RESUMO
Few contemporary data are available that compare incidence and survival of metastatic breast cancer between ductal and lobular carcinomas. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-9 registries, we identified 10,639 patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer diagnosed from 1990 to 2011. Annual age-adjusted incidence rates and annual percent changes (APCs) were analyzed. Multivariable Cox regression models were used to investigate the impact of year of diagnosis and histology on overall survival. 9250 (86.9 %) patients had ductal and 1389 (13.1 %) had lobular carcinomas. Metastatic breast cancer incidence increased slightly over time for ductal (APC = +1.7, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = +1.0 to +2.4) and lobular carcinomas (APC = +3.0, 95 % CI = +1.8 to +4.3). Median overall survival was 22 months among the whole cohort. More recent year of diagnosis was associated with better overall survival only for patients with ductal carcinomas (interaction p value = 0.006), with an adjusted hazard ratio of death for every five-year increment in the date of diagnosis of 0.93 (95 % CI = 0.91-0.95) among ductal carcinomas, compared with 1.05 (95 % CI = 0.95-1.10) among lobular carcinomas. Overall survival was longer for lobular versus ductal carcinomas (28 versus 21 months, respectively; adjusted hazard ratio of death = 0.93, 95 % CI = 0.87-0.99), but the magnitude of this effect was attenuated among the cohort restricted to hormone receptor-positive tumors. In this population-based analysis, incidence rates of metastatic breast cancer at presentation increased slightly over time for both histologies, and particularly for lobular tumors. A modest improvement in metastatic breast cancer median overall survival was observed, but was apparently limited to ductal carcinomas.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/epidemiologia , Carcinoma Lobular/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Programa de SEER , Análise de Sobrevida , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto JovemRESUMO
IMPORTANCE: Whether the administration of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogues (LHRHa) during chemotherapy is a reliable strategy to preserve ovarian function is controversial owing to both the lack of data on long-term ovarian function and pregnancies and the safety concerns about the potential negative interactions between endocrine therapy and chemotherapy. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate long-term results of LHRHa-induced ovarian suppression during breast cancer chemotherapy. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Parallel, randomized, open-label, phase 3 superiority trial conducted at 16 Italian sites. Between October 2003 and January 2008, 281 premenopausal women with stage I to III hormone receptor-positive or hormone receptor-negative breast cancer were enrolled. Last annual follow-up was June 3, 2014. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized to receive adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (control group) or chemotherapy plus triptorelin (LHRHa group). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary planned end point was incidence of chemotherapy-induced early menopause. Post hoc end points were long-term ovarian function (evaluated by yearly assessment of menstrual activity and defined as resumed by the occurrence of at least 1 menstrual cycle), pregnancies, and disease-free survival (DFS). RESULTS: A total of 281 women (median age, 39 [range, 24-45] years) were randomized. Median follow-up was 7.3 years (interquartile range, 6.3-8.2 years). The 5-year cumulative incidence estimate of menstrual resumption was 72.6% (95% CI, 65.7%-80.3%) among the 148 patients in the LHRHa group and 64.0% (95% CI, 56.2%-72.8%) among the 133 patients in the control group (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28 [95% CI, 0.98-1.68]; P = .07; age-adjusted HR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.12-1.95]; P = .006). Eight pregnancies (5-year cumulative incidence estimate of pregnancy, 2.1% [95% CI, 0.7%-6.3%]) occurred in the LHRHa group and 3 (5-year cumulative incidence estimate of pregnancy, 1.6% [95% CI, 0.4%-6.2%]) in the control group (HR, 2.56 [95% CI, 0.68-9.60]; P = .14; age-adjusted HR, 2.40 [95% CI, 0.62-9.22]; P = .20). Five-year DFS was 80.5% (95% CI, 73.1%-86.1%) in the LHRHa group and 83.7% (95% CI, 76.1%-89.1%) in the control group (LHRHa vs control: HR, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.72-1.92]; P = .52). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among premenopausal women with either hormone receptor-positive or hormone receptor-negative breast cancer, concurrent administration of triptorelin and chemotherapy, compared with chemotherapy alone, was associated with higher long-term probability of ovarian function recovery, without a statistically significant difference in pregnancy rate. There was no statistically significant difference in DFS for women assigned to triptorelin and those assigned to chemotherapy alone, although study power was limited. