Riboneogenesis in yeast.

Glucose is catabolized in yeast via two fundamental routes, glycolysis and the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway, which produces NADPH and the essential nucleotide component ribose-5-phosphate. Here, we describe riboneogenesis, a thermodynamically driven pathway that converts glycolytic intermediates into ribose-5-phosphate without production of NADPH. Riboneogenesis begins with synthesis, by the combined action of transketolase and aldolase, of the seven-carbon bisphosphorylated sugar sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphate. In the pathway's committed step, sedoheptulose bisphosphate is hydrolyzed to sedoheptulose-7-phosphate by the enzyme sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase (SHB17), whose activity we identified based on metabolomic analysis of the corresponding knockout strain. The crystal structure of Shb17 in complex with sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphate reveals that the substrate binds in the closed furan form in the active site. Sedoheptulose-7-phosphate is ultimately converted by known enzymes of the nonoxidative pentose phosphate pathway to ribose-5-phosphate. Flux through SHB17 increases when ribose demand is high relative to demand for NADPH, including during ribosome biogenesis in metabolically synchronized yeast cells.

Physician perspectives of Helicobacter pylori diagnostic and treatment practices in Canada: results of a Canadian survey.

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori infection is prevalent worldwide and can lead to peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and gastric cancer. Effective diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori infection by gastroenterologists and family physicians is crucial. However, there are differing views on optimal diagnosis and treatment. The objective of this study is to understand the impressions of Canadian physicians regarding H. pylori diagnosis and treatment and whether impressions differ between gastroenterologists and family physicians. A second objective is to understand physician perspectives on rising antibiotic resistance and how that guides empiric management. METHODS: A survey facilitated via REDCap was administered to Canadian gastroenterologists and family physicians. A total of 105 participants completed the survey, including 43 gastroenterologists and 62 family physicians. Gastroenterologists were recruited from across the country and family physicians were recruited from Manitoba. RESULTS: For diagnosis of H. pylori, 67% of gastroenterologists reported endoscopic biopsies for histology assessment as most common and 73% of family physicians reported serology as their main diagnostic test. While nearly all gastroenterologists believed antibiotic resistance to be a problem, nearly one quarter of family physicians did not believe it was a problem. CONCLUSIONS: There is variability in practices among both gastroenterologists and family physicians regarding diagnosis of H. pylori infection. There was consensus that local antibiotic resistance patterns should guide management. If known, the degree and patterns of antibiotic resistance could bring a more uniform consensus to H. pylori management. Greater education of physicians, especially family physicians regarding management of H pylori is needed.

Prevalence and management of dyslipidemia in primary care practices in Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence of dyslipidemia and to describe its management in Canadian primary care. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using primary care electronic medical record data. SETTING: Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 40 years or older who saw a Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network contributor between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2019. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Presence or absence of dyslipidemia as identified by a validated case definition and the treatment status of patients identified as having dyslipidemia based on having been prescribed a lipid-lowering agent (LLA). RESULTS: In total, 50.0% of the 773,081 patients 40 years of age or older who had had a primary care visit in 2018 or 2019 were identified as having dyslipidemia. Dyslipidemia was more prevalent in patients 65 or older (61.5%), in males (56.7%) versus females (44.7%), and in those living in urban areas (50.0%) versus rural areas (45.2%). In patients with documented dyslipidemia, 42.8% had evidence of treatment with an LLA. Stratifying patients by Framingham risk score revealed that those in the high-risk category were more likely to have been prescribed an LLA (65.0%) compared with those in the intermediate-risk group (48.7%) or the low-risk group (22.8%). The strongest determinants of receiving LLA treatment for dyslipidemia include sex, with males being 1.95 times more likely to have been treated compared with females (95% CI 1.91 to 1.98; P<.0001); and body mass index, with those with obesity having a significantly increased likelihood of being treated with an LLA (adjusted odds ratio of 1.36, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.41; P<.0001). CONCLUSION: This study provides an updated look at the prevalence and treatment of dyslipidemia among Canadians. Half of patients aged 40 years or older have dyslipidemia, with an even higher prevalence observed among adults aged 65 years or older, males, and those with obesity or other chronic conditions. There are still gaps in treatment among those with documented dyslipidemia, principally among those calculated to have high or intermediate Framingham risk scores. Particular attention should also be paid to those at higher risk for not receiving treatment, including female patients and those within normal body mass index ranges.

