Hypereosinophilic syndrome in Europe: Retrospective study of treatment patterns, clinical manifestations, and healthcare resource utilization.

BACKGROUND: The burden of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) in Europe is not well characterized. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate real-world patient characteristics, treatment patterns, clinical manifestations, and healthcare resource utilization for patients with HES from France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom. METHODS: In this retrospective, noninterventional study, data for patients with a physician-confirmed diagnosis of HES were abstracted from medical chart reviews. Patients were aged 6 years or older at the time of HES diagnosis and had 1 or more years of follow-up from the index date (first clinic visit between January 2015 and December 2019). Data on treatment patterns, comorbidities, clinical manifestations, clinical outcomes, and healthcare resource utilization were collected from diagnosis or index date to end of follow-up. RESULTS: Data for 280 patients were abstracted from medical charts by 121 physicians treating HES, with multiple specialties. Most patients (55%) had idiopathic HES, and 24% had myeloid HES; the median number (interquartile range [IQR]) of diagnostic tests per patient was 10 (6-12). The most common comorbidities were asthma (45%) and anxiety or depression (36%). Most patients (89%) used oral corticosteroids; 64% used immunosuppressants or cytotoxic agents, and 44% used biologics. Patients had a median (IQR) of 3 clinical manifestations (1-5), most commonly constitutional (63%), lung (49%), and skin (48%). Twenty-three percent of patients experienced a flare, and 40% had a complete treatment response. Some patients (30%) were hospitalized with a median (IQR) stay of 9 days (5-15) for HES-related issues. CONCLUSION: Patients with HES across 5 European countries had a substantial disease burden despite extensive oral corticosteroids treatment, highlighting the need for additional targeted therapies.

Evaluating the real-world effectiveness of belimumab in patients with SLE using SLE-related laboratory values and rheumatoid arthritis-derived disease activity measures: RAPID3, swollen joint count and tender joint count.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the real-world impact of intravenous belimumab treatment among patients with SLE using rheumatoid arthritis-derived disease activity measures and SLE-related laboratory values. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used US electronic medical record data from the United Rheumatology Normalised Integrated Community Evidence (UR-NICE) database. Adult patients with SLE who initiated intravenous belimumab between 1 January 2012 and 3 December 2019 (index), had 12 months of pre-index and 24 months of post-index clinical activity, and had ≥6 infusions of belimumab during the 24 months post-index were included. The primary outcome measure was time to first improvement of minimally important difference (MID) for Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), Patient Pain Index (PPI), swollen joint count, tender joint count (TJC), complement C3 and C4 and anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies during the on-treatment follow-up period of up to 24 months. The secondary outcome measure evaluated the trajectories of these outcome measures for up to 24 months of belimumab treatment. RESULTS: Of 495 patients included, between 21.0% and 52.1% had ≥1 record for each of the disease activity measures or laboratory values in the pre-index and post-index periods and were included in analyses for that measure. The proportion of patients achieving MID for each measure increased rapidly within 3 months, with continued gradual improvement throughout the remaining on-treatment period, up to 24 months. After 6 months, 52.3% and 55.3% of patients had achieved MID in RAPID3 and PPI, respectively. Outcome measure trajectories indicated improved disease activity with belimumab treatment, particularly in RAPID3, TJC and laboratory values. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-world effectiveness study, belimumab therapy for SLE resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in rheumatoid arthritis-derived disease activity measures within 3 months of treatment, with patients who remained on belimumab therapy experiencing improvement even up to 24 months of observation.

Treatment patterns and deep molecular response in chronic phase - chronic myeloid leukemia patients treated with second-line nilotinib or dasatinib: a multi-country retrospective chart review study.

Achievement of MR4.5 (BCR-ABL1 ≤ 0.0032% on international scale) is an important goal of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). This study describes treatment patterns by region and assesses time to achieve MR4.5 in patients with CML - chronic phase (CP) treated with second-line nilotinib or dasatinib in 10 countries. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess time to MR4.5 for nilotinib versus dasatinib. The model accounted for the competing-risk event of TKI resistance, included random effects for country clustering, and was adjusted for baseline covariates. The study included 280 patients treated with either nilotinib (N = 135 [48%]) or dasatinib (N = 145 [52%]) as second-line TKI with median treatment durations of 19.1 and 18.7 months, respectively. Nilotinib was observed to be better in achieving MR4.5 than dasatinib (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.37, 95% CI [1.11, 1.69]) suggesting second-line nilotinib may perform better in achieving MR4.5 than dasatinib.

Epilepsy, impaired functioning, and quality of life in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) and associated manifestations and to identify potential factors associated with HRQoL in this population of patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of adults with TSC who attended the outpatient clinic of the University Medical Center Utrecht in the Netherlands from 1990 to 2015 (N = 363; on average 33.6 years of follow-up). HRQoL data were assessed in 2012 using the Health Utility Index version 3 (HUI-3) questionnaire completed by patients or caregivers (N = 214 with HUI score and ≥1 TSC manifestation, including renal angiomyolipomas [rAMLs], subependymal giant cell astrocytoma [SEGA], or epilepsy). RESULTS: Of 214 patients in the study sample, 171 had TSC-associated epilepsy (with or without rAML/SEGA), 37 had TSC and rAML (without epilepsy or SEGA), and 6 had other combinations of manifestations. The median HUI score for the 214 patients with ≥1 TSC manifestation was 0.51 (-0.371 to 1 scale, 1 = perfect health, 0 = death, <0 = worse than death). Among all components used to build the overall HUI score, the cognition component had the lowest score (mean = 0.47; 0-1 scale). Patients with TSC-epilepsy had significantly lower overall HUI than patients with TSC and rAML only (median HUI = 0.31 vs 0.95, P < .05), especially those who were in refractory state for prolonged periods of time (median HUI = -0.11 among patients with seizures during the entire duration of their follow-up time). In multivariate analyses, severe impairment of daily functioning was the strongest predictor of HRQoL decrement (adjusted HUI difference between patients with severe vs. no impairment = -0.55, P < .05). SIGNIFICANCE: This study showed that TSC-related epilepsy is associated with lower HUI, especially for patients who have refractory seizures for prolonged periods of time. Early and effective interventions to control or reduce seizures and preserve patients' cognitive functions may help to improve patients' quality of life.

Development of a classifier to identify patients with probable Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in health insurance claims databases via random forest methodology.

Objective: Describe the development of a claims-based classifier utilizing machine learning to identify patients with probable Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) from six state Medicaid programs. Methods: Patients were included if they had ≥2 medical claims ≥30 days apart for specified or unspecified epilepsy, excluding those with ≥1 claim for petit mal status. The LGS classifier utilized a random forest algorithm, a compilation of thousands of binary decision trees in which machine-generated predictor variables split the data set into branches that predict the presence or absence of LGS. To construct the splitting rules, the importance of each candidate variable was determined by calculating the mean decrease in Gini impurity. Training and testing were performed on two data sets (30% and 70%) using a "true" LGS and non-LGS patient population. Performance was compared with logistic regression and single tree methodology. Results: Using a 60% probability threshold, which yielded the highest sensitivity (97.3%) and specificity (95.6%), the classifier identified approximately 4% of patients with epilepsy as probable LGS. The most important input variables included number of distinct antiepileptic drugs received, epilepsy-related outpatient/inpatient visits, electroencephalogram procedures and claims for delayed development. The random forest methodology outperformed logistic regression and single tree methodology. Most of the important LGS predictor characteristics identified by the classifier were statistically significantly associated with LGS status (p < .05). Conclusions: The claims-based LGS classifier showed high sensitivity and specificity, outperformed single tree and logistic regression methodologies and identified a prevalence of probable LGS that was similar to previously published estimates.

Evaluating dose ratio of subcutaneous to intravenous immunoglobulin therapy among patients with primary immunodeficiency disease switching to 20% subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy.