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier:NCT00311636.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Hormonais/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Ovário/efeitos dos fármacos , Taxa de Gravidez , Pamoato de Triptorrelina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Neoplasias da Mama/química , Neoplasias da Mama/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/fisiopatologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Interações Medicamentosas , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Luteolíticos/uso terapêutico , Ciclo Menstrual/fisiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ovário/metabolismo , Gravidez , Pré-Menopausa/efeitos dos fármacos , Recuperação de Função FisiológicaRESUMO
Influenza vaccination is generally recommended for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) patients, but no data are available about the activity of this vaccine after treatment with rituximab-containing regimens. We evaluated the humoral response to the trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine in a group of NHL patients in complete remission for ≥6 mo (median, 29 mo) after treatment with rituximab-containing regimens (n = 31) compared with age-matched healthy subjects (n = 34). B cell populations and incidence of influenza-like illness were also evaluated. For each viral strain, the response was significantly lower in patients compared with controls and was particularly poor in patients treated with fludarabine-based regimens. In the patient group, the response to vaccination did not fulfill the immunogenic criteria based on the European Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use requirements. Among the patients, CD27(+) memory B cells were significantly reduced, and their reduction correlated with serum IgM levels and vaccine response. Episodes of influenza-like illness were recorded only in patients. These results showed that NHL patients treated with rituximab-containing regimens have persisting perturbations of B cell compartments and Ig synthesis and may be at particular risk for infection, even in long-standing complete remission.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Linfócitos B/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/imunologia , Influenza Humana/prevenção & controle , Linfoma não Hodgkin/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma não Hodgkin/imunologia , Orthomyxoviridae/imunologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais Murinos/imunologia , Anticorpos Monoclonais Murinos/uso terapêutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Memória Imunológica , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H1N1/imunologia , Vírus da Influenza A Subtipo H3N2/imunologia , Vírus da Influenza B/imunologia , Vacinas contra Influenza/administração & dosagem , Influenza Humana/imunologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Rituximab , Membro 7 da Superfamília de Receptores de Fatores de Necrose Tumoral/imunologia , Vidarabina/análogos & derivados , Vidarabina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine the immunogenicity and antitumor activity of a vaccine consisting of autologous, tumor-derived heat shock protein gp96-peptide complexes (HSPPC-96, Oncophage; Antigenics, Inc, Woburn, MA) in metastatic (American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IV) melanoma patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients had surgical resection of metastatic tissue required for vaccine production, 42 patients were able to receive the vaccine, and 39 were assessable after one cycle of vaccination (four weekly injections). In 21 patients, a second cycle (four biweekly injections) was given because no progression occurred. Antigen-specific antimelanoma T-cell response was assessed by enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained before and after vaccination. Immunohistochemical analyses of tumor tissues were also performed. RESULTS: No treatment-related toxicity was observed. Of 28 patients with measurable disease, two had a complete response (CR) and three had stable disease (SD) at the end of follow-up. Duration of CR was 559+ and 703+ days, whereas SD lasted for 153, 191, and 272 days, respectively. ELISPOT assay with PBMCs of 23 subjects showed a significantly increased number of postvaccination melanoma-specific T-cell spots in 11 patients, with clinical responders displaying a high frequency of increased T-cell activity. Immunohistochemical staining of melanoma tissues from which vaccine was produced revealed high expression of both HLA class I and melanoma antigens in seven of eight clinical responders (two with CR, three with SD, and the three with long-term disease-free survival) and in four of 12 nonresponders. CONCLUSION: Vaccination of metastatic melanoma patients with autologous HSPPC-96 is feasible and devoid of significant toxicity. This vaccine induced clinical and tumor-specific T-cell responses in a significant minority of patients.
