Lamotrigine has an anxiolytic-like profile in the rat conditioned emotional response test of anxiety: a potential role for sodium channels?

RATIONALE: Many anticonvulsants are used in disorders other than epilepsy. For example, lamotrigine is reported to be effective in post-traumatic stress disorder and mania. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the effects of the anticonvulsants lamotrigine, valproate and carbamazepine in an animal model of anxiety. We assessed a wide range of pharmacological tools to delineate the mechanism of lamotrigine's anxiolytic effect. METHODS: We assessed these compounds in the rat conditioned emotional response (CER) test of anxiety. RESULTS: Lamotrigine (30-80 mg/kg) dose-dependently and reproducibly engendered an anxiolytic response in this test, with similar efficacy to benzodiazepines. Carbamazepine (20-40 mg/kg) and riluzole (10 mg/kg), which block Na+ channels by a similar mechanism as lamotrigine, were also anxiolytic. By contrast, valproate (100-600 mg/kg) was inactive and appears to differ in its interaction with Na+ channels. The SSRI paroxetine, the GABA(A) receptor positive modulator propofol, the NMDA antagonists memantine and (+)MK-801, and the Ca2+ channel antagonist nifedipine were all inactive in the CER test, suggesting these mechanisms may not mediate the anxiolytic effect of lamotrigine. More directly, we showed that the anxiolytic effect of lamotrigine could be blocked by co-administering rats with the Na+ channel activator veratrine (0.1 mg/kg). By contrast, neither the Ca2+ channel agonist BAYK8644 (0.5 mg/kg) nor the 5-HT1A or 5-HT(1/2) antagonists WAY100635 (0.3 mg/kg) and metergoline (3 mg/kg), respectively, were able to block the effect. CONCLUSION: Lamotrigine's anxiolytic effect in the CER test may be mediated via block of Na+ channels, and this may represent a target for the development of novel anxiolytics.

The effects of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists on cognitive performance in aged monkeys.

The serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists ondansetron and SEC-579 were tested over a wide dose range (0.000001-0.5 mg/kg, PO) for cognitive-enhancing effects in aged rhesus monkeys. Animals were tested on the following cognitive and motor tasks: 1) acquisition of a visual object discrimination; 2) reversal of a visual object discrimination; 3) the delayed response task, a spatial working memory task; and 4) a fine motor task. This study found enhanced acquisition of a visual object discrimination following very low doses (0.000001-0.00001 mg/kg, PO) of either 5-HT3 receptor antagonist. This finding replicates a previous study in marmosets. However, unlike the marmoset research, no reliable improvement was found on the reversal condition. Similarly, no improvement was observed on the delayed response or fine motor tasks. No side effects were observed at any dose, consistent with reports in both animals and humans. These results suggest that 5-HT3 receptor antagonists may be helpful in treating a subset of cognitive functions.

Measurement of anxiety in transgenic mice.

A wide range of approaches has been used to study anxiety in mice. All presuppose that aversive stimuli, such as foot shock or novelty, induce a central state of fear, which can be quantified through specific behavioural and physiological measures. This review discusses the validity of the various approaches in terms of their similarity to different human anxiety disorders, their ability to detect compounds which modulate human anxiety, and their relevance to animal defensive processes. The most commonly used models of anxiety suitable for screening transgenic and knockout mice are discussed, with an emphasis placed on controlling for factors which could confound results. As all models used to date have limitations and no single paradigm adequately models all aspects of anxiety, this review recommends the use of a broad range of anxiety models in order to provide a comprehensive characterisation of the behavioural phenotype of transgenic mice.

Effects of 5-HT1A receptor agonists, partial agonists and a silent antagonist on the performance of the conditioned emotional response test in the rat.