BACKGROUND: Current prescribing information recommends that physicians apply a dose ratio of 1.37:1 (1.53:1 prior to January 2015) in the United States (US) when switching patients with primary immunodeficiency disease (PI) from intravenous (IVIG) therapy to most subcutaneous therapy ([SCIG], except the 10% SCIG human hyaluronidase and immune globulin). However, a dose ratio of 1:1 was studied and approved for the European Union (EU). The dose-adjustment ratio used by prescribers in real-world US clinical practice is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To examine real-world Hizentra 20% SCIG-to-IVIG dose ratios in the US after PI patients are switched from IVIG to 20% SCIG (Hizentra). METHODS: A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted using prescription shipment data of patients with PI from specialty pharmaceutical and service providers from 2011 to 2016. Patients who had at least 1 shipment of IVIG prior to switching to 20% SCIG (Hizentra) and subsequently received at least 1 more 20% SCIG (Hizentra) shipment in the following 6 months were included. Monthly 20% SCIG (Hizentra) doses following a switch from IVIG were calculated for each 2-month interval by summing daily doses that were estimated by dividing shipped volume by days between shipments. Mean monthly IVIG dose was calculated from the total volume shipped prior to switch. Per-patient dose ratios of Hizentra 20% SCIG-to-IVIG were calculated by dividing monthly 20% SCIG (Hizentra) dose by monthly IVIG dose during each 2-month interval. To minimize the influence of outliers, median dose ratios were reported. Dose ratios at months 2 to 4, 4 to 6, and 6 to 8 were compared with the dose ratio at months 0 to 2 using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. A sensitivity analysis excluding pediatric patients was conducted to assess the impact of changes in weight. RESULTS: Data from 278 patients who met the inclusion criteria showed that median Hizentra 20% SCIG-to-IVIG dose ratios were 1.14:1 at 0 to 2 months post switch, 1.09:1 at 2 to 4 months, and stabilized at 1.05:1 at 4 to 6 and 6 to 8 months post switch. Median dose ratios at months 2 to 4, 4 to 6, and 6 to 8 were statistically significantly lower than the median dose ratio at 0 to 2 months post switch (all P < .001). Similar results were seen in the sensitivity analysis excluding pediatric patients. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world data indicate that patients were switched to 20% SCIG (Hizentra) from IVIG at dose ratios lower than recommended by US prescribing information but similar to prescribing information in the EU. The initial dose ratio of 1.14:1 at 0 to 2 months stabilized to 1.05:1 at 4 to 6 and 6 to 8 months, which was consistent with reports of dose-equivalent switching patterns used in management of PI in clinical practice in the US.

Clinical and cost burden of rotavirus infection before and after introduction of rotavirus vaccines among commercially and Medicaid insured children in the United States.

This study aims to quantify clinical and economic burden of rotavirus (RV) infection pre- and post-vaccine introduction in commercially insured and Medicaid populations. Beneficiaries with continuous enrollment for ≥6 months while <5 years of age were identified separately in commercial (2000-2010) and Medicaid (2002-2009) claims databases. Commercial and Medicaid databases included 3,998,708 and 1,034,440 eligible children, respectively, observed from enrollment start date(s) to end of eligibility or 5-years-old. Rates of RV-coded and diarrhea-coded encounters and first RV episodes, and incremental cost of first RV episodes were calculated. In the post-vaccine period, rates per 10,000 person-years for RV-coded hospitalizations, outpatient visits and ER visits were 5.58 (95% CI, 5.37-5.80), 6.96 (95% CI, 6.75-7.20), and 4.85 (95% CI, 4.66-5.06), respectively (pre-vaccine, 16.67 [95% CI, 16.19-17.15], 13.20 [95% CI, 12.78-13.63], 11.26 [95% CI, 10.87-11.66], respectively), for commercially insured. In Medicaid the corresponding rates were 10.53 (95% CI, 9.60-11.56), 11.72 (95% CI, 10.73-12.80), and 9.11 (95% CI, 8.24-10.07) (pre-vaccine, 19.78 [95% CI, 19.14-20.45], 19.39 [95% CI, 18.75-20.05], 27.61 [95% CI, 26.84-28.40]). Incidence rate per 10,000 person-years for first RV episode pre- vs. post-vaccine were 27.03 (95% CI, 26.42-27.65) vs. 10.14 (95% CI, 9.86-10.44) in the commercially insured population and 37.71 (95% CI, 36.81-38.63) vs. 18.64 (95% CI, 17.37-19.99) in Medicaid. Incremental per-patient per-month cost of first RV episode was $3363 (95% CI, $3308-$3418) among commercially insured and $1831 (95% CI, $1768-$1887) in Medicaid. Since vaccine introduction clinical burden of RV disease decreased among children; costs associated with RV episodes remained significant across insured populations.

Quality measure attainment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the demographics, comorbidities, clinical characteristics, and treatments of people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) treated with metformin and sulfonylurea as well as an elderly subgroup. Achievement of predefined quality measure goals (glycated hemoglobin [A1C], blood pressure [BP], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C], body mass index [BMI]) and their association with diabetes-related healthcare costs were assessed. STUDY DESIGN: The study applied a retrospective longitudinal cohort design. METHODS: Health insurance claims and electronic medical records from 14,532 adults with T2DM (2007- 2011) were used to identify a sample receiving metformin and sulfonylurea (MET+SU) concomitantly. The index date was the first dispensing of MET+SU after 6 months of eligibility. Clinical characteristics were assessed during baseline. Quality measure attainment (A1C <8%, BP <140/90 mm Hg, LDL-C level <100 mg/dL, BMI <30 kg/m²), was evaluated during the 12 months following the index date. Association between attainment and diabetes-related costs was evaluated using non-parametric bootstrap methods adjusting for imbalance in baseline characteristics between cohorts. RESULTS: Among 2044 patients, including 1283 patients 65 years and older, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and cardiovascular disease were the most common baseline comorbidities. Quality measure goal attainment was 63.9% for A1C, 33.1% for BP, 68.2% for LDL-C level, and 34.4% for BMI, and was associated with significantly lower diabetes-related costs per patient per year compared with nonattainment (adjusted mean cost differences: -$1445 for A1C; -$1218 for BMI; -$2029 for A1C and BMI; -$2073 for A1C, BMI, and BP; all P <.05). CONCLUSION: This study highlights the high incidence of comorbidities and potential financial implications of attaining T2DM quality outcomes.

Resource utilization and costs following hospitalization of patients with chronic heart failure in the US.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in its management and the identification of preventable risk factors, heart failure (HF) is a growing health problem in the US. The objective of this study was to describe treatment patterns, medical resource utilization and costs following hospitalization for chronic HF for patients stratified by age. METHODS: Patients with at least one hospitalization with chronic HF were identified in a US commercial insurance claims database from 2004-2008. Patients were followed from the 1st day of chronic HF hospitalization (index hospitalization) until disenrollment or end of data availability. Inpatient, outpatient and prescription drug utilization rates were calculated per person per month (PPPM). Costs included payments made by insurers and, where available, patient out-of-pocket payments and sick-leave costs were also calculated. Utilization rates and costs were stratified by patient age. RESULTS: There were 7814 patients included in the study. Index hospitalization was the most resource intensive and expensive ($31,023 age <65, $12,426 age ≥ 65). The rate of outpatient visits was the highest within 3 months following index hospitalization (3.6/PPPM age <65, 4.1/PPPM age ≥ 65). For the older age group, rate of re-hospitalizations was highest (0.06/PPPM) within 3-6 months following index hospitalization, while the younger group had its highest rate (0.08/PPPM) during the first 3 months following index hospitalization. Prescription dispensing rates were similar between age groups; average reimbursement PPPM for cardiovascular drugs did not exceed $92 (age <65) and $221 (age ≥ 65), which represents less than 3% of hospitalization costs for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treating chronic HF patients is resource intensive. The greatest burden occurs within 6 months after index hospitalization for both age groups; patients continue to be burdened after hospitalization by high inpatient and outpatient visit rates. Outpatient cardiovascular drug costs account for a small proportion of total healthcare costs.

Costs associated with angiogenesis inhibitor therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma in clinical practice: results from a medical chart review study.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate costs for treatment of mRCC patients receiving angiogenesis inhibitors (AI) using resource utilization data from medical charts. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed in two U.S. tertiary oncology centers. Non-trial mRCC patients treated from 04/2003 to 06/2008, ≥ 18 years old, and with ≥ 1 prescription for sunitinib (SU; n = 57), sorafenib (SOR; n = 62), or ≥ 1 intravenous (i.v.) administration bevacizumab (BEV; n = 25) as first AI were included. Per-patient-per-month (PPPM) costs ($2008) were estimated for drug, i.v. administration, office visits, procedures, and AE treatments. AI drug costs were estimated by applying Average Wholesale Price to treatment course. Office visit and procedure costs were based on private insurance reimbursement. Hospitalization costs were based on HCUP National Inpatient Sample charges for AEs and were converted to costs. ER visit cost was based on national average from Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. RESULTS: Median treatment duration (mo) was 10.5 (SU), 8.1 (SOR), 7.9 (BEV). Average daily oral dosage was 32 mg (SU), 690 mg (SOR); average dose per i.v. administration was 871 mg (BEV). Total PPPM costs were $7,945 (SU), $6,990 (SOR), $15,189 (BEV). AI drugs accounted for the majority of PPPM costs ($5,639 [SU], $5,214 [SOR], $13,664 [BEV]), followed by procedures ($1,420 [SU], $1,004 [SOR], $749 [BEV]), and AE treatments ($729 [SU], $636 [SOR], $291 [BEV]). CONCLUSIONS: BEV patients incurred about twice the cost of SU patients and more than twice the cost of SOR patients, mainly due to higher drug and i.v. administration costs. Patients who received SU incurred the highest cost for AE management.

