Civil detentions of older adults under successive Scottish mental health legislation: a comparative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Many countries have adopted new mental health legislation, with the detention of adults for treatment of mental disorders remaining an integral part of such policies. However, there are relatively few publications on the use of mental health legislation in the detention of older adults. This paper examines the civil detention of older adults in one Scottish region under successive mental health legislation. METHOD: This prospective study collected data primarily by clinician-based interviews on all emergency detentions under the Mental Health (Scotland) Act 1984 of older adults in 1994 and compared these with all emergency and initial short-term detentions under the Mental Health (Care and Treatment) (Scotland) Act 2003 of older adults during 2008 in the same Scottish region. RESULTS: There were a total of 124 detentions, with an initial rate of 68 increasing to 141 detentions per 100,000 of the respective over-65 year age populations, a two-fold increase. Compared to the 1994 patient cohort, the 2008 cohort had higher rates of over 85-year-olds (18.4% v 5.4%) and organic mental disorders (74.7% v 56.8%) and were significantly more likely to be detained by consultant psychiatrists (73.6% v 18.9%) during working hours (87.4% v 48.6%) and proceed to six-month detention orders (31% v 10.8%). CONCLUSION: The observed higher rates and longer periods of detention in the 2008 cohort may reflect changes in clinical attitudes and legal requirements from a previous reliance on the common law doctrine of necessity to the requirements of a more legalistic framework, and may signal future clinical requirements, given the aging population, pointing towards the need for earlier recognition and management of clinical issues in an attempt to minimize the "necessity" of clinico-legal intervention.

A psychiatric intensive care unit for older adults: an interval comparison of admissions.

BACKGROUND: Published information on psychiatric intensive care provision and requirements of older adults is limited. This audit aims to describe and compare demographic data, clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients admitted to a Scottish regional psychiatric intensive care unit (PICU) for older adults during two 18-month periods five years apart. METHOD: Data on all patients admitted to the PICU for older adults during the two sample periods, commencing 2001 and 2006 respectively, were collected prospectively by the clinical care team, and included information on previous psychiatric contact and detentions under mental health legislation, diagnoses, cognitive ratings, reasons for transfer to the PICU, treatments and outcomes. Continuous variables were subject to statistical analyses. RESULTS: Twenty-one and 20 male patients were admitted during the 2001 and 2006 cohorts respectively, with equivalent mean ages of 72.9 years. The majority of patients were married, diagnosed with dementia, with similar levels of previous psychiatric admissions and detentions under mental health legislation. The commonest reason for transfer to the PICU was physical aggression. The 2006 cohort exhibited shorter inpatient stays prior to transfer to, and shorter durations of stay in, the PICU. CONCLUSIONS: The PICU for older adults provides a function similar to the PICU for general adults. The cohorts were similar on most recorded variables, with noted differences possibly reflecting increased awareness and acceptance of the service, reduced tolerance by staff of aggressive behaviors by patients, and enhanced community services in the region. These perceptions warrant further study and clarification.