Delivery of adjuvant sequential dose-dense FEC-Doc to patients with breast cancer is feasible, but dose reductions and toxicity are dependent on treatment sequence.

INTRODUCTION: This study prospectively investigates the impact of dose densification and altering sequence of fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide [FEC(100)] and docetaxel [Doc] on dose delivery and tolerability of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. METHODS: 117 patients with high-risk primary operable breast cancer were randomized (1:1:2:2) to conventional (three cycles of 3-weekly FEC(100) then three cycles of 3-weekly Doc 100 mg/m(2) or reverse sequence) or dose-dense (dd) treatment (four 10- to 11-day cycles of FEC(75) then four 2-weekly cycles of Doc 75 mg/m(2), or the reverse). In the dd arms, pegfilgrastim was given on day 2 of each cycle, but only as secondary prophylaxis in conventional arms. RESULTS: The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients completing intended cycles at relative dose intensity >or=85% and this was achieved by 95% of patients in each group except for the ddDoc-->FEC group (90%). Dose intensity in the dd arms increased by 48% for FEC and 11% for docetaxel, compared with the conventional arms (both P < 0.001). Doc dose reductions were more frequent with dd treatment and when Doc was given after FEC. Grade 3-4 neutropenia was significantly more frequent with conventional treatment, while fatigue and hand-foot syndrome were numerically more common with dd treatment, particularly when Doc was given after FEC. Discussion Delivery of adjuvant sequential ddFEC and Doc is feasible with growth factor support, and chemotherapy sequence appeared to affect delivery of target doses and toxicity.

Pegfilgrastim +/- ciprofloxacin for primary prophylaxis with TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy for breast cancer. Results from the GEPARTRIO study.

BACKGROUND: TAC (docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide) is associated with high incidences of grade 4 neutropenia and febrile neutropenia (FN). This analysis compared the efficacies of four regimens for primary prophylaxis of FN and related toxic effects in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant TAC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with stage T2-T4 primary breast cancer were scheduled to receive 6-8 cycles of TAC. Primary prophylaxis was: ciprofloxacin 500 mg orally twice daily on days 5-14 (n = 253 patients; 1478 cycles), daily granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) (filgrastim 5 microg/kg/day or lenograstim 150 microg/m(2)/day) on days 5-10 (n = 377; 2400 cycles), pegfilgrastim 6 mg on day 2 (n = 305; 1930 cycles), or pegfilgrastim plus ciprofloxacin (n = 321; 1890 cycles). RESULTS: Pegfilgrastim with/without ciprofloxacin was significantly more effective than daily G-CSF or ciprofloxacin in preventing FN (5% and 7% versus 18% and 22% of patients; all P < 0.001), grade 4 neutropenia, and leukopenia. Pegfilgrastim plus ciprofloxacin completely prevented first cycle FN (P < 0.01 versus pegfilgrastim alone) and fatal neutropenic events. CONCLUSION: Ciprofloxacin alone, or daily G-CSF from day 5-10 (as in common practice), provided suboptimal protection against FN and related toxic effects in patients receiving TAC. Pegfilgrastim was significantly more effective in this setting, especially if given with ciprofloxacin.

Pegfilgrastim supports delivery of FEC-100 chemotherapy in elderly patients with high risk breast cancer: a randomized phase 2 trial.

This randomized phase 2 study explored the feasibility of delivering four to six cycles of the dose-intensified regimen FEC-100 (5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide) to elderly patients with stage II-III breast cancer, using pegfilgrastim for neutrophil support. Sixty patients aged 65-77 years received single 6mg doses of pegfilgrastim on day 2 of FEC-100, either as primary prophylaxis (all cycles: PP), or as secondary prophylaxis (all cycles following a neutropenic event: SP). Neutropenic events (a composite endpoint that included grade 3 neutropenia+fever, grade 4 neutropenia, infectious complication requiring systemic anti-infectives and chemotherapy dose delay/reduction) occurred in 24/30 (80%) of the PP and 21/29 (72%) of the SP group in the first cycle. Most patients received all chemotherapy cycles at full dose on schedule (26/30 [87%] PP; 20/29 [69%] SP). These data indicate that delivery of FEC-100 is feasible with pegfilgrastim support in elderly breast cancer patients.

Febrile neutropenia and related complications in breast cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis versus current practice neutropaenia management: results from an integrated analysis.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs) reduce febrile neutropaenia (FN) incidence but may be used inconsistently in current practice (CP). This study compared the efficacy of pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis (PPP) with CP neutropaenia management in breast cancer. Individual patient data (N=2282) from 11 clinical trials and observational studies using chemotherapy regimens with > or =15% FN risk and PPP (6 mg, all cycles) or CP (no G-CSF or any cycle G-CSF/pegfilgrastim) were included in an integrated analysis. Most patients received docetaxel-containing regimens. A generalised linear mixed model was fitted (N=2210). Neutropaenia prophylaxis (PPP versus CP), age and disease stage influenced the incidence of FN. Overall, FN was less frequent with PPP than with CP (odds ratio [OR]: 0.124; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.08, 0.194; P<0.0001). Odds for cycle 1 FN, dose reductions > or =15% and FN-related hospitalisation were also significantly lower with PPP. These data support PPP in breast cancer patients receiving chemotherapy with moderately high/high FN risk.

Achieving full-dose, on-schedule administration of ACE chemotherapy every 14 days for the treatment of patients with extensive small-cell lung cancer.

Extensive small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is commonly treated with multiple cycles of chemotherapy. Reducing the time interval between cycles of chemotherapy (dose-dense chemotherapy) may improve outcomes in the treatment of extensive SCLC, as it has in other chemosensitive malignancies. To evaluate the feasibility of dose-dense chemotherapy in patients with extensive SCLC, this study evaluates a dose-dense doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide/etoposide (ACE) regimen, supported by the once-per-cycle administration of the hematopoietic growth factor pegfilgrastim. Patients received up to six 14-day cycles of ACE chemotherapy (doxorubicin 40 mg/m,(2) cyclophosphamide 1000 mg/m(2), etoposide 120 mg/m(2) on day 1 IV, plus oral etoposide 240 mg/m(2) daily on days 2-3). On day 4 of each cycle, patients received pegfilgrastim 6 mg by subcutaneous injection. Of 30 patients enrolled, 27 started chemotherapy and received pegfilgrastim. Full-dose, on-schedule chemotherapy was given to all 22 patients starting cycle 2, and in 107 (88%) of 121 cycles. Eighteen of the 27 patients (67%) received full-dose, on-schedule chemotherapy for all 6 cycles. The overall response rate was 17/27 (63%). Nine patients (33%) experienced hematologic toxicities that investigators considered severe or life-threatening. Four patients (15%) had febrile neutropenia. Full-dose, on-schedule dose-dense ACE chemotherapy is feasible with once-per-cycle pegfilgrastim support in extensive SCLC.