Platelet aggregatory response to platelet activating factor (PAF), ex vivo, and PAF-acetylhydrolase activity in patients with unstable angina: effect of c7E3 Fab (abciximab) therapy.

OBJECTIVE: Platelet activation and aggregation is a dominant feature in the pathophysiology of unstable angina. The final step of platelet aggregation is mediated through the platelet integrin glycoprotein IIb/IIIa (GP IIb/IIIa), while abciximab (ReoPro) is one of the most potent inhibitors of this receptor. Platelet-activating factor (PAF) is a potent platelet agonist which is degraded and inactivated by PAF-acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH). The plasma form of PAF-AH is associated with lipoproteins. We studied the platelet response to the aggregatory effect of PAF, ex vivo, in relation to the plasma PAF-AH activity in 32 patients with unstable angina, as well as the effect of abciximab therapy on the above parameters. METHODS: Thirty two patients with unstable angina and 25 sex- and age-matched healthy controls participated in the study. On the day of admission (day 1) 17 patients received a bolus of abciximab (0.25 mg/kg) followed by a 12-h infusion (10 micrograms/min). Platelet aggregation to both PAF and ADP, in platelet rich plasma, was successively studied in both patients receiving abciximab or remaining untreated. The plasma and HDL-associated PAF-AH activity was also determined at the same times. RESULTS: In the untreated patients, the PAF EC50 values were significantly lower on the day of admission, whereas the maximal percentage of aggregation was significantly higher compared to controls (p < 0.01 for both comparisons). Similar behaviour of the platelets was observed in the aggregatory effect of ADP. This aggregatory response was not significantly altered 4 days, 7 days or 1 month afterwards. In the 17 patients who received abciximab, platelet aggregation to both PAF and ADP was inhibited by 90 +/- 5 and 96 +/- 3%, respectively, 1 h after bolus. At 2 and 3 days after treatment, platelet aggregation to both agonists was significantly recovered being similar to controls. However, it was fully restored 6 days after bolus, still being significantly higher compared to controls (p < 0.01 for PAF and p < 0.003 for ADP). The total plasma PAF-AH activity in both patient groups was not different from that of controls, whereas the HDL-associated PAF-AH activity was significantly lower. The total plasma or HDL-associated enzyme activity was not altered at any time interval studied, and it was not influenced by abciximab. CONCLUSIONS: The increased aggregatory response of platelets to PAF and the low plasma levels of HDL-cholesterol and HDL-associated PAF-AH activity in patients with unstable angina may contribute to the severe atherosclerosis and to acute thrombosis found in these patients. Abciximab therapy may protect platelets from PAF action in vivo the first days after drug administration, but it fails to permanently restore the enhanced aggregatory response observed.

Treatment of refractory unstable angina in geographically isolated areas without cardiac surgery. Invasive versus conservative strategy (TRUCS study).

AIMS: We compared invasive (on-site coronary angioplasty or emergency air-ambulance transfer for bypass grafting surgery) vs conservative (persistent medical treatment) strategies in the management of refractory unstable angina in geographically isolated hospitals without cardiac surgical facilities. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred and forty eight randomized patients with refractory unstable angina were compared on an intention-to-treat basis. Outcomes (invasive vs conservative): (a) in hospital: stabilization (96% vs 43%, P=0.0001), non-fatal myocardial infarction (2.6% vs 4.2%, P=ns), death (1.3% vs 8.3%, P=0.046), combined outcome (3.9% vs 12.5%, P=0.053) and hospitalization (11.4+/-6.3 vs 12.4+/-8.0 days, P=ns). (b) 30-days follow-up: non-fatal myocardial infarction (2.6% vs 4.2%, P=ns), death (2.6% vs 11.1%, P=0.030) and combined outcome (5.3% vs 15.3%, P=0.031). (c) 12 month follow-up: non-fatal myocardial infarction (3. 9% vs 4.2%, P=ns), death (3.9% vs 12.5%, P=0.053), combined outcome (7.9% vs 16.7%, P=ns), re-admissions for unstable angina: (17.1% vs 23.6%, P=ns), late coronary angioplasty: (15.8% vs 11.1%, P=ns) and (d) late coronary bypass grafting: (7.9% vs 12.5%, P=ns). CONCLUSION: Invasive treatment of patients with refractory angina in remote areas without surgical back-up results in significant in-hospital stabilization and a reduction in major events in-hospital and at 30 days. Coronary angioplasty in stand-alone units and air-transfer of these patients seems safe.

Serum lipoprotein(a) concentrations and apolipoprotein(a) isoforms: association with the severity of clinical presentation in patients with coronary heart disease.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the possible associations between lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations or apolipoprotein(a) isoforms and the mode of clinical presentation of coronary heart disease (CHD) (acute thrombotic event or not). METHODS: A total of 131 CHD patients and 71 age- and gender-matched individuals without known CAD (free of symptoms of heart disease) were enrolled in the study. CHD patients were classified into patients with a history of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS, n=94) and patients with stable angina (SA, n=37). Lp(a) levels were measured with an ELISA method, whereas apolipoprotein(a) isoform analysis was performed (in all patients and 33 controls) by electrophoresis in 1.5% SDS-agarose gels followed by immunoblotting. Isoform size was expressed as the number of kringle 4 (K4) repeats. RESULTS: ACS patients had higher Lp(a) plasma levels 121.9 (0.8-84.1) mg/dl] and a greater proportion of elevated (> or = 30 mg/dl) Lp(a) concentrations (25.5%) compared with SA patients [9.2 (0.8-50.5) mg/dl, P < 0.01 and 10.8%, P < 0.05] and controls [8.0 (0.8-55.0) mg/dl, P < 0.01 and 11.2%, P < 0.05], while there were no differences between SA patients and controls. The median apolipoprotein(a)-isoform size was 26 K4. In 17 (10%) patients we could not detect any apolipoprotein(a) isoform bands by immunoblotting. ACS patients had a higher proportion of isoforms < 26 K4 (low molecular weight) than SA patients (56/85 vs. 12/33, P < 0.005) and controls (10/29, P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: CAD patients with a history of ACS have higher Lp(a) plasma levels and a significantly higher proportion of low molecular weight apolipoprotein(a) isoforms compared with patients with SA or to controls.