An analysis of sex differences and socioeconomic deprivation among Canadian children with high blood pressure: a retrospective, cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Understanding which children are at highest risk for high blood pressure (HBP) can inform surveillance and treatment. This study evaluated sex differences in childhood HBP and its associations with socioeconomic status. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study assessed 74,233 children with data from a national primary care electronic medical record database. Differences between sex and material and social deprivation scores for children with and without HBP were examined. Covariates included age, BMI z-score, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and depression. HBP was defined as > 90th percentile for < 13-year-olds, and ≥ 120/80 for age ≥ 13 years on 2 separate occasions between 2010 and 2017. RESULTS: The prevalence of HBP was 10.2% in males and 7.6% in females (p < 0.0001). Children with HBP had higher BMI z-scores (0.66 vs. 0.18, p < 0.0001), and higher rates of diabetes (1.31 vs. 0.54%, p < 0.0001), depression (9.89 vs. 7.11%, p < 0.0001), and hyperlipidemia (2.82 vs. 0.86%, p < 0.0001). In univariate regression analyses, boys in the most materially deprived quintile had increased odds of HBP (OR 1.24 (95% CI 1.08-1.43)), whereas females did not (OR 1.11 (95% CI 0.95-1.29)). In multivariate regression, male sex was associated with HBP with adjusted OR of 1.39 (95% CI 1.24-1.55). After statistical adjustment, material deprivation was no longer significant (aOR 1.05, 95% CI 0.94-1.17). CONCLUSIONS: Male sex is associated with HBP in Canadian children. This study also suggests a possible association between material deprivation and HBP, particularly in boys. Further study is required to better understand this relationship. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Evaluation of BASE eConsult Manitoba: patient perspectives on the use of electronic consultation to improve access to specialty advice in Manitoba.

BACKGROUND: The burden of waiting to access specialist expertise may contribute to poorer health outcomes and causes distress for patients and providers. One solution to improve access to specialist care is to use innovative tools such as remote asynchronous electronic consultation (eConsult). Modeled after the Champlain BASE™ (Building Access to Specialist Advice) eConsult service, BASE™ eConsult Manitoba was launched in 2017 to help address long waits for patients to access specialist advice. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate patients' experiences after obtaining a BASE™ eConsult Manitoba service in their primary care setting. METHODS: Patients whose Primary Care Providers (PCPs) used BASE™ eConsult as part of their care were asked to participate and complete a telephone-based or online 29-question survey between January 2021 and October 2021. The survey questions were created in consultation with patient partners and based on questions asked in studies done in other jurisdictions. RESULTS: Of the 36 patients who chose to participate, 29 completed the entire survey (80%). Two-thirds (n = 22) agreed that eConsult has been helpful in their situation, and over 80% (n = 24) of participants agreed that eConsult was an acceptable way to access specialist care. During the visit when their PCP sent the eConsult, 7 patients were expecting to be referred to a specialist for a face-to-face consultation. Over half of all respondents (n = 15) reported that before the eConsult occurred, their PCP asked them what questions they wanted to be answered by the specialist. Almost all of these respondents' questions were fully answered by the eConsult. All of the respondents were satisfied with the experience of receiving an eConsult. CONCLUSION: Using eConsult is an acceptable way to improve access to specialist advice from patients' perspectives. Consideration should be given to expanding the use of eConsult services to improve access to specialist expertise for PCPs and their patients.

Psychiatric consultation: Characteristics, satisfaction, and perceived opportunities among referrers to a 1-time service.