In the present study, the effects of 5-HT1A receptor ligands with varying degrees of intrinsic activity at the 5-HT1A receptor were examined in the conditioned emotional response (CER) test and their effects compared to those of the benzodiazepine receptor agonists, diazepam and chlordiazepoxide. Diazepam (3.0 mg/kg) and chlordiazepoxide (3.0 mg/kg), and the 5-HT1A receptor partial agonists, ipsapirone (10.0 mg/kg) and gepirone (3.0 mg/kg), alleviated conditioned suppression of lever pressing. The 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist, buspirone (0.1-1.0 mg/kg), the 5-HT1A receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT (0.01-0.10 mg/kg), and the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY-100635 (0.03-3.0 mg/kg), had no effects on conditioned fear. Neither enhancing the level of food deprivation nor pretreatment with the amnesic agent scopolamine induced anxiolytic-like effects in the present CER test. The anxiolytic-like effects of ipsapirone in this test were completely reversed by WAY-100635. These results indicate that 5-HT1A agonist, but not antagonist actions, induce an anxiolytic effect in the CER test in rats.

Effects of the potassium channel blockers, apamin and 4-aminopyridine, on scopolamine-induced deficits in the delayed matching to position task in rats: a comparison with the cholinesterase inhibitor E2020.

The effects of the muscarinic antagonists, scopolamine HBr and MeBr, a cholinesterase inhibitor, E2020, and K+ channel blockers, 4-aminopyridine (4-AP) and apamin, on the performance of rats in a delayed matching to position (DMTP) task were examined. The percentage of correct choices (choice accuracy), number of trials completed and intertrial intervals were measured. Discriminability and response bias were also calculated, using signal detection analysis. Scopolamine HBr (0.1 mg/kg), but not scopolamine MeBr (0.1 mg/kg), significantly and consistently reduced the choice accuracy and discriminability, but neither affected the other measurements. E2020 (0.03-1.0 mg/kg) had no effect on the baseline performance in the DMTP task, but at 1.0 mg/kg, it significantly attenuated the deficits in choice accuracy induced by scopolamine. 4-AP (0.001-0.1 mg/kg) had no effect on either baseline performance or deficits induced by scopolamine. Apamin (0.1-0.4 mg/kg) had no effect on choice accuracy and discriminability. Apamin also failed to attenuate the scopolamine-induced deficits. When administered in combination with scopolamine, apamin at 0.4 mg/kg significantly decreased the number of trials completed and increased the intertrial interval relative to that of the control group. Taken together, these results demonstrate that K+ channel blockers (4-AP and apamin), unlike a cholinesterase inhibitor (E2020), fail to reverse the scopolamine-induced deficits in the DMTP task.

Effect of the benzodiazepine receptor agonist, zolpidem, on palatable fluid consumption in the rat.

Two experiments examined the effect of the benzodiazepine receptor agonist, zolpidem, on palatable fluid intake in water-deprived rats. In the first experiment, pretreatment with 3.0 or 10.0 mg/kg zolpidem IP was found to increase consumption of a novel glucose drink (3% d-glucose and 0.15 sodium saccharine w/v in water). The increase in fluid consumption induced with zolpidem was comparable to the increases observed with diazepam and the benzodiazepine partial agonist, FG 8205. Experiment 2 demonstrated that this zolpidem-induced increase in drinking could be observed in both naive rats and in rats that had been habituated to the glucose drink and the testing environment: pretreatment with 3.0 mg/kg PO of zolpidem was found to increase fluid consumption in rats that had received either 0 or 8 days pre-exposure to the testing conditions. Contrary to earlier reports, these results support the conclusion that zolpidem, like other benzodiazepine agonists, can directly modulate ingestive behaviour.

Dissociation between cognitive and motor/motivational deficits in the delayed matching to position test: effects of scopolamine, 8-OH-DPAT and EAA antagonists.

