Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Int Immunopharmacol ; 129: 111629, 2024 Mar 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38346377

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: As a common chronic musculoskeletal condition, osteoarthritis (OA) presently lacks particular treatment strategies. The aim of this study was to examine how AT-III therapies affected macrophage repolarity in order to slow down the advancement of OA. METHODS: RAW264.7 macrophages were polarized to M1 subtypes then administered with different concentrations of AT-III. Immunofluorescence, qRT-PCR and flow cytometry were used to assess the polarization of the macrophages. The mechanism of AT-III repolarize macrophages was evaluated by western blot. Furthermore, the effects of macrophage conditioned media (CM) on the migration, proliferation, and chondrogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) were investigated using CCK-8 assays, the scratch test, and alcian blue staining. The effects of macrophage CM on chondrocyte proliferation and degeneration were investigated using CCK-8 and qRT-PCR. In vivo micro-CT and histological observations were performed on rats with anterior cruciate ligament transection and partial medial meniscectomy, either with or without AT-III treatment. RESULTS: AT-III repolarized M1 macrophages to M2 phenotype. Mechanistically, AT-III reduced the expression of Toll-like receptor(TLR) 4 induced by lipopolysaccharide in RAW264.7 and lowered nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) signaling molecules p-p65 and p-IκBα. The TLR4 agonist RS09 reversed the effects of AT-III on macrophage repolarization. AT-III-induced macrophages CM stimulated BMSCs migration, proliferation and chondrogenic differentiation. AT-III-treated macrophage CM promoted chondrocyte proliferation while inhibiting chondrocyte degeneration. In vivo, AT-III treatment alleviated the degree of synovitis, inhibited subchondral bone remodeling and reduced cartilage destruction in the rat OA model. CONCLUSIONS: AT-III attenuates OA by repolarizing macrophages through inactivating TLR4/NF-κB signaling. These data suggest that AT-III may be an effective therapeutic candidate for OA treatment.


Assuntos
NF-kappa B , Osteoartrite , Ratos , Animais , NF-kappa B/metabolismo , Receptor 4 Toll-Like/metabolismo , Sincalida/metabolismo , Sincalida/farmacologia , Sincalida/uso terapêutico , Macrófagos , Osteoartrite/tratamento farmacológico , Osteoartrite/metabolismo
2.
Front Bioeng Biotechnol ; 12: 1395197, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38962665

RESUMO

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical characteristics of the tandem spinal external fixation (TSEF) for treating multilevel noncontiguous spinal fracture (MNSF) using finite element analysis and provide a theoretical basis for clinical application. Methods: We constructed two models of L2 and L4 vertebral fractures that were fixed with the TSEF and the long-segment spinal inner fixation (LSIF). The range of motion (ROM), maximum stresses at L2 and L4 vertebrae, the screws and rods, and the intervertebral discs of the two models were recorded under load control. Subsequently, the required torque, the maximum stress at L2 and L4 vertebrae, the screws and rods, and the intervertebral discs were analyzed under displacement control. Results: Under load control, the TSEF model reserved more ROM than the LSIF model. The maximum stresses of screws in the TSEF model were increased, while the maximum stresses of rods were reduced compared to the LSIF model. Moreover, the maximum stresses of L2 and L4 vertebrae and discs in the TSEF model were increased compared to the LSIF model. Under displacement control, the TSEF model required fewer moments (N·mm) than the LSIF model. Compared to the LSIF model, the maximum stresses of screws and rods in the TSEF model have decreased; the maximum stresses at L2 and L4 in the TSEF model were increased. In the flexion condition, the maximum stresses of discs in the TSEF model were less than the LSIF model, while the maximum stresses of discs in the TSEF model were higher in the extension condition. Conclusion: Compared to LSIF, the TSEF has a better stress distribution with higher overall mobility. Theoretically, it reduces the stress concentration of the connecting rods and the stress shielding of the fractured vertebral bodies.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA