Cost of a population-based programme of chest x-ray screening for lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: After the implementation of a population-based programme of chest x-ray (CXR) screening on smokers in Varese, Italy, lung cancer (LC) mortality was significantly reduced. Analysis of the incremental costs due to this type of screening programme is needed to evaluate its economic impact on the healthcare system. METHODS: In July 1997 a population-based cohort, consisting of all high-risk smokers (n=5,815) identified among 60,000 adult residents from the Varese province, was invited to a LC screening programme (an annual CXR for five years) in a general practice setting, and was observed through 2006. Invitees received National Health Service (NHS) usual care, with the addition of CXRs in screening participants. At the end of observation, among the 245 LCs diagnosed in the entire screening-invited cohort the observed LC deaths were 38 fewer than expected. To estimate the incremental direct cost due to screening in the invited cohort for the period July 1997-2006, we compared the direct cost of screening administration, CXR screens and LC management in the invited cohort and in the uninvited and unscreened controls in NHS usual care setting. RESULTS: Over the 9.5 years, the total incremental direct healthcare costs (including screening organization/administration, CXR screens, additional procedures prompted by false-positive tests, overdiagnosed LCs) were estimated to range from euro 607,440 to euro 618,370 (in euros as of 2012), equating to between euro 15,985- euro 16,273 per patient out of the 38 LC deaths averted. CONCLUSIONS: In a general practice setting, the incremental cost for a CXR screening programme targeted at all high-risk smokers in a population of 60,000 adults was estimated to be about euro 65,000 per annum, approx. euro 16,000 for each LC death averted.

Macrothrombocytosis in cavalier King Charles spaniels.

Low platelet counts (< 150 x 10(9)/litre) have been measured by autoanalyser in cavalier King Charles spaniels with a wide range of diseases. However, the direct examination of blood smears revealed adequate numbers of platelets but many abnormally large platelets and it was not clear whether the large platelets were the result of disease or a breed abnormality. The numbers and diameters of the platelets in a group of clinically normal King Charles spaniels and a group of other breeds were measured by autoanalyser and manually. The automated platelet counts were lower in the King Charles spaniels than in the other breeds (P < 0.01), but the manual counts were similar. The platelet diameter was greater in the cavalier King Charles spaniels (median values 2.5 to 3.75 microns, P < 0.001) than the other breeds (median values 1.25 to 2.5 microns) and had a bimodal distribution with peaks at 1.25 to 2.5 microns and 3.75 to 5 microns. No clinical evidence of platelet dysfunction was detected. These findings indicate that cavalier King Charles spaniels may have large platelets which could lead to the erroneous diagnosis of thrombocytopenia by automated haematological analysis.