OBJECTIVE: To further understand and optimize primary care provider (PCP) referrals to a 1-time psychiatric consultation service by developing profiles of PCP referrers, assessing PCP satisfaction with the service, and determining intervention opportunities. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a referral database and subsequent cross-sectional survey of referrers. SETTING: Winnipeg, Man. PARTICIPANTS: All family physicians who had made at least 1 referral in 2017 to the Centralized Psychiatric Consultation Service for Adults, a 1-time consultation service. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Referral frequency, individual and practice characteristics, satisfaction with the Centralized Psychiatric Consultation Service for Adults, and subjective drivers of referral activity were assessed. Interest in a range of intervention opportunities to increase mental health knowledge and support were also examined. RESULTS: Of the 403 family physicians who referred patients to the consultation service in 2017, a total of 111 (27.5%) responded to the survey. Among all referrers, 287 (71.2%) were low referrers (1 to 4 referrals), 65 (16.1%) were moderate referrers (5 to 9 referrals), and 51 (12.7%) were high referrers (≥10 referrals). Solo practice (P=.04) and no access to collaborative mental health services (P<.001) were significantly associated with being a high referrer. Roughly 26.3% of low referrers, 29.2% of moderate referrers, and 15.4% of high referrers were satisfied with wait times for the service. Higher referrers did not identify a lack of comfort with providing psychiatric care as a driver of referrals; more indicated that they had a high volume of patients with mental health needs, that there was a lack of access to alternative services, and that patients sometimes requested referral. Overall, more than 40% of respondents expressed interest in a mental health care navigator, hard-copy resource information, and rapid access to consultation advice via telephone or an electronic platform. There was less interest in other proposed interventions. CONCLUSION: We found referrers to the Centralized Psychiatric Consultation Service for Adults to be clustered based on specific practice characteristics, as well as provider-patient factors. Overall, satisfaction with the service was fair and PCPs were not highly interested in a variety of proposed interventions. Future studies should explore how useful 1-time consultation services are for solo-practising PCPs and how best to support these and other PCPs in their management of patients with mental health needs.

Approach to atrial fibrillation: Essentials for primary care.

OBJECTIVE: To support family physicians in preventing atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients at risk and in identifying and managing those with established AF; and to summarize key recommendations for ideal screening and care of patients. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society and Canadian Heart Rhythm Society comprehensive guidelines for the management of AF, based on current evidence and clinical experience related to AF. MAIN MESSAGE: Atrial fibrillation, which is estimated to affect at least 500,000 Canadians, is associated with high risks of stroke, heart failure, and death. Primary care clinicians occupy a central role in the management of this chronic condition, focusing on the challenges of preventing AF and identifying, diagnosing, treating, and following patients with AF. Evidence-based guidelines that provide optimal management strategies have been published by the Canadian Cardiovascular Society and Canadian Heart Rhythm Society to assist in these tasks. Messages critical to primary care are offered to support effective knowledge translation. CONCLUSION: Most patients with AF can be managed effectively in primary care. Family physicians not only play an important role in ensuring patients with AF receive timely diagnoses, but they are also key to providing initial and ongoing care, especially in patients with comorbid conditions.

Use of Benzodiazepines and Z-Drugs in Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

INTRODUCTION: We estimated the incidence and prevalence of benzodiazepine and Z-drug (separately and jointly as BZD) use in the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) population compared with matched controls without IBD and examined the association of mood/anxiety disorders (M/ADs) with the use of BZD from 1997 to 2017. METHODS: Using administrative data from Manitoba, Canada, we identified 5,741 persons with incident IBD who were matched in a 1:5 ratio to controls on sex, birth year, and region. Validated case definitions were used to identify M/AD. Dispensations of BZD were identified. Multivariable generalized linear models were used to assess the association between IBD, M/AD, and BZD use. RESULTS: In 2016, the incident age/sex-standardized benzodiazepine use rates per 1,000 were 28.06 (95% confidence interval [CI] 26.41-29.81) in the IBD cohort and 16.83 (95% CI 16.28-17.39) in controls (adjusted rate ratio = 1.69 [95% CI 1.56-1.79]). Benzodiazepine incidence rates were higher for women with IBD than men, but the RR between cases and controls were similar for men and women. The incident age/sex-standardized Z-drug use rate per 1,000 was 21.07 (95% CI 19.69-22.41) in the IBD cohort. This was 1.87-fold higher than in controls (95% CI 1.73-2.01). In 2017, approximately 20% of persons with IBD used benzodiazepines and 20% used Z-drugs. There was a subadditive effect of both benzodiazepine and Z-drug uses between IBD and M/AD after adjusting for covariates. DISCUSSION: The use of BZD is more common in people with IBD than in population controls. Strategies to reduce the use of BZDs in persons with IBD and to offer alternative management strategies for M/ADs, sleep disorders, and other symptomatic concerns are needed.

