Sarcopenia is a risk factor for major adverse cardiac events after surgical revascularization for critical limb ischemia.

OBJECTIVES: We examined the effect of sarcopenia on early surgical outcomes in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) in terms of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE), as well as the value of inflammatory markers of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios (PLR) as indicators of sarcopenia in CLI patients. METHODS: This was an observational retrospective single-center study. Patients who required surgical revascularization for CLI between October 2015 and December 2020 were identified. Psoas muscle areas were calculated from computed tomography images for psoas muscle index (PMI) calculations. Sarcopenia was defined as PMI < 5.5 cm2/m2 for men and PMI < 4.0 cm2/m2 for women. Risk factors for 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE) were analyzed. NLR and PLR were compared between sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic patients. RESULTS: The mean age of 217 study patients was 61.5 ± 10.9, and 16 (7.4%) patients were female. 82 (37.8%) patients were sarcopenic. Patients with sarcopenia were older (65.1 ± 9.3 vs 59.4 ± 11.2, p < .001) and history of myocardial infarction was more frequent (23.2% vs 12.6%, p = 0.042) among sarcopenic patients. Sarcopenic patients more frequently encountered MACE (9.8% vs 0.7%, p = 0.002), but not MALE. Sarcopenia increased early postoperative MACE in our cohort with an odds ratio of 11.925. NLR was not different between the two groups, while PLR was higher (127.16 vs 104.06, p = 0.010) among sarcopenic patients. The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio of 125.11 had a sensitivity of 53.7% and a specificity of 68.1% for differentiating sarcopenia. CONCLUSIONS: Sarcopenia was associated with more frequent 30-day MACE and perioperative mortality after revascularization for CLI. 30-day MALE was not increased in patients with sarcopenia. The use of PLR as a simple marker of sarcopenia is limited by its low sensitivity and specificity.

Comparison of post-operative and pulmonary morbidity due to subxiphoid and midaxillary chest drainage tubes after coronary artery bypass grafting.

AIM: pain and pulmonary morbidity in patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using left internal thoracic artery (LITA) grafting. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study was prospective and included 40 patients who underwent elective isolated CABG with pedicled LITA grafts. Patients were divided into two groups according to the method used to place chest drainage tubes. Group 1 (n=20) had the left chest drain tube inserted through the sixth intercostal space along the anterior axillary line (mid-axillary approach), and Group 2 (n=20) had the left chest drain tube inserted through the midline inferior to the xiphoid process (subxiphoid approach). We evaluated the groups in terms of postoperative pain, pulmonary morbidity, amount of chest tube drainage, need for analgesic agents, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: In group 1, the pain was significantly higher during mobilization and drain removal (p<0.05) but was similar at rest. In Group 1 and Group 2, pulmonary morbidity rates were statistically similar for pleural effusion (2 vs. 5; p=0.40), atelectasis (2 vs. 5; p=0.40), and pneumothorax after drain removal (1 vs. 0; p=1.00). Two of the patients with pleural effusion in Group 2 underwent thoracentesis. There was no difference between the two groups regarding the amount of chest tube drainage, cumulative doses of an analgesic agent, and length of hospital stay (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: According to these results, both procedures can be used safely for chest drainage tube placement after CABG. KEY WORDS: Chest Pain, Chest Tubes, Coronary Artery Bypass, Complications, Drainage, Postoperative.

Aneurysmal degeneration in the Omniflow II biosynthetic vascular graft.

Despite advances in endovascular treatments, femoropopliteal bypass is still the best option for the treatment of lower-extremity occlusive artery disease. Omniflow II biosynthetic vascular grafts are often chosen as bypass grafts when autologous vein grafting is not possible. A negative feature of this graft is the tendency towards late biodegeneration with possible formation of graft aneurysms. In this case report, we present a thrombosed non-anastomotic biosynthetic graft aneurysm, which caused only a pulsatile mass in the inguinal region, in a 62-year-old male patient who had undergone a femoropopliteal bypass operation three years earlier. Aneurysm formation in vascular grafts is multifactorial and can cause life-threatening consequences. Therefore, all patients with biosynthetic vascular grafts should remain under lifetime surveillance with duplex ultrasound for aneurysmal graft degeneration and graft thrombosis.

Prosthetic vascular graft management in above-knee amputations.

OBJECTIVE: Critical limb ischaemia (CLI) is the most severe state of peripheral arterial disease and is one of the major causes of lower-limb amputations. One of the treatment choices is prosthetic vascular grafts. Despite treatment, CLI may lead to amputation owing to infection or progressive ischaemia. The aim of this study was to show that multidisciplinary planning and surgery for CLI patients with prosthetic grafts decreased the duration of hospital stay, costs, risk of infection and ascending conversion of the amputation level. METHODS: Forty-two above-knee amputation patients with grafts were retrospectively evaluated. Group A patients (n = 24) had partial excision and group B patients ( n = 18) total excision with or without saphenous patch-plasty, according to the patency of the deep femoral artery. Growth in wound culture, antibiotic therapy duration, conversion to hip disarticulation and hospitalisation periods were compared. RESULTS: Differences in growth of wound culture (p = 0.007), antibiotic duration (p = 0.003), hip disarticulation (p = 0.029) and duration of hospital stay (p = 0.0001) between the two groups were found to be statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Management of CLI patients is a complex process, and a multidisciplinary approach is key to avoiding undesirable outcomes. Meticulous planning, including excision of the total graft, while ensuring the vascular supply, is essential.

Three Different Strategies for Repair of Symptomatic or Aneurysmatic Aberrant Right Subclavian Arteries.