Assuntos
Vacinas Anticâncer/imunologia , Vacinas Anticâncer/uso terapêutico , Antígenos HLA/imunologia , Proteínas de Choque Térmico/imunologia , Imunoterapia , Melanoma/terapia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Antígenos de Neoplasias/imunologia , Feminino , Humanos , Imunoensaio/métodos , Imuno-Histoquímica , Masculino , Melanoma/imunologia , Melanoma/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica , Indução de Remissão , Neoplasias Cutâneas/imunologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Análise de Sobrevida , Linfócitos T/imunologiaRESUMO
Although the presence of multiple cases of melanoma on the same side of a family is the best predictor of germline CDKN2A mutation, other features (i.e. early age at onset) may be useful to identify carriers. We analysed the records of 682 hospital-based Ligurian melanoma patients. Of these, 238 cases (34 familial, 14 non-familial multiple primary and 190 non-familial single primary melanomas) were consecutively enrolled for screening of the CDKN2A and CDK4 genes. Screening of the 34 familial patients revealed that nine were carriers of the CDKN2A G101W founder mutation. Of the 14 non-familial multiple primary melanoma patients, three carried the G101W founder mutation and one the P48T mutation. For the non-familial patients with a single melanoma, 17 of 190 carried germline CDKN2A mutations, with most (16/17) carrying the G101W Ligurian founder mutation and one a novel single base pair substitution, D74Y. The effect of mutation on age at diagnosis was significant (P=0.012) after correcting for melanoma type (familial or non-familial), number of primaries (single or multiple), gender and disease occurrence (incident or prevalent). Early age at onset may be a good predictor of CDKN2A mutation in Liguria, where the G101W founder mutation is prevalent among melanoma patients, independent of family history.
Assuntos
Inibidor p16 de Quinase Dependente de Ciclina/genética , Efeito Fundador , Melanoma/genética , Mutação/genética , Neoplasias Cutâneas/genética , Adolescente , Adulto , Idade de Início , Idoso , Análise Mutacional de DNA , DNA de Neoplasias/química , DNA de Neoplasias/genética , Feminino , Triagem de Portadores Genéticos , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Testes Genéticos , Genótipo , Humanos , Itália/epidemiologia , Masculino , Prontuários Médicos , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Melanoma/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Linhagem , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Cutâneas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The most appropriate timing of chemotherapy and hormone therapy administration is a critical issue in early breast cancer patients. The purpose of our study was to compare the efficacy of concurrent vs sequential administration of adjuvant chemotherapy and tamoxifen. METHODS: Women with node-positive primary breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive tamoxifen (20 mg/d for 5 years) during (concurrent arm) or after (sequential arm) adjuvant chemotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of alternating regimens of cyclophosphamide, epidoxorubicin, and 5-fluorouracil and cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and 5-fluorouracil every 21 days for a total of 12 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints were toxic effects and disease-free survival (DFS). No provision for interim analyses was made in the original study protocol. Survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariable Cox regression models, adjusted for age, menopausal status, tumor stage, and lymph node and hormone receptor status, were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: From 1985 to 1992, 431 patients were randomly assigned and studied according to the intention-to-treat principle. After a maximum of 15.4 years of follow-up (median 12.3 years), the estimated actuarial 10-year OS was equivalent for the two study arms (concurrent arm: 111 patients, 66%, 95% CI = 59% to 72%; sequential arm: 114 patients, 65%, 95% CI = 59% to 72%, P = .86). No differences in DFS and toxic effects were evident. Four interim analyses were performed, but no alpha error adjustment was necessary because of the largely negative results of this final analysis (sequential vs concurrent arm: HR of death = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.78 to 1.44, P = .76; HR of relapse = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.88 to 1.52, P = .36). CONCLUSIONS: No statistically significant differences in OS, DFS, and toxic effects between concurrent and sequential adjuvant chemo- and hormone therapies were observed. Our study does not support the superiority of one schedule of chemo- and hormone-therapy administration over the other. However, because of the limited statistical power of the study, these results must be considered with caution.