Randomized controlled trial of an audit and feedback cycle to improve adherence to Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations.

Context: Choosing Wisely Canada (CWC) aims to engage healthcare providers to reduce unnecessary care. Reducing overuse of antimicrobials and antipsychotics in patients with dementia in primary care settings remains an ongoing challenge. Audit and Feedback (A&F) interventions can facilitate practice change but can be improved by understanding factors affecting the likelihood of uptake of the feedback. Objective: To assess the impact of A&F interventions to reduce unnecessary prescribing of antibiotics and antipsychotics use and evaluate whether practice changes remain stable over time. Design: Clustered randomized controlled trial. Dataset: The Manitoba Primary Care Research Network (MaPCReN), a practice-based network that includes a repository containing de-identified EMR data from over 288,000 Manitobans. Population: Primary care providers participating in MaPCReN were randomized to three A&F groups: 1) Information on the relevant CWC recommendations; 2) practice specific data along with general information regarding the CWC recommendations 3) No CWC information. Outcome Measures: Statistics demonstrating changes in target prescriptions. Multivariate regression assessed characteristics of providers with improved prescribing. Results: 182 primary care providers were evaluated, 86.3% decreased the number of target prescriptions. More providers decreased prescribing in group1 (88.9%) or group2 (94.0%) compared to the control group 3 (76.7%) (p-value 0.02). There was no statistically significant difference between practice specific feedback and generic CWC information. An average of 46 antibiotic medications per provider were prescribed for viral indications in 2014/2015. This dropped to 15 in 2016/17 and was 18 in 2018/19. An average of 3 antipsychotic medications were prescribed for patients with dementia in 2014/2015. This dropped 7% in 2016/17 and remained stable in 2018/19. There were no statistically significant provider characteristics when considering all providers with improved prescribing, but male, rural and fee for service providers were more likely to decrease prescribing greater than the mean. Conclusion: Both practice specific and generic A&F information sent directly to primary care providers by a trusted source reduced potentially unnecessary prescriptions. This supports ongoing engagement with primary care providers in practice-based research networks to improve care and promote sustained practice changes.

Primary care provider diagnosed eczema within electronic medical records from seven canadian provinces.

Context: Most epidemiological research on eczema has largely relied on patient survey data. With the increasing use of electronic medical records (EMR) in primary care, there has been a shift in epidemiological research towards the use of validated case definitions to study disease. Objective: Apply a validated case definition for eczema to EMR data from primary care providers participating in the Canadian Primary Care Sentential Surveillance Network (CPCSSN) to determine the prevalence of diagnosed eczema in Canada and describe patient's characteristics including risk factors and comorbidities. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Dataset: EMR data from 1,574 primary care providers in seven Canadian provinces. Population Studied: Patient records were examined for those with at least one encounter with a family physician, nurse practitioner or community pediatrician participating in CPCSSN between January 1, 2017, and December 31, 2019 (N= 689,301 patients). Outcome Measures: Primary outcome was lifetime prevalence of eczema. Secondary outcomes were demographics of eczema patients and the association between eczema and various comorbidities. Results: Descriptive statistics revealed a lifetime prevalence of documented eczema of 11.6% overall, 15.1% in those <19 years, and 11.5% in those >19 years. Patients with eczema were more likely to be smokers. Using the Material and Social Deprivation Index we found eczema was more prevalent among the least materially and socially deprived quintiles. In logistic regression, female patients (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.27-1.32) and patients <19 years (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.19-1.35) had higher odds of eczema compared to male patients and patients aged >19 years. Patients with comorbidities such as rhinitis (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 2.06-2.17), asthma (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.37-1.43), any allergy (OR, 1.09, 95% CI 1.06-1.11), COPD (OR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.06-1.14) and anxiety (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.63-1.69) had higher odds of eczema compared to patients without these comorbidities. Depression (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98) and obesity (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.94-0.98) were negatively associated with a diagnosis of eczema. Conclusion: This is the first study in Canada to determine the prevalence of primary care provider documented eczema using EMR data. This study can inform and improve disease surveillance as well as future studies exploring burden of illness, trends or interventions related to eczema care in Canada.