The effects of the muscarinic antagonists scopolamine HBr and MeBr, the 5-HT1A agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), and the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) antagonists MK-801 and CGS-19755 on performance of rats in a delayed matching-to-position task were examined. Pretreatment with scopolamine HBr (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg), resulted in a delay-dependent decrease in the percentage of correct responses and discriminability (log d), but had no effect on either the latency to complete trials, or the rate of trial completion during the fixed duration session. Scopolamine MeBr (0.1 mg/kg) did not impair percent correct or increase the response latency but did decrease the rate of trial completion. 8-OH-DPAT (up to 0.3 mg/kg), had no effect on percent correct, but did induce a small decrease in discriminability. The impairment in discriminability occurred only at a dose that substantially reduced the rate of trial completion. Both MK-801 (0.05 mg/kg) and CGS 19755 (10 mg/kg) induced a delay-independent impairment in percent correct, discriminability and a reduction in the rate of trial completion without affecting latency. A lower dose of CGS 19755 (5.0 mg/kg) induced a slight impairment in discriminability without significantly affecting the other measures. Taken together, these results demonstrate some dissociation between drug-induced cognitive and motor/motivational deficits in the DMTP test. However, the data question the specificity of putative cognitive impairments reported in many previous studies with the 5-HT1A agonist 8-OH-DPAT.

Effects of the selective angiotensin II receptor antagonists losartan and PD123177 in animal models of anxiety and memory.

There is increasing interest in the potential functional role of the octapeptide angiotensin II (AII) in psychiatric and cognitive disorders. The novel angiotensin II (AII) receptor antagonists, losartan and PD123177, selective for the AT1 and AT2 receptor subtypes respectively, constitute important pharmacological tools for the assessment of the behavioural consequences of modulation of AII function. The present series of studies investigated the effects of each compound in two animal models of anxiety, the rat elevated zero-maze and mouse light/dark box, and two models of working memory in the rat, the operant delayed matching to position (DMTP) task and the spatial reinforced alternation test in the T-maze. Our data indicate that both compounds (0.01-10 mg/kg s.c.) were without significant effect in any of the behavioural assays. Using the present methods and strains of laboratory rodents, these findings provide no support for the involvement of AII receptor function in the mediation of anxiety of working memory.

One-trial tolerance to the effects of chlordiazepoxide on the elevated plus maze may be due to locomotor habituation, not repeated drug exposure.

The phenomenon of "one-trial tolerance" to the effects of chlordiazepoxide hydrochloride (CDP) in the elevated plus maze was re-examined. Unlike previous experiments, pre-exposure to the maze resulted in habituation and a consequential reduction in time spent on the open arms. The habituation effect was measured by recording the actual distance travelled by the rats in the maze and this was found to be significantly reduced by pre-exposure. Pre-exposure to the maze in the presence of CDP resulted in a reduced response to its "anxiolytic-like" effects (increasing time on the open arms compared to vehicle control rats). However, although the time spent on the open arms was reduced by pre-exposure, CDP significantly increased the time spent on the open arms by rats pre-exposed under a non-drugged state. These results suggest that rats do not become tolerant to the effects of CDP, but rather the reduced response to CDP after pre-exposure is due to habituation of exploratory behaviour.

Lack of effect of CCKB receptor antagonists in ethological and conditioned animal screens for anxiolytic drugs.

The effects of the CCKB receptor antagonists L-365,260, CI-988 and L-740,093, a new compound with improved bioavailability and CNS penetration, were assessed for anxiolytic-like effects in three rat anxiolytic screens sensitive to benzodiazepines, the elevated plus maze (EPM), conditioned suppression of drinking (CSD) and conditioned emotional response (CER) tests. In the EPM, L-740,093 (0.1-1.0 mg/kg), L-365,260 (0.00001-10.0 mg/kg), and CI-988 (0.01-1.0 mg/kg) did not increase the time spent on the open arms of the maze or the number of entries onto the open arms. In contrast, the benzodiazepine receptor partial agonist, bretazenil (0.3-10.0 mg/kg), significantly increased both the time spent on the open arms and the number of open arm entries. In the CSD and the CER tests, L-740,093 (0.1-1.0 mg/kg) L-365,260 (0.0001-0.1 mg/kg) and CI-988 (0.01-10.0 mg/kg) failed to increase suppression ratios compared to the vehicle-treated control rats, whereas, the benzodiazepine receptor partial agonist FG 8205 (10.0 mg/kg) (CSD) and bretazenil (0.3-3.0 mg/kg) (CER) both significantly increased suppression ratios compared to vehicle-treated control rats. In addition, L-365,260 (1.0-50.0 mg/kg), CI-988 (0.1-10.0 mg/kg) and diazepam (0.1-1.0 mg/kg) were assessed in a squirrel monkey conflict procedure. Although diazepam significantly increased suppressed lever pressing rates, L-365,260 and CI-988 were without effect. The present findings provide little support for the hypothesis that CCKB receptor antagonists have anti-anxiety effects in animals.

WAY100635 and latent inhibition in the rat: selective effects at preexposure.

The influence of the selective, silent 5HT1a antagonist WAY100635 (Wyeth Research Ltd) on the latent inhibition effect was examined in a within-subject, on-baseline conditioned suppression procedure in rats. WAY100635 was found to enhance the latent inhibition effect, producing a retardation in the acquisition of conditioned suppression following a level of stimulus preexposure known to be insufficient to produce a latent inhibition effect in control animals. This influence of the drug was restricted to its actions during the preexposure phase of the experiment, and the drug also abolished the unconditioned suppression of lever pressing that occurs on the first presentation of a novel auditory stimulus. These findings are discussed in terms of the possible influence of serotonergic manipulations on contextual processing, and also have important implications for current animal models of schizophrenia which stress the role of dopaminergic mechanisms in latent inhibition.

Electrophysiological, biochemical, neurohormonal and behavioural studies with WAY-100635, a potent, selective and silent 5-HT1A receptor antagonist.

Although considerable progress has been made in characterising the 5-HT1A receptor using agonists, partial agonists or non-selective antagonists, further studies of 5-HT1A receptor function have been hindered by the lack of highly selective antagonists. The term 'silent' antagonist has been used for such compounds in order to distinguish them unequivocally from several 5-HT1A receptor partial agonists which were initially designated 'antagonists'. In this report we provide a comprehensive review of the biochemical, pharmacological and behavioural properties of the first potent, selective and silent 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY-100635 (N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl)-N-(2- pyridinyl)cyclohexanecarboxamide trihydrochloride). WAY-100635 had an IC50 (displacement of specific [3H]8-OH-DPAT binding to 5-HT1A receptors in the rat hippocampus) of 1.35 nM and was > 100-fold selective for the 5-HT1A site relative to a range of other CNS receptors. [3H]WAY-100635 was also characterised as the first 5-HT1A antagonist radioligand, displaying the same regional distribution of binding sites as [3H]8-OH-DPAT in rat brain. As would be expected for the binding of an antagonist to a G-protein-coupled receptor, the Bmax of [3H]WAY-100635 specific binding was consistently 50-60% greater than that of the agonist radioligand, [3H]8-OH-DPAT. Mn2+, but not guanine nucleotides, inhibited [3H]WAY-100635-specific binding. [3H]WAY-100635 was also shown to bind selectively to brain 5-HT1A receptors in vivo, following intravenous administration to mice. In vitro electrophysiological studies demonstrated that WAY-100635 had no 5-HT1A receptor agonist actions, but dose-dependently blocked the effects of agonists at both the postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptor in the CA1 region of the hippocampus, and the somatodendritic 5-HT1A receptor located on dorsal raphe 5-HT neurones. In vivo, WAY-100635 also dose-dependently blocked the ability of 8-OH-DPAT to inhibit the firing of dorsal raphe 5-HT neurones, and to induce the '5-HT syndrome', hypothermia, hyperphagia and to elevate plasma ACTH levels. In the mouse light/dark box anxiety model, WAY-100635 induced anxiolytic-like effects. WAY-100635 had no intrinsic effect on cognition in the delayed-matching-to-position model of short-term memory in the rat, but reversed the disruptive effects of 8-OH-DPAT on motor motivational performance. These data clearly demonstrate that WAY-100635 is the first potent, selective and silent 5-HT1A receptor antagonist. Furthermore, [3H]WAY-100635 is the first antagonist radioligand to become available for 5-HT1A receptor binding studies both in vitro and in vivo. The positive effects of WAY-100635 in an anxiety model also indicate that a postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptor antagonist action may contribute to the anxiolytic properties of 5-HT1A receptor partial agonists.

