre phase II trial evaluated the response rate of veliparib in patients with previously treated BRCA1/2- or PALB2-mutant pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS: Patients with stage III/IV PDAC and known germline BRCA1/2 or PALB2 mutation, 1-2 lines of treatment, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0-2, were enrolled. Veliparib was dosed at a volume of 300 mg twice-daily (N = 3), then 400 mg twice-daily (N = 15) days 1-28. The primary end-point was to determine the response rate of veliparib; secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response, overall survival (OS) and safety. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled; male N = 8 (50%). Median age was 52 years (range 43-77). Five (31%) had a BRCA1 and 11 (69%) had a BRCA2 mutation. Fourteen (88%) patients had received prior platinum-based therapy. No confirmed partial responses (PRs) were seen: one (6%) unconfirmed PR was observed at 4 months with disease progression (PD) at 6 months; four (25%) had stable disease (SD), whereas 11 (69%) had PD as best response including one with clinical PD. Median PFS was 1.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.57-1.83) and median OS was 3.1 months (95% CI 1.9-4.1). Six (38%) patients had grade III toxicity, including fatigue (N = 3), haematology (N = 2) and nausea (N = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Veliparib was well tolerated, but no confirmed response was observed although four (25%) patients remained on study with SD for ≥ 4 months. Additional strategies in this population are needed, and ongoing trials are evaluating PARPis combined with chemotherapy (NCT01585805) and as a maintenance strategy (NCT02184195).

RNAi therapy targeting KRAS in combination with chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The miniature biodegradable implant siG12D-LODER™ was inserted into a tumor and released a siRNA drug against KRAS(G12D) along four months. This novel siRNA based drug was studied, in combination with chemotherapy, as targeted therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC). METHODS: An open-label Phase 1/2a study in the first-line setting of patients with non-operable LAPC was initiated. In this study patients were assigned to receive a single dose of siG12D-LODERs, in three escalating dose cohorts (0.025mg, 0.75mg and 3.0mg). Gemcitabine was given on a weekly basis, following the siG12D-LODERTM insertion, until disease progression. The recommended dose was further examined with modified FOLFIRINOX. The follow up period was eight weeks and survival until death. RESULTS: Fifteen patients with LAPC were enrolled. Among the 15 treated patients, the most frequent adverse events observed were grade 1or 2 in severity (89%); five patients experienced serious adverse events (SAEs). In 12 patients analyzed by CT scans, none showed tumor progression, the majority (10/12) demonstrated stable disease and two showed partial response. Decrease in tumor marker CA19-9 was observed in 70% (7/10) of patients. Median overall survival was 15.12 months; 18 month survival was 38.5%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of siG12D-LODER™ and chemotherapy is well tolerated, safe and demonstrated a potential efficacy in patients with LAPC. NCT01188785.

Abdominal cocoon: a potential pitfall in patients with ovarian carcinoma.

Background. Abdominal cocoon, or sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis, is a rare condition characterized by partial or total encasement of small bowel and mesentery by a thick fibrocollagenous sack that looks like a cocoon. Within the sack, bowel loops are drawn together causing intestinal obstruction.Case presentation. We report on a 57-year-old female patient who developed a very unusual complication of ovarian cancer: abdominal cocoon formation.Conclusions. This report highlights the need for a timely diagnosis of sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis in cancer patients.

A 67-year-old woman with BRCA 1 mutation associated with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: There are approximately 40,000 new cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosed in the USA each year. It is estimated that 5-10% of all patients with pancreatic cancer have a first-degree relative with the disease, while up to 20% of cases have a hereditary component. Individuals who carry a germline mutation in the BRCA 1 or 2 genes have an increased lifetime risk of developing pancreatic adenocarcinoma when compared with the general population. CASE REPORT: Here, we present a case of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma arising in a 67-year-old carrier of a BRCA 1 germline mutation. DISCUSSION: In patients with known BRCA 1 or 2 mutation-associated pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the addition of a DNA cross-linking agent such as cisplatin, oxaliplatin, or mitomycin to a standard gemcitabine chemotherapy backbone should be considered. Poly ADP-ribose inhibitors are a novel class of drug, which have demonstrated promising efficacy in trials of BRCA 1 and 2 mutant breast and ovarian cancer, and are currently undergoing prospective evaluation in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Neoadjuvant imatinib for unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

We have evaluated the feasibility of the use of neoadjuvant imatinib mesylate in the management of unresectable localized gastrointestinal stromal tumors. In a pilot experience, two patients with unresectable gastrointestinal tumors were treated with neoadjuvant imatinib. Their treatment course and surgical outcomes are described. In both cases, the patient attained sufficient tumor regression to enable complete resection of tumor. We conclude that in the management of unresectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors, neoadjuvant administration of imatinib may facilitate sufficient tumor regression to facilitate subsequent tumor resection with curative intent.