Characterizing posttraumatic stress disorder in primary care using electronic medical records: a retrospective cohort study.

Context: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a chronic mental health disorder associated with significant morbidity and economic cost. Primary care providers are frequently involved in the ongoing management of patients experiencing PTSD, as well as related comorbid conditions. Despite recognized need to enhance PTSD management in primary care settings, knowledge regarding its prevalence in these settings is limited. Objective: To apply a validated case definition of PTSD to electronic medical records (EMRs) of family physicians and nurse practitioners participating in the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN). Study Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Dataset: This study accessed de-identified EMR from 1,574 primary care providers participating in the CPCSSN. Population Studied: The study population included all patients with at least one visit to a primary care provider participating in the CPCSSN between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2019 (N = 689,301). Outcome Measures: We identified patients with PTSD and described associations between PTSD and patient characteristics (including sex, age, geography, depression, anxiety, medical comorbidities, substance use and social and material deprivation) using multivariable logistic regression models. Results: Among the 689,301 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 8,213 (1.2%) had a diagnosis of PTSD. Patients with PTSD were significantly more likely to reside in an urban location (84.9% vs. 80.4%; p-value <.0001) and have one or more comorbid conditions (90.8% vs. 70.2%; p-value <.0001). On multivariable logistic regression analysis, patients with depression (OR 4.8; 95%CI 4.6-5.1) and anxiety (OR 2.2; 95%CI 2.1-2.3) had increased odds of having PTSD compared to patients without depression or anxiety. Patients with alcohol (OR 1.8; 95%CI 1.6-1.9) and drug (OR 3.1; 95%CI 2.9-3.3) use disorders had significantly higher odds of PTSD compared to patients without these disorders. Patients in the most deprived neighborhoods based on census data had 4.2 times higher odds of have PTSD (95%CI 3.2-5.43) compared to patients in the least deprived areas. Conclusions: This is the first study to describe PTSD prevalence in a large Canadian sample of primary care patients using an EMR-based case definition. Characterizing patients with PTSD in primary care may improve disease surveillance and inform the interdisciplinary care required to manage PTSD symptoms.

The COVID-19 pandemic: Adverse effects on the social determinants of health in children and families.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of social determinants on the experience of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic within the pediatric population, how this impact may influence the long-term health and security of children, and what measures can be taken to ameliorate this impact moving forward. DATA SOURCES: Nonsystematic review of relevant literature and news sources. STUDY SELECTIONS: Relevant literature and news sources. RESULTS: There have been increases in housing insecurity and food insecurity during the pandemic, including global increases in poverty. Public policies such as school closures have had a disproportionate impact on those facing adverse social determinants. There has been a dramatic increase in reports of abuse-related injuries and other injuries indicative of child abuse during the pandemic. In addition, there are disproportionate impacts of COVID-19 based on race and ethnicity within the United States. It is clear that children are facing more adverse determinants as a result of this pandemic and that there are both short-term and long-term implications associated. For those living in poverty or with other adverse social determinants of health, the pandemic has made a bad situation worse. Ongoing studies are required to measure the impact of COVID-19 on those with adverse social determinants, in particular among children. CONCLUSION: Social determinants of health must be part of pandemic research priorities, public health and vaccination goals, and economic policy implementation. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has further served to shed a light on the broad disparities that exist within our society and their direct and indirect impacts on health outcomes.