The representation of the reinforcer and the force of the pigeon's keypeck in first- and second-order conditioning.

The aim of this study was to determine whether reinforcer-specific conditioned responding would occur in a situation in which responding was not thought to be mediated by a representation that encodes information about the specific properties of the reinforcer. The force of the pigeon's keypeck was monitored during first- and second-order conditioning with either food or water as the unconditioned stimulus (US). Each pigeon was trained with four different stimuli: a first-order cue predicting that responding would be reinforced with grain (S1f), a first-order cue predicting water as the reinforcer (S1w), a second-order stimulus predicting the S1f (S2f), and a second-order cue predicting the S1w (S2w). Following conditioning, the pigeons were selectively satiated with one of the two reinforcers and presented with the first- and second-order cues in an extinction test. At the end of training, the pigeon's keypecks were less forceful to the S1w than to the S1f. There was not, however, a reliable difference between the force of the pecks to the S2f and the S2w. These force differences are consistent with the conclusion that the topography of the keypecks was systematically related to the nature of the primary reinforcer during first- but not during second-order conditioning. The results from the selective satiation test are difficult to interpret. There was no evidence to indicate that second-order responding was mediated by a detailed representation of the primary US, but a detailed representation of the reinforcer may have been mediating first-order responding. Taken together, these findings are consistent with the view that a representation of the reinforcer is an important determinant of the topography of conditioned responding.

The muscarinic receptor agonist xanomeline has an antipsychotic-like profile in the rat.

The muscarinic receptor agonist xanomeline was examined and compared with the antipsychotics clozapine and/or haloperidol in the following in vivo rat models: apomorphine-induced disruption of prepulse inhibition (PPI), amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion, and the conditioned emotional response (CER) test. The effects of xanomeline were also assessed ex vivo on dopamine turnover in the rat medial prefrontal cortex. Under conditions of varying dose and prepulse intensity, xanomeline, like haloperidol, had no effect on PPI. In contrast, the muscarinic receptor antagonist scopolamine and the muscarinic receptor agonist pilocarpine both induced significant dose-dependent deficits in PPI. Haloperidol and xanomeline, but not pilocarpine, dose dependently reversed apomorphine-induced disruption of PPI. Thus, xanomeline induced a clear antipsychotic-like effect in PPI, whereas pilocarpine appeared to induce a psychotomimetic-like effect. Xanomeline attenuated amphetamine-induced hyperactivity at doses that had no effect on spontaneous activity, possibly indicating a separation between attenuation of limbic hyperdopaminergic function and the induction of hypolocomotion. Haloperidol and clozapine also reversed amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion, but at similar doses to those that reduced spontaneous locomotion. Clozapine, but not haloperidol had an anxiolytic-like effect in the CER test. The effects of xanomeline in the CER test were similar to those of clozapine, although at the anxiolytic dose it tended to disrupt baseline levels of lever pressing. Finally, haloperidol, clozapine, pilocarpine, and xanomeline, all induced an increase in dopamine turnover in medial prefrontal cortex. The antipsychotic-like effects of xanomeline in the animal models used here suggest that it may be a useful treatment for psychosis.