Predictors of response to sequential sunitinib and the impact of prior VEGF-targeted drug washout in patients with metastatic clear-cell renal cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that can be used to identify metastatic clear cell RCC patients more likely to benefit from sequential sunitinib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified patients who failed sorafenib or bevacizumab and subsequently received sunitinib. We looked at objective response rates (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) to sunitinib in relation to baseline clinical variables. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients received sunitinib sequential therapy. Median duration of follow-up after starting sunitinib was 9.3 months. Median PFS was 5.8 months; median OS was not reached. Significantly higher ORR was seen in patients with normal hemoglobin (25.6%) [defined as >12 gm/dl for female; >13 gm/dl for male]. In addition, a shorter PFS for patients with low hemoglobin, and patients with time from diagnosis to first treatment ≤ 1 year was found. There was a shorter OS for patients ≥ 60 years old, with brain metastasis, low hemoglobin, and time from diagnosis to treatment ≤ 1 year. There was no difference in ORR, PFS, or OS in patients who started sunitinib after or within a 30-day period. CONCLUSIONS: Metastatic clear-cell RCC patients with anemia have less clinical benefit from sequential sunitinib after failure of bevacizumab or sorafenib. Other factors associated with poor outcome include brain metastases, older age, and <1 year between diagnosis and first treatment. Importantly, no difference in outcomes was observed if sequential therapy was initiated within or after 30 days. External validation and prospective evaluation are needed to confirm these findings.

Hospital visits and costs following outpatient treatment of CAP with levofloxacin or moxifloxacin.

BACKGROUND: Hospital admissions (inpatient and emergency room) are a major source of medical costs for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) initially treated in the outpatient setting. Current CAP treatment guidelines do not differentiate between outpatient treatment with levofloxacin and moxifloxacin. OBJECTIVE: Compare health care resource use and medical costs to payers for CAP outpatients initiating treatment with levofloxacin or moxifloxacin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: CAP episodes were identified in the PharMetrics database between 2Q04 and 2Q07 based on: pneumonia diagnosis, chest X-ray and treatment with levofloxacin or moxifloxacin. Subsequent 30-day risk of pneumonia-related hospital visits and 30-day health care costs to payers for levofloxacin vs. moxifloxacin treatment were estimated after adjusting for pre-treatment demographics, health care resource use and pneumonia-specific risk factors using propensity score and exact factor matching. RESULTS: A total of 15,472 levofloxacin- and 6474 moxifloxacin-initiated CAP patients were identified. Among 6352 matched pairs, levofloxacin treatment was associated with a 35% reduction in the odds of pneumonia-related hospital visits (odds ratio = 0.65, P = 0.004), lower per-patient costs for pneumonia-related hospital visits (102 dollars vs. 210 dollars, P = 0.001), lower pneumonia-related total costs (medical services and prescription drugs, 363 dollars vs. 491 dollars, P < 0.001) and lower total costs (1308 dollars vs. 1446 dollars, P < 0.001) vs. moxifloxacin over the 30-day observation period. LIMITATIONS: Although observational analyses of claims data provide large sample sizes and reflect routine care, they do have several inherent limitations. Since randomization of subjects is not possible, adequate statistical techniques must be used to ensure that patient characteristics are well-balanced between treatment groups. In addition, data may be missing or miscoded. CONCLUSIONS: CAP outpatients initiated with levofloxacin generated substantially lower costs to payers compared to matched patients initiated with moxifloxacin. The cost savings for patients initiated with levofloxacin were largely attributable to reduced rates of pneumonia-related hospitalization or ER visits.