Characterizing primary care patients with posttraumatic stress disorder using electronic medical records: a retrospective cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) has significant morbidity and economic costs. This study describes the prevalence and characteristics of patients with PTSD using primary care electronic medical record (EMR) data. METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study used EMR data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network (CPCSSN). This study included 1,574 primary care providers located in 7 Canadian provinces. There were 689,301 patients that visited a CPCSSN provider between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2019. We describe associations between PTSD and patient characteristics using descriptive statistics, chi-square, and multiple logistic regression models. RESULTS: Among the 689,301 patients included, 8,817 (1.3%, 95% CI 1.2-1.3) had a diagnosis of PTSD. On multiple logistic regression analysis, patients with depression (OR 4.4, 95% CI 4.2-4.7, P < 0.001), alcohol abuse/dependence (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.6-1.9, P < 0.001), and/or drug abuse/dependence (OR 2.6, 95% CI 2.5-2.8, P < 0.001) had significantly higher odds of PTSD compared with patients without those conditions. Patients residing in community areas considered the most material deprived (OR 2.1, 95% CI 1.5-2.1, P < 0.001) or the most socially deprived (OR 2.8, 95% CI 2.7-5.3, P < 0.001) had higher odds of being diagnosed with PTSD compared with patients in the least deprived areas. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of PTSD in Canadian primary care is 1.3% (95% CI 1.25-1.31). Using EMR records we confirmed the co-occurrence of PTSD with other mental health conditions within primary care settings suggesting benefit for improved screening and evidence-based resources to manage PTSD.

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a mental health disorder with symptoms presenting after having experienced or witnessed a traumatic event. PTSD symptoms continue for more than 1 month after the event and negatively impact the health and social wellbeing of an individual. Primary care, including family doctors, nurse practitioners, and community paediatricians, are often the first point of healthcare for an individual. This study found that PTSD is diagnosed and managed in primary care. Patients with PTSD had comorbidities, substance use, and visited their primary care provider more frequently. Additionally, patients with PTSD often live in a community area that is experiencing high material and social deprivation. The presence of PTSD in primary care suggests the need for new and additional evidence-based resources to assist in managing this complex condition.

Increasing likelihood of prescribing recommended lipid management: Primary care providers' participation in cardiology continuing medical education.

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether participation in a series of cardiology continuing medical education (CME) activities affects primary care providers' (PCPs') lipid management for their patients. DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study used a database of participation in cardiology CME activities (2011 to 2017) linked to electronic medical records. Statistical analyses were completed using logistic regression with generalized estimating equations. SETTING: Manitoba. PARTICIPANTS: Patients receiving care from 225 PCPs participating in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Recommended lipid management was defined as prescription of statins (yes or no) among patients diagnosed with cardiovascular disease (CVD), patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM; 40 years or older), and patients diagnosed with chronic kidney disease (CKD; 50 years and older) in 2017. Treatment was identified using the ATC (Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical) system (ATC code C10AA or C10B). RESULTS: After adjusting for relevant confounders, the odds of prescribing statins to patients with CVD, DM, or CKD among PCPs who did not participate in the cardiology CME activities were 50%, 55%, and 67% lower, respectively, than among PCPs who participated in 2 or more activities. The odds of prescribing statins to patients with CVD and DM among PCPs who participated in only 1 cardiology CME activity were also 67% and 63% lower, respectively, than among PCPs who participated in 2 or more activities. CONCLUSION: Results suggested that PCPs who participated in 2 or more cardiology CME activities were more likely to prescribe recommended lipid management (statins) for adults with CVD, DM, or CKD.