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos Hormonais/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Axila , Neoplasias da Mama/metabolismo , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/cirurgia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Fatores de Confusão Epidemiológicos , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Esquema de Medicação , Epirubicina/administração & dosagem , Epirubicina/análogos & derivados , Feminino , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Seguimentos , Glucuronatos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Itália , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Excisão de Linfonodo , Mastectomia Segmentar , Metotrexato/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Hormônio-Dependentes/tratamento farmacológico , Prognóstico , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Fatores de Risco , Tamoxifeno/administração & dosagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The identification of tumor antigens recognized by T cells led to the design of therapeutic strategies aimed at eliciting adaptive immune responses. The last decade of experience has shown that, although active immunization can induce enhancement of anticancer T-cell precursors (easily detectable in standard assays), most often they are unable to induce tumor regression and, consequently, have scarcely any impact on overall survival. Moreover, in the few occasions when tumor rejection occurs, the mechanisms determining this phenomenon remain poorly understood, and data derived from in vivo human observations are rare. The advent of high-throughput gene-expression analysis (microarrays) has cast new light on unrecognized mechanisms that are now deemed to be central for the development of efficient immune-mediated tumor rejection. The aim of this article is to review the data on the molecular signature associated with this process. We believe that the description of how the mechanism of immune-mediated tissue destruction occurs would contribute to our understanding of why it happens, thereby allowing us to develop more effective immune therapeutic strategies.
Assuntos
Vacinas Anticâncer/uso terapêutico , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica , Imunização , Neoplasias/terapia , Animais , Carcinoma Basocelular/terapia , Humanos , Interleucina-2/uso terapêutico , Melanoma/terapia , Neoplasias/imunologia , Terapia Viral Oncolítica , Linfócitos T/imunologia , Linfócitos T/metabolismo , Receptor 7 Toll-Like/agonistas , Vaccinia virusAssuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/efeitos adversos , Anticorpos Anti-Hepatite B/sangue , Antígenos do Núcleo do Vírus da Hepatite B/imunologia , Hepatite B , Linfoma , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Monoclonais Murinos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Hepatite B/diagnóstico , Hepatite B/epidemiologia , Hepatite B/imunologia , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , Linfoma/complicações , Linfoma/tratamento farmacológico , Linfoma/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Rituximab , Estudos SoroepidemiológicosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: To determine whether a dose-dense regimen improves outcome in early breast cancer patients, we compared outcomes with the same fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) chemotherapeutic regimen administered every 3 weeks (FEC21) or administered every 2 weeks (FEC14 including support with filgrastim, a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor) in a multicenter phase III randomized trial. METHODS: A total of 1214 patients with early-stage breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of FEC14 (604 patients) or of FEC21 (610 patients). Study endpoints were overall survival and event-free survival. Associations were assessed by multivariable analysis with adjustment for age; tumor size; grade; proliferative rate; and menopausal, lymph node, estrogen receptor, and progesterone receptor status. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Patients in the FEC14 arm had fewer dose reductions or treatment delays or discontinuation (26%) than those in the FEC21 arm (33%) (difference = 7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2% to 12%; P = .008). FEC14 therapy, compared with FEC21 therapy, was associated with more asthenia (36% versus 29%, difference = 7%, 95% CI = 2% to 12%; P = .01), bone pain (33% versus 4%, difference = 29%, 95% CI = 25% to 33%; P < .001), anemia (38% versus 19%, difference = 19%, 95% CI = 14% to 24%; P < .001), and thrombocytopenia (8% versus 2%, difference = 6%, 95% CI = 4% to 9%; P < .001), but with less leukopenia (12% versus 45%, difference = 33%, 95% CI = 28% to 37%; P < .001). No acute myelogenous leukemia or myelodysplastic syndrome was observed. At a median follow-up of 10.4 years, no statistically significant difference in the hazard of death (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.67 to 1.13) or recurrence (HR = 0.88, 95% CI = 0.71 to 1.08) was found between FEC14 and FEC21 groups after adjustment by multivariable analysis. Although the study was underpowered for subset analysis, we found no evidence that the effect of the treatment type was associated with any of the potential prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Our results support the long-term safety of FEC14 chemotherapy as an adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. However, this therapy was not associated with improved outcome, but because of the limited statistical power of our study, we cannot rule out a modest improvement in outcome associated with FEC14 therapy.
