RESUMO
The advent of costimulation blockade provides the prospect for targeted therapy with improved graft survival in transplant patients. Perhaps the most effective costimulation blockade in experimental models is the use of reagents to block the CD40/CD154 pathway. Unfortunately, successful clinical translation of anti-CD154 therapy has not been achieved. In an attempt to develop an agent that is as effective as previous CD154 blocking antibodies but lacks the risk of thromboembolism, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel anti-human CD154 domain antibody (dAb, BMS-986004). The anti-CD154 dAb effectively blocked CD40-CD154 interactions but lacked crystallizable fragment (Fc) binding activity and resultant platelet activation. In a nonhuman primate kidney transplant model, anti-CD154 dAb was safe and efficacious, significantly prolonging allograft survival without evidence of thromboembolism (Median survival time 103 days). The combination of anti-CD154 dAb and conventional immunosuppression synergized to effectively control allograft rejection (Median survival time 397 days). Furthermore, anti-CD154 dAb treatment increased the frequency of CD4+ CD25+ Foxp3+ regulatory T cells. This study demonstrates that the use of a novel anti-CD154 dAb that lacks Fc binding activity is safe without evidence of thromboembolism and is equally as potent as previous anti-CD154 agents at prolonging renal allograft survival in a nonhuman primate preclinical model.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais/farmacologia , Ligante de CD40/imunologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/imunologia , Imunoglobulina G/imunologia , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Animais , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Rejeição de Enxerto/etiologia , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/efeitos dos fármacos , Testes de Função Renal , Primatas , Fatores de Risco , Linfócitos T Reguladores/imunologia , Imunologia de TransplantesRESUMO
Six female patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (S.L.E.) have been treated with chlorambucil. In five the decision was taken after failure by corticosteroids to control progressive renal disease in the face of unacceptable corticosteroid toxicity. After the introduction of chlorambucil renal function improved and all patients remain well six, six, five, three, and two-and-a-half years later, respectively. On renal biopsy five had focal proliferative glomerulonephritis. Repeat biopsy in two cases showed quantitative improvement. The sixth patient was treated with chlorambucil because of failure by corticosteroids to control peripheral vascular lesions and haemolysis and she remains well four years later. In four patients is it probable that amenorrhoea was related to chlorambucil treatment, but there were no other important side effects although one patient developed a degree of marrow depression during treatment. Chlorambucil may hold advantages over the immunosuppressive drugs normally recommended in this condition, azathioprine and cyclophosphamide, as it appears less liable to cause important marrow suppression and, unlike cyclophosphamide is not associated with alopecia and haemorrhagic cystitis.