Primary medication nonadherence in a large primary care population: Observational study from Manitoba.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze primary medication nonadherence across several prescription indications and test the predictors of drug nonadherence in an adult primary care population. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study using primary care provider prescriptions linked to pharmacy-based dispensing data from 2012 to 2014. SETTING: Manitoba. PARTICIPANTS: Patients in the Manitoba Primary Care Research Network. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of primary medication nonadherence by drug class. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to test the associations of patient demographic and clinical or provider characteristics with primary medication nonadherence. The C statistic was used to assess the models' discriminative performance. RESULTS: A total of 91,660 unique prescriptions were assessed from a cohort of more than 200,000 patients. Primary medication nonadherence ranged from 13.7% (antidepressants) to 30.3% (antihypertensives). In conditions that typically present symptomatically (eg, infections, anxiety) nonadherence ranged from 13.7% to 17.5%. The range was 21.2% to 30.0% for medications related to asymptomatic conditions or those typically detected by screening. The discriminative performance of the models based on patient demographic, clinical, or provider characteristics was weak. CONCLUSION: Primary medication nonadherence is common, occurring more often in asymptomatic conditions. The poor predictability of the models suggests that caution is required when considering characteristic-based interventions or prediction tools to improve primary medication nonadherence.

PEER simplified chronic pain guideline: Management of chronic low back, osteoarthritic, and neuropathic pain in primary care.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a clinical practice guideline to support the management of chronic pain, including low back, osteoarthritic, and neuropathic pain in primary care. METHODS: The guideline was developed with an emphasis on best available evidence and shared decision-making principles. Ten health professionals (4 generalist family physicians, 1 pain management-focused family physician, 1 anesthesiologist, 1 physical therapist, 1 pharmacist, 1 nurse practitioner, and 1 psychologist), a patient representative, and a nonvoting pharmacist and guideline methodologist comprised the Guideline Committee. Member selection was based on profession, practice setting, and lack of financial conflicts of interest. The guideline process was iterative in identification of key questions, evidence review, and development of guideline recommendations. Three systematic reviews, including a total of 285 randomized controlled trials, were completed. Randomized controlled trials were included only if they reported a responder analysis (eg, how many patients achieved a 30% or greater reduction in pain). The committee directed an Evidence Team (composed of evidence experts) to address an additional 11 complementary questions. Key recommendations were derived through committee consensus. The guideline and shared decision-making tools underwent extensive review by clinicians and patients before publication. RECOMMENDATIONS: Physical activity is recommended as the foundation for managing osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain; evidence of benefit is unclear for neuropathic pain. Cognitive-behavioural therapy or mindfulness-based stress reduction are also suggested as options for managing chronic pain. Treatments for which there is clear, unclear, or no benefit are outlined for each condition. Treatments for which harms likely outweigh benefits for all or most conditions studied include opioids and cannabinoids. CONCLUSION: This guideline for the management of chronic pain, including osteoarthritis, low back pain, and neuropathic pain, highlights best available evidence including both benefits and harms for a number of treatment interventions. A strong recommendation for exercise as the primary treatment for chronic osteoarthritic and low back pain is made based on demonstrated long-term evidence of benefit. This information is intended to assist with, not dictate, shared decision making with patients.

Pediatric hypertension screening and recognition in primary care clinics in Canada.

Objectives: Screening for hypertension in children is recommended by pediatric consensus guidelines. However, current practice is unknown. We evaluated rates of blood pressure assessment and hypertension recognition in primary care. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated electronic medical record data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network between 2011 and 2017. Children aged 3 to <18 years with at least one clinical encounter were included. Screening, follow-up, and hypertension recognition rates were evaluated. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistical regression were used to determine patient and provider characteristics associated with increased screening and recognition of pediatric hypertension. Results: Among 378,002 children, blood pressure was documented in 33.3% of all encounters, increasing from 26.7% in 2011 to 36.2% in 2017; P=0.007. Blood pressure was documented in 76.0% of well child visits. Follow-up visits occurred within 6 months for 26.4% of children with elevated blood pressure, 57.1% of children with hypertension, and within 1 month for 7.2% of children with hypertension. Patient factors associated with increased blood pressure screening include being overweight (OR 2.15, CI 2.09 to 2.22), having diabetes (OR 1.69, CI 1.37 to 2.08), chronic kidney disease (OR 7.51, CI 6.54 to 8.62), increased social deprivation (OR 1.10, CI 1.09 to 1.11), and urban residence (OR 1.27, CI 1.15 to 1.4). Overall prevalence of hypertension was 1.9% (n=715) and of those, 5.6% (n=40) had recognized hypertension. Factors associated with increased recognition include male sex, overweight, and hyperlipidemia. Conclusions: Rates of hypertension screening and recognition are low in primary care settings in Canada, suggesting pediatric hypertension should be a priority for implementation and dissemination of interventions.

Effect of mood and anxiety disorders on health care utilization in multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the effects of changes in the presence or absence of psychiatric disorders on health care utilization in multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between "active" mood and anxiety disorders (MAD) and health care utilization in MS. METHODS: Using administrative data from Manitoba, Canada, we identified 4748 persons with MS and 24,154 persons without MS matched on sex, birth year, and region. Using multivariable general linear models, we evaluated the within-person and between-person effects of any "active" MAD on annual physician visits, hospital days, and number of drug classes dispensed in the following year. RESULTS: Annually, the MS cohort had an additional two physician visits, two drug classes, and nearly two more hospital days versus the matched cohort. Individuals with any MAD had more physician visits, had hospital days, and used more drug classes than individuals without a MAD. Within individuals, having an "active" MAD was associated with more utilization for all outcomes than not having an "active" MAD, but the magnitude of this effect was much smaller for visits and drugs than the between-person effect. CONCLUSION: Within individuals with MS, changes in MAD activity are associated with changes in health services use.

Ten tips for improving your clinical practice during the COVID-19 pandemic.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review provides ten tips for improving clinical practice during COVID-19 as pandemic fatigue begins to complicate personal and professional lives of clinicians. RECENT FINDINGS: COVID-19 has created unique and unexpected challenges to healthcare delivery, but has also provided opportunities for re-evaluation of practice patterns to optimize high-value practices. With ongoing uncertainty, key factors to appreciate for patient and population health include the continued touchstones of empathy and compassion, the use of effective risk communication with shared clinical decision-making when appropriate, attention to resource stewardship and vulnerable populations, importance of health literacy and need for critical assessment of media and medical literature to mitigate misinformation, and the hidden costs of the pandemic on children. Although there has been some international concern for allergic reactions to the recently approved Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, neither the United States Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna COVID-19 vaccine emergency use authorizations exclude patients without a specific allergy to a vaccine component from receiving vaccination. SUMMARY: Practical adjustments to practice during COVID-19 are feasible and acceptable. Experience during COVID-19 reinforces the critical need for human connection while providing care and service in every encounter.

Primary care provider-reported prevalence of vaccine and polyethylene glycol allergy in Canada.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has highlighted the importance of accurate capture of vaccine, and vaccine component, allergy. There remains a gap in the prevalence literature from the perspective of direct primary care provider (PCP) reporting at a population level. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of PCP-documented vaccine and polyethylene glycol (PEG) allergy using electronic medical record data from the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using the Canadian Primary Care Sentinel Surveillance Network repository. Machine learning algorithms were applied to evaluate for vaccine allergy documentation, and Anatomic Therapeutic Chemical codes were used for PEG allergy or allergy to common injectable medications containing PEG (CIMCP). RESULTS: The prevalence of PCP-documented vaccine allergy in Canada was 0.037% (395/1,055,677) and of PEG allergy was 0.0009% (10/1,055,677). In total, 0.01% of patients had a documented allergy to either PEG or CIMCP (135/1,055,677). None of the patients with PEG allergy had a documented allergy to a CIMCP. Patients with vaccine allergy and PEG allergy were significantly more likely to have other atopic comorbidities, including asthma (P < .001 for both), eczema (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively), rhinitis (P = .002 and P < .001, respectively), and food allergy (P < .001 for both). Significantly higher rates of depression (P < .001 and P < .001, respectively) and anxiety (P = .003 and P < .001, respectively) were found in those with vaccine allergy, or PEG allergy, than those without vaccine allergy or PEG allergy. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to estimate the prevalence of vaccine and PEG allergy in a national cohort that uses PCP documentation, revealing a low reported rate of vaccine allergy and PEG allergy.