Assuntos
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Intervalos de Confiança , Ciclofosfamida/administração & dosagem , Ciclofosfamida/efeitos adversos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Esquema de Medicação , Epirubicina/administração & dosagem , Epirubicina/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Filgrastim , Fluoruracila/administração & dosagem , Fluoruracila/efeitos adversos , Fator Estimulador de Colônias de Granulócitos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Itália , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Razão de Chances , Proteínas Recombinantes , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
With the advent of sentinel node (sN) biopsy in melanoma patients, elective lymph node dissection (ELND) can be considered an exceeded procedure. Regardless of the possible therapeutic benefits, sN biopsy efficiently predicts prognosis avoiding the morbidity rate of ELND. The importance of the sN is underlined by multivariate analyses, which show that the sN status represents the most important prognostic factor influencing disease-free and distant disease-free survival in patients with stage I and II melanoma. Moreover, sN biopsy provides a minimally invasive method for identifying those patients with subclinical nodal metastasis who actually have stage III disease, with a very high risk of occult distant metastases and who may benefit by adjuvant therapy.
Assuntos
Linfonodos/patologia , Melanoma/cirurgia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Neoplasias Cutâneas/cirurgia , Análise de Variância , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Metástase Linfática , Melanoma/mortalidade , Melanoma/patologia , Terapia Neoadjuvante , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Taxa de SobrevidaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The sentinel lymph node (sN) represents one of the most powerful predictors of the outcome of patients with Stages I and II cutaneous melanoma, and may be relevant for the therapeutic planning of early-stage melanoma patients. Since adopting the technique of lymphatic mapping with vital blue dye (Patent Blue-V) in July 1993, we have periodically up-dated the methodology and revised our results in order to define the contribution of radio-guided surgery (RGS) to the detection of the sN as well as the role of intraoperative frozen section examination of the sN. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between July 1993 and December 1997, 180 patients with clinically node-negative primary cutaneous melanoma (Stages I-II) underwent sN biopsy followed by "selective lymph node dissection" (SLND) whenever sN metastasis was detected. Presently, complete data are available in 165 patients who were divided into two consecutive subsets of 39 and 126 patients, based on the technique for the identification of the sN: Patent Blue-V only or Patent Blue-V associated to RGS. Moreover, in this second subset of patients intraoperative frozen section findings were compared with definitive pathologic examination. RESULTS: As regards the first subset of 39 patients (17 males and 22 females; mean age 51.3 years), the sN was identified in 35 patients (89.7%); 8 patients (22.8%) were found to have metastatic melanoma cells in their sN, and they all underwent SLND of the affected basin. As regards the second set of 126 patients (54 males and 72 females; mean age 53.5 years), the sN was detected in every case by means of the combined technique (Patent Blue-V and RGS): in 4 of 126 patients (3.2%), the sN was detected by means of RGS only whereas in no patient was the sN detected by Patent Blue-V only. Frozen section examination was performed in 123 of 126 patients who had sN detection by Patent Blue-V and RGS, and the intraoperative examination had a sensitivity of 66.6% (22 of 33), specificity of 100% (90 of 90), negative predictive value of 89.1% (90 of 101), and accuracy of 91% (112 of 123). The benefit of frozen section examination in avoiding a two-stage procedure was 17.9% (22 of 123 patients). In patients with thicker lesions (pT(3)-pT(4)), the sensitivity and the benefit of intraoperative examination were 76% (19 of 25) and 32% (19 of 59 patients), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel node lymphadenectomy can be better accomplished when both procedures (lymphatic mapping with Patent Blue-V and RGS) are used because the two methods look quite complementary. In fact, the use of the radiocolloid mapping allows to detect a hot spot in the regional basin prior to making the skin incision in order to perform a minimal invasive access, and it may also more accurately differentiate the true sN from a secondary echelon node (non-sN). The use of frozen section examination should be restricted to patients with pT(3)-pT(4) primary melanoma, due to the higher sensitivity and benefit in terms of avoiding a two-stage operative procedure.