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we aimed to present three different methods for symptomatic aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) surgery. METHODS: We identified 11 consecutive adult patients undergoing symptomatic and/or aneurysmal ARSA repair between January 2016 and December 2020. Symptoms were dysphagia (n=8) and dyspnea + dysphagia (n=3). Six patients had aneurysm formation of the ARSA (mean diameter of 4.2 cm [range 2.8 - 6.3]). All data were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Median age of the patients (7 females/4 males) was 55 years (range 49 - 62). The first four patients (36.4%) underwent hybrid repair using thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and bilateral carotid-subclavian artery bypass (CScBp). Three patients (27.2%) were treated by open ARSA resection/ligation with left mini posterolateral thoracotomy (LMPLT) and right CScBp. And the last four patients (36.4%) underwent ARSA resection/ligation with LMPLT and ascending aorta-right subclavian artery bypass with upper mini sternotomy (UMS). Two of the four patients who underwent TEVAR + bilateral CScBp had continuing dysphagia cause of persistent esophageal compression. Brachial plexus injury developed in one of three patients who underwent LMPLT + right CScBp. Pleural effusion treated with thoracentesis alone was observed in one of four patients who underwent UMS + LMPLT. CONCLUSION: Among the symptomatic and/or aneurysmal ARSA treatment approaches, surgical and hybrid methods are used. There is still no consensus on how to manage these patients. In our study, we recommend the UMS + LMPLT method, since the risk of complications with anatomical bypass is less, and we have more successful surgical results.

The effects of gabapentin on acute and chronic postoperative pain after coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the analgesic effects of perioperative gabapentin on postoperative acute and chronic pain after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery with median sternotomy and internal mammary artery harvesting. DESIGN: A double-blind randomized clinical study. SETTING: A single-academic hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with ischemic heart disease who were scheduled to undergo CABG surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Forty patients were allocated randomly into 2 groups; the gabapentin group (n = 20) received 1.2 g/d of oral gabapentin before and for 2 days after surgery, and the placebo group (n = 20) received a placebo capsule instead. The primary outcome was to evaluate the effects of gabapentin on acute and chronic pain after surgery. The postoperative evaluation included the assessment of pain at rest and when coughing, intravenous tramadol usage, postoperative morbidities, and side effects of gabapentin. Postoperative analgesia at 6, 12, 18, 24, 48, and 72 hours after extubation and at discharge was evaluated with the visual analog scale. The assessment of postoperative pain at the 1- and 3-month follow-ups was performed using a numeric rating scale. MAIN RESULTS: Postoperative pain scores at 1, 2, and 3 days were significantly lower in the gabapentin group when compared with the placebo group (p < 0.05). Pain scores at 1 and 3 months postoperatively were lower in the gabapentin group than in the placebo group (p > 0.05). Consumption of intravenous tramadol given as rescue analgesic within 24 hours after extubation in the gabapentin group was 99.0 ± 53.8 mg versus 149.4 ± 72.5 mg in the placebo group (p < 0.05). There were no differences in the incidence of side effects and time to extubation between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Gabapentin significantly reduced the intensity of pain and tramadol consumption in the early postoperative period after CABG surgery. Pain scores at 1 and 3 months after surgery were low in both groups, with no significant difference between the groups.

Predictive Value of Systemic Immune Inflammation Index for Postoperative Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.

OBJECTIVE: Inflammation plays an important role in the initiation of postoperative atrial fibrillation (PoAF) in individuals undergoing cardiac surgery, Thus, this study aimed to investigate the predictive value of the systemic immune inflammation index (SII) to develop PoAF in such patients. METHODS: In total, 391 consecutive patients undergoing an isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were retrospectively analyzed. PoAF was defined according to the current guideline. The SII is determined using the following equation: neutrophil (N) × platelet (P) ÷ lymphocyte (L). RESULTS: The incidence of PoAF in the present study was 24% (n=97 cases). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the SII was an independent predictor of PoAF (Odds ratio: 1.002 95% confidence interval: (1.001-1.002), p<0.01). The optimal value of the SII in detecting PoAF was established by a receiver operating characteristic curve assessment, and it was >807.8 with 60.8% sensitivity and 80.9% specificity [area under the curve (AUC): 0.7107]. The AUC value of SII in detecting PoAF was much greater than the AUC values of both the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) (AUC: 0.6740 and AUC: 0.6426, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed that SII was an independent predictor of PoAF in patients who were operated on for isolated CABG. Additionally, SII had a better discriminative ability for PoAF compared to either NLR or PLR among these cases.

Safety Pericardiocentesis with Fluoroscopy Following Cardiac Surgery.

PURPOSE: In the treatment of the postsurgical pericardial effusions via pericardiocentesis, determination of the puncture site might be difficult. Contrast echocardiography may not be efficient due to surgical artefacts and pulmonary problems and therefore may lead to inaccurate evaluation. Alternative imaging methods might be helpful to perform the pericardiocentesis with decreased complications. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the patients who had undergone pericardiocentesis in our department from January 2008 through April 2018. The procedure was performed in slightly semi-seated position with the guidance of the echocardiography and fluoroscopy. Following the catheterization, percutaneous drainage was performed. RESULTS: There were 63 patients needed intervention due to pericardial effusion. 67% of the patients were using warfarin and the next patients were using acetyl salicylic acid and/or clopidogrel. All effusions were in the posterolateral localization. The mean volume of aspirated pericardial fluid was 404 ± 173 mL (150-980 mL). Control echocardiograms showed that almost all fluid was drained in all patients and there were no procedural or follow-up complications. CONCLUSION: In the treatment of postoperative pericardial effusion, fluoroscopy is an alternative method to locate the catheter accurately in challenging situations following cardiac surgery. Thus, procedural risk minimizes and drainage of pericardial